<?xml version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <description>JURIST's legal news service, powered by a team of over 40 law student reporters and editors led by Professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law.</description>
    <title>JURIST - Paper Chase</title>
    <link>http://jurist.org/paperchase</link>
    <webMaster>JURISTremove_this@pitt.edu</webMaster>
    
    
    <item>
      <description><![CDATA[&lt;table align="left" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">&lt;tbody>&lt;tr>&lt;td>&lt;img src="/topstoryphoto/frontbih.jpg" alt="Photo source or description" valign="top" align="left" border="1" hspace="0" vspace="4">&lt;/td>&lt;td>&lt;img src="/images/s.gif" border="0" height="1" width="5">&lt;/td>&lt;/tr>&lt;/tbody>&lt;/table>[JURIST] The &lt;a href=" http://www.ccbh.ba/eng/">Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina&lt;/a> [official website] &lt;a href="http://www.ccbh.ba/eng/press/index.php?pid=6416&sta=3&pkat=506">ordered&lt;/a> [press release] Friday that &lt;a href="http://www.predsjednikfbih.gov.ba/">Zivko Budimir&lt;/a> [official website, in Croatian], president of the Bosniak-Croat Federation, be released from jail immediately. Budmir was &lt;a href="/paperchase/2013/04/bosnia-president-arrested-for-corruption.php">arrested&lt;/a> [JURIST report] in April along with 19 other officials as part of a corruption investigation and crackdown. Budmir, who has been charged with accepting bribes to grant amnesty to numerous convicts, left the prison in the southern town of Mostar late Friday evening. 

&lt;p>&lt;a href="http://www.ohchr.org/en/countries/enacaregion/pages/baindex.aspx">Bosnia and Herzegovina&lt;/a> (BiH) [OHCHR profile] is still recovering from the impact of the Bosnian War which was fought from 1992-1995. BiH is also still deciding how to treat war crimes prisoners. Earlier this month the BiH &lt;a href="http://www.sudbih.gov.ba/?jezik=e">war crimes court&lt;/a> [official website] &lt;a href="/paperchase/2013/05/former-bosnian-serb-pm-cleared-of-war-crimes-charges.php">acquitted&lt;/a> [JURIST report] former Bosnian Serb prime minister &lt;a href="http://www.sudbih.gov.ba/?opcija=predmeti&id=74&jezik=e">Gojko Klickovic&lt;/a> [case materials] of war crime charges. In March the BiH war crimes court &lt;a href="/paperchase/2013/03/bosnia-court-sentences-montenegro-paramilitary-leader-to-45-years.php">convicted a former paramilitary unit commander&lt;/a> [JURIST report] from Montenegro on multiple counts of murder, torture, rape and looting committed during the the civil war in the former Yugoslavia and sentenced him to 45 years of imprisonment. In January the BiH war crimes court sentenced a former Bosnian Serb police officer to 20 years in prison for his role in the &lt;a href="http://www.hrw.org/node/85087/section/1">Srebrenica massacre&lt;/a> [HRW backgrounder; &lt;a href="/jurist_search.php?q=srebrenica">JURIST news archive&lt;/a>].&lt;/p>]]></description>
      <guid>http://jurist.org/paperchase/2013/05/bosnia-court-orders-release-of-president.php</guid>
      <pubDate>2013-05-25T13:32:03-05:00</pubDate>
      <title>Bosnia court orders release of president</title>
      <link>http://jurist.org/paperchase/2013/05/bosnia-court-orders-release-of-president.php</link>
      <author>Blake Lynch</author>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<![CDATA[<table align="left" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr><td><img src="/topstoryphoto/frontbih.jpg" alt="Photo source or description" valign="top" align="left" border="1" hspace="0" vspace="4"></td><td><img src="/images/s.gif" border="0" height="1" width="5"></td></tr></tbody></table>[JURIST] The <a href=" http://www.ccbh.ba/eng/">Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina</a> [official website] <a href="http://www.ccbh.ba/eng/press/index.php?pid=6416&sta=3&pkat=506">ordered</a> [press release] Friday that <a href="http://www.predsjednikfbih.gov.ba/">Zivko Budimir</a> [official website, in Croatian], president of the Bosniak-Croat Federation, be released from jail immediately. Budmir was <a href="/paperchase/2013/04/bosnia-president-arrested-for-corruption.php">arrested</a> [JURIST report] in April along with 19 other officials as part of a corruption investigation and crackdown. Budmir, who has been charged with accepting bribes to grant amnesty to numerous convicts, left the prison in the southern town of Mostar late Friday evening. 

<p><a href="http://www.ohchr.org/en/countries/enacaregion/pages/baindex.aspx">Bosnia and Herzegovina</a> (BiH) [OHCHR profile] is still recovering from the impact of the Bosnian War which was fought from 1992-1995. BiH is also still deciding how to treat war crimes prisoners. Earlier this month the BiH <a href="http://www.sudbih.gov.ba/?jezik=e">war crimes court</a> [official website] <a href="/paperchase/2013/05/former-bosnian-serb-pm-cleared-of-war-crimes-charges.php">acquitted</a> [JURIST report] former Bosnian Serb prime minister <a href="http://www.sudbih.gov.ba/?opcija=predmeti&id=74&jezik=e">Gojko Klickovic</a> [case materials] of war crime charges. In March the BiH war crimes court <a href="/paperchase/2013/03/bosnia-court-sentences-montenegro-paramilitary-leader-to-45-years.php">convicted a former paramilitary unit commander</a> [JURIST report] from Montenegro on multiple counts of murder, torture, rape and looting committed during the the civil war in the former Yugoslavia and sentenced him to 45 years of imprisonment. In January the BiH war crimes court sentenced a former Bosnian Serb police officer to 20 years in prison for his role in the <a href="http://www.hrw.org/node/85087/section/1">Srebrenica massacre</a> [HRW backgrounder; <a href="/jurist_search.php?q=srebrenica">JURIST news archive</a>].</p>]]>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <description><![CDATA[&lt;table align="left" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">&lt;tbody>&lt;tr>&lt;td>&lt;img src="/topstoryphoto/frontpuertorico.jpg" alt="Photo source or description" valign="top" align="left" border="1" hspace="0" vspace="4">&lt;/td>&lt;td>&lt;img src="/images/s.gif" border="0" height="1" width="5">&lt;/td>&lt;/tr>&lt;/tbody>&lt;/table>[JURIST] Puerto Rico's House of Representatives on Thursday approved a bill that prohibits discrimination on the basis of gender or sexual orientation in places of employment. According to media sources, the bill originally included protections for commercial transactions, housing, governmental services, and public accommodations, but the Senate &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/puerto-rico-approves-anti-discrimination-bill-19253069#.UaEPKJVA_zI">voted&lt;/a> [AP report] to narrow to bill's scope to employment last week. The bill will now move back to the Senate, which is expected to approve the measure. In addition, &lt;a href="http://prfaa.pr.gov/governornd2.asp">Governor Alejandro Garcia Padilla&lt;/a> [official profile] has reportedly indicated his intent to sign the bill after its final approval. According to reports, Puerto Rico has enacted several other measures to foster equality in 2013, including an executive order which extends health insurance coverage to domestic partners of workers in the executive branch. In addition, the &lt;a href="http://www.justicia.pr.gov">Puerto Rico Department of Justice&lt;/a> [official website] is reportedly prosecuting the nation's first hate-crime case.  

&lt;p>LGBT and gender rights have been an issue in Puerto Rico in the past. In February Puerto Rico's Supreme Court &lt;a href="/paperchase/2013/02/puerto-rico-supreme-court-upholds-same-sex-adoption-ban.php">upheld&lt;/a> [JURIST report] a law banning same-sex couples from adopting children. In a 5-4 judgment, the court upheld the constitutionality of a law making it legally impossible for a person to adopt a child if the potential adopter is of the same sex as the child's legal parent. Other nations have recently sought to make strides towards equality. In July Chile &lt;a href="/paperchase/2012/07/chile-president-signs-hate-crime-bill.php">enacted an anti-discrimination law&lt;/a> [JURIST report] following the March 2012 beating death of a young gay man in a Santiago park. In June Ontario lawmakers on &lt;a href="/paperchase/2012/06/ontario-amends-anti-discrimination-code-to-include-transgender-protections.php">unanimously approved&lt;/a> [JURIST report] an amendment to the province's Human Rights Code that prohibits discrimination based on gender identity and gender expression.&lt;/p>]]></description>
      <guid>http://jurist.org/paperchase/2013/05/puerto-rico-lawmakers-approve-gender-sexual-orientation-discrimination-law.php</guid>
      <pubDate>2013-05-25T12:26:29-05:00</pubDate>
      <title>Puerto Rico lawmakers approve gender, sexual orientation discrimination law</title>
      <link>http://jurist.org/paperchase/2013/05/puerto-rico-lawmakers-approve-gender-sexual-orientation-discrimination-law.php</link>
      <author>Benjamin Minegar</author>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<![CDATA[<table align="left" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr><td><img src="/topstoryphoto/frontpuertorico.jpg" alt="Photo source or description" valign="top" align="left" border="1" hspace="0" vspace="4"></td><td><img src="/images/s.gif" border="0" height="1" width="5"></td></tr></tbody></table>[JURIST] Puerto Rico's House of Representatives on Thursday approved a bill that prohibits discrimination on the basis of gender or sexual orientation in places of employment. According to media sources, the bill originally included protections for commercial transactions, housing, governmental services, and public accommodations, but the Senate <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/puerto-rico-approves-anti-discrimination-bill-19253069#.UaEPKJVA_zI">voted</a> [AP report] to narrow to bill's scope to employment last week. The bill will now move back to the Senate, which is expected to approve the measure. In addition, <a href="http://prfaa.pr.gov/governornd2.asp">Governor Alejandro Garcia Padilla</a> [official profile] has reportedly indicated his intent to sign the bill after its final approval. According to reports, Puerto Rico has enacted several other measures to foster equality in 2013, including an executive order which extends health insurance coverage to domestic partners of workers in the executive branch. In addition, the <a href="http://www.justicia.pr.gov">Puerto Rico Department of Justice</a> [official website] is reportedly prosecuting the nation's first hate-crime case.  

<p>LGBT and gender rights have been an issue in Puerto Rico in the past. In February Puerto Rico's Supreme Court <a href="/paperchase/2013/02/puerto-rico-supreme-court-upholds-same-sex-adoption-ban.php">upheld</a> [JURIST report] a law banning same-sex couples from adopting children. In a 5-4 judgment, the court upheld the constitutionality of a law making it legally impossible for a person to adopt a child if the potential adopter is of the same sex as the child's legal parent. Other nations have recently sought to make strides towards equality. In July Chile <a href="/paperchase/2012/07/chile-president-signs-hate-crime-bill.php">enacted an anti-discrimination law</a> [JURIST report] following the March 2012 beating death of a young gay man in a Santiago park. In June Ontario lawmakers on <a href="/paperchase/2012/06/ontario-amends-anti-discrimination-code-to-include-transgender-protections.php">unanimously approved</a> [JURIST report] an amendment to the province's Human Rights Code that prohibits discrimination based on gender identity and gender expression.</p>]]>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <description><![CDATA[&lt;p> &lt;table align="left" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">&lt;tbody>&lt;tr>&lt;td>&lt;img src="/topstoryphoto/frontunhumanrights.jpg" alt="Photo source or description" valign="top" align="left" border="1" hspace="0" vspace="4">&lt;/td>&lt;td>&lt;img src="/images/s.gif" border="0" height="1" width="5">&lt;/td>&lt;/tr>&lt;/tbody>&lt;/table>[JURIST] A group of UN independent experts on Friday urged South Asian countries to strengthen legislation to &lt;a href="http://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=13352&LangID=E ">prevent caste-based discrimination&lt;/a> [press release]. In South Asia, those members of society who are of low caste are referred to as "Dalits" or "untouchables." The UN experts noted that Dalits endure "marginalization, social and economic exclusion, segregation in housing, limited access to basic services including water and sanitation and employment, enforcement of certain types of menial jobs, and working conditions similar to slavery." The experts emphasized that Dalit women and girls are particularly susceptible to abuse born from this type of discrimination. Besides urging countries to adopt legislation to combat case-based abuses, the UN experts also called on world governments to support and implement the &lt;a href="http://idsn.org/uploads/media/UN_Principles_And_Guidelines_-_IDSN.pdf">UN Principles and Guidelines&lt;/a> [text, PDF] for the elimination of caste-based discrimination.&lt;/p>

&lt;p>South Asian caste systems remain controversial. Last year &lt;a href="http://hrnk.org">the Committee for Human Rights in North Korea&lt;/a> (HRNK) [advocacy website] reported that North Korea's caste system &lt;a href="/paperchase/2012/06/north-korea-caste-system-leads-to-human-rights-violations-report.php">leads to abuses&lt;/a> [JURIST report] and human rights violations. In 2010 the Nepalese District Court in Baitadi &lt;a href="/paperchase/2010/03/nepal-rights-groups-praise-court.php">issued two judgments&lt;/a> [JURIST report] against caste-based discrimination in Nepal. In 2008 the &lt;a href=" http://www.supremecourtofindia.nic.in/">Supreme Court of India&lt;/a> [official website] &lt;a href="/paperchase/2008/04/india-high-court-upholds-educational.php">upheld a government program&lt;/a> [JURIST report] reserving seats at India's top state schools for members of lower castes.&lt;/p>]]></description>
      <guid>http://jurist.org/paperchase/2013/05/un-rights-experts-urger-south-asian-countries-to-strengthen-legislation.php</guid>
      <pubDate>2013-05-25T11:56:25-05:00</pubDate>
      <title>UN rights experts urge stronger legislation against caste-based discrimination</title>
      <link>http://jurist.org/paperchase/2013/05/un-rights-experts-urger-south-asian-countries-to-strengthen-legislation.php</link>
      <author>Blake Lynch</author>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<![CDATA[<p> <table align="left" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr><td><img src="/topstoryphoto/frontunhumanrights.jpg" alt="Photo source or description" valign="top" align="left" border="1" hspace="0" vspace="4"></td><td><img src="/images/s.gif" border="0" height="1" width="5"></td></tr></tbody></table>[JURIST] A group of UN independent experts on Friday urged South Asian countries to strengthen legislation to <a href="http://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=13352&LangID=E ">prevent caste-based discrimination</a> [press release]. In South Asia, those members of society who are of low caste are referred to as "Dalits" or "untouchables." The UN experts noted that Dalits endure "marginalization, social and economic exclusion, segregation in housing, limited access to basic services including water and sanitation and employment, enforcement of certain types of menial jobs, and working conditions similar to slavery." The experts emphasized that Dalit women and girls are particularly susceptible to abuse born from this type of discrimination. Besides urging countries to adopt legislation to combat case-based abuses, the UN experts also called on world governments to support and implement the <a href="http://idsn.org/uploads/media/UN_Principles_And_Guidelines_-_IDSN.pdf">UN Principles and Guidelines</a> [text, PDF] for the elimination of caste-based discrimination.</p>

<p>South Asian caste systems remain controversial. Last year <a href="http://hrnk.org">the Committee for Human Rights in North Korea</a> (HRNK) [advocacy website] reported that North Korea's caste system <a href="/paperchase/2012/06/north-korea-caste-system-leads-to-human-rights-violations-report.php">leads to abuses</a> [JURIST report] and human rights violations. In 2010 the Nepalese District Court in Baitadi <a href="/paperchase/2010/03/nepal-rights-groups-praise-court.php">issued two judgments</a> [JURIST report] against caste-based discrimination in Nepal. In 2008 the <a href=" http://www.supremecourtofindia.nic.in/">Supreme Court of India</a> [official website] <a href="/paperchase/2008/04/india-high-court-upholds-educational.php">upheld a government program</a> [JURIST report] reserving seats at India's top state schools for members of lower castes.</p>]]>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <description><![CDATA[&lt;table align="left" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">&lt;tbody>&lt;tr>&lt;td>&lt;img src="/topstoryphoto/frontfederalcourtruling.jpg" alt="Photo source or description" valign="top" align="left" border="1" hspace="0" vspace="4">&lt;/td>&lt;td>&lt;img src="/images/s.gif" border="0" height="1" width="5">&lt;/td>&lt;/tr>&lt;/tbody>&lt;/table>[JURIST] The &lt;a href="http://www.ca3.uscourts.gov">US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit&lt;/a> [official website] on Friday &lt;a href="http://www.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/113277p.pdf">upheld&lt;/a> [opinion, PDF] the conviction and 28-year sentence for former &lt;a href="http://www.luzernecounty.org/county/court_system/court_of_common_pleas">Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas&lt;/a> [official website] judge Mark Ciavarella Jr. In February 2011 Ciavarella was &lt;a href="/paperchase/2011/02/jury-reaches-mixed-verdict-over-pennsylvania-juvenile-sentencing-scandal.php">convicted by a jury&lt;/a> [JURIST report] in the &lt;a href="http://www.pamd.uscourts.gov/">US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania&lt;/a> [official website] of racketeering, mail fraud, money laundering, tax fraud and other related crimes. The convictions stemmed from a &lt;a href="/jurist_search.php?q=sentencing+scandal">juvenile sentencing scandal&lt;/a> [JURIST news archive] in which Ciavarella and judge Michael Conahan allegedly received $2.8 million in kickbacks from a commercial builder, an attorney and a businessman in exchange for helping to construct and operate two juvenile detention centers, and placing hundreds of juvenile offenders there. In August 2011 the court &lt;a href="/paperchase/2011/08/pennsylvania-judge-sentenced-to-28-years-for-juvenile-sentencing-scandal.php">sentenced&lt;/a> [JURIST report] Ciavarella to 28 years in prison despite his eligibility for a life sentence under federal sentencing guidelines. On appeal, Ciavarella specifically challenged denial of his motions to disqualify the district judge, arguing that the judge had "improperly relied on extrajudicial statements" by commenting to the media and public before denying Ciavarella's plea agreement. The appellate court, however, found that the district judge's statements did not constitute the requisite bias required for disqualification under &lt;a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/455">28 USC &#167; 455(a)&lt;/a> [text] because they did not display "a deep-seated favoritism or antagonism that would make fair judgment impossible." Pursuant to the ruling, Ciavarella will continue to serve his 28-year sentence in federal prison in Illinois. 

