JURIST Supported by the University of Pittsburgh

Today in legal history...

Wednesday, May 02, 2012

Supreme Court ruled for Wyoming in water dispute
Katherine Bacher at 12:00 AM ET

On May 2, 2011, the US Supreme Court ruled in the case of Montana v. Wyoming, finding for the state of Wyoming with a vote of 7-1 in a case that involved the states' relative water rights over the Tongue and Powder rivers. Montana claimed Wyoming violated the Yellowstone River Compact, which allowed water storage facilities to be constructed. In October 2008, the Court appointed a special master to oversee the lawsuit because the Supreme Court has original and exclusive jurisdiction over all disputes between US states. The investigator initially reported that Montana had failed to state a valid claim in its lawsuit because the activities of Wyoming were permissible under the Compact. Justice Thomas wrote the majority opinion for the Court and Justice Kagan took no part in the decision.

Learn more about water rights from the JURIST news archive.

Link post | IM post | go to JURIST | © JURIST, 2012


 Egypt breaks diplomatic relations with Syria, Libya, Algeria and South Yemen
December 5, 2016

 21st Amendment ended Prohibition
December 5, 2016

 click for more...


Add This Day at Law to your RSS reader or personalized portal:
  • Add to Google
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Add to My AOL


Subscribe to This Day at Law alerts via R|mail. Enter your e-mail address below. After subscribing and being returned to this page, please check your e-mail for a confirmation message.
MyBlogAlerts also e-mails alerts of new This Day at Law entries. It's free and fast, but ad-based.


This Day at Law welcomes reader comments, tips, URLs, updates and corrections. E-mail us at archives@jurist.org