Federal judge ruled Patriot Act provisions unconstitutional

On September 26, 2007, the US District Court for the District of Oregon ruled that provisions of the USA Patriot Act which amended the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) were unconstitutional. The suit was originally brought by Oregon lawyer Brandon Mayfield, following his arrest and detention in 2004. While the District Court initially ruled that the Patriot Act's expansion of electronic eavesdropping and physical searches violated the Fourth Amendment, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ultimately dismissed the lawsuit for lack of standing.

Learn more about the Patriot Act from JURIST Features.

advertisement

Support JURIST

We rely on our readers to keep JURIST running


 Donate now!
 

About This Day at Law

This Day at Law is JURIST's platform for legal history, highlighting interseting and important developments that shaped the law and the world.

© Copyright JURIST Legal News and Research Services, Inc., 2013.