Jurist
DONATE NOW
  • News ▾
    • All Legal News
    • US Legal News
    • World Legal News
    • This Day @ Law
  • Dispatches ▾
    • All Dispatches
    • Afghanistan
    • Canada
    • EU
    • Ghana
    • India
    • Iran
    • Israel
    • Italy
    • Kazakhstan
    • Kenya
    • Myanmar
    • Pakistan
    • Peru
    • Romania
    • Sri Lanka
    • Taiwan
    • UK
    • Ukraine
    • US
  • Commentary ▾
    • All Commentary
    • Faculty Commentary
    • Professional Commentary
    • Student Commentary
  • Features ▾
    • All Features
    • Explainers
    • Long Reads
    • Multimedia
    • Interviews
  • Topics
  • Rule of Law ▾
    • Materials
    • Podcasts
  • About ▾
    • FAQ
    • Staff
    • Awards
    • Apply
    • Journalist in Residence
    • Board of Directors
    • Contact Us
  • Donate ▾
    • Why Support JURIST?
    • Donate
    • Honor Roll
DC same-sex marriage ruling [US SC] News
DC same-sex marriage ruling [US SC]
March 2, 2010 03:50:00 pm

Jackson, et al v. District of Columbia Board of Elections and Ethics, et al, US Supreme Court, March 2, 2010 [denying an emergency petition to prevent Washington DC's same-sex marriage law from taking effect].

Reported in JURIST's Paper Chase here. Latest commentary available here. JURIST has more on same-sex marriage.

Law students to join jurist
GET OUR DAILY DIGEST
LinkedIn YouTube Instagram Facebook RSS Twitter
Latest DISPATCHES
Justices spar over statutory text as asylum metering policy reaches Supreme Court — SCOTUS Dispatch

Justices spar over statutory text as asylum metering policy reaches Supreme Court — SCOTUS Dispatch

Italy dispatch: voters reject judicial reform, preserving judiciary’s unified independence

Italy dispatch: voters reject judicial reform, preserving judiciary’s unified independence

Latest COMMENTARY
Beyond Westphalia: Why the International System Cannot Survive Another Century of Tribal War

Beyond Westphalia: Why the International System Cannot Survive Another Century of Tribal War

by Louis Rene Beres
Force, Vetoes, and Sanctions: Why the ICC Can’t Touch a US President

Force, Vetoes, and Sanctions: Why the ICC Can’t Touch a US President

by L. Ali Khan | Washburn University School of Law
Latest FEATURES
Trump v. Barbara: the Supreme Court case that could redefine birthright citizenship

Trump v. Barbara: the Supreme Court case that could redefine birthright citizenship

‘Reflecting the Old Order’: An Interview with Canadian Senator Yuen Pau Woo on Bill C-12, Carney’s Foreign Policy, and Canada’s Double Standards

‘Reflecting the Old Order’: An Interview with Canadian Senator Yuen Pau Woo on Bill C-12, Carney’s Foreign Policy, and Canada’s Double Standards

THIS DAY @ LAW

Maurice Papon convicted of war crimes

On April 2, 1998, Maurice Papon was convicted of war crimes for his role in deporting French Jews to concentration camps during the Nazi occupation of France. Under German occupation, Papon served as the supervisor of the Service for Jewish Questions in Bordeaux from which he collaborated with the Nazi SS and oversaw the deportation of 1,560 Jewish men, women, and children to concentration camps. Read a biography of Maurice Papon from the BBC.

Massachusetts enacted anti-Vietnam War bill

On April 2, 1970, the Governor of Massachusetts signed into law an anti-Vietnam War bill providing that no inhabitant of Massachusetts inducted into or serving in the armed forces "shall be required to serve" abroad in an armed hostility that had not been declared a war by Congress under Article I, Section 8, clause 11 of the United States Constitution. Supporters of the legislation hoped that the US Supreme Court would seize on the obvious conflict that the bill created between state and federal law and would rule on the constitutionality of the Vietnam War itself, but the Court refused to exercise original jurisdiction, forcing the case into the lower federal courts.

Trial of Marquess of Queensberry begins, leading to the imprisonment of Oscar Wilde

On April 2, 1895, the libel trial of the Marquess of Queensberry began on allegations that he called Oscar Wilde a "posing somdomite [sic]". The trial led to the disclosure of details of Wilde's personal life that eventually resulted in his imprisonment for homosexuality. Read about the trials of Oscar Wilde.

Jurist
Home Attributions Disclaimer Privacy Policy Contact Us
Copyright © 2026, JURIST Legal News & Research Services, Inc.
JURISTnews is a collaboration with the University of Pittsburgh