Manhattan district attorney agrees to postpone Trump ‘hush money’ sentencing News
Sgt. Alicia Brand, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
Manhattan district attorney agrees to postpone Trump ‘hush money’ sentencing

Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg announced Tuesday in a letter to Justice Juan Merchan that his office has agreed to postpone the sentencing of US president-elect Donald Trump in the so-called “hush money” case, allowing time to address Trump’s anticipated motion to dismiss his conviction. This highlights the unprecedented nature of prosecuting a president-elect and the complexities of balancing legal proceedings with constitutional presidential immunity.

Following Trump’s recent election victory, his legal team has argued that proceeding with sentencing could destabilize the government, asserting that a president-elect should have immunity similar to a sitting president. They have also urged the court to dismiss the conviction on constitutional grounds. In the two-page letter docketed Wednesday, Trump’s defense attorney (and pick for attorney general) Todd Blanche argued, “just as a sitting President is completely immune from any criminal process, so too is President Trump as president-elect.”

While District Attorney Bragg opposed dismissing the case entirely, he has agreed to delay sentencing to allow for thorough litigation of the dismissal motion. Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Juan Merchan, will determine the new sentencing date and rule on the motion to dismiss, with the potential that this could set a legal precedent for the prosecution of high-ranking officials in the United States.

This development occurs amid ongoing national debates over the legal boundaries of prosecuting current and former presidents, highlighting the intricate balance between upholding the rule of law and respecting the constitutional protections afforded to the nation’s highest office.

A Manhattan jury convicted Trump in May on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records related to payments made to adult film actress Stormy Daniels during his 2016 presidential campaign.

Trump’s legal challenges extend beyond this case as he faces federal cases related to classified documents in which a judge denied the motion to dismiss in April. He also faces allegations of attempting to overturn the 2020 election results. The outcomes of these cases may have profound implications for his upcoming presidency and the broader legal landscape concerning presidential immunity and accountability.

THIS DAY @ LAW

State Union of Serbia and Montenegro dissolves

On June 3, 2006, the State Union of Serbia and Montenegro formerly dissolved with the latter's declaration of independence. After the dissolution of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia in 2003, Serbia and Montenegro was born as a union of the only nations that had not departed the Yugoslav federation. In 2006, Montenegro became the last nation of the former Yugoslavia to break from Serbia. Read Montenegro's 2007 Constitution.

US Supreme Court ruled first federal child labor law unconstitutional

On June 3, 1918, the US Supreme Court ruled in Hammer v. Dagenhart that the first federal child labor law, the Keating-Owen Child Labor Act, was unconstitutional, falling outside the scope of Congressional authority under the Commerce Clause.