&lt;p>Ciavarella's trial &lt;a href="/paperchase/2011/02/former-pennsylvania-judge-goes-on-trial-over-juvenile-sentencing-scandal.php">began&lt;/a> [JURIST report] in early February 2011. In December 2012 a federal judge &lt;a href="/paperchase/2012/12/judge-approves-settlement-in-pa-juvenile-sentencing-suit.php">approved a settlement&lt;/a> [JURIST report] of almost $18 million in a lawsuit brought by juveniles wrongfully incarcerated by the two judges. In July 2010 Judge Edwin Kosik &lt;a href="/paperchase/2010/07/federal-judge-accepts-plea-agreement-in-juvenile-sentencing-scandal.php">accepted&lt;/a> [JURIST report] a plea agreement from former judge Conahan for his involvement in the juvenile sentencing scandal. Conahan now faces a 20-year prison sentence, a fine of up to $250,000 and disbarment. Kosik had previously &lt;a href="/paperchase/2010/07/federal-judge-accepts-plea-agreement-in-juvenile-sentencing-scandal.php">rejected&lt;/a> [JURIST report] joint plea agreements from Conahan and Ciavarella, finding that plea bargaining to honest services fraud and tax evasion charges demonstrated that the men did not accept responsibility and that the disbarment and 87-month prison &lt;a href="/forum/2009/02/sentencing-children-for-kickbacks.php">sentences were too lenient&lt;/a> [JURIST op-ed]. In October 2009 the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania &lt;a href="/paperchase/2009/10/pennsylvania-court-overturns-thousands.php">overturned 6,500 juvenile-offender convictions issued by Ciavarella&lt;/a> [JURIST report].  Conahan and Ciavarella were &lt;a href="/paperchase/2011/02/paperchase/2009/09/former-pennsylvania-judges-indicted-in.php">indicted&lt;/a> in September 2009, following a &lt;a href="/paperchase/2011/02/paperchase/2009/08/pennsylvania-judges-in-juvenile.php">withdrawal&lt;/a> of the guilty pleas they &lt;a href="/paperchase/2009/02/pennsylvania-judges-plead-guilty-to.php">entered&lt;/a> [JURIST reports] in February 2009.&lt;/p>]]></description>
      <guid>http://jurist.org/paperchase/2013/05/third-circuit-upholds-conviction-in-pennsylvania-juvenile-sentencing-scandal.php</guid>
      <pubDate>2013-05-25T10:16:16-05:00</pubDate>
      <title>Third Circuit upholds conviction in Pennsylvania juvenile sentencing scandal</title>
      <link>http://jurist.org/paperchase/2013/05/third-circuit-upholds-conviction-in-pennsylvania-juvenile-sentencing-scandal.php</link>
      <author>Benjamin Minegar</author>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<![CDATA[<table align="left" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr><td><img src="/topstoryphoto/frontfederalcourtruling.jpg" alt="Photo source or description" valign="top" align="left" border="1" hspace="0" vspace="4"></td><td><img src="/images/s.gif" border="0" height="1" width="5"></td></tr></tbody></table>[JURIST] The <a href="http://www.ca3.uscourts.gov">US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit</a> [official website] on Friday <a href="http://www.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/113277p.pdf">upheld</a> [opinion, PDF] the conviction and 28-year sentence for former <a href="http://www.luzernecounty.org/county/court_system/court_of_common_pleas">Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas</a> [official website] judge Mark Ciavarella Jr. In February 2011 Ciavarella was <a href="/paperchase/2011/02/jury-reaches-mixed-verdict-over-pennsylvania-juvenile-sentencing-scandal.php">convicted by a jury</a> [JURIST report] in the <a href="http://www.pamd.uscourts.gov/">US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania</a> [official website] of racketeering, mail fraud, money laundering, tax fraud and other related crimes. The convictions stemmed from a <a href="/jurist_search.php?q=sentencing+scandal">juvenile sentencing scandal</a> [JURIST news archive] in which Ciavarella and judge Michael Conahan allegedly received $2.8 million in kickbacks from a commercial builder, an attorney and a businessman in exchange for helping to construct and operate two juvenile detention centers, and placing hundreds of juvenile offenders there. In August 2011 the court <a href="/paperchase/2011/08/pennsylvania-judge-sentenced-to-28-years-for-juvenile-sentencing-scandal.php">sentenced</a> [JURIST report] Ciavarella to 28 years in prison despite his eligibility for a life sentence under federal sentencing guidelines. On appeal, Ciavarella specifically challenged denial of his motions to disqualify the district judge, arguing that the judge had "improperly relied on extrajudicial statements" by commenting to the media and public before denying Ciavarella's plea agreement. The appellate court, however, found that the district judge's statements did not constitute the requisite bias required for disqualification under <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/455">28 USC &#167; 455(a)</a> [text] because they did not display "a deep-seated favoritism or antagonism that would make fair judgment impossible." Pursuant to the ruling, Ciavarella will continue to serve his 28-year sentence in federal prison in Illinois. 

<p>Ciavarella's trial <a href="/paperchase/2011/02/former-pennsylvania-judge-goes-on-trial-over-juvenile-sentencing-scandal.php">began</a> [JURIST report] in early February 2011. In December 2012 a federal judge <a href="/paperchase/2012/12/judge-approves-settlement-in-pa-juvenile-sentencing-suit.php">approved a settlement</a> [JURIST report] of almost $18 million in a lawsuit brought by juveniles wrongfully incarcerated by the two judges. In July 2010 Judge Edwin Kosik <a href="/paperchase/2010/07/federal-judge-accepts-plea-agreement-in-juvenile-sentencing-scandal.php">accepted</a> [JURIST report] a plea agreement from former judge Conahan for his involvement in the juvenile sentencing scandal. Conahan now faces a 20-year prison sentence, a fine of up to $250,000 and disbarment. Kosik had previously <a href="/paperchase/2010/07/federal-judge-accepts-plea-agreement-in-juvenile-sentencing-scandal.php">rejected</a> [JURIST report] joint plea agreements from Conahan and Ciavarella, finding that plea bargaining to honest services fraud and tax evasion charges demonstrated that the men did not accept responsibility and that the disbarment and 87-month prison <a href="/forum/2009/02/sentencing-children-for-kickbacks.php">sentences were too lenient</a> [JURIST op-ed]. In October 2009 the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania <a href="/paperchase/2009/10/pennsylvania-court-overturns-thousands.php">overturned 6,500 juvenile-offender convictions issued by Ciavarella</a> [JURIST report].  Conahan and Ciavarella were <a href="/paperchase/2011/02/paperchase/2009/09/former-pennsylvania-judges-indicted-in.php">indicted</a> in September 2009, following a <a href="/paperchase/2011/02/paperchase/2009/08/pennsylvania-judges-in-juvenile.php">withdrawal</a> of the guilty pleas they <a href="/paperchase/2009/02/pennsylvania-judges-plead-guilty-to.php">entered</a> [JURIST reports] in February 2009.</p>]]>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <description><![CDATA[&lt;table align="left" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">&lt;tbody>&lt;tr>&lt;td>&lt;img src="/topstoryphoto/frontafricanunion.jpg" alt="Photo source or description" valign="top" align="left" border="1" hspace="0" vspace="4">&lt;/td>&lt;td>&lt;img src="/images/s.gif" border="0" height="1" width="5">&lt;/td>&lt;/tr>&lt;/tbody>&lt;/table>[JURIST] African foreign ministers agreed Friday to request that Kenyan leaders accused of inciting violence following the 2007 elections stand trial in their home country rather than before the &lt;a href="http://www.icc-cpi.int/EN_Menus/icc/Pages/default.aspx">International Criminal Court&lt;/a> (ICC) [official website] in The Hague. This follows Tuesday's &lt;a href="http://www.tjrckenya.org/images/documents/TJRC_report_Volume_4.pdf">report&lt;/a> [text, PDF] by the &lt;a href="http://www.tjrckenya.org/">Truth Justice and Reconciliation Commission&lt;/a> [advocacy website] &lt;a href="/paperchase/2013/05/kenya-report-connects-president-vp-to-post-election-violence.php">connecting&lt;/a> [JURIST report] the Kenyan leaders to the violence. The African leaders' request stems from &lt;a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5jqMSzWPyx1lhjapIOmk97FRNz1eQ?docId=CNG.42e0aca09ab3f2ce235f023c7b6dde42.621">accusations&lt;/a> [AFP report] by members of the African Union that the ICC targets African governments that do not please western leaders. The president and vice president of Kenya, &lt;a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-21544245">Uhuru Kenyatta&lt;/a> [BBC profile; JURIST &lt;a href="/jurist_search.php?q=uhuru+kenyatta">news archive&lt;/a>] and &lt;a href="/jurist_search.php?q=william+ruto">William Ruto&lt;/a> [JURIST news archive], respectively, stand accused of inciting &lt;a href="/jurist_search.php?q=Kenya">violence following the 2007 elections&lt;/a> [JURIST news archive] in which more than 1,100 people died. 

&lt;p>This is the latest in the controversy surrounding Kenyatta and Ruto's involvement in the human rights violations. Despite the allegations, both were able to win the &lt;a href="/paperchase/2013/04/icc-indictee-kenyatta-sworn-in-as-fourth-president-of-kenya.php">recent election&lt;/a> [JURIST report]. Earlier this month the Kenyan ambassador to the UN requested the ICC &lt;a href="/paperchase/2013/05/kenya-un-ambassador-seeks-dismissal-of-icc-charges-against-president.php">drop the charges&lt;/a> [JURIST report] against Kenyatta and Ruto. Also this month the ICC continued to &lt;a href="/paperchase/2013/05/icc-postpones-trial-of-kenya-vice-president.php">postpone&lt;/a> [JURIST report] Ruto's trial. In April a judge overseeing Kenyatta's case &lt;a href="/paperchase/2013/04/icc-judge-withdraws-from-case-against-kenya-president.php">withdrew&lt;/a> [JURIST report] from the case, after the President's personal attorney requested that the charges be dropped. &lt;/p>]]></description>
      <guid>http://jurist.org/paperchase/2013/05/african-leaders-to-request-icc-try-kenyan-leaders-in-kenya.php</guid>
      <pubDate>2013-05-24T15:03:40-05:00</pubDate>
      <title>African leaders to request Kenyan leaders be tried domestically</title>
      <link>http://jurist.org/paperchase/2013/05/african-leaders-to-request-icc-try-kenyan-leaders-in-kenya.php</link>
      <author>G. Redd</author>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<![CDATA[<table align="left" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr><td><img src="/topstoryphoto/frontafricanunion.jpg" alt="Photo source or description" valign="top" align="left" border="1" hspace="0" vspace="4"></td><td><img src="/images/s.gif" border="0" height="1" width="5"></td></tr></tbody></table>[JURIST] African foreign ministers agreed Friday to request that Kenyan leaders accused of inciting violence following the 2007 elections stand trial in their home country rather than before the <a href="http://www.icc-cpi.int/EN_Menus/icc/Pages/default.aspx">International Criminal Court</a> (ICC) [official website] in The Hague. This follows Tuesday's <a href="http://www.tjrckenya.org/images/documents/TJRC_report_Volume_4.pdf">report</a> [text, PDF] by the <a href="http://www.tjrckenya.org/">Truth Justice and Reconciliation Commission</a> [advocacy website] <a href="/paperchase/2013/05/kenya-report-connects-president-vp-to-post-election-violence.php">connecting</a> [JURIST report] the Kenyan leaders to the violence. The African leaders' request stems from <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5jqMSzWPyx1lhjapIOmk97FRNz1eQ?docId=CNG.42e0aca09ab3f2ce235f023c7b6dde42.621">accusations</a> [AFP report] by members of the African Union that the ICC targets African governments that do not please western leaders. The president and vice president of Kenya, <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-21544245">Uhuru Kenyatta</a> [BBC profile; JURIST <a href="/jurist_search.php?q=uhuru+kenyatta">news archive</a>] and <a href="/jurist_search.php?q=william+ruto">William Ruto</a> [JURIST news archive], respectively, stand accused of inciting <a href="/jurist_search.php?q=Kenya">violence following the 2007 elections</a> [JURIST news archive] in which more than 1,100 people died. 

<p>This is the latest in the controversy surrounding Kenyatta and Ruto's involvement in the human rights violations. Despite the allegations, both were able to win the <a href="/paperchase/2013/04/icc-indictee-kenyatta-sworn-in-as-fourth-president-of-kenya.php">recent election</a> [JURIST report]. Earlier this month the Kenyan ambassador to the UN requested the ICC <a href="/paperchase/2013/05/kenya-un-ambassador-seeks-dismissal-of-icc-charges-against-president.php">drop the charges</a> [JURIST report] against Kenyatta and Ruto. Also this month the ICC continued to <a href="/paperchase/2013/05/icc-postpones-trial-of-kenya-vice-president.php">postpone</a> [JURIST report] Ruto's trial. In April a judge overseeing Kenyatta's case <a href="/paperchase/2013/04/icc-judge-withdraws-from-case-against-kenya-president.php">withdrew</a> [JURIST report] from the case, after the President's personal attorney requested that the charges be dropped. </p>]]>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <description><![CDATA[&lt;table align="left" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">&lt;tbody>&lt;tr>&lt;td>&lt;img src="/topstoryphoto/frontcourt.jpg" alt="Photo source or description" valign="top" align="left" border="1" hspace="0" vspace="4">&lt;/td>&lt;td>&lt;img src="/images/s.gif" border="0" height="1" width="5">&lt;/td>&lt;/tr>&lt;/tbody>&lt;/table>[JURIST] Finnish telecommunications company &lt;a href="http://www.nokia.com/us-en/">Nokia&lt;/a> filed suit against Taiwanese company &lt;a href="http://www.htc.com/us/smartphones/htc-one/?PS=1&cid=sem157p174343&gclid=CLTGwYOor7cCFcij4AodC3AAcg">HTC&lt;/a> [corporate websites] Thursday for selling products in the US that infringe Nokia's patents on mobile technology. Three patents in question involve program products typically used in hand sets for a mobile phone. Thursday's suit brings the &lt;a href="http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/2270425/nokia-goes-after-the-htc-one-with-another-patent-lawsuit">total number&lt;/a> [&lt;em>Inquirer&lt;/em> report] of Nokia patents being asserted against HTC in courts around the world to 50.

&lt;p>Nokia has a &lt;a href="/jurist_search.php?q=Nokia">long history&lt;/a> [JURIST news archive] of holding other companies accountable in the courts. HTC finds itself across the aisle from Nokia with &lt;a href="http://www.apple.com/">Apple&lt;/a>, Rhythm in Motion (known for their &lt;a href="http://us.blackberry.com/smartphones/blackberry-z10/buy.html?CPID=KNC-kw379030_p6&HBX_PK=rim|32278df2-cfef-9da9-c265-000016da7950">Blackberry products&lt;/a>), the German law firm &lt;a href="http://www.ipcom-munich.com/home_en.html">IPCom GmbH &#38; Co&lt;/a>, amongst others. For example, In March 2011 Nokia announced that it had filed &lt;a href="/paperchase/2011/03/nokia-files-new-round-of-patent-suits-against-apple.php">complaints against Apple&lt;/a> [JURIST report] with the US International Trade Commission (ITC). That complaint alleged that Apple violated seven patents regarding various technological devices and their operating systems. Previous to that announcement, Nokia and Apple had both sued each other over more than 20 patents in more than four countries.&lt;/p>]]></description>
      <guid>http://jurist.org/paperchase/2013/05/nokia-files-patent-infringement-suit-against-htc.php</guid>
      <pubDate>2013-05-24T12:38:35-05:00</pubDate>
      <title>Nokia files patent infringement suit against HTC</title>
      <link>http://jurist.org/paperchase/2013/05/nokia-files-patent-infringement-suit-against-htc.php</link>
      <author>G. Redd</author>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<![CDATA[<table align="left" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr><td><img src="/topstoryphoto/frontcourt.jpg" alt="Photo source or description" valign="top" align="left" border="1" hspace="0" vspace="4"></td><td><img src="/images/s.gif" border="0" height="1" width="5"></td></tr></tbody></table>[JURIST] Finnish telecommunications company <a href="http://www.nokia.com/us-en/">Nokia</a> filed suit against Taiwanese company <a href="http://www.htc.com/us/smartphones/htc-one/?PS=1&cid=sem157p174343&gclid=CLTGwYOor7cCFcij4AodC3AAcg">HTC</a> [corporate websites] Thursday for selling products in the US that infringe Nokia's patents on mobile technology. Three patents in question involve program products typically used in hand sets for a mobile phone. Thursday's suit brings the <a href="http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/2270425/nokia-goes-after-the-htc-one-with-another-patent-lawsuit">total number</a> [<em>Inquirer</em> report] of Nokia patents being asserted against HTC in courts around the world to 50.

