France court allows Noriega extradition to Panama News
France court allows Noriega extradition to Panama
Photo source or description

[JURIST] A French appeals court ruled Wednesday that former Panamanian dictator Manuel Noriega [BBC backgrounder; JURIST news archive] can be extradited to Panama. Noriega faces charges of human rights violations in Panama for crimes allegedly committed during his 1981-1989 rule. He was already convicted on three counts of human rights violations in absentia, and each count carries a 20-year prison sentence. Panamanian President Ricardo Martinelli [official profile, in Spanish] and Panamanian authorities have been seeking Noriega’s extradition [JURIST report] to face charges of human rights violations in Panama since April 2010. French authorities ordered his extradition [JURIST report] earlier this year, but it has been held up in court. It is unclear when [CNN report] French Prime Minister Francois Fillon [official website, in French] will sign the extradition order.

A French criminal court sentenced Noriega [JURIST report] to seven years in jail for money laundering in July 2010. He was convicted of laundering $3 million in drug profits by purchasing property in Paris. In April 2010, Noriega was extradited [JURIST report] from the US, where he had served a 17-year sentence on drug charges, after fighting extradition [JURIST report] since 2007. The US Supreme Court declined to reconsider [JURIST report] Noriega’s petition to stop the extradition process. His lawyers filed the petition in February 2010 after the Supreme Court denied certiorari [JURIST reports] on the case a month earlier. Noriega, who has been declared a prisoner of war, sought to enforce a provision of the Geneva Convention [ICRC backgrounder] that requires repatriation at the end of confinement. Noriega and his wife were sentenced in absentia [Reuters report] to 10 years in jail by a French court in 1999, but France agreed to hold a new trial if he was extradited.

Opinions expressed in JURIST Commentary are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of JURIST's editors, staff, donors or the University of Pittsburgh.