JURIST Supported by the University of Pittsburgh

Today in legal history...

Saturday, May 21, 2011

DC Circuit dismissed Bagram detainee habeas petitions
Dwyer Arce at 12:00 AM ET

On May 21, 2010, the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled in Al Maqaleh v. Gates that detainees held at Bagram Air Force Base in Afghanistan cannot bring habeas corpus challenges in US courts. The circuit court reversed the district court's ruling, which allowed habeas corpus challenges by three Bagram detainees pursuant to the Supreme Court's test in Boumediene v. Bush. The DC Circuit found that the district court underestimated the significance of Bagram being located in an area of armed conflict, which differentiates the defendants' jurisdictional status from those detained at Guantanamo Bay. The court held that the current case was more comparable to Johnson v. Eisentrager, where the Supreme Court held that US courts had no jurisdiction over war criminals held in a US-administered German prison.

Learn more about Guantanamo Bay, Bagram Air Force Base, and habeas corpus petitions from the JURIST news archive, and read commentary on the decision from Guest Columnist Amos Guiora on JURIST Forum.

Link post | IM post | go to JURIST | © JURIST, 2011


 European Patent Institute established
October 21, 2016

 First West law reports published
October 21, 2016

 click for more...


Add This Day at Law to your RSS reader or personalized portal:
  • Add to Google
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Add to My AOL


Subscribe to This Day at Law alerts via R|mail. Enter your e-mail address below. After subscribing and being returned to this page, please check your e-mail for a confirmation message.
MyBlogAlerts also e-mails alerts of new This Day at Law entries. It's free and fast, but ad-based.


This Day at Law welcomes reader comments, tips, URLs, updates and corrections. E-mail us at archives@jurist.org