<p>Nokia has a <a href="/jurist_search.php?q=Nokia">long history</a> [JURIST news archive] of holding other companies accountable in the courts. HTC finds itself across the aisle from Nokia with <a href="http://www.apple.com/">Apple</a>, Rhythm in Motion (known for their <a href="http://us.blackberry.com/smartphones/blackberry-z10/buy.html?CPID=KNC-kw379030_p6&HBX_PK=rim|32278df2-cfef-9da9-c265-000016da7950">Blackberry products</a>), the German law firm <a href="http://www.ipcom-munich.com/home_en.html">IPCom GmbH &#38; Co</a>, amongst others. For example, In March 2011 Nokia announced that it had filed <a href="/paperchase/2011/03/nokia-files-new-round-of-patent-suits-against-apple.php">complaints against Apple</a> [JURIST report] with the US International Trade Commission (ITC). That complaint alleged that Apple violated seven patents regarding various technological devices and their operating systems. Previous to that announcement, Nokia and Apple had both sued each other over more than 20 patents in more than four countries.</p>]]>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <description><![CDATA[&lt;table align="left" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">&lt;tbody>&lt;tr>&lt;td>&lt;img src="/topstoryphoto/frontcourt.jpg" alt="Photo source or description" valign="top" align="left" border="1" hspace="0" vspace="4">&lt;/td>&lt;td>&lt;img src="/images/s.gif" border="0" height="1" width="5">&lt;/td>&lt;/tr>&lt;/tbody>&lt;/table>[JURIST] &lt;a href="http://www.hobbylobby.com/">Hobby Lobby, Inc.&lt;/a> [corporate website] requested an exemption from the mandate to provide employees with coverage for contraceptives under the &lt;a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d111:H.R.3590:">Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act&lt;/a> (PPACA) [text; JURIST &lt;a href="/feature/featured/health-care-reform/">backgrounder&lt;/a>] in an &lt;em>en banc&lt;/em> hearing before the &lt;a href="http://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/index.php">US Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit&lt;/a> [official website] on Thursday. The Green family, founders of Hobby Lobby and its sister company Mardel, &lt;a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/may/23/hobby-lobby-appeals-birth-control-obamacare">contend&lt;/a> [AP report] that businesses, not just the currently exempted religious groups, should be excepted from that part of the health law if it violates the business-owners' religious beliefs. The &lt;a href="http://www.okwd.uscourts.gov/">US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma&lt;/a> [official website], from which the Green family appealed, &lt;a href="http://www.becketfund.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Order-for-HL-PI.pdf">ruled&lt;/a> [opinion, PDF] that for-profit businesses are not covered by the exemption for religious organizations, which currently applies to churches themselves, but not to affiliated nonprofit corporations, like hospitals, which do not rely primarily on members of the faith as employees.

&lt;p>Thursday's &lt;em>en banc&lt;/em> hearing is the most recent development in the challenge by the Green family in its fight against the PPACA. In February a group of nine senators and two representatives &lt;a href="/paperchase/2013/02/us-legislators-join-hobby-lobby-in-challenge-to-contraception-mandate.php">joined to file an &lt;em>amicus&lt;/em> brief&lt;/a> in support of Hobby Lobby and Mardel. Last December the US &lt;a href="http://www.supremecourt.gov/">Supreme Court&lt;/a> [official website] said it would &lt;a href="/paperchase/2012/12/supreme-court-justice-denies-injunction-against-contraceptive-coverage-mandate.php">not intervene&lt;/a> [JURIST report] by issuing an injunction while an appeal was still pending with the Tenth Circuit, to which the Greens have responded that they will &lt;a href="/paperchase/2012/12/two-businesses-will-not-comply-with-supreme-courts-order-on-contraception-mandate.php">not comply&lt;/a> [JURIST report] with the mandate even without a protective injunction. Justice Sonia Sotomayor ruled that the Oklahoma City family's religiously oriented business did not meet the requirements to allow an injunction against the PPACA's mandate. The opinion stated that the Hobby Lobby family did not meet the standard of showing that they have an "indisputably clear" legal right to an injunction while appeal is pending. &lt;/p>]]></description>
      <guid>http://jurist.org/paperchase/2013/05/tenth-circuit-hears-hobby-lobby-appeal-of-health-care-ruling.php</guid>
      <pubDate>2013-05-24T11:51:00-05:00</pubDate>
      <title>Tenth Circuit hears Hobby Lobby appeal of health care ruling</title>
      <link>http://jurist.org/paperchase/2013/05/tenth-circuit-hears-hobby-lobby-appeal-of-health-care-ruling.php</link>
      <author>Julie Deisher</author>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<![CDATA[<table align="left" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr><td><img src="/topstoryphoto/frontcourt.jpg" alt="Photo source or description" valign="top" align="left" border="1" hspace="0" vspace="4"></td><td><img src="/images/s.gif" border="0" height="1" width="5"></td></tr></tbody></table>[JURIST] <a href="http://www.hobbylobby.com/">Hobby Lobby, Inc.</a> [corporate website] requested an exemption from the mandate to provide employees with coverage for contraceptives under the <a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d111:H.R.3590:">Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act</a> (PPACA) [text; JURIST <a href="/feature/featured/health-care-reform/">backgrounder</a>] in an <em>en banc</em> hearing before the <a href="http://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/index.php">US Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit</a> [official website] on Thursday. The Green family, founders of Hobby Lobby and its sister company Mardel, <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/may/23/hobby-lobby-appeals-birth-control-obamacare">contend</a> [AP report] that businesses, not just the currently exempted religious groups, should be excepted from that part of the health law if it violates the business-owners' religious beliefs. The <a href="http://www.okwd.uscourts.gov/">US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma</a> [official website], from which the Green family appealed, <a href="http://www.becketfund.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Order-for-HL-PI.pdf">ruled</a> [opinion, PDF] that for-profit businesses are not covered by the exemption for religious organizations, which currently applies to churches themselves, but not to affiliated nonprofit corporations, like hospitals, which do not rely primarily on members of the faith as employees.

<p>Thursday's <em>en banc</em> hearing is the most recent development in the challenge by the Green family in its fight against the PPACA. In February a group of nine senators and two representatives <a href="/paperchase/2013/02/us-legislators-join-hobby-lobby-in-challenge-to-contraception-mandate.php">joined to file an <em>amicus</em> brief</a> in support of Hobby Lobby and Mardel. Last December the US <a href="http://www.supremecourt.gov/">Supreme Court</a> [official website] said it would <a href="/paperchase/2012/12/supreme-court-justice-denies-injunction-against-contraceptive-coverage-mandate.php">not intervene</a> [JURIST report] by issuing an injunction while an appeal was still pending with the Tenth Circuit, to which the Greens have responded that they will <a href="/paperchase/2012/12/two-businesses-will-not-comply-with-supreme-courts-order-on-contraception-mandate.php">not comply</a> [JURIST report] with the mandate even without a protective injunction. Justice Sonia Sotomayor ruled that the Oklahoma City family's religiously oriented business did not meet the requirements to allow an injunction against the PPACA's mandate. The opinion stated that the Hobby Lobby family did not meet the standard of showing that they have an "indisputably clear" legal right to an injunction while appeal is pending. </p>]]>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <description><![CDATA[&lt;table align="left" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">&lt;tbody>&lt;tr>&lt;td>&lt;img src="/topstoryphoto/fronteulex.jpg" alt="Photo source or description" valign="top" align="left" border="1" hspace="0" vspace="4">&lt;/td>&lt;td>&lt;img src="/images/s.gif" border="0" height="1" width="5">&lt;/td>&lt;/tr>&lt;/tbody>&lt;/table>[JURIST] The &lt;a href="http://www.eulex-kosovo.eu/en/pressreleases/0443.php">European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo&lt;/a> (EULEX) [official website] and the &lt;a href="http://www.eulex-kosovo.eu/docs/Accountability/EULEX-PROGRAMME-REPORT-July-2009-new.pdf">Kosovo Police Special Operations Unit ROSU&lt;/a> [EU backgrounder, PDF] arrested five people Thursday on suspicion of war crimes in the &lt;a href="/jurist_search.php?q=Kosovo">1998-1999 conflict&lt;/a> [JURIST news archive]. Although the names of the accused were not released, the lawyer for Sami Lushtaku announced that his client is among those arrested. Lushtaku is the mayor of the town of &lt;a href="http://www.osce.org/kosovo/13273">Skenderaj&lt;/a> [OSCE backgrounder, PDF], and is a close ally of Kosovo &lt;a href="http://www.osce.org/kosovo/13273">Prime Minister Hashim Thaci&lt;/a> [official website]. Both men served as commanders in the guerrilla &lt;a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-17907947">Kosovo Liberation Army&lt;/a> (KLA) [BBC backgrounder] during the conflict. Allegedly, Kosovo's ambassador to Albania is also among those arrested. The five accused parties are charged with "war crimes against the civilian population in the form of violation of bodily integrity and health of civilians held in a KLA detention centre... also for... the killing of one civilian." The order for the arrest came from a pre-trial judge of the &lt;a href="http://www.osce.org/kosovo/75526">Mitrovica Basic Court&lt;/a> [OSCE backgrounder, PDF] and will be prosecuted by the EULEX special prosecutor from the &lt;a href="http://www.eulex-kosovo.eu/en/justice/prosecution.php">Special Prosecution Office of Kosovo&lt;/a> (SPRK) [official website].

&lt;p>These arrests come on the heels of last month's &lt;a href="/paperchase/2013/04/retrial-begins-against-kosovo-politician-accused-of-war-crimes.php">retrial of KLA leaders&lt;/a> [JURIST report], as well as a landmark agreement between &lt;a href="http://www.state.gov/p/eur/ci/ri/">Serbia&lt;/a> and &lt;a href="http://www.state.gov/p/eur/ci/kv/">Kosovo&lt;/a> [US State Department backgrounders] regarding &lt;a href="/paperchase/2013/04/un-welcomes-landmark-agreement-between-serbia-and-kosovo.php">membership in the EU&lt;/a> [JURIST report]. Tensions have remained high between the two nations since Kosovo declared independence from Serbia, partly due to Serbia's refusal to recognize Kosovo as an independent nation. Last year &lt;a href="/paperchase/2012/02/eulex-arrests-6-serbia-government-agents-in-kosovo.php">EU Kosovo officials arrested six Serbian officials&lt;/a> [JURIST report] in Kosovo, alleging that they were "suspected of exerting undue pressure ... not to recognize Kosovo institutions." In 2010 Serbia's parliament &lt;a href="/paperchase/2010/07/serbia-parliament-rejects-kosovo-independence-in-perpetuity.php">passed a resolution&lt;/a> [JURIST report] stating that it would never recognize Kosovo as an independent nation. This resolution was passed days after the &lt;a href="http://www.icj-cij.org/">International Court of Justice&lt;/a> [official website] ruled that Kosovo's declaration of independence &lt;a href="/paperchase/2010/07/icj-rules-kosovo-independence-declaration-did-not-violate-international-law.php">did not violate international law&lt;/a> [JURIST report]. &lt;/p>]]></description>
      <guid>http://jurist.org/paperchase/2013/05/allies-of-kosovo-pm-probed-over-war-crimes.php</guid>
      <pubDate>2013-05-24T11:42:52-05:00</pubDate>
      <title>Allies of Kosovo PM probed over war crime allegations</title>
      <link>http://jurist.org/paperchase/2013/05/allies-of-kosovo-pm-probed-over-war-crimes.php</link>
      <author>G. Redd</author>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<![CDATA[<table align="left" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr><td><img src="/topstoryphoto/fronteulex.jpg" alt="Photo source or description" valign="top" align="left" border="1" hspace="0" vspace="4"></td><td><img src="/images/s.gif" border="0" height="1" width="5"></td></tr></tbody></table>[JURIST] The <a href="http://www.eulex-kosovo.eu/en/pressreleases/0443.php">European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo</a> (EULEX) [official website] and the <a href="http://www.eulex-kosovo.eu/docs/Accountability/EULEX-PROGRAMME-REPORT-July-2009-new.pdf">Kosovo Police Special Operations Unit ROSU</a> [EU backgrounder, PDF] arrested five people Thursday on suspicion of war crimes in the <a href="/jurist_search.php?q=Kosovo">1998-1999 conflict</a> [JURIST news archive]. Although the names of the accused were not released, the lawyer for Sami Lushtaku announced that his client is among those arrested. Lushtaku is the mayor of the town of <a href="http://www.osce.org/kosovo/13273">Skenderaj</a> [OSCE backgrounder, PDF], and is a close ally of Kosovo <a href="http://www.osce.org/kosovo/13273">Prime Minister Hashim Thaci</a> [official website]. Both men served as commanders in the guerrilla <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-17907947">Kosovo Liberation Army</a> (KLA) [BBC backgrounder] during the conflict. Allegedly, Kosovo's ambassador to Albania is also among those arrested. The five accused parties are charged with "war crimes against the civilian population in the form of violation of bodily integrity and health of civilians held in a KLA detention centre... also for... the killing of one civilian." The order for the arrest came from a pre-trial judge of the <a href="http://www.osce.org/kosovo/75526">Mitrovica Basic Court</a> [OSCE backgrounder, PDF] and will be prosecuted by the EULEX special prosecutor from the <a href="http://www.eulex-kosovo.eu/en/justice/prosecution.php">Special Prosecution Office of Kosovo</a> (SPRK) [official website].

<p>These arrests come on the heels of last month's <a href="/paperchase/2013/04/retrial-begins-against-kosovo-politician-accused-of-war-crimes.php">retrial of KLA leaders</a> [JURIST report], as well as a landmark agreement between <a href="http://www.state.gov/p/eur/ci/ri/">Serbia</a> and <a href="http://www.state.gov/p/eur/ci/kv/">Kosovo</a> [US State Department backgrounders] regarding <a href="/paperchase/2013/04/un-welcomes-landmark-agreement-between-serbia-and-kosovo.php">membership in the EU</a> [JURIST report]. Tensions have remained high between the two nations since Kosovo declared independence from Serbia, partly due to Serbia's refusal to recognize Kosovo as an independent nation. Last year <a href="/paperchase/2012/02/eulex-arrests-6-serbia-government-agents-in-kosovo.php">EU Kosovo officials arrested six Serbian officials</a> [JURIST report] in Kosovo, alleging that they were "suspected of exerting undue pressure ... not to recognize Kosovo institutions." In 2010 Serbia's parliament <a href="/paperchase/2010/07/serbia-parliament-rejects-kosovo-independence-in-perpetuity.php">passed a resolution</a> [JURIST report] stating that it would never recognize Kosovo as an independent nation. This resolution was passed days after the <a href="http://www.icj-cij.org/">International Court of Justice</a> [official website] ruled that Kosovo's declaration of independence <a href="/paperchase/2010/07/icj-rules-kosovo-independence-declaration-did-not-violate-international-law.php">did not violate international law</a> [JURIST report]. </p>]]>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <description><![CDATA[&lt;table align="left" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">&lt;tbody>&lt;tr>&lt;td>&lt;img src="/topstoryphoto/frontcourt.jpg" alt="Photo source or description" valign="top" align="left" border="1" hspace="0" vspace="4">&lt;/td>&lt;td>&lt;img src="/images/s.gif" border="0" height="1" width="5">&lt;/td>&lt;/tr>&lt;/tbody>&lt;/table>[JURIST] US District Judge Denise Cote expressed a tentative view on Thursday that the &lt;a href="http://www.justice.gov/">Department of Justice&lt;/a> (DOJ) [official website] would be able to show at trial that &lt;a href="http://www.apple.com/">Apple&lt;/a> [corporate website] knowingly participated in and facilitated a conspiracy to raise the prices of e-books with five publishers. She said her view was &lt;a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/05/23/us-usa-apple-ebooks-idUSBRE94M19A20130523">based largely&lt;/a> [Reuters report] on material submitted as evidence. The trial, set for June 3, will proceed in the &lt;a href="http://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/">US District Court for the Southern District of New York&lt;/a> [official website]. The DOJ's &lt;a href="http://www.justice.gov/atr/">Antitrust Division&lt;/a> [official website] has reached settlements with &lt;a href="/paperchase/2012/09/court-approves-settlement-in-e-book-conspiracy-suit.php">Hachette Book Group Inc., HarperCollins Publishers L.L.C., Simon &#38; Schuster Inc.&lt;/a>, &lt;a href="/paperchase/2012/12/doj-reaches-settlement-with-publisher-in-price-fixing-lawsuit.php">Penguin Group (USA) Inc.&lt;/a>, and Holtzbrinck Publishers LLC, known by the public as &lt;a href="/paperchase/2013/02/macmillan-settles-e-book-case-with-doj.php">Macmillan&lt;/a> [JURIST reports], leaving Apple as the sole defendant remaining in the litigation.

