US federal court deems Trump’s clean energy grant cancellation illegal News
Dennis Schroeder - NREL Photographer, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
US federal court deems Trump’s clean energy grant cancellation illegal

A US federal court ruled Monday that US President Donald Trump’s cancellation of clean energy grants to 16 Democratic-led states was illegal.

In October 2025, the Department of Energy (DOE) announced that it would cancel over $7.5 billion in clean energy project grants that funded 223 projects across the country. The agency claimed that the grants funded projects that “did not adequately advance the nation’s energy needs, were not economically viable, and would not provide a positive return on investment of taxpayer dollars.”

Funds supported projects that would upgrade battery plants and the electric grid, as well as efforts to mitigate carbon dioxide emissions in 16 states that voted for former vice president Kamala Harris in the 2024 presidential election. Conversely, states that voted for Trump continued to receive grant money.

The city of Saint Paul, Minn., and environmental groups filed a joint complaint against the Trump administration, arguing that its cancellation of these grants violated the Fifth and First amendments. The case was brought to the District Court for the District of Columbia, where Judge Amit Mehta concluded that the cancellation violated equal protection. The decision cited the principle that government actions must be “rationally related to a legitimate government purpose” to be constitutionally valid.

The court concluded that while cancellation of the grants may have constituted a legitimate government purpose, the different treatment for of Democratic-led states and Republican-led states was not rationally related to that purpose. The court stated:

In fact, Defendants concede that Plaintiffs’ seven terminated grants are “comparable” to awards to grantees in Red States that were not terminated. The only identifiable difference—the grant recipient’s state’s political identity and, specifically, its electoral votes cast against President Trump—does not provide a rational basis for why Defendants chose to terminate Plaintiffs’ grants over others to advance their stated interest of aligning grant funding with agency priorities.

The decision came the same day another federal court ruled that work on an offshore wind farm, that would benefit Rhode Island and Connecticut, may resume.

THIS DAY @ LAW

President Lincoln signs Naitonal Banking Act into law

On February 26, 1863, President Abraham Lincoln signed the National Banking Act into law, creating the American banking charter system. The Act furthermore created the Office of the Comptroller of Currency (OCC) within the Treasury Department. The law was further intended to help raise money for the Civil War by pressing banks to buy federal as opposed to state bonds. The law was not as successful as intended in this regard and was soon replaced by the National Banking Act of 1864. Read the history of the OCC from the US Department of the Treasury.

Hitler put on trial for treason in Munich

On February 26, 1924, Adolf Hitler and several others were put on trial for treason in Munich in connection with an attempted coup. Learn more about the Munich (or "Beer Hall") Putsch and the subsequent trial of Hitler and his associates.