ICC appeals chamber affirms jurisdiction to investigate alleged war crimes in Gaza News
OSeveno, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons
ICC appeals chamber affirms jurisdiction to investigate alleged war crimes in Gaza

The Appeals Chamber of the International Criminal Court (ICC), by a 3-2 majority, affirmed on Monday its jurisdiction to investigate the accusations of war crimes that took place in the Gaza Strip after the Hamas-led attack on Israel of October 7, 2023.

The majority upheld the pre-trial chamber’s decision that the alleged crimes are within the scope of the notification issued by the Prosecutor pursuant to Article 18 of the Rome Statute. The decision allows the court’s investigation in Palestine to continue, This is the same investigation that prompted the issuance of arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former defense minister Yoav Gallant.

Article 18(1) requires the Prosecutor to notify all state parties before the commencement of an investigation. The Prosecutor notified Israel on March 9, 2021, of the investigation into alleged crimes since June 2014. In an attempt to halt the investigation, Israel argued that the notification did not include events in Gaza that took place after October 7, 2023.

Rejecting Israel’s bid to appeal, the court reasoned that the notification did not limit itself to the “settlement regime” that was in place in the Occupied Palestinian Territories by 2014. The court found that the Prosecutor had explicitly stated that the subject of the investigation may include all acts that could constitute war crimes or crimes against humanity under the statute. The court also reiterated that the notice was sufficiently specific, as the Prosecutor cannot possibly identify all acts which they intend to examine at the early stage of an investigation.

The court, however, was divided on whether a new situation arose after October 7, 2023. While the majority found that nothing gave rise to a new situation that fell outside the scope of the investigation, Judge Luz Del Carmen Ibáñez Carranza and Judge Solomy Balungi Bossa dissented on the grounds that the pre-trial chamber’s failure to consider the subsequent 2023 and 2024 referrals in its original decision amounts to an error of law that warrants the case being remanded to the pre-trial chamber for reconsideration.

In response to the ruling, the Israeli Foreign Ministry said:

Israel rejects the ICC Appeals Chamber’s decision, by a narrow majority, to deny Israel’s right to receive advance notice, as demanded by the principle of complementarity particularly with regard to a democratic state with an independent and robust judicial system. This is yet another example of the ongoing politicization of the ICC and its blatant disregard for the sovereign rights of non-party States, as well as its own obligations under the Rome Statute.

The court’s jurisdiction over the situation in Palestine has been a heated topic in international law. While 79 member states of the ICC supported its operation in Gaza, the US has sanctioned ICC officials for their operation against Israel, arguing that they are not members of the ICC and the court was operating ultra vires.

Earlier this month, Human Rights Watch noted the increasing threats and sanctions faced by the ICC, and urged member states of the ICC to safeguard the court and combat impunity for international crimes.

THIS DAY @ LAW

Anglo-Irish Treaty ratified

On January 7, 1922, Dáil Éireann ratified the Anglo-Irish Treaty. Signed on December 6 of the preceding year, the treaty ended the Irish War of Independence against Great Britain. The British Parliament voted to approve the treaty on December 16, 1921. Ratification was completed on January 14, 1922, when the House of Commons of Southern Ireland became the third and final party to approve the document. The Anglo-Irish treaty effectively split the island into its current state. While the lower counties of Ireland were granted autonomy under the treaty, Britain insisted that the six Protestant counties of Northern Ireland be allowed to determine their own future. On the day after the treaty was signed, these counties elected to remain part of Great Britain. Today, they remain part of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

New York State Assembly expels five socialist assemblymen

The New York State Assembly, the state's lower house, expelled five duly elected assemblymen from the Socialist Party over their political affiliation on January 7, 1920. The US was in the midst of the first Red Scare, a panic resulting from the ascendancy of the Bolsheviks in Russia, which resulted in the repression of socialists across the country. The result of the expulsion vote was 140-6. Thus, Assemblymen August Claessens, Samuel A. DeWitt, Samuel Orr, Charles Solomon and Louis Waldman were removed from their posts. Learn more about the expulsions from the Historical Society of the Courts of the State of New York.

Rehnquist sworn in as US Supreme Court Justice

On January 7, 1972, the late Chief Justice William Rehnquist was sworn in as a Justice of the United States Supreme Court. Read a short profile of Chief Justice Rehnquist here.