&lt;p>The DOJ alleged that Apple, &lt;a href="http://www.hachettebookgroup.com/">Hachette&lt;/a>, &lt;a href="http://www.harpercollins.com/">HarperCollins&lt;/a>, &lt;a href="http://www.macmillan.com/">Macmillan&lt;/a>, &lt;a href="http://www.us.penguingroup.com/">Penguin&lt;/a> and &lt;a href="http://www.simonandschuster.com/">Simon &#38; Schuster&lt;/a> [corporate websites] conspired to fix the prices of e-books in response to Amazon's discount pricing strategy. The DOJ &lt;a href="/paperchase/2012/04/doj-accuses-apple-publishers-of-e-book-price-fixing-conspiracy.php">brought the suit&lt;/a> in April, and the court &lt;a href="/paperchase/2012/05/federal-judge-denies-motion-to-dismiss-e-book-conspiracy-suit.php">denied a motion to dismiss&lt;/a> [JURIST reports] in May. Commentators had been very mixed in response to the proposed settlement agreement. Some commentators have suggested that the DOJ's lawsuit is merely &lt;a href="/forum/2012/04/daniel-crane-ebook-pricing.php">"superficial"&lt;/a> [JURIST op-ed] and that the effect of the agency agreements may actually have been a net-positive to consumers if Amazon was selling e-books at a loss in order to drive the sale of Kindles. Other commentators, however, state that commentators against the settlement agreement and the defendants' arguments are based on a premise that &lt;a href="/forum/2012/04/harry-gerla-ebook-pricing.php">competition is wrong&lt;/a> [JURIST op-ed].&lt;/p>]]></description>
      <guid>http://jurist.org/paperchase/2013/05/federal-judge-believes-doj-will-prevail-in-apple-antitrust-case.php</guid>
      <pubDate>2013-05-24T10:23:25-05:00</pubDate>
      <title>Federal judge gives preliminary view that DOJ will prevail in Apple antitrust case</title>
      <link>http://jurist.org/paperchase/2013/05/federal-judge-believes-doj-will-prevail-in-apple-antitrust-case.php</link>
      <author>Julie Deisher</author>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<![CDATA[<table align="left" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr><td><img src="/topstoryphoto/frontcourt.jpg" alt="Photo source or description" valign="top" align="left" border="1" hspace="0" vspace="4"></td><td><img src="/images/s.gif" border="0" height="1" width="5"></td></tr></tbody></table>[JURIST] US District Judge Denise Cote expressed a tentative view on Thursday that the <a href="http://www.justice.gov/">Department of Justice</a> (DOJ) [official website] would be able to show at trial that <a href="http://www.apple.com/">Apple</a> [corporate website] knowingly participated in and facilitated a conspiracy to raise the prices of e-books with five publishers. She said her view was <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/05/23/us-usa-apple-ebooks-idUSBRE94M19A20130523">based largely</a> [Reuters report] on material submitted as evidence. The trial, set for June 3, will proceed in the <a href="http://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/">US District Court for the Southern District of New York</a> [official website]. The DOJ's <a href="http://www.justice.gov/atr/">Antitrust Division</a> [official website] has reached settlements with <a href="/paperchase/2012/09/court-approves-settlement-in-e-book-conspiracy-suit.php">Hachette Book Group Inc., HarperCollins Publishers L.L.C., Simon &#38; Schuster Inc.</a>, <a href="/paperchase/2012/12/doj-reaches-settlement-with-publisher-in-price-fixing-lawsuit.php">Penguin Group (USA) Inc.</a>, and Holtzbrinck Publishers LLC, known by the public as <a href="/paperchase/2013/02/macmillan-settles-e-book-case-with-doj.php">Macmillan</a> [JURIST reports], leaving Apple as the sole defendant remaining in the litigation.

<p>The DOJ alleged that Apple, <a href="http://www.hachettebookgroup.com/">Hachette</a>, <a href="http://www.harpercollins.com/">HarperCollins</a>, <a href="http://www.macmillan.com/">Macmillan</a>, <a href="http://www.us.penguingroup.com/">Penguin</a> and <a href="http://www.simonandschuster.com/">Simon &#38; Schuster</a> [corporate websites] conspired to fix the prices of e-books in response to Amazon's discount pricing strategy. The DOJ <a href="/paperchase/2012/04/doj-accuses-apple-publishers-of-e-book-price-fixing-conspiracy.php">brought the suit</a> in April, and the court <a href="/paperchase/2012/05/federal-judge-denies-motion-to-dismiss-e-book-conspiracy-suit.php">denied a motion to dismiss</a> [JURIST reports] in May. Commentators had been very mixed in response to the proposed settlement agreement. Some commentators have suggested that the DOJ's lawsuit is merely <a href="/forum/2012/04/daniel-crane-ebook-pricing.php">"superficial"</a> [JURIST op-ed] and that the effect of the agency agreements may actually have been a net-positive to consumers if Amazon was selling e-books at a loss in order to drive the sale of Kindles. Other commentators, however, state that commentators against the settlement agreement and the defendants' arguments are based on a premise that <a href="/forum/2012/04/harry-gerla-ebook-pricing.php">competition is wrong</a> [JURIST op-ed].</p>]]>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <description><![CDATA[&lt;table align="left" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">&lt;tbody>&lt;tr>&lt;td>&lt;img src="/topstoryphoto/frontafghanflag.jpg" alt="Photo source or description" valign="top" align="left" border="1" hspace="0" vspace="4">&lt;/td>&lt;td>&lt;img src="/images/s.gif" border="0" height="1" width="5">&lt;/td>&lt;/tr>&lt;/tbody>&lt;/table>[JURIST] The Afghan Parliament approved two new electoral laws Wednesday that will take effect in the elections next spring. According to &lt;a href="http://www.tolonews.com/en/afghanistan/10277-afghan-parliament-approves-2-paragraphs-of-4th-article-of-election-law">Tolo News of Afghanistan&lt;/a> [official website], the statutes in question will provide a legal framework for the quarantine of ballot boxes and the creation of a complaints commission. Both houses of the Afghan Parliament have been working with &lt;a href="http://president.gov.af/en/news/17289">President Hamid Karzai&lt;/a> [official website] to establish &lt;a href="http://www.refworld.org/pdfid/42d63a1b4.pdf">laws for the election&lt;/a> [unofficial statute translation, PDF] of his successor, and recent delays in the statutory process have threatened to delay the election itself. In order for the statute to become law, Karzai will have to approve it no more than 15 days after it was approved by &lt;a href="http://wj.parliament.af/english.aspx">Parliament&lt;/a> [official website]. Voter registration for next spring's elections will open this Saturday, and these laws were passed with the legislative intent to provide security for voters, regardless of which candidate they support before the election season even begins.

&lt;p>These developments come as a direct result of an April 2012 &lt;a href="http://www.iec.org.af/">Independent Election Commission of Afghanistan&lt;/a> (IEC) announcement that it would change the country's parliamentary election proceedings in an effort to eliminate future fraud. That announcement was the result of problems with the previous election. In August 2011 Karzai &lt;a href="/paperchase/2012/04/afghanistan-election-commission-proposes-voting-changes-to-prevent-fraud.php">dissolved&lt;/a> [JURIST report] the special elections court that he had created to investigate election fraud in parliamentary elections. The court was criticized as a vehicle for overturning the electoral gains made by many of Karzai's political opponents. In June 2011 the court had &lt;a href="/paperchase/2011/06/afghan-court-overturns-parliamentary-election-results-for-fraud.php">invalidated the election results&lt;/a> [JURIST Report] of nearly 25 percent of the assembly seats. Karzai then ordered that the &lt;a href="/paperchase/2011/01/afghanistan-president-orders-delay-in-seating-of-new-parliament.php">seating of parliament be delayed&lt;/a> [JURIST report] by a month in order to further investigate the findings. Though Karzai conceded that the IEC retains ultimate authority on election results, the IEC stated that it would review the findings and documents of the court in the April 2012 announcement (above).&lt;/p>]]></description>
      <guid>http://jurist.org/paperchase/2013/05/afghan-lawmakers-approve-new-electoral-law.php</guid>
      <pubDate>2013-05-24T10:19:36-05:00</pubDate>
      <title>Afghanistan lawmakers approve new electoral law</title>
      <link>http://jurist.org/paperchase/2013/05/afghan-lawmakers-approve-new-electoral-law.php</link>
      <author>G. Redd</author>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<![CDATA[<table align="left" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr><td><img src="/topstoryphoto/frontafghanflag.jpg" alt="Photo source or description" valign="top" align="left" border="1" hspace="0" vspace="4"></td><td><img src="/images/s.gif" border="0" height="1" width="5"></td></tr></tbody></table>[JURIST] The Afghan Parliament approved two new electoral laws Wednesday that will take effect in the elections next spring. According to <a href="http://www.tolonews.com/en/afghanistan/10277-afghan-parliament-approves-2-paragraphs-of-4th-article-of-election-law">Tolo News of Afghanistan</a> [official website], the statutes in question will provide a legal framework for the quarantine of ballot boxes and the creation of a complaints commission. Both houses of the Afghan Parliament have been working with <a href="http://president.gov.af/en/news/17289">President Hamid Karzai</a> [official website] to establish <a href="http://www.refworld.org/pdfid/42d63a1b4.pdf">laws for the election</a> [unofficial statute translation, PDF] of his successor, and recent delays in the statutory process have threatened to delay the election itself. In order for the statute to become law, Karzai will have to approve it no more than 15 days after it was approved by <a href="http://wj.parliament.af/english.aspx">Parliament</a> [official website]. Voter registration for next spring's elections will open this Saturday, and these laws were passed with the legislative intent to provide security for voters, regardless of which candidate they support before the election season even begins.

<p>These developments come as a direct result of an April 2012 <a href="http://www.iec.org.af/">Independent Election Commission of Afghanistan</a> (IEC) announcement that it would change the country's parliamentary election proceedings in an effort to eliminate future fraud. That announcement was the result of problems with the previous election. In August 2011 Karzai <a href="/paperchase/2012/04/afghanistan-election-commission-proposes-voting-changes-to-prevent-fraud.php">dissolved</a> [JURIST report] the special elections court that he had created to investigate election fraud in parliamentary elections. The court was criticized as a vehicle for overturning the electoral gains made by many of Karzai's political opponents. In June 2011 the court had <a href="/paperchase/2011/06/afghan-court-overturns-parliamentary-election-results-for-fraud.php">invalidated the election results</a> [JURIST Report] of nearly 25 percent of the assembly seats. Karzai then ordered that the <a href="/paperchase/2011/01/afghanistan-president-orders-delay-in-seating-of-new-parliament.php">seating of parliament be delayed</a> [JURIST report] by a month in order to further investigate the findings. Though Karzai conceded that the IEC retains ultimate authority on election results, the IEC stated that it would review the findings and documents of the court in the April 2012 announcement (above).</p>]]>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <description><![CDATA[&lt;table align="left" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">&lt;tbody>&lt;tr>&lt;td>&lt;img src="/topstoryphoto/frontobamapres.jpg" alt="Photo source or description" valign="top" align="left" border="1" hspace="0" vspace="4">&lt;/td>&lt;td>&lt;img src="/images/s.gif" border="0" height="1" width="5">&lt;/td>&lt;/tr>&lt;/tbody>&lt;/table>[JURIST] US &lt;a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/">President Barack Obama&lt;/a> [official website] delivered a &lt;a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/05/23/remarks-president-national-defense-university">speech&lt;/a> [text] Thursday on US counterterrorism policy and efforts, outlining plans to restrict the use of unmanned drone strikes and to renew efforts to close the detention center at &lt;a href="/feature/featured/guantanamo/">Guantanamo Bay&lt;/a> [JURIST backgrounder]. In Obama's first major speech on counterterrorism since his re-election, he addressed the war on terror: "Our systematic effort to dismantle terrorist organizations must continue, but this war, like all wars, must end. That's what history advises. That's what our democracy demands." Rather than introduce new sweeping policies, Obama's speech reaffirmed his national security priorities. On drone strikes, the president noted that the US will only use drone strikes when a threat is "continuous and imminent," a nuanced change from the previous policy of launching strikes against any "significant" threat. Moreover, the &lt;a href="http://www.defense.gov/">Defense Department&lt;/a> [official website], as opposed to the CIA, will now take charge of launching lethal drones. The president addressed the criticism on drone strikes, noting that the tragedy civilian casualties will haunt him, but he must weigh the alternatives. He defended the use of drones when unable to capture individual terrorists. Regarding Guantanamo, Obama stressed that he cannot close the facility on his own, but is taking steps at getting prisoners out. Of significance, he lifted a moratorium on detainee transfers to Yemen. He also called on Congress to lift restrictions on the transfer of terrorism suspects.

&lt;p>&lt;iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/fEnUbwXAof0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen>&lt;/iframe>&lt;/p>

&lt;p>The Obama administration's counterterrorism projects have been highly criticized. Earlier this month Pakistan declared &lt;a href="/paperchase/2013/05/pakistan-court-declares-drone-strikes-illegal-directs-foreign-ministry-to-introduce-resolution-in-un.php">US drone strikes are illegal&lt;/a> [JURIST report] and directed Pakistan's &lt;a href="http://www.mofa.gov.pk/">Foreign Ministry&lt;/a> [official website] to introduce a resolution against such attacks in the UN. Last month JURIST Guest Columnist David Frakt of the University of Pittsburgh School of Law argued that the Obama administration should &lt;a href="/forum/2013/04/david-frakt-hunger-strike.php">release those detainees&lt;/a> [JURIST op-ed] held at Guantanamo Bay who have already been declared to not be a danger to the US. Also last month UN High Commissioner for Human Rights &lt;a href="http://www.ohchr.org/en/aboutus/pages/highcommissioner.aspx">Navi Pillay&lt;/a> [official profile] called for US authorities to &lt;a href="/paperchase/2013/04/un-rights-chief-calls-for-guantanamo-prison-closure.php">close down the Guantanamo prison camp&lt;/a> [JURIST report], emphasizing the continued indefinite incarcerations of many detainees as a clear violation of international law. In March a federal appeals court judge in the US &lt;a href="/paperchase/2013/03/federal-appeals-court-judge-reverses-ruling-on-cia-drone-records.php">reversed&lt;/a> [JURIST report] a ruling on CIA drone strikes and held that the CIA must respond to a &lt;a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/5/552">Freedom of Information Act&lt;/a> (FOIA) [text] claim filed by the &lt;a href="http://www.aclu.org/">American Civil Liberties Union&lt;/a> [advocacy website] requesting records on the CIA's drone program.&lt;/p>]]></description>
      <guid>http://jurist.org/paperchase/2013/05/obama-addresses-us-drone-strikes-steps-to-close-guantanamo.php</guid>
      <pubDate>2013-05-24T09:38:24-05:00</pubDate>
      <title>Obama addresses US drone strikes, steps to close Guantanamo</title>
      <link>http://jurist.org/paperchase/2013/05/obama-addresses-us-drone-strikes-steps-to-close-guantanamo.php</link>
      <author>Alison Sacriponte</author>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<![CDATA[<table align="left" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr><td><img src="/topstoryphoto/frontobamapres.jpg" alt="Photo source or description" valign="top" align="left" border="1" hspace="0" vspace="4"></td><td><img src="/images/s.gif" border="0" height="1" width="5"></td></tr></tbody></table>[JURIST] US <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/">President Barack Obama</a> [official website] delivered a <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/05/23/remarks-president-national-defense-university">speech</a> [text] Thursday on US counterterrorism policy and efforts, outlining plans to restrict the use of unmanned drone strikes and to renew efforts to close the detention center at <a href="/feature/featured/guantanamo/">Guantanamo Bay</a> [JURIST backgrounder]. In Obama's first major speech on counterterrorism since his re-election, he addressed the war on terror: "Our systematic effort to dismantle terrorist organizations must continue, but this war, like all wars, must end. That's what history advises. That's what our democracy demands." Rather than introduce new sweeping policies, Obama's speech reaffirmed his national security priorities. On drone strikes, the president noted that the US will only use drone strikes when a threat is "continuous and imminent," a nuanced change from the previous policy of launching strikes against any "significant" threat. Moreover, the <a href="http://www.defense.gov/">Defense Department</a> [official website], as opposed to the CIA, will now take charge of launching lethal drones. The president addressed the criticism on drone strikes, noting that the tragedy civilian casualties will haunt him, but he must weigh the alternatives. He defended the use of drones when unable to capture individual terrorists. Regarding Guantanamo, Obama stressed that he cannot close the facility on his own, but is taking steps at getting prisoners out. Of significance, he lifted a moratorium on detainee transfers to Yemen. He also called on Congress to lift restrictions on the transfer of terrorism suspects.

