California Attorney General Bill Lockyer, October 8, 2004 . Read the brief here . Reported in JURIST's Paper Chase here.
S 2845, United States Senate, passed October 6, 2004 . Read the full text here . Reported in JURIST's Paper Chase here. This legislation must be reconciled with a pending House version before it can go to the President for signature.
Romano Prodi, President of the European Commission – The Commission's Report and Recommendation on Turkey's Application; Presentation to the European Parliament, October 6, 2004. Excerpt: As you know, the first task allotted to us by the Copenhagen European Council was to draw up a report on the extent to which Turkey meets the Copenhagen political [...]
United States District Court, District of Massachusetts. Indictment of Saajid Mohammed Badat , October 4, 2005. Read the indictment here. Reported in JURIST's Paper Chase here.
Agreement Between the United Nations and the Royal Government of Cambodia Concerning the Prosecution Under Cambodian Law of Crimes Committed During the Period of Democratic Kampuchea . Ratified by Cambodia's National Assembly October 4, 2004; signed at Phnom Penh, June 6, 2003. Read the full text of the agreement here . Reported in JURIST's Paper [...]
Judge M. Langhorne Keith, Fairfax County Circuit Court, Virginia, October 1, 2004 . Read the ruling here . Reported in JURIST's Paper Chase here.
Florida Supreme Court, September 30, 2004 . Read the ruling here . Reported in JURIST's Paper Chase here.
Judge Victor Marrero, United States Distrcit Court, Southern District of New York, September 29, 2004 . Read the opinion here. Reported in JURIST's Paper Chase here.
S 1436, State of California, signed into law September 28, 2004. Excerpt: It is the intent of the Legislature that this act protect California consumers from the use of spyware and malware that is deceptively or surreptitiously installed on their computers. Because the threats posed by these practices change over time, it is the intent [...]
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, September 28, 2004 . Read the opinion here . Excerpt: We deal here with a novel First Amendment claim. The appellants, three tobacco companies, claim that California violated their First Amendment rights by imposing a surtax on cigarettes and then using some of the proceeds of that [...]