Georgia high court declared right of interpreter for defendants


On November 22, 2010, the Supreme Court of Georgia ruled that defendants with limited English proficiency have a constitutional right to court interpreters in criminal trials. The Georgia Court of Appeals denied Annie Ling's motion for a new trial after a jury convicted her of cruelty to children in the first degree. Ling's native language was Mandarin Chinese, and she claimed the court relied on her husband to act as her interpreter. The court held that a lack of an interpreter could impede a defendant's right to be present at trial in violation of the Sixth Amendment and the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) submitted a brief [PDF] on behalf of Ling. The ACLU and many other rights groups have spoken out in support of court interpreters for defendants with limited English proficiency.

State flag of Georgia

Learn more about the Due Process Clause from the JURIST news archive.


Support JURIST

We rely on our readers to keep JURIST running

 Donate now!

About This Day at Law

This Day at Law is JURIST's platform for legal history, highlighting interseting and important developments that shaped the law and the world.

© Copyright JURIST Legal News and Research Services, Inc., 2013.