Supreme Court refuses to block new Rhode Island absentee ballot rules News
© WikiMedia (Spc. Carlynn Knaak)
Supreme Court refuses to block new Rhode Island absentee ballot rules

The US Supreme Court denied the application for stay in a Rhode Island absentee ballot case on Thursday, which allows an order suspending a two-witness requirement for absentee ballots to stand for the September primary.

In order to vote by absentee ballot in Rhode Island, voters were previously required to have their absentee ballots signed by two witnesses or a notary public. Because of COVID-19, the Rhode Island State Board of Elections voted on March 26 to suspend this requirement for the June 2 presidential primary. On April 16 Governor Gina Raimondo issued an executive order suspending the requirement.

The US District Court for the District of Rhode Island issued a consent order and decree on July 30 that continued the suspension of the two-witness requirement for the September primary. The US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit upheld this order on August 7. Following these decisions, the Republican National Committee asked the Supreme Court to block the new voter rules.

On Thursday, the Supreme Court denied the application for a stay. The court stated that, unlike other cases in which a state defends its own law, the state election officials in this case support the challenged decree. Because of this, the applicants lacked a cognizable interest in the state’s ability to “enforce its duly enacted” laws.

The Republican Party of Rhode Island issued a statement Thursday after the Supreme Court issued its order, voicing fears of a “chaotic November election” that “will have serious consequences for public confidence in our election system.”

Rhode Island is scheduled to begin sending out absentee ballots for the September state primary election on Friday.