JURIST Supported by the University of Pittsburgh

Today in legal history...

Saturday, November 12, 2011

Second Circuit ruled CIA did not infringe ex-agent Plame's free speech rights
Cody Harding at 12:00 AM ET

On November 12, 2009, the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled that the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) did not violate the free speech rights of former agent Valerie Plame when it sought to prevent her from revealing specific classified information in her memoir. The suit was brought by Plame and her publisher, Simon & Schuster, who alleged that the CIA violated Plame's right to free speech by preventing her from discussing her employment with the CIA prior to 2002. Plame was forced to resign as an undercover operative in 2006 after her identity was revealed in a highly publicized scandal.

Learn more about the Valerie Plame and the CIA from the JURIST news archive, and read commentary on the issue from JURIST Guest Columnist Sandra Jordan in Forum.

Link post | IM post | go to JURIST | © JURIST, 2011


 Province of Canada created
July 23, 2016

 Justice Kennedy born
July 23, 2016

 click for more...


Add This Day at Law to your RSS reader or personalized portal:
  • Add to Google
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Add to My AOL


Subscribe to This Day at Law alerts via R|mail. Enter your e-mail address below. After subscribing and being returned to this page, please check your e-mail for a confirmation message.
MyBlogAlerts also e-mails alerts of new This Day at Law entries. It's free and fast, but ad-based.


This Day at Law welcomes reader comments, tips, URLs, updates and corrections. E-mail us at archives@jurist.org