EU court ruled employee firing over fertilization violated equal treatment laws

austria_flag.png

On February 26, 2008, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruled that an employee's dismissal based on her advanced stage of in vitro fertilization treatment was contrary to the principle of equal treatment for men and women. The ruling came in the case of an Austrian woman, Sabine Mayr, who claimed that she was entitled to full payment of her salary and protection against dismissal from the time in vitro fertilization of her egg took place, even though the egg had not yet been implanted in her uterus. Mayr was fired after her egg had been fertilized but three days before the egg was implanted; she argued that she was pregnant immediately following the egg's fertilization and, therefore, her firing was illegal under Austrian law.


Flag of Austria

Learn more about gender discrimination and the laws governing in vitro fertilization from the JURIST news archive.

advertisement

Support JURIST

We rely on our readers to keep JURIST running


 Donate now!
 

About This Day at Law

This Day at Law is JURIST's platform for legal history, highlighting interseting and important developments that shaped the law and the world.

© Copyright JURIST Legal News and Research Services, Inc., 2013.