Jurist
DONATE NOW
  • News ▾
    • All Legal News
    • US Legal News
    • World Legal News
    • This Day @ Law
  • Dispatches ▾
    • All Dispatches
    • Afghanistan
    • Canada
    • EU
    • Ghana
    • India
    • Iran
    • Israel
    • Italy
    • Kazakhstan
    • Kenya
    • Myanmar
    • Pakistan
    • Peru
    • Romania
    • Sri Lanka
    • Taiwan
    • UK
    • Ukraine
    • US
  • Commentary ▾
    • All Commentary
    • Faculty Commentary
    • Professional Commentary
    • Student Commentary
  • Features ▾
    • All Features
    • Explainers
    • Long Reads
    • Multimedia
    • Interviews
  • Topics
  • Rule of Law ▾
    • Materials
    • Podcasts
  • About ▾
    • FAQ
    • Staff
    • Awards
    • Apply
    • Journalist in Residence
    • Board of Directors
    • Contact Us
  • Donate ▾
    • Why Support JURIST?
    • Donate
    • Honor Roll
Hallucinogenic tea religious freedom ruling [US SC] News
Hallucinogenic tea religious freedom ruling [US SC]
February 21, 2006 10:21:00 pm

Gonzales v. O Centro Espirita Beneficiente Uniao do Vegetal, US Supreme Court, February 21, 2006 [holding that a church congregation could use hallucinogenic tea as part of a religious ceremony to connect with God]. Read the full text of the opinion [PDF]. Reported in JURIST's Paper Chase here.

Law students to join jurist
GET OUR DAILY DIGEST
LinkedIn YouTube Instagram Facebook RSS Twitter
Latest DISPATCHES
Taiwan dispatch: motion for retrial filed over 2000 execution amid miscarriage of justice concerns

Taiwan dispatch: motion for retrial filed over 2000 execution amid miscarriage of justice concerns

Kenya dispatch: country marks 16 years of transformative Constitution torn between celebration and reckoning

Kenya dispatch: country marks 16 years of transformative Constitution torn between celebration and reckoning

Latest COMMENTARY
Believing in the Hijab Does Not Mean Believing in Its Enforcement

Believing in the Hijab Does Not Mean Believing in Its Enforcement

by AmirAli Maleki | JURIST Deputy Managing Editor for Global Commentary
El Niño Tests Governments’ Duty to Protect From Foreseeable Harm

El Niño Tests Governments’ Duty to Protect From Foreseeable Harm

by Cecile Akoeley Attiogbe Atayi | U. Cape Coast Faculty of Law | GH
Latest FEATURES
‘Accountability Is Deferred Rather Than Delivered’ — Conflict Resolution Scholar Johannes Langer on Mediation, Amnesty, and the Limits of the ICC

‘Accountability Is Deferred Rather Than Delivered’ — Conflict Resolution Scholar Johannes Langer on Mediation, Amnesty, and the Limits of the ICC

‘Genocide denial is often a state project’ — Iva Vukušić on Srebrenica and the politics of memory

‘Genocide denial is often a state project’ — Iva Vukušić on Srebrenica and the politics of memory

THIS DAY @ LAW

Congress passed Judiciary Act of 1789

On September 24, 1789, Congress instituted a three-tiered federal judicial structure topped by a Supreme Court with the passage of "An Act to establish the Judicial Courts of the United States", later known as the Judiciary Act of 1789. Learn more about the Act from the National Archives.

Netherlands surrenders New Amsterdam to Great Britain

On September 24, 1664, the Netherlands surrendered New Amsterdam to Great Britain, which changed the city's name to New York. Learn more about New Amsterdam from the New Amsterdam Project.

Jurist
Home Attributions Disclaimer Privacy Policy Contact Us
Copyright © 2026, JURIST Legal News & Research Services, Inc.
JURISTnews is a collaboration with the University of Pittsburgh