<p><iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/fEnUbwXAof0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>

<p>The Obama administration's counterterrorism projects have been highly criticized. Earlier this month Pakistan declared <a href="/paperchase/2013/05/pakistan-court-declares-drone-strikes-illegal-directs-foreign-ministry-to-introduce-resolution-in-un.php">US drone strikes are illegal</a> [JURIST report] and directed Pakistan's <a href="http://www.mofa.gov.pk/">Foreign Ministry</a> [official website] to introduce a resolution against such attacks in the UN. Last month JURIST Guest Columnist David Frakt of the University of Pittsburgh School of Law argued that the Obama administration should <a href="/forum/2013/04/david-frakt-hunger-strike.php">release those detainees</a> [JURIST op-ed] held at Guantanamo Bay who have already been declared to not be a danger to the US. Also last month UN High Commissioner for Human Rights <a href="http://www.ohchr.org/en/aboutus/pages/highcommissioner.aspx">Navi Pillay</a> [official profile] called for US authorities to <a href="/paperchase/2013/04/un-rights-chief-calls-for-guantanamo-prison-closure.php">close down the Guantanamo prison camp</a> [JURIST report], emphasizing the continued indefinite incarcerations of many detainees as a clear violation of international law. In March a federal appeals court judge in the US <a href="/paperchase/2013/03/federal-appeals-court-judge-reverses-ruling-on-cia-drone-records.php">reversed</a> [JURIST report] a ruling on CIA drone strikes and held that the CIA must respond to a <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/5/552">Freedom of Information Act</a> (FOIA) [text] claim filed by the <a href="http://www.aclu.org/">American Civil Liberties Union</a> [advocacy website] requesting records on the CIA's drone program.</p>]]>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <description><![CDATA[&lt;table align="left" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">&lt;tbody>&lt;tr>&lt;td>&lt;img src="/topstoryphoto/frontguantanamosign.jpg" alt="Photo source or description" valign="top" align="left" border="1" hspace="0" vspace="4">&lt;/td>&lt;td>&lt;img src="/images/s.gif" border="0" height="1" width="5">&lt;/td>&lt;/tr>&lt;/tbody>&lt;/table>[JURIST] Lawyers representing &lt;a href="/feature/featured/guantanamo/">Guantanamo Bay&lt;/a> [JURIST backgrounder] prisoners filed a &lt;a href="http://www.documentcloud.org/documents/703319-emergency-access-motion-doc-38-05-22-13.html">complaint&lt;/a> [text; &lt;a href="http://www.aljazeera.com/humanrights/2013/05/2013523924640987.html?utm_content=automate&utm_campaign=Trial6&utm_source=NewSocialFlow&utm_term=plustweets&utm_medium=MasterAccount">case materials&lt;/a>] Thursday alleging search policies restrict the detainees' access to counsel. According to a &lt;a href="http://www.aljazeera.com/humanrights/2013/05/201351583142509183.html">new policy&lt;/a> [Al Jazeera report], detainees are subject to a genital pat-down whenever they wish to leave the detention camp, which they must do to meet with their lawyers. This caused representatives for more than a dozen detainees to file the complaint, saying:&lt;blockquote>The new policies have no legitimate purpose, but are pretextual, imposed in order to chill the right of access to counsel... The inescapable inference, however, is that the new policies have no legitimate purpose, but are pretextual, imposed in order to chill the right of access to counsel. Indeed, one guard has admitted that the purpose of the physical searches and the treatment inflicted upon detainees.&lt;/blockquote>This new policy is said to offend and humiliate the prisoners in such a way as to prevent them effective access to counsel. Because of this, the challengers of the policy seek an immediate end to the practice. 

&lt;p>Earlier this month US &lt;a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/">President Barack Obama&lt;/a> [official website] &lt;a href="/paperchase/2013/05/obama-renews-pledge-to-close-guantanamo.php">renewed his pledge&lt;/a> [JURIST report] to make an effort to close the detention center at Guantanamo Bay. In April JURIST Guest Columnist David Frakt of the University of Pittsburgh School of Law argued that the Obama administration &lt;a href="/forum/2013/04/david-frakt-hunger-strike.php">should release those detainees&lt;/a> [JURIST op-ed] held at Guantanamo Bay who have already been declared to not be a danger to the US. Earlier last month UN High Commissioner for Human Rights &lt;a href="http://www.ohchr.org/en/aboutus/pages/highcommissioner.aspx">Navi Pillay&lt;/a> [official profile] called for US authorities to &lt;a href="/paperchase/2013/04/un-rights-chief-calls-for-guantanamo-prison-closure.php">close down the Guantanamo prison camp&lt;/a> [JURIST report], emphasizing the continued indefinite incarcerations of many detainees as a clear violation of international law. &lt;/p>]]></description>
      <guid>http://jurist.org/paperchase/2013/05/guantanamo-lawyers-seek-end-to-invasive-search-policy.php</guid>
      <pubDate>2013-05-24T08:43:13-05:00</pubDate>
      <title>Guantanamo lawyers seek end to allegedly abusive search policy</title>
      <link>http://jurist.org/paperchase/2013/05/guantanamo-lawyers-seek-end-to-invasive-search-policy.php</link>
      <author>Matthew Pomy</author>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<![CDATA[<table align="left" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr><td><img src="/topstoryphoto/frontguantanamosign.jpg" alt="Photo source or description" valign="top" align="left" border="1" hspace="0" vspace="4"></td><td><img src="/images/s.gif" border="0" height="1" width="5"></td></tr></tbody></table>[JURIST] Lawyers representing <a href="/feature/featured/guantanamo/">Guantanamo Bay</a> [JURIST backgrounder] prisoners filed a <a href="http://www.documentcloud.org/documents/703319-emergency-access-motion-doc-38-05-22-13.html">complaint</a> [text; <a href="http://www.aljazeera.com/humanrights/2013/05/2013523924640987.html?utm_content=automate&utm_campaign=Trial6&utm_source=NewSocialFlow&utm_term=plustweets&utm_medium=MasterAccount">case materials</a>] Thursday alleging search policies restrict the detainees' access to counsel. According to a <a href="http://www.aljazeera.com/humanrights/2013/05/201351583142509183.html">new policy</a> [Al Jazeera report], detainees are subject to a genital pat-down whenever they wish to leave the detention camp, which they must do to meet with their lawyers. This caused representatives for more than a dozen detainees to file the complaint, saying:<blockquote>The new policies have no legitimate purpose, but are pretextual, imposed in order to chill the right of access to counsel... The inescapable inference, however, is that the new policies have no legitimate purpose, but are pretextual, imposed in order to chill the right of access to counsel. Indeed, one guard has admitted that the purpose of the physical searches and the treatment inflicted upon detainees.</blockquote>This new policy is said to offend and humiliate the prisoners in such a way as to prevent them effective access to counsel. Because of this, the challengers of the policy seek an immediate end to the practice. 

<p>Earlier this month US <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/">President Barack Obama</a> [official website] <a href="/paperchase/2013/05/obama-renews-pledge-to-close-guantanamo.php">renewed his pledge</a> [JURIST report] to make an effort to close the detention center at Guantanamo Bay. In April JURIST Guest Columnist David Frakt of the University of Pittsburgh School of Law argued that the Obama administration <a href="/forum/2013/04/david-frakt-hunger-strike.php">should release those detainees</a> [JURIST op-ed] held at Guantanamo Bay who have already been declared to not be a danger to the US. Earlier last month UN High Commissioner for Human Rights <a href="http://www.ohchr.org/en/aboutus/pages/highcommissioner.aspx">Navi Pillay</a> [official profile] called for US authorities to <a href="/paperchase/2013/04/un-rights-chief-calls-for-guantanamo-prison-closure.php">close down the Guantanamo prison camp</a> [JURIST report], emphasizing the continued indefinite incarcerations of many detainees as a clear violation of international law. </p>]]>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <description><![CDATA[&lt;table align="left" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">&lt;tbody>&lt;tr>&lt;td>&lt;img src="/topstoryphoto/frontamnesty.jpg" alt="Photo source or description" valign="top" align="left" border="1" hspace="0" vspace="4">&lt;/td>&lt;td>&lt;img src="/images/s.gif" border="0" height="1" width="5">&lt;/td>&lt;/tr>&lt;/tbody>&lt;/table>[JURIST] &lt;a href="http://www.amnesty.org/en">Amnesty International&lt;/a> (AI) [advocacy website] on Thursday published its annual report entitled &lt;a href="http://files.amnesty.org/air13/AmnestyInternational_AnnualReport2013_complete_en.pdf">State of the World's Human Rights&lt;/a> [materials], which details the human rights landscape across the world in 2012. The report focuses on the increasing danger faced by those displaced from their homes. This includes international refugees displaced by violence and those internally displaced. More than 42 million individuals have been forced to flee from their homes because of violence or persecution. Specifically, the &lt;a href="/feature/featured/syria-1/">fighting in Syria&lt;/a> [JURIST backgrounder] has displaced more than 1.5 million people. The report states:&lt;blockquote>The most vulnerable are the 12 million stateless people in the world, equivalent in numbers to the world's great agglomerations such as London, Lagos or Rio. And around 80% of them are women. Without the protection of their 'sovereign' state these people are true global citizens. And their protection falls to all of us. They are the purest argument for the fulfilment of the duty to protect there is. For human rights protections must be applied to all humans, whether at home or not.&lt;/blockquote>The report goes on to highlight improvements and issues in specific countries. Notably, the report alleges both Israel and Palestine committed war crimes in November 2012. Also, the report highlights what AI calls a "deficit of justice" in the Brazilian justice system. Finally, the report notes New Zealand's high rate of child poverty as an area of needed improvement. 

&lt;p>AI regularly reports on human rights violations around the world. In a recent comment, JURIST Guest Columnist Clare da Silva of AI &lt;a href="/hotline/2013/05/clare-da-silva-arms-trade.php">argued&lt;/a> [JURIST comment] that the new Arms Trade Treaty shows remarkable progress in the international regulation of arms transactions. In April AI &lt;a href="/paperchase/2013/04/rights-groups-criticize-russia-laws-restricting-free-speech.php">criticized&lt;/a> [JURIST report] Russia laws restricting free speech. Earlier last month AI &lt;a href="/paperchase/2013/04/iraq-executes-21-convicted-of-terrorism.php">reported&lt;/a> [JURIST report] on Iraq executing 21 individuals convicted of terrorism. Also that month AI &lt;a href="/paperchase/2013/04/ai-ukraine-must-investigate-police-brutality-torture.php">called upon&lt;/a> [JURIST report] Ukraine to investigate police brutality and torture.&lt;/p>]]></description>
      <guid>http://jurist.org/paperchase/2013/05/amnesty-international-publishes-annual-human-rights-report.php</guid>
      <pubDate>2013-05-24T07:08:43-05:00</pubDate>
      <title>Amnesty International publishes annual human rights report</title>
      <link>http://jurist.org/paperchase/2013/05/amnesty-international-publishes-annual-human-rights-report.php</link>
      <author>Matthew Pomy</author>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<![CDATA[<table align="left" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr><td><img src="/topstoryphoto/frontamnesty.jpg" alt="Photo source or description" valign="top" align="left" border="1" hspace="0" vspace="4"></td><td><img src="/images/s.gif" border="0" height="1" width="5"></td></tr></tbody></table>[JURIST] <a href="http://www.amnesty.org/en">Amnesty International</a> (AI) [advocacy website] on Thursday published its annual report entitled <a href="http://files.amnesty.org/air13/AmnestyInternational_AnnualReport2013_complete_en.pdf">State of the World's Human Rights</a> [materials], which details the human rights landscape across the world in 2012. The report focuses on the increasing danger faced by those displaced from their homes. This includes international refugees displaced by violence and those internally displaced. More than 42 million individuals have been forced to flee from their homes because of violence or persecution. Specifically, the <a href="/feature/featured/syria-1/">fighting in Syria</a> [JURIST backgrounder] has displaced more than 1.5 million people. The report states:<blockquote>The most vulnerable are the 12 million stateless people in the world, equivalent in numbers to the world's great agglomerations such as London, Lagos or Rio. And around 80% of them are women. Without the protection of their 'sovereign' state these people are true global citizens. And their protection falls to all of us. They are the purest argument for the fulfilment of the duty to protect there is. For human rights protections must be applied to all humans, whether at home or not.</blockquote>The report goes on to highlight improvements and issues in specific countries. Notably, the report alleges both Israel and Palestine committed war crimes in November 2012. Also, the report highlights what AI calls a "deficit of justice" in the Brazilian justice system. Finally, the report notes New Zealand's high rate of child poverty as an area of needed improvement. 

<p>AI regularly reports on human rights violations around the world. In a recent comment, JURIST Guest Columnist Clare da Silva of AI <a href="/hotline/2013/05/clare-da-silva-arms-trade.php">argued</a> [JURIST comment] that the new Arms Trade Treaty shows remarkable progress in the international regulation of arms transactions. In April AI <a href="/paperchase/2013/04/rights-groups-criticize-russia-laws-restricting-free-speech.php">criticized</a> [JURIST report] Russia laws restricting free speech. Earlier last month AI <a href="/paperchase/2013/04/iraq-executes-21-convicted-of-terrorism.php">reported</a> [JURIST report] on Iraq executing 21 individuals convicted of terrorism. Also that month AI <a href="/paperchase/2013/04/ai-ukraine-must-investigate-police-brutality-torture.php">called upon</a> [JURIST report] Ukraine to investigate police brutality and torture.</p>]]>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <description><![CDATA[&lt;table align="left" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">&lt;tbody>&lt;tr>&lt;td>&lt;img src="/topstoryphoto/frontmalaysia.jpg" alt="Photo source or description" valign="top" align="left" border="1" hspace="0" vspace="4">&lt;/td>&lt;td>&lt;img src="/images/s.gif" border="0" height="1" width="5">&lt;/td>&lt;/tr>&lt;/tbody>&lt;/table>[JURIST] The Malaysian &lt;a href="http://www.moha.gov.my/index.php/en/">Ministry of Home Affairs&lt;/a> [official website, in Malay] on Thursday &lt;a href="http://portal.ikdn.gov.my/2013/05/kenyataan-media-penahanan-tabloid-yang-menyalahi-akta-mesin-cetak-dan-penerbitan-1984-pindaan-2012/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+ikdn+%28Portal+Berita+iKDN%29">seized&lt;/a> [press release, in Malay] more than 2,500 copies of newspapers published by opposition parties. The Ministry states that the seized newspapers were sold in violation of their publication licenses, which limit the distribution of opposition party newspapers to party members, not public retail sale. Malaysian authorities have also made &lt;a href="http://www.newser.com/article/da6f1arg1/malaysia-charges-student-activist-with-sedition-arrests-3-other-anti-government-figures.html">several unpopular arrests&lt;/a> [AP report], including Tian Chua, a senior official in opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim's &lt;a href="http://www.keadilanrakyat.org/">People's Justice Party&lt;/a> [official website]; Haris Ibrahim, a rights activists who leads an anti-government group; and Tamrin Ghafar, an opposition party member, all of whom criticized the ruling &lt;a href="http://barisannasional.org.my/">Barisan Nasional&lt;/a> (BN) [party website] party at a recent political gathering. Prosecutors have also charged student Adam Adii for making seditious statements. Malaysian law defines sedition as promoting hatred against the government, and if convicted, Adii could face three years in prison. Political tensions have been high since Malaysia's May 5 general elections in whichBN  won a weak majority of parliamentary seats. Opposition activists have staged a number of peaceful protests in response, alleging that BN has retained power since 1957 through the use of bogus ballots and other irregularities.

&lt;p>In October a Malaysian court &lt;a href="/paperchase/2012/10/malaysia-court-awards-damages-to-former-detainees.php">awarded damages&lt;/a> [JURIST report] to a group of five opposition politicians and activists who were unlawfully detained pursuant to the country's controversial &lt;a href="http://ejp.icj.org/IMG/INTERNAL_SECURITY_ACT_1960.pdf">Internal Security Act of 1960&lt;/a> (ISA) [text, PDF], which permits indefinite detention without trial for terror suspects, dissidents and political opponents. Three politicians and two activists were detained without trial for two years after being arrested in 2001 following anti-government protests. Last year the &lt;a href="http://www.parlimen.gov.my/">Malaysian Parliament&lt;/a> [official website, in Malay] &lt;a href="/paperchase/2012/04/malaysia-lawmakers-approve-security-measures-law-replacing-sedition-law.php">approved a law&lt;/a> [JURIST report] aimed at replacing the ISA. Malaysian &lt;a href="http://www.pmo.gov.my/?menu=page&amp;page=1926">Prime Minister Najib Razak&lt;/a> [official profile] originally &lt;a href="/paperchase/2011/09/malaysia-to-repeal-strict-laws-allowing-detention-without-trial.php">announced&lt;/a> [JURIST report] that the government would repeal the ISA as well as the &lt;a href="http://www.commonlii.org/my/legis/consol_act/ba19591972191/">Banishment Act of 1959&lt;/a> [text] in September 2011 and &lt;a href="/paperchase/2011/10/malayasia-pm-initiates-repeal-of-security-laws.php">initiated the repeal&lt;/a> [JURIST report] a month later.&lt;/p>]]></description>
      <guid>http://jurist.org/paperchase/2013/05/malaysia-authorities-seize-newspapers-detain-opposition-activists.php</guid>
      <pubDate>2013-05-23T12:34:44-05:00</pubDate>
      <title>Malaysia authorities seize newspapers, detain opposition activists</title>
      <link>http://jurist.org/paperchase/2013/05/malaysia-authorities-seize-newspapers-detain-opposition-activists.php</link>
      <author>Julie Deisher</author>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<![CDATA[<table align="left" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr><td><img src="/topstoryphoto/frontmalaysia.jpg" alt="Photo source or description" valign="top" align="left" border="1" hspace="0" vspace="4"></td><td><img src="/images/s.gif" border="0" height="1" width="5"></td></tr></tbody></table>[JURIST] The Malaysian <a href="http://www.moha.gov.my/index.php/en/">Ministry of Home Affairs</a> [official website, in Malay] on Thursday <a href="http://portal.ikdn.gov.my/2013/05/kenyataan-media-penahanan-tabloid-yang-menyalahi-akta-mesin-cetak-dan-penerbitan-1984-pindaan-2012/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+ikdn+%28Portal+Berita+iKDN%29">seized</a> [press release, in Malay] more than 2,500 copies of newspapers published by opposition parties. The Ministry states that the seized newspapers were sold in violation of their publication licenses, which limit the distribution of opposition party newspapers to party members, not public retail sale. Malaysian authorities have also made <a href="http://www.newser.com/article/da6f1arg1/malaysia-charges-student-activist-with-sedition-arrests-3-other-anti-government-figures.html">several unpopular arrests</a> [AP report], including Tian Chua, a senior official in opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim's <a href="http://www.keadilanrakyat.org/">People's Justice Party</a> [official website]; Haris Ibrahim, a rights activists who leads an anti-government group; and Tamrin Ghafar, an opposition party member, all of whom criticized the ruling <a href="http://barisannasional.org.my/">Barisan Nasional</a> (BN) [party website] party at a recent political gathering. Prosecutors have also charged student Adam Adii for making seditious statements. Malaysian law defines sedition as promoting hatred against the government, and if convicted, Adii could face three years in prison. Political tensions have been high since Malaysia's May 5 general elections in whichBN  won a weak majority of parliamentary seats. Opposition activists have staged a number of peaceful protests in response, alleging that BN has retained power since 1957 through the use of bogus ballots and other irregularities.

