Supreme Court heard arguments on summary judgment appeals

On November 1, 2010, the US Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Ortiz v. Jordan on the issue of whether a party may appeal an order denying summary judgment after a full trial on the merits if the party chose not to appeal the order before trial. The Court took the case in order to resolve a circuit split which originated from an earlier decision by the US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. The Court unanimously ruled in January 2011 that a party in a federal civil case may not appeal a denial of a motion for summary judgment after a full trial has been conducted in district court.

Learn more about the US Supreme Court and the laws governing summary judgments from the JURIST news archive.


Support JURIST

We rely on our readers to keep JURIST running

 Donate now!

About This Day at Law

This Day at Law is JURIST's platform for legal history, highlighting interseting and important developments that shaped the law and the world.

© Copyright JURIST Legal News and Research Services, Inc., 2013.