Jurist
DONATE NOW
  • News ▾
    • All Legal News
    • US Legal News
    • World Legal News
    • This Day @ Law
  • Dispatches ▾
    • All Dispatches
    • Afghanistan
    • Canada
    • EU
    • Ghana
    • India
    • Iran
    • Israel
    • Kazakhstan
    • Kenya
    • Myanmar
    • Pakistan
    • Peru
    • Sri Lanka
    • UK
    • Ukraine
    • US
  • Commentary ▾
    • All Commentary
    • Faculty Commentary
    • Professional Commentary
    • Student Commentary
  • Features ▾
    • All Features
    • Explainers
    • Long Reads
    • Multimedia
    • Interviews
  • Topics
  • Rule of Law ▾
    • Materials
    • Podcasts
  • About ▾
    • FAQ
    • Staff
    • Awards
    • Apply
    • Journalist in Residence
    • Board of Directors
    • Contact Us
  • Donate ▾
    • Why Support JURIST?
    • Donate
    • Honor Roll
Martha Stewart appeal brief [2nd Circuit] News
Martha Stewart appeal brief [2nd Circuit]
Bernard Hibbitts | JURIST Staff
October 21, 2004 01:02:00 pm

US v. Stewart and Bocanovic, Brief for the Defendant-Appellant Martha Stewart, October 20, 2004. Read the full text of the brief here [PDF]. Reported in JURIST's Paper Chase here.

Law students to join jurist
GET OUR DAILY DIGEST
LinkedIn YouTube Instagram Facebook RSS Twitter
Latest DISPATCHES
Italy dispatch: voters reject judicial reform, preserving judiciary’s unified independence

Italy dispatch: voters reject judicial reform, preserving judiciary’s unified independence

US dispatch: President Trump declares Iran ‘victory’ as military campaign raises war powers concerns

US dispatch: President Trump declares Iran ‘victory’ as military campaign raises war powers concerns

Latest COMMENTARY
Can Algorithms Respect Human Dignity? The Problem with Predictive Justice

Can Algorithms Respect Human Dignity? The Problem with Predictive Justice

by Tuğba Tosun Çobanoğlu
The US-Iran Conflict Is Dismantling the Rules-Based International Order

The US-Iran Conflict Is Dismantling the Rules-Based International Order

by Shobhitabh Srivastava | IIULER
Latest FEATURES
“Reflecting the Old Order”: An Interview with Canadian Senator Yuen Pau Woo on Bill C-12, Carney’s Foreign Policy, and Canada’s Double Standards

“Reflecting the Old Order”: An Interview with Canadian Senator Yuen Pau Woo on Bill C-12, Carney’s Foreign Policy, and Canada’s Double Standards

What Does It Mean to ‘Arrive’ at the Border? Supreme Court to Weigh Asylum-Seekers’ Rights

What Does It Mean to ‘Arrive’ at the Border? Supreme Court to Weigh Asylum-Seekers’ Rights

THIS DAY @ LAW

Supreme Court ruled on Chinese Exclusion Act

On March 28, 1898, the US Supreme Court ruled that a child born in the US to Chinese immigrants was a US citizen and could not be deported under the terms of the Chinese Exclusion Act.

Read US v. Wong Kim Ark and learn more about the Chinese Exclusion Act.

Thomas Hare born

On March 28, 1808, English jurist Thomas Hare was born in the United Kingdom. After being admitted to the Bar in 1833, Hare became a campaigner for electoral reform. He created the Single Transferable Vote (STV) system of proportional representation used in many democratic countries today. He was also an early law reporter, recording important judicial decisions in The Hare Law Reports before there was any official reporting of legal opinions in the UK. Read a biography of Thomas Hare and a description of the STV system from the Electoral Reform Society.

Jurist
Home Attributions Disclaimer Privacy Policy Contact Us
Copyright © 2026, JURIST Legal News & Research Services, Inc.
JURISTnews is a collaboration with the University of Pittsburgh