HRW urges China to drop charges against rights activist News
HRW urges China to drop charges against rights activist
Photo source or description

[JURIST] Human Rights Watch (HRW) [advocacy website] on Thursday urged [press release] the Chinese government to drop all politically motivated charges against Xu Zhiyong [BBC backgrounder; JURIST news archive] and release the rights activist from prison. Xu, a prominent critic of China’s one-party system and founder of the nongovernmental New Citizen’s Movement [WSJ backgrounder], was arrested in April and faces five years in prison for organizing a series of small-scale protests to disrupt public order. HRW Asia Director Brad Adams [official profile] cited Xu’s official indictment [text] as evidence of the spurious charges against peaceful protesting. Adams went on to state that “the politically motivated character of Xu’s prosecution makes a conviction a near certainty if this case goes to trial. Xu’s treatment is a test-case for the broader fate of civil society in China under Xi Jinping” [BBC backgrounder]. Xu was placed on house arrest in April, but was taken into custody [JURIST report] in July and formally arrested in August. HRW believes that Xu may go on trial as early as December 28 in order to curb international scrutiny.

The detainment of anti-corruption activists has been a recurrent human rights issue in China. In August Chinese writer, lawyer and human rights advocate Yang Maodong, commonly known by his pen-name Guo Feixiong [HRIC profile], became the second leader, following Xu, of the New Citizens movement to be arrested [JURIST report] on suspicion of disrupting the peace. In June a Chinese court in Huairou sentenced [JURIST report] Liu Hui, brother-in-law of the Nobel Peace Prize winner and democracy activist Liu Xiaobo [BBC profile; JURIST news archive], to 11 years in prison on charges of fraud. In May China’s Nanjing Intermediate People’s Court issued a life sentence [JURIST report] to Huang Sheng, the former provincial deputy governor of Shandong Province, for accepting almost $2 million in bribes from 21 organizations and numerous individuals between 1998 and 2011.

Opinions expressed in JURIST Commentary are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of JURIST's editors, staff, donors or the University of Pittsburgh.