<p>In October a Malaysian court <a href="/paperchase/2012/10/malaysia-court-awards-damages-to-former-detainees.php">awarded damages</a> [JURIST report] to a group of five opposition politicians and activists who were unlawfully detained pursuant to the country's controversial <a href="http://ejp.icj.org/IMG/INTERNAL_SECURITY_ACT_1960.pdf">Internal Security Act of 1960</a> (ISA) [text, PDF], which permits indefinite detention without trial for terror suspects, dissidents and political opponents. Three politicians and two activists were detained without trial for two years after being arrested in 2001 following anti-government protests. Last year the <a href="http://www.parlimen.gov.my/">Malaysian Parliament</a> [official website, in Malay] <a href="/paperchase/2012/04/malaysia-lawmakers-approve-security-measures-law-replacing-sedition-law.php">approved a law</a> [JURIST report] aimed at replacing the ISA. Malaysian <a href="http://www.pmo.gov.my/?menu=page&amp;page=1926">Prime Minister Najib Razak</a> [official profile] originally <a href="/paperchase/2011/09/malaysia-to-repeal-strict-laws-allowing-detention-without-trial.php">announced</a> [JURIST report] that the government would repeal the ISA as well as the <a href="http://www.commonlii.org/my/legis/consol_act/ba19591972191/">Banishment Act of 1959</a> [text] in September 2011 and <a href="/paperchase/2011/10/malayasia-pm-initiates-repeal-of-security-laws.php">initiated the repeal</a> [JURIST report] a month later.</p>]]>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <description><![CDATA[&lt;table align="left" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">&lt;tbody>&lt;tr>&lt;td>&lt;img src="/topstoryphoto/frontrussia2.jpg" alt="Photo source or description" valign="top" align="left" border="1" hspace="0" vspace="4">&lt;/td>&lt;td>&lt;img src="/images/s.gif" border="0" height="1" width="5">&lt;/td>&lt;/tr>&lt;/tbody>&lt;/table>[JURIST] A Russian court on Thursday denied parole for Maria Alekhina, a member of the feminist rock band &lt;a href="http://www.rapsinews.com/judicial_analyst/20120820/264341551.html">Pussy Riot&lt;/a> [RASPI backgrounder; JURIST &lt;a href="/jurist_search.php?q=pussy+riot">news archive&lt;/a>]. Band members Alekhina, Nadezhda Tolokonnikova and Yekaterina Samutsevich were &lt;a href="/paperchase/2012/08/russia-punk-feminists-receive-2-year-prison-sentence-on-hooliganism-conviction.php">sentenced&lt;/a> [JURIST report] to two years in prison for "hooliganism," characterized by the court as driven by religious hatred, in connection to the band's February 2012 "guerrilla performance" of a protest song at the altar of Moscow's &lt;a href="http://www.xxc.ru/english/">Christ the Savior Cathedral&lt;/a> [official website], a space maintained to be sacred to the Russian Orthodox Church. In denying Alekhina parole, the court accepted the prosecutors' &lt;a href="http://www.thehindu.com/news/international/russian-court-denies-parole-to-pussy-riots-alekhina/article4743119.ece">claim&lt;/a> [AP report] that Alekhina has systematically disobeyed prison authorities and failed to repent for her crime. After being barred from the court hearing, Alekhina went on a hunger strike on Wednesday and ordered her defense not to participate. The court had previously &lt;a href="/paperchase/2013/01/russia-court-denies-sentencing-deferral-for-imprisoned-feminist-rocker.php">denied&lt;/a> [JURIST report] Alekhina a sentencing deferral, despite her having a young child.

&lt;p>The imprisonment of members of Pussy Riot sparked an international outcry against the Russian political and judicial system. Last month a Russian court &lt;a href="/paperchase/2013/04/member-of-russia-feminist-rock-group-denied-parole.php">denied parole&lt;/a> [JURIST report] for Tolokonnikova, who had requested it so that she could look after her young daughter. In February the band &lt;a href="/paperchase/2013/02/russia-feminist-rock-group-appeals-conviction-to-europe-rights-court.php">filed a complaint&lt;/a> [JURIST report] in the &lt;a href="http://www.echr.coe.int/echr/homepage_EN">European Court of Human Rights&lt;/a> (ECHR) [official website] challenging their conviction. They contend that their conviction violates four articles of the &lt;a href="http://www.echr.coe.int/NR/rdonlyres/D5CC24A7-DC13-4318-B457-5C9014916D7A/0/Convention_ENG.pdf">European Convention on Human Rights&lt;/a> [text, PDF]. In January a court &lt;a href="/paperchase/2013/01/russia-court-denies-feminist-rock-group-appeal-of-internet-ban.php">denied&lt;/a> [JURIST report] the band's appeal of an Internet ban on their videos. The court ruled that the band's videos questioning the role of religion in Russian government was "extremist" and President Vladimir Putin argued that the ban is protecting the beliefs of the Russian Orthodox population. In October Alekhina and Tolokonnikova were &lt;a href="/paperchase/2012/10/two-members-of-russia-feminist-rock-band-transferred-to-regional-prisons.php">transferred to separate regional prisons&lt;/a> [JURIST report] generally reserved for dangerous criminals to serve their two-year sentences. Earlier in October Samutsevich was &lt;a href="/paperchase/2012/10/russia-court-frees-one-member-of-feminist-rock-band-upholds-sentence-for-2-others.php">freed on appeal&lt;/a> [JURIST report] because she did not actually participate in the protest song, and she vowed to take the band's case to the ECHR on charges that the Russian government had illegally detained them and also violated the rock group's right to free speech.&lt;/p>]]></description>
      <guid>http://jurist.org/paperchase/2013/05/member-of-feminist-rock-group-pussy-riot-denied-parole.php</guid>
      <pubDate>2013-05-23T11:56:19-05:00</pubDate>
      <title>Member of feminist rock group Pussy Riot denied parole</title>
      <link>http://jurist.org/paperchase/2013/05/member-of-feminist-rock-group-pussy-riot-denied-parole.php</link>
      <author>Julie Deisher</author>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<![CDATA[<table align="left" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr><td><img src="/topstoryphoto/frontrussia2.jpg" alt="Photo source or description" valign="top" align="left" border="1" hspace="0" vspace="4"></td><td><img src="/images/s.gif" border="0" height="1" width="5"></td></tr></tbody></table>[JURIST] A Russian court on Thursday denied parole for Maria Alekhina, a member of the feminist rock band <a href="http://www.rapsinews.com/judicial_analyst/20120820/264341551.html">Pussy Riot</a> [RASPI backgrounder; JURIST <a href="/jurist_search.php?q=pussy+riot">news archive</a>]. Band members Alekhina, Nadezhda Tolokonnikova and Yekaterina Samutsevich were <a href="/paperchase/2012/08/russia-punk-feminists-receive-2-year-prison-sentence-on-hooliganism-conviction.php">sentenced</a> [JURIST report] to two years in prison for "hooliganism," characterized by the court as driven by religious hatred, in connection to the band's February 2012 "guerrilla performance" of a protest song at the altar of Moscow's <a href="http://www.xxc.ru/english/">Christ the Savior Cathedral</a> [official website], a space maintained to be sacred to the Russian Orthodox Church. In denying Alekhina parole, the court accepted the prosecutors' <a href="http://www.thehindu.com/news/international/russian-court-denies-parole-to-pussy-riots-alekhina/article4743119.ece">claim</a> [AP report] that Alekhina has systematically disobeyed prison authorities and failed to repent for her crime. After being barred from the court hearing, Alekhina went on a hunger strike on Wednesday and ordered her defense not to participate. The court had previously <a href="/paperchase/2013/01/russia-court-denies-sentencing-deferral-for-imprisoned-feminist-rocker.php">denied</a> [JURIST report] Alekhina a sentencing deferral, despite her having a young child.

<p>The imprisonment of members of Pussy Riot sparked an international outcry against the Russian political and judicial system. Last month a Russian court <a href="/paperchase/2013/04/member-of-russia-feminist-rock-group-denied-parole.php">denied parole</a> [JURIST report] for Tolokonnikova, who had requested it so that she could look after her young daughter. In February the band <a href="/paperchase/2013/02/russia-feminist-rock-group-appeals-conviction-to-europe-rights-court.php">filed a complaint</a> [JURIST report] in the <a href="http://www.echr.coe.int/echr/homepage_EN">European Court of Human Rights</a> (ECHR) [official website] challenging their conviction. They contend that their conviction violates four articles of the <a href="http://www.echr.coe.int/NR/rdonlyres/D5CC24A7-DC13-4318-B457-5C9014916D7A/0/Convention_ENG.pdf">European Convention on Human Rights</a> [text, PDF]. In January a court <a href="/paperchase/2013/01/russia-court-denies-feminist-rock-group-appeal-of-internet-ban.php">denied</a> [JURIST report] the band's appeal of an Internet ban on their videos. The court ruled that the band's videos questioning the role of religion in Russian government was "extremist" and President Vladimir Putin argued that the ban is protecting the beliefs of the Russian Orthodox population. In October Alekhina and Tolokonnikova were <a href="/paperchase/2012/10/two-members-of-russia-feminist-rock-band-transferred-to-regional-prisons.php">transferred to separate regional prisons</a> [JURIST report] generally reserved for dangerous criminals to serve their two-year sentences. Earlier in October Samutsevich was <a href="/paperchase/2012/10/russia-court-frees-one-member-of-feminist-rock-band-upholds-sentence-for-2-others.php">freed on appeal</a> [JURIST report] because she did not actually participate in the protest song, and she vowed to take the band's case to the ECHR on charges that the Russian government had illegally detained them and also violated the rock group's right to free speech.</p>]]>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <description><![CDATA[&lt;table align="left" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">&lt;tbody>&lt;tr>&lt;td>&lt;img src="/topstoryphoto/frontegyptflag.jpg" alt="Photo source or description" valign="top" align="left" border="1" hspace="0" vspace="4">&lt;/td>&lt;td>&lt;img src="/images/s.gif" border="0" height="1" width="5">&lt;/td>&lt;/tr>&lt;/tbody>&lt;/table>[JURIST] The North Cairo Criminal Court on Wednesday acquitted seven police officers accused of killing a protester and injuring 11 others during the January 2011 revolution. The public prosecution had charged these seven police officers with attempted and premeditated murder. The initial panel of judges on this case declined to review it, forcing the appeals court to assign a new panel of judges. The court found &lt;a href="http://www.dailynewsegypt.com/2013/05/22/criminal-court-acquits-seven-police-officers/">insufficient evidence&lt;/a> [Daily News Egypt report] to convict. Most Egyptian police officers with charges involving protesters' deaths have been cleared of the charges. Nonetheless, the &lt;a href="http://www.mohp.gov.eg/default.aspx">Ministry of Health&lt;/a> [official website, in Arabic] suggests nearly 1,000 protesters were killed and 6,000 injured from excessive police force during the 18-day uprising.

&lt;p>Egypt has experienced continued unrest and instability since the 2011 &lt;a href="/feature/featured/egyptian-revolution/">revolution&lt;/a> [JURIST backgrounder]. Last month a number of Egyptian opposition groups &lt;a href="/paperchase/2013/04/egypt-opposition-files-lawsuit-demanding-public-debate-of-budget.php">filed a lawsuit&lt;/a> [JURIST report] demanding public debate of the country's budget. Earlier in April Egypt's upper house of parliament, the Shura Council, &lt;a href="/paperchase/2013/04/egypt-upper-house-approves-new-election-law.php">approved&lt;/a> [JURIST report] new election procedures to elect the House of Representatives. The process has been delayed, however, by Egypt's Supreme Administrative Court &lt;a href="/paperchase/2013/03/jurist-egypts-supreme-administrative-court.php">referring&lt;/a> [JURIST report] the newly passed law to the Supreme Constitutional Court (SCC) for review. The court's decision was said to be based on technical grounds, namely that the Shura Council failed to return the amended electoral to the SCC for final review &lt;a href="/paperchase/2013/02/egypt-upper-house-approves-court-ordered-changes-to-election-law.php">before passing it&lt;/a> [JURIST report]. The law was &lt;a href="/paperchase/2013/02/egypt-high-court-remands-parliamentary-election-law-to-legislature-for-amendment.php">amended&lt;/a> [JURIST report] in five key areas as demanded by the high court. in March, the SCC &lt;a href="/paperchase/2013/03/egypt-constitutional-court-dismisses-challenge-to-constitutional-assembly.php">dismissed complaints&lt;/a> [JURIST report] against the assembly responsible for drafting the country's new constitution.&lt;/p>]]></description>
      <guid>http://jurist.org/paperchase/2013/05/egypt-court-acquits-police-officers-accused-of-killing-protester.php</guid>
      <pubDate>2013-05-23T11:39:29-05:00</pubDate>
      <title>Egypt court acquits police officers accused of killing protester</title>
      <link>http://jurist.org/paperchase/2013/05/egypt-court-acquits-police-officers-accused-of-killing-protester.php</link>
      <author>Alison Sacriponte</author>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<![CDATA[<table align="left" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr><td><img src="/topstoryphoto/frontegyptflag.jpg" alt="Photo source or description" valign="top" align="left" border="1" hspace="0" vspace="4"></td><td><img src="/images/s.gif" border="0" height="1" width="5"></td></tr></tbody></table>[JURIST] The North Cairo Criminal Court on Wednesday acquitted seven police officers accused of killing a protester and injuring 11 others during the January 2011 revolution. The public prosecution had charged these seven police officers with attempted and premeditated murder. The initial panel of judges on this case declined to review it, forcing the appeals court to assign a new panel of judges. The court found <a href="http://www.dailynewsegypt.com/2013/05/22/criminal-court-acquits-seven-police-officers/">insufficient evidence</a> [Daily News Egypt report] to convict. Most Egyptian police officers with charges involving protesters' deaths have been cleared of the charges. Nonetheless, the <a href="http://www.mohp.gov.eg/default.aspx">Ministry of Health</a> [official website, in Arabic] suggests nearly 1,000 protesters were killed and 6,000 injured from excessive police force during the 18-day uprising.

<p>Egypt has experienced continued unrest and instability since the 2011 <a href="/feature/featured/egyptian-revolution/">revolution</a> [JURIST backgrounder]. Last month a number of Egyptian opposition groups <a href="/paperchase/2013/04/egypt-opposition-files-lawsuit-demanding-public-debate-of-budget.php">filed a lawsuit</a> [JURIST report] demanding public debate of the country's budget. Earlier in April Egypt's upper house of parliament, the Shura Council, <a href="/paperchase/2013/04/egypt-upper-house-approves-new-election-law.php">approved</a> [JURIST report] new election procedures to elect the House of Representatives. The process has been delayed, however, by Egypt's Supreme Administrative Court <a href="/paperchase/2013/03/jurist-egypts-supreme-administrative-court.php">referring</a> [JURIST report] the newly passed law to the Supreme Constitutional Court (SCC) for review. The court's decision was said to be based on technical grounds, namely that the Shura Council failed to return the amended electoral to the SCC for final review <a href="/paperchase/2013/02/egypt-upper-house-approves-court-ordered-changes-to-election-law.php">before passing it</a> [JURIST report]. The law was <a href="/paperchase/2013/02/egypt-high-court-remands-parliamentary-election-law-to-legislature-for-amendment.php">amended</a> [JURIST report] in five key areas as demanded by the high court. in March, the SCC <a href="/paperchase/2013/03/egypt-constitutional-court-dismisses-challenge-to-constitutional-assembly.php">dismissed complaints</a> [JURIST report] against the assembly responsible for drafting the country's new constitution.</p>]]>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <description><![CDATA[&lt;table align="left" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">&lt;tbody>&lt;tr>&lt;td>&lt;img src="/topstoryphoto/frontmusharraf.jpg" alt="Photo source or description" valign="top" align="left" border="1" hspace="0" vspace="4">&lt;/td>&lt;td>&lt;img src="/images/s.gif" border="0" height="1" width="5">&lt;/td>&lt;/tr>&lt;/tbody>&lt;/table>[JURIST] A Pakistani anti-terrorism court (ATC) refused Wednesday to grant bail to former president &lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/4797762.stm">Pervez Musharraf&lt;/a> [BBC profile; JURIST &lt;a href="/jurist_search.php?q=musharraf">news archive&lt;/a>] over the detention of judges in 2007 when he imposed emergency rule.  Musharraf has been detained since April 19 at his Islamabad farmhouse for the detention charges as well as conspiracy to murder former prime minister &lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/2228796.stm">Benazir Bhutto&lt;/a> [BBC obituary; JURIST &lt;a href="/jurist_search.php?q=Bhutto">news archive&lt;/a>]. Just two days ago, the ATC &lt;a href="/paperchase/2013/05/pakistan-court-grants-bail-for-former-military-ruler-remains-on-house-arrest.php">granted bail&lt;/a> [JURIST report] to Musharraf over the murder of Bhutto. Although the judge rejected Musharraf's most recent bail application, Musharraf can appeal to the high court. 

