JURIST Supported by the University of Pittsburgh

Today in legal history...

Saturday, May 07, 2011

Canadian high court ruled journalists lack right to shield confidential sources
Dwyer Arce at 12:00 AM ET

On May 7, 2010, the Canadian Supreme Court ruled that journalists do not have an automatic right to shield their sources and that decisions on who is entitled to remain anonymous will be made on a case by case basis. The ruling upheld an order requiring a former National Post reporter to turn over evidence to police in connection with an ongoing investigation. In addition to ruling on the merits of the case, the court issued standards to be used in deciding future cases involving confidential sources. The court indicated that in the future a balancing of interests should occur. The court also noted that, due to the numerous forms of alternative media in use today, it would be impracticable to apply a broad rule to every situation.

Canadian flag

Learn more about laws governing press freedom from the JURIST news archive.

Link post | IM post | go to JURIST | © JURIST, 2011


 US Supreme Court ruled death penalty unconstitutional
June 29, 2016

 Seychelles gains independence
June 29, 2016

 click for more...


Add This Day at Law to your RSS reader or personalized portal:
  • Add to Google
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Add to My AOL


Subscribe to This Day at Law alerts via R|mail. Enter your e-mail address below. After subscribing and being returned to this page, please check your e-mail for a confirmation message.
MyBlogAlerts also e-mails alerts of new This Day at Law entries. It's free and fast, but ad-based.


This Day at Law welcomes reader comments, tips, URLs, updates and corrections. E-mail us at archives@jurist.org