Federal judge struck down state-financed religious prison program


On June 2, 2006, Chief Judge Robert W. Pratt of the US District Court for the Southern District of Iowa issued an opinion finding that a religious prison organization receiving government funds violated the US Constitution because it was used to rehabilitate prison inmates by advocating the tenets of Christianity. Pratt found that inmates who voluntarily entered the program benefited through improved living conditions and pointed out that alternative secular or non-Christian programs were not provided to prisoners. Upon appeal, a panel of the US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit that included retired US Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor issued an opinion affirming that using taxpayer money to fund a faith-based treatment program in a state jail is unconstitutional.

Learn more about prison programs from the JURIST news archives, and read commentary on the appellate decision from JURIST Guest Columnist Mark Earley in Hotline.


Support JURIST

We rely on our readers to keep JURIST running

 Donate now!

About This Day at Law

This Day at Law is JURIST's platform for legal history, highlighting interseting and important developments that shaped the law and the world.

© Copyright JURIST Legal News and Research Services, Inc., 2013.