&lt;p>Musharraf has had many legal troubles of late. In April the Peshawar High Court of Pakistan &lt;a href="/paperchase/2013/04/pakistan-court-bans-musharraf-from-running-for-public-office.php">banned&lt;/a> [JURIST report] him from running for public office for the rest of his life and extended his house arrest during the ongoing trial regarding the murder of Bhutto. Last week the Pakistani interim government &lt;a href="/paperchase/2013/04/interim-government-of-pakistan-refuses-to-try-musharraf.php">declined&lt;/a> [JURIST report] to try Musharraf for treason because they claimed such action would be outside the scope of their duties. In April a Pakistan court &lt;a href="/paperchase/2013/04/pakistan-court-extends-bail-for-former-president.php">extended&lt;/a> [JURIST report] Musharraf's bail on charges of illegally detaining judges. In March Human Rights Watch &lt;a href="/paperchase/2013/03/hrw-pakistan-should-hold-musharraf-accountable-for-human-rights-abuses.php">urged&lt;/a> [JURIST report] Pakistan to hold Musharraf accountable for alleged human rights abuses upon his return to the country. Last year Pakistani authorities &lt;a href="/paperchase/2012/02/pakistan-to-seek-arrest-of-ex-president-musharraf.php">pledged to arrest &lt;/a>[JURIST report] Musharraf for his alleged involvement in Bhutto's assassination. In August 2011 a court ordered &lt;a href="/paperchase/2011/08/pakistan-court-orders-seizure-of-musharrafs-property-assets.php">seizure of his property&lt;/a> [JURIST report] and froze his bank account after he failed to respond to multiple subpoenas regarding the assassination investigation.&lt;/p>]]></description>
      <guid>http://jurist.org/paperchase/2013/05/pakistani-court-refuses-bail-to-musharraf.php</guid>
      <pubDate>2013-05-23T10:52:49-05:00</pubDate>
      <title>Pakistan court refuses bail to Musharraf over detention of judges</title>
      <link>http://jurist.org/paperchase/2013/05/pakistani-court-refuses-bail-to-musharraf.php</link>
      <author>Alison Sacriponte</author>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<![CDATA[<table align="left" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr><td><img src="/topstoryphoto/frontmusharraf.jpg" alt="Photo source or description" valign="top" align="left" border="1" hspace="0" vspace="4"></td><td><img src="/images/s.gif" border="0" height="1" width="5"></td></tr></tbody></table>[JURIST] A Pakistani anti-terrorism court (ATC) refused Wednesday to grant bail to former president <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/4797762.stm">Pervez Musharraf</a> [BBC profile; JURIST <a href="/jurist_search.php?q=musharraf">news archive</a>] over the detention of judges in 2007 when he imposed emergency rule.  Musharraf has been detained since April 19 at his Islamabad farmhouse for the detention charges as well as conspiracy to murder former prime minister <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/2228796.stm">Benazir Bhutto</a> [BBC obituary; JURIST <a href="/jurist_search.php?q=Bhutto">news archive</a>]. Just two days ago, the ATC <a href="/paperchase/2013/05/pakistan-court-grants-bail-for-former-military-ruler-remains-on-house-arrest.php">granted bail</a> [JURIST report] to Musharraf over the murder of Bhutto. Although the judge rejected Musharraf's most recent bail application, Musharraf can appeal to the high court. 

<p>Musharraf has had many legal troubles of late. In April the Peshawar High Court of Pakistan <a href="/paperchase/2013/04/pakistan-court-bans-musharraf-from-running-for-public-office.php">banned</a> [JURIST report] him from running for public office for the rest of his life and extended his house arrest during the ongoing trial regarding the murder of Bhutto. Last week the Pakistani interim government <a href="/paperchase/2013/04/interim-government-of-pakistan-refuses-to-try-musharraf.php">declined</a> [JURIST report] to try Musharraf for treason because they claimed such action would be outside the scope of their duties. In April a Pakistan court <a href="/paperchase/2013/04/pakistan-court-extends-bail-for-former-president.php">extended</a> [JURIST report] Musharraf's bail on charges of illegally detaining judges. In March Human Rights Watch <a href="/paperchase/2013/03/hrw-pakistan-should-hold-musharraf-accountable-for-human-rights-abuses.php">urged</a> [JURIST report] Pakistan to hold Musharraf accountable for alleged human rights abuses upon his return to the country. Last year Pakistani authorities <a href="/paperchase/2012/02/pakistan-to-seek-arrest-of-ex-president-musharraf.php">pledged to arrest </a>[JURIST report] Musharraf for his alleged involvement in Bhutto's assassination. In August 2011 a court ordered <a href="/paperchase/2011/08/pakistan-court-orders-seizure-of-musharrafs-property-assets.php">seizure of his property</a> [JURIST report] and froze his bank account after he failed to respond to multiple subpoenas regarding the assassination investigation.</p>]]>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <description><![CDATA[&lt;table align="left" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">&lt;tbody>&lt;tr>&lt;td>&lt;img src="/topstoryphoto/frontreporters.jpg" alt="Photo source or description" valign="top" align="left" border="1" hspace="0" vspace="4">&lt;/td>&lt;td>&lt;img src="/images/s.gif" border="0" height="1" width="5">&lt;/td>&lt;/tr>&lt;/tbody>&lt;/table>[JURIST] A bipartisan group of lawmakers from the US House of Representative advocated Wednesday for a law that would shield the press from giving information to a federal entity unless certain conditions are met. The &lt;a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/05/media-shield-law-house-group-91745.html">push for legislation&lt;/a> [Politico report] comes in response to an incident in which the US Department of Justice (DOJ) obtained journalists' records. In a press conference, Representative Ted Poe (R-TX) &lt;a href="http://thehill.com/homenews/house/301341-house-pushes-oversight-of-doj-in-wake-of-ap-leaks-case">called the DOJ's search&lt;/a> [The Hill report] for the source of leaked information in April and May 2012 "a massive intimidation fishing expedition." The new legislation would prevent the DOJ from taking such actions unless it was in the interest of preventing potential harm to national security or an act of terrorism. Similar to the &lt;a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c111:S.448:">Free Flow of Information Act&lt;/a> [text], the bill would give journalists some protections from penalties for refusing to identify confidential sources, allowing journalists to refuse divulging sources unless a court compels them to.

&lt;p>The Obama administration has renewed its efforts to push for the reintroduction of media shield legislation after a recent scandal in which federal investigators &lt;a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/13/ap-phone-records-government-intrusion-unprecedented_n_3268569.html">secretly used a subpoena&lt;/a> [AP report] this year to obtain phone records of AP journalists without advance notice. The records were believed to have been in connection with a foiled bombing plot involving the Yemen branch of al Qaeda in the spring of 2012. Attorney General Eric Holder announced that he &lt;a href="http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2013-05-14/world/39248139_1_phone-records-justice-department-holder">recused himself&lt;/a> [WP report] from investigations into the leak probe. AP called the search "massive and unprecedented" in a &lt;a href="http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2013/05/13/doj-seizes-ap-phone-records/2156819/">letter&lt;/a> [text] to Holder. More than 50 news organizations joined in protest against the DOJ, issuing a &lt;a href="http://www.rcfp.org/sites/default/files/Media%20coalition%20letter%20re%20AP%20subpoena.pdf">second letter&lt;/a> [text, PDF] to Holder the following day. The US Attorney's office in Washington &lt;a href="http://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/700577/051413-letter-to-g-pruitt.pdf">responded to criticism&lt;/a> [text, PDF], stating that investigators seek phone records from news outlets as a last resort after making "every reasonable effort to obtain information through alternative means." AP and other news organizations are demanding that the DOJ destroy the phone records.&lt;/p>]]></description>
      <guid>http://jurist.org/paperchase/2013/05/us-lawmakers-urge-media-shield-law.php</guid>
      <pubDate>2013-05-23T09:56:49-05:00</pubDate>
      <title>US lawmakers urge media shield law</title>
      <link>http://jurist.org/paperchase/2013/05/us-lawmakers-urge-media-shield-law.php</link>
      <author>Kimberly Bennett</author>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<![CDATA[<table align="left" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr><td><img src="/topstoryphoto/frontreporters.jpg" alt="Photo source or description" valign="top" align="left" border="1" hspace="0" vspace="4"></td><td><img src="/images/s.gif" border="0" height="1" width="5"></td></tr></tbody></table>[JURIST] A bipartisan group of lawmakers from the US House of Representative advocated Wednesday for a law that would shield the press from giving information to a federal entity unless certain conditions are met. The <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/05/media-shield-law-house-group-91745.html">push for legislation</a> [Politico report] comes in response to an incident in which the US Department of Justice (DOJ) obtained journalists' records. In a press conference, Representative Ted Poe (R-TX) <a href="http://thehill.com/homenews/house/301341-house-pushes-oversight-of-doj-in-wake-of-ap-leaks-case">called the DOJ's search</a> [The Hill report] for the source of leaked information in April and May 2012 "a massive intimidation fishing expedition." The new legislation would prevent the DOJ from taking such actions unless it was in the interest of preventing potential harm to national security or an act of terrorism. Similar to the <a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c111:S.448:">Free Flow of Information Act</a> [text], the bill would give journalists some protections from penalties for refusing to identify confidential sources, allowing journalists to refuse divulging sources unless a court compels them to.

<p>The Obama administration has renewed its efforts to push for the reintroduction of media shield legislation after a recent scandal in which federal investigators <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/13/ap-phone-records-government-intrusion-unprecedented_n_3268569.html">secretly used a subpoena</a> [AP report] this year to obtain phone records of AP journalists without advance notice. The records were believed to have been in connection with a foiled bombing plot involving the Yemen branch of al Qaeda in the spring of 2012. Attorney General Eric Holder announced that he <a href="http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2013-05-14/world/39248139_1_phone-records-justice-department-holder">recused himself</a> [WP report] from investigations into the leak probe. AP called the search "massive and unprecedented" in a <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2013/05/13/doj-seizes-ap-phone-records/2156819/">letter</a> [text] to Holder. More than 50 news organizations joined in protest against the DOJ, issuing a <a href="http://www.rcfp.org/sites/default/files/Media%20coalition%20letter%20re%20AP%20subpoena.pdf">second letter</a> [text, PDF] to Holder the following day. The US Attorney's office in Washington <a href="http://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/700577/051413-letter-to-g-pruitt.pdf">responded to criticism</a> [text, PDF], stating that investigators seek phone records from news outlets as a last resort after making "every reasonable effort to obtain information through alternative means." AP and other news organizations are demanding that the DOJ destroy the phone records.</p>]]>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <description><![CDATA[&lt;table align="left" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">&lt;tbody>&lt;tr>&lt;td>&lt;img src="/topstoryphoto/frontjapan.jpg" alt="Photo source or description" valign="top" align="left" border="1" hspace="0" vspace="4">&lt;/td>&lt;td>&lt;img src="/images/s.gif" border="0" height="1" width="5">&lt;/td>&lt;/tr>&lt;/tbody>&lt;/table>[JURIST] The &lt;a href="http://www.ndl.go.jp/index.html">Japanese parliament&lt;/a> [official website, in Japanese] approved a bill on Wednesday adopting the Hague convention on resolving cross-border abductions of children. Parliament unanimously &lt;a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-22620662">passed&lt;/a> [BBC report] the treaty in response to international pressure for Tokyo to address concerns that Japanese mothers from broken international marriages can take children away from foreign fathers, leaving the fathers without any recourse for the children's return. Countries that are party to the &lt;a href="http://www.hcch.net/index_en.php?act=conventions.text&cid=24">Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction&lt;/a> [text] agree that should a child be removed from a signatory country in violation of parental custody rights, the child shall be promptly returned to the treaty partner country. The convention &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/japan-approves-joining-intl-child-abduction-pact-19230834#.UZ1HVCv72K8">will likely take effect next year&lt;/a> [AP report] when Japan officially ratifies the treaty after finalizing domestic procedures, such as passing an implementation law and setting up a local authority for locating abducted children.

&lt;p>Under Japanese family law, &lt;a href="http://www.japantimes.co.jp/community/2010/01/26/community/judges-fill-the-gaps-in-japans-family-law/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%2525253A+japantimes+%25252528The+Japan+Times%2525253A+All+Stories%25252529&utm_content=Google+Feedfetcher#.UZ1hfyv72K8">only one parent is granted custody&lt;/a> [&lt;em>Japan Times&lt;/em> report], and foreign parents are usually excluded from custody privileges. According to human rights groups, nearly 160,000 divorced or separated foreign and Japanese parents in Japan are &lt;a href="http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2009/10/10/news/custody-laws-force-parents-to-extremes/#.UZ1hmSv72K8">not allowed to see their children&lt;/a> [&lt;em>Japan Times&lt;/em> report] under the current child custody laws. In 2011 &lt;a href="http://www.edano.gr.jp/index.html">Chief Cabinet Secretary Yukio Edano&lt;/a> [official website, in Japanese] &lt;a href="/paperchase/2011/05/japan-agrees-to-sign-international-child-abduction-treaty.php">announced&lt;/a> [JURIST report] that Japan would be signing the convention for the welfare of children. Japan was &lt;a href="/paperchase/2010/02/japan-urged-to-sign-international-child.php">urged to sign the treaty&lt;/a> [JURIST report] by 10 other nations in early 2010. Japan had resisted signing the treaty, citing opposition from women who had fled abusive husbands. The US House of Representatives increased pressure on Japan to sign the convention by passing the &lt;a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c111:H.R.3240.IH:">International Child Abduction Prevention Act of 2009&lt;/a> [text] in 2010, which created nonbinding sanctions against any country refusing to cooperate in cases of international child abductions. Russia remains the only G8 nation to not sign the treaty.&lt;/p>]]></description>
      <guid>http://jurist.org/paperchase/2013/05/japan-lawmakers-approve-international-child-abduction-treaty.php</guid>
      <pubDate>2013-05-23T08:33:01-05:00</pubDate>
      <title>Japan lawmakers approve international child abduction treaty</title>
      <link>http://jurist.org/paperchase/2013/05/japan-lawmakers-approve-international-child-abduction-treaty.php</link>
      <author>Kimberly Bennett</author>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<![CDATA[<table align="left" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr><td><img src="/topstoryphoto/frontjapan.jpg" alt="Photo source or description" valign="top" align="left" border="1" hspace="0" vspace="4"></td><td><img src="/images/s.gif" border="0" height="1" width="5"></td></tr></tbody></table>[JURIST] The <a href="http://www.ndl.go.jp/index.html">Japanese parliament</a> [official website, in Japanese] approved a bill on Wednesday adopting the Hague convention on resolving cross-border abductions of children. Parliament unanimously <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-22620662">passed</a> [BBC report] the treaty in response to international pressure for Tokyo to address concerns that Japanese mothers from broken international marriages can take children away from foreign fathers, leaving the fathers without any recourse for the children's return. Countries that are party to the <a href="http://www.hcch.net/index_en.php?act=conventions.text&cid=24">Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction</a> [text] agree that should a child be removed from a signatory country in violation of parental custody rights, the child shall be promptly returned to the treaty partner country. The convention <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/japan-approves-joining-intl-child-abduction-pact-19230834#.UZ1HVCv72K8">will likely take effect next year</a> [AP report] when Japan officially ratifies the treaty after finalizing domestic procedures, such as passing an implementation law and setting up a local authority for locating abducted children.

