A coalition of 78 civil rights, labor, consumer protection, technology accountability and community organizations on Monday urged the US Senate to remove existing artificial intelligence (AI) sandbox provisions from the proposed Digital Asset Market Clarity Act (CLARITY Act), warning that the measure could allow financial institutions to test AI systems without legal protections for consumers, making them effectively unaccountable.
In a letter sent July 31 to Senate Majority Leader John Thune and Minority Leader Charles Schumer, the organizations argued that the bill’s proposed “AI Innovation Labs” would create vague regulatory exemptions that could undermine civil rights laws, consumer protections, investor safeguards, and financial oversight. They added that allowing companies to experiment with AI outside established legal frameworks could leave individuals without satisfactory remedies when automated systems cause harm.
The groups stressed that their opposition is not to AI itself and acknowledged that AI can improve financial services by reducing costs, detecting fraud, increasing efficiency, and expanding access to financial products. However, they argued that AI systems should remain subject to the same legal obligations as other financial technologies.
The proposed AI Innovation Labs would operate as regulatory sandboxes, allowing companies to test AI products under reduced regulatory requirements. Supporters argue that these programs would encourage innovation by giving businesses flexibility to develop new technologies while regulators evaluate potential risks.
The AI provisions are part of the CLARITY ACT, which seeks to establish a federal regulatory framework for cryptocurrency and digital assets. The bill would divide oversight between the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), thus creating new classifications for digital assets and determining which agency has authority over different types of crypto activity.
Supporters of the CLARITY Act argue that clearer rules would reduce regulatory uncertainty, encourage investment, and preserve digital asset innovation in the US. The House passed the legislation in July 2025 by a vote of 294–134, and the bill is currently pending before the Senate.
Critics argue that the safeguards are insufficient and that the proposal shifts the risks of AI experimentation from companies to the public. Patrick Woodall, managing director of Americans for Financial Reform, said the provision could allow financial firms to deploy risky AI systems to increase profits while consumers and the economy absorb the consequences.