Canadian high court ruled journalists lack right to shield confidential sources

On May 7, 2010, the Canadian Supreme Court ruled that journalists do not have an automatic right to shield their sources and that decisions on who is entitled to remain anonymous will be made on a case by case basis. The ruling upheld an order requiring a former National Post reporter to turn over evidence to police in connection with an ongoing investigation. In addition to ruling on the merits of the case, the court issued standards to be used in deciding future cases involving confidential sources. The court indicated that in the future a balancing of interests should occur. The court also noted that, due to the numerous forms of alternative media in use today, it would be impracticable to apply a broad rule to every situation.

Canadian flag

Learn more about laws governing press freedom from the JURIST news archive.


Support JURIST

We rely on our readers to keep JURIST running

 Donate now!

About This Day at Law

This Day at Law is JURIST's platform for legal history, highlighting interseting and important developments that shaped the law and the world.

© Copyright JURIST Legal News and Research Services, Inc., 2013.