Supreme Court of Canada agreed to review prostitution laws

On March 31, 2011, the Supreme Court of Canada agreed to review a ruling from the Court of Appeal of British Columbia, which would permit standing for Sheryl Kiselbach, a former sex worker from Vancouver, if affirmed. Kiselbach initiated a lawsuit challenging anti-prostitution laws in 2007, but was denied standing in a lower court ruling. Upon appeal, the B.C. Court of Appeals reversed, approving standing. The federal attorney general then appealed to the Supreme Court. A similar case fighting Canadian anti-prostitution laws was initiated in Ontario in March 2007 by the Sex Professionals of Canada (SPOC). The Ontario Court of Appeals affirmed a stay on June 17, 2011, which kept certain aspects of sex work illegal, and later ruled the law unconstitutional. On April 26, 2012, a challenge to the unconstitutionality of the anti-prostitution law was appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada.

Flag of Canada

Learn more about prostitution from the JURIST news archive.


Support JURIST

We rely on our readers to keep JURIST running

 Donate now!

About This Day at Law

This Day at Law is JURIST's platform for legal history, highlighting interseting and important developments that shaped the law and the world.

© Copyright JURIST Legal News and Research Services, Inc., 2013.