Taiwan detains journalist over alleged bribery to obtain military information for China News
bohdanchreptak / Pixabay
Taiwan detains journalist over alleged bribery to obtain military information for China

The Taiwan Ciaotou District Court on Saturday ordered the incommunicado detention of a journalist. The District Prosecutors Office accused the journalist of bribing army officers to obtain military information, in violation of the island’s National Security Act, Anti-Corruption Act, and criminal provisions regarding the disclosure of confidential information.

In a press statement, the District Prosecutors Office said they conducted a search and seizure on Friday against journalist Lin Chen-yu, and nine former and current veterans. The investigation concluded that Lin provided bribes, ranging from 1,000 to 10,000 New Taiwan Dollars, to current veterans for them to provide military information to China.

In response, CTi News, the company Lin worked for, clarified that the company had no knowledge of Lin’s alleged activities and was not the target of the investigation, urging the public not to spread misinformation.

Under Taiwan’s Criminal Procedure Act, only a court can order an incommunicado detention if it believes that the detention is necessary to prevent the suspect from colluding with other witnesses and destroying evidence. When the detention is ordered, the detainee cannot contact anyone except his defense attorney. Under international law, the UN Human Rights Committee has been calling for provisions against incommunicado detention since 1992.

Taiwan People’s Party legislator, Chang Chi-kai, called for an impartial trial, stating that this is the first time the ruling Democratic Progress Party (DPP) has cited the island’s National Security Act against a journalist, who has been committed to investigative journalism with public support. He also urged the ruling government not to repeat the island’s White Terror Period between 1949 and 1987, claiming that the ruling government had previously misused its prosecutorial power to persecute the party’s leader, Ko Wen-je, undermining judicial credibility. The corruption investigation against Ko remains ongoing, even though the Taipei District Court lifted his restriction on residence on December 24, 2025.

On the other hand, DPP legislator Puma Shen contended in a social media post that Lin was arrested for his alleged criminal activities but not for his journalism work. He added that labelling all investigations as “White Terror” will not help the fact-finding process.

These developments come as Cross-Strait relations intensify. On January 12, the island’s legislature conducted a bill review of the ruling party’s amendment to the Anti-Infiltration Act. During the review, Taiwan’s Mainland Affairs Council Deputy Minister Liang Wen-chieh said an amendment is urgent and necessary as the statute cannot list all methods of infiltration, which evolve quickly to leverage legislative gaps.

Previously, on January 7, the Chinese Communist Party expanded the list of Taiwan Independence Diehards to include the island’s internal minister and education minister. China’s Taiwan Affairs Office said the listed individuals will face criminal consequences for their secessionist activities.

THIS DAY @ LAW

Nixon nominated Harrold Carswell to the US Supreme Court

On January 19, 1970, President Richard Nixon nominated Judge G. Harrold Carswell of the US Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals to the US Supreme Court. The nomination became intensely controversial after a reporter discovered the text of a 1948 political campaign speech by Carswell in which he said "segregation of the races is proper." The Senate eventually rejected the nomination 51-45. ------------------- Afterword In November 2004, a JURIST reader wrote with regard to this entry: You are factually correct. The speech is accurately quoted. But the most significant part of it wasn't that quote -- which, after all, reflected the law of the land through Brown v. Board of Education. The most significant part was Carswell's avowal of his "firm, vigorous belief in the principles of white supremacy." I recall this because I was the reporter who discovered the speech, in the basement of the Wilkinson County courthouse in Georgia, where it was preserved as lead story in The Irwinton Bulletin, a weekly Carswell edited, which was kept because it was the legal paper of record." Edward Roeder later added: "just to ensure the accuracy of my quote from the speech -- including capitalization and punctuation -- let me check it. At the moment, I'm at the Library of Congress, a couple of blocks from my home where I have a photograph I took of the speech as printed in 1948 in the weekly newspaper. Another great quote spawned by that confirmation battle was by Sen. Judiciary Committee Ranking Republican Roman Hruska, in response to the charge that Carswell was "mediocre." Hruska famously told the cameras staked outside the hearing room: "Even if he was mediocre, there are a lot of mediocre judges and people and lawyers . . . They are entitled to a little representation, aren't they, and a little chance? We can't have all Brandeises and Cardozos and Frankfurters and stuff like that there." One other aspect of that nomination might be worth noting. After Carswell's defeat, the seat went to Harry Blackmun. A year and a half later, he wrote Roe v. Wade," probably the most controversial and far-reaching SCOTUS decision since Brown."And finally:I found and reviewed my photo of Carswell's 1948 speech. First, it may be helpful to provide a bit of context for the part you quoted. The graf read, "I Am A Southerner By Ancestry, Birth, Training, Inclination, Belief And Practice. I Believe That Segregation Of The Races is Proper And The ONLY Practical And Correct Way Of Life In Our States." The first letter of each word is capitalized, the the word ONLY is in all caps. The "white supremacy" quote, two grafs later, is as strident: "I Yield To NO MAN, As A Fellow Candidate, Or As A Fellow Citizen, In The Firm Vigirous Belief In The Principles Of White Supremacy, And I Shall Always Be So Governed." Again, the first letter of each word is capitalized, and NO MAN is in all caps. "Vigorous" is misspelled in the newspaper. JURIST thanks Mr. Roeder for sharing his recollections - and his role in a fascinating snippet of Supreme Court history.

Tribunal established for Japan war criminals

On January 19, 1946, General Douglas MacArthur promulgated the Charter for the International Military Tribunal for the Far East, creating a court in Tokyo to try Japanese war criminals after World War II. Pursuant to Article 7 of the Charter, the Court's Rules of Procedure were set three months later. The judges and prosecutors represented the allied nations of the United States, the USSR, China, the Netherlands, Canada, France, New Zealand, Australia, the United Kingdom, the Philippines, and India. Article 6 of the Charter divided the accused War Criminals into three classes. Class A war criminals were those guilty of crimes against peace. Class B war criminals were those found guilty of actual war crimes. The highest-level war criminals fell into Class C for crimes against humanity. Court prosecutors indicted over 5,700 people in Japan for Class B and C War Crimes. When the tribunal's final judgment was issued two years later on November 1, 1948, 984 of the defendants were convicted and sentenced to death. 475 of them were convicted and sentenced to life in prison, while 2,944 received lesser prison terms. Finally, 1,297 Japanese defendants were either acquitted, not tried, or not sentenced. Many Japanese defendants were indicted for their actions during the occupation of China. Read the indictment of Class A war criminals involved in the Rape of Nanking.

American Civil Liberties Union founded

The American Civil Liberties Union was founded on January 19, 1920 by a group of civil rights activists and lawyers. The group's founders included Helen Keller, labor activist Elizabeth Gurley-Flynn and future Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter. The organization would be involved in the Scopes Monkey Trial and the landmark Supreme Court decision Brown v. Board of Education. Learn more about the history of the American Civil Liberties Union.