<p>Under Japanese family law, <a href="http://www.japantimes.co.jp/community/2010/01/26/community/judges-fill-the-gaps-in-japans-family-law/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%2525253A+japantimes+%25252528The+Japan+Times%2525253A+All+Stories%25252529&utm_content=Google+Feedfetcher#.UZ1hfyv72K8">only one parent is granted custody</a> [<em>Japan Times</em> report], and foreign parents are usually excluded from custody privileges. According to human rights groups, nearly 160,000 divorced or separated foreign and Japanese parents in Japan are <a href="http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2009/10/10/news/custody-laws-force-parents-to-extremes/#.UZ1hmSv72K8">not allowed to see their children</a> [<em>Japan Times</em> report] under the current child custody laws. In 2011 <a href="http://www.edano.gr.jp/index.html">Chief Cabinet Secretary Yukio Edano</a> [official website, in Japanese] <a href="/paperchase/2011/05/japan-agrees-to-sign-international-child-abduction-treaty.php">announced</a> [JURIST report] that Japan would be signing the convention for the welfare of children. Japan was <a href="/paperchase/2010/02/japan-urged-to-sign-international-child.php">urged to sign the treaty</a> [JURIST report] by 10 other nations in early 2010. Japan had resisted signing the treaty, citing opposition from women who had fled abusive husbands. The US House of Representatives increased pressure on Japan to sign the convention by passing the <a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c111:H.R.3240.IH:">International Child Abduction Prevention Act of 2009</a> [text] in 2010, which created nonbinding sanctions against any country refusing to cooperate in cases of international child abductions. Russia remains the only G8 nation to not sign the treaty.</p>]]>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <description><![CDATA[&lt;table align="left" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">&lt;tbody>&lt;tr>&lt;td>&lt;img src="/topstoryphoto/frontguncontrol.jpg" alt="Photo source or description" valign="top" align="left" border="1" hspace="0" vspace="4">&lt;/td>&lt;td>&lt;img src="/images/s.gif" border="0" height="1" width="5">&lt;/td>&lt;/tr>&lt;/tbody>&lt;/table>[JURIST] Several groups filed a &lt;a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/143048213/Firearms-Law-Challenge">lawsuit&lt;/a> [complaint] Wednesday challenging the constitutionality of a new Connecticut &lt;a href="http://www.cga.ct.gov/2013/TOB/s/pdf/2013SB-01160-R00-SB.pdf">gun control law&lt;/a> [GA Bill 1160, PDF]. The new law expanded the firearms banned as "assault weapons" under existing state law. It also limits magazine capacity to 10 rounds. The complaint alleges these new requirement are overly vague which makes them too difficult to follow. The lawsuit is seeking an immediate injunction of enforcement of the law. The plaintiffs allege that the new restrictions unconstitutionally hamper individuals' right to purchase firearms for personal protection and prevent retailers from selling weapons that should not be outlawed. The law was &lt;a href="/paperchase/2013/04/connecticut-governor-to-sign-gun-control-law.php">passed&lt;/a> [JURIST report] in April following the &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/topics/news/newtown-connecticut-school-shooting.htm">shooting&lt;/a> [ABC News backgrounder] at an elementary school in Newtown, Connecticut.

&lt;p>This is the latest development in the controversial topic of &lt;a href="/jurist_search.php?q=gun+control">gun control&lt;/a> [JURIST news archive] in the US. Earlier this week, a group of Colorado County Sheriffs &lt;a href="/paperchase/2013/05/colorado-sheriffs-challenge-new-gun-control-laws.php">challenged&lt;/a> [JURIST report] similar regulations. The Colorado laws were &lt;a href="/paperchase/2013/03/colorado-governor-signs-gun-control-legislation.php">passed&lt;/a> [JURIST report] in March in response to the Connecticut shooting. Last month &lt;a href="/paperchase/2013/04/maryland-senate-approves-gun-control-legislation.php">Maryland&lt;/a> [JURIST report] also approved new gun control laws. In March President Barack Obama &lt;a href="/paperchase/2013/03/obama-urges-congress-to-pass-gun-control-measures.php">urged&lt;/a> [JURIST report] Congress to pass three bills which would require background checks for all private gun sales, renew a grant to improve schools security programs and make the act of buying a weapon for someone barred from owning one a federal crime.&lt;/p>]]></description>
      <guid>http://jurist.org/paperchase/2013/05/connecticut-gun-control-law-challenged-in-federal-court.php</guid>
      <pubDate>2013-05-23T08:30:23-05:00</pubDate>
      <title>Connecticut gun control law challenged in federal court</title>
      <link>http://jurist.org/paperchase/2013/05/connecticut-gun-control-law-challenged-in-federal-court.php</link>
      <author>Matthew Pomy</author>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<![CDATA[<table align="left" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr><td><img src="/topstoryphoto/frontguncontrol.jpg" alt="Photo source or description" valign="top" align="left" border="1" hspace="0" vspace="4"></td><td><img src="/images/s.gif" border="0" height="1" width="5"></td></tr></tbody></table>[JURIST] Several groups filed a <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/143048213/Firearms-Law-Challenge">lawsuit</a> [complaint] Wednesday challenging the constitutionality of a new Connecticut <a href="http://www.cga.ct.gov/2013/TOB/s/pdf/2013SB-01160-R00-SB.pdf">gun control law</a> [GA Bill 1160, PDF]. The new law expanded the firearms banned as "assault weapons" under existing state law. It also limits magazine capacity to 10 rounds. The complaint alleges these new requirement are overly vague which makes them too difficult to follow. The lawsuit is seeking an immediate injunction of enforcement of the law. The plaintiffs allege that the new restrictions unconstitutionally hamper individuals' right to purchase firearms for personal protection and prevent retailers from selling weapons that should not be outlawed. The law was <a href="/paperchase/2013/04/connecticut-governor-to-sign-gun-control-law.php">passed</a> [JURIST report] in April following the <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/topics/news/newtown-connecticut-school-shooting.htm">shooting</a> [ABC News backgrounder] at an elementary school in Newtown, Connecticut.

<p>This is the latest development in the controversial topic of <a href="/jurist_search.php?q=gun+control">gun control</a> [JURIST news archive] in the US. Earlier this week, a group of Colorado County Sheriffs <a href="/paperchase/2013/05/colorado-sheriffs-challenge-new-gun-control-laws.php">challenged</a> [JURIST report] similar regulations. The Colorado laws were <a href="/paperchase/2013/03/colorado-governor-signs-gun-control-legislation.php">passed</a> [JURIST report] in March in response to the Connecticut shooting. Last month <a href="/paperchase/2013/04/maryland-senate-approves-gun-control-legislation.php">Maryland</a> [JURIST report] also approved new gun control laws. In March President Barack Obama <a href="/paperchase/2013/03/obama-urges-congress-to-pass-gun-control-measures.php">urged</a> [JURIST report] Congress to pass three bills which would require background checks for all private gun sales, renew a grant to improve schools security programs and make the act of buying a weapon for someone barred from owning one a federal crime.</p>]]>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <description><![CDATA[&lt;table align="left" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">&lt;tbody>&lt;tr>&lt;td>&lt;img src="/topstoryphoto/frontkenyaflag.jpg" alt="Photo source or description" valign="top" align="left" border="1" hspace="0" vspace="4">&lt;/td>&lt;td>&lt;img src="/images/s.gif" border="0" height="1" width="5">&lt;/td>&lt;/tr>&lt;/tbody>&lt;/table>[JURIST] A &lt;a href="http://www.tjrckenya.org/images/documents/TJRC_report_Volume_4.pdf">report&lt;/a> [text, PDF] released Tuesday by the Kenyan &lt;a href="http://www.tjrckenya.org/">Truth Justice and Reconciliation Commission&lt;/a> (TJRC) [advocacy website] names &lt;a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-21544245">President Uhuru Kenyatta&lt;/a> [BBC profile; JURIST &lt;a href="/jurist_search.php?q=Uhuru+Kenyatta">news archive&lt;/a>] and &lt;a href="/jurist_search.php?q=william+ruto">Vice President William Ruto&lt;/a> [JURIST report] as having contributed to human rights abuses that took place after the 2007 election. The report alleges the two officials helped fund and plan violence. &lt;a href="http://www.icc-cpi.int/en_menus/icc/situations%20and%20cases/situations/situation%20icc%200109/related%20cases/icc01090211/Pages/icc01090111.aspx">Kenyatta&lt;/a> and &lt;a href="http://www.icc-cpi.int/en_menus/icc/situations%20and%20cases/situations/situation%20icc%200109/related%20cases/icc01090111/Pages/icc01090111.aspx">Ruto&lt;/a> [ICC case materials] have already been charged with crimes against humanity in the &lt;a href="http://www.icc-cpi.int/EN_Menus/ICC/Pages/default.aspx">International Criminal Court&lt;/a> (ICC) [official website] from their suspected involvement. In the report, the commission also details how the media's portrayal contributed to prolonging the violence. It also analyzes the historic causes of the violence, going back to the treatment by the country's first three presidents following independence. According to the TJRC, historical discrepancies in land distribution contributed to perpetuating violence.  

&lt;p>This is the latest in the controversy surrounding Kenyatta and Ruto's involvement in the human rights violations. Despite the allegations, both were able to win the &lt;a href="/paperchase/2013/03/uhuru-kenyatta-declared-winner-of-kenya-presidential-election.php">recent election&lt;/a> [JURIST report]. Earlier this month the Kenyan ambassador to the UN requested the ICC &lt;a href="/paperchase/2013/05/kenya-un-ambassador-seeks-dismissal-of-icc-charges-against-president.php">drop the charges&lt;/a> [JURIST report] against Kenyatta and Ruto. Also this month the ICC continued to &lt;a href="/paperchase/2013/05/icc-postpones-trial-of-kenya-vice-president.php">postpone&lt;/a> [JURIST report] Ruto's trial. In April a judge overseeing Kenyatta's case &lt;a href="/paperchase/2013/04/icc-judge-withdraws-from-case-against-kenya-president.php">withdrew&lt;/a> [JURIST report] from the case. In March Kenyatta's lawyer asked the ICC to &lt;a href="/paperchase/2013/03/kenya-presidential-candidate-asks-icc-to-withdraw-charges.php">drop the charges&lt;/a> [JURIST report] against him for lack of evidence, but the prosecution refused. &lt;/p>]]></description>
      <guid>http://jurist.org/paperchase/2013/05/kenya-report-connects-president-vp-to-post-election-violence.php</guid>
      <pubDate>2013-05-23T06:46:55-05:00</pubDate>
      <title>Kenya report connects president, VP to post-election violence</title>
      <link>http://jurist.org/paperchase/2013/05/kenya-report-connects-president-vp-to-post-election-violence.php</link>
      <author>Matthew Pomy</author>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<![CDATA[<table align="left" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr><td><img src="/topstoryphoto/frontkenyaflag.jpg" alt="Photo source or description" valign="top" align="left" border="1" hspace="0" vspace="4"></td><td><img src="/images/s.gif" border="0" height="1" width="5"></td></tr></tbody></table>[JURIST] A <a href="http://www.tjrckenya.org/images/documents/TJRC_report_Volume_4.pdf">report</a> [text, PDF] released Tuesday by the Kenyan <a href="http://www.tjrckenya.org/">Truth Justice and Reconciliation Commission</a> (TJRC) [advocacy website] names <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-21544245">President Uhuru Kenyatta</a> [BBC profile; JURIST <a href="/jurist_search.php?q=Uhuru+Kenyatta">news archive</a>] and <a href="/jurist_search.php?q=william+ruto">Vice President William Ruto</a> [JURIST report] as having contributed to human rights abuses that took place after the 2007 election. The report alleges the two officials helped fund and plan violence. <a href="http://www.icc-cpi.int/en_menus/icc/situations%20and%20cases/situations/situation%20icc%200109/related%20cases/icc01090211/Pages/icc01090111.aspx">Kenyatta</a> and <a href="http://www.icc-cpi.int/en_menus/icc/situations%20and%20cases/situations/situation%20icc%200109/related%20cases/icc01090111/Pages/icc01090111.aspx">Ruto</a> [ICC case materials] have already been charged with crimes against humanity in the <a href="http://www.icc-cpi.int/EN_Menus/ICC/Pages/default.aspx">International Criminal Court</a> (ICC) [official website] from their suspected involvement. In the report, the commission also details how the media's portrayal contributed to prolonging the violence. It also analyzes the historic causes of the violence, going back to the treatment by the country's first three presidents following independence. According to the TJRC, historical discrepancies in land distribution contributed to perpetuating violence.  

<p>This is the latest in the controversy surrounding Kenyatta and Ruto's involvement in the human rights violations. Despite the allegations, both were able to win the <a href="/paperchase/2013/03/uhuru-kenyatta-declared-winner-of-kenya-presidential-election.php">recent election</a> [JURIST report]. Earlier this month the Kenyan ambassador to the UN requested the ICC <a href="/paperchase/2013/05/kenya-un-ambassador-seeks-dismissal-of-icc-charges-against-president.php">drop the charges</a> [JURIST report] against Kenyatta and Ruto. Also this month the ICC continued to <a href="/paperchase/2013/05/icc-postpones-trial-of-kenya-vice-president.php">postpone</a> [JURIST report] Ruto's trial. In April a judge overseeing Kenyatta's case <a href="/paperchase/2013/04/icc-judge-withdraws-from-case-against-kenya-president.php">withdrew</a> [JURIST report] from the case. In March Kenyatta's lawyer asked the ICC to <a href="/paperchase/2013/03/kenya-presidential-candidate-asks-icc-to-withdraw-charges.php">drop the charges</a> [JURIST report] against him for lack of evidence, but the prosecution refused. </p>]]>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <description><![CDATA[&lt;table align="left" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">&lt;tbody>&lt;tr>&lt;td>&lt;img src="/topstoryphoto/frontcapitol.jpg" alt="Photo source or description" valign="top" align="left" border="1" hspace="0" vspace="4">&lt;/td>&lt;td>&lt;img src="/images/s.gif" border="0" height="1" width="5">&lt;/td>&lt;/tr>&lt;/tbody>&lt;/table>[JURIST] The &lt;a href="http://www.judiciary.senate.gov/">Senate Judiciary Committee&lt;/a> [official website] on Tuesday &lt;a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/113/s744/text">approved S. 744&lt;/a> [text], an immigration reform bill. The bill, entitled the Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act, is intended to help create a 13-year path to citizenship for the approximately 11 million current undocumented immigrants, contingent upon strengthening security along the Mexican border. The bill also proposed an improved process for allowing high-skilled immigrants into the country's workforce. After a five-day deliberation, the bill passed by a vote of 13-5. The 13 who voted in favor of the bill consisted of 3 Republicans and 10 Democrats. The full Senate will consider the bill next month.

&lt;p>&lt;a href="/feature/featured/immigration/">Immigration&lt;/a> [JURIST backgrounder] has become a hot button issue in the US. Tuesday's bill is the result of a bipartisan group of eight senators, including Senators &lt;a href="http://www.schumer.senate.gov/">Chuck Schumer&lt;/a>, &lt;a href="http://www.mccain.senate.gov/public/">John McCain&lt;/a>, &lt;a href="http://www.durbin.senate.gov/public/">Dick Durbin&lt;/a>, &lt;a href="http://www.menendez.senate.gov/">Robert Menendez&lt;/a> and &lt;a href="http://www.rubio.senate.gov/public/">Marco Rubio&lt;/a> [official websites], who in January &lt;a href="/paperchase/2013/01/us-senators-unveil-immigration-reform-plan.php">released&lt;/a> [JURIST report] a &lt;a href="http://www.lgraham.senate.gov/public/_files/_pdfs/Framework%20For%20Immigration%20Reform.pdf">framework&lt;/a> [text, PDF] of comprehensive immigration reform legislation. The individual senators involved in building the framework released several statements on what they hoped the legislation will achieve. McCain &lt;a href="http://www.mccain.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressOffice.PressReleases&ContentRecord_id=82b56b33-0e30-667d-596f-8822f3ca36d6&Region_id=&Issue_id=">focused on border security&lt;/a> [press release], stating that "greater focus needs to be paid to drug traffickers and criminals that cross the border." He also &lt;a href="http://www.mccain.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressOffice.PressReleases&ContentRecord_id=82b06c86-d403-2a4f-7b86-e59912bf5489&Region_id=&Issue_id=">compared the framework to failed legislation&lt;/a> [FAQ text] that was put forward in 2007, and issued more details about the plan, including that funding for some aspects of the program will come from "fees collected from immigrant workers&#8212;both new guest workers and the previously undocumented." These funds, said McCain, were intended to be used for "registering the undocumented, processing visas and other applications, enhancing enforcement and providing English and civics education to immigrants." &lt;/p>]]></description>
      <guid>http://jurist.org/paperchase/2013/05/senate-judiciary-approves-immigration-bill.php</guid>
      <pubDate>2013-05-22T12:45:32-05:00</pubDate>
      <title>Senate Judiciary Committee approves immigration reform bill</title>
      <link>http://jurist.org/paperchase/2013/05/senate-judiciary-approves-immigration-bill.php</link>
      <author>Addison Morris</author>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<![CDATA[<table align="left" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr><td><img src="/topstoryphoto/frontcapitol.jpg" alt="Photo source or description" valign="top" align="left" border="1" hspace="0" vspace="4"></td><td><img src="/images/s.gif" border="0" height="1" width="5"></td></tr></tbody></table>[JURIST] The <a href="http://www.judiciary.senate.gov/">Senate Judiciary Committee</a> [official website] on Tuesday <a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/113/s744/text">approved S. 744</a> [text], an immigration reform bill. The bill, entitled the Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act, is intended to help create a 13-year path to citizenship for the approximately 11 million current undocumented immigrants, contingent upon strengthening security along the Mexican border. The bill also proposed an improved process for allowing high-skilled immigrants into the country's workforce. After a five-day deliberation, the bill passed by a vote of 13-5. The 13 who voted in favor of the bill consisted of 3 Republicans and 10 Democrats. The full Senate will consider the bill next month.

<p><a href="/feature/featured/immigration/">Immigration</a> [JURIST backgrounder] has become a hot button issue in the US. Tuesday's bill is the result of a bipartisan group of eight senators, including Senators <a href="http://www.schumer.senate.gov/">Chuck Schumer</a>, <a href="http://www.mccain.senate.gov/public/">John McCain</a>, <a href="http://www.durbin.senate.gov/public/">Dick Durbin</a>, <a href="http://www.menendez.senate.gov/">Robert Menendez</a> and <a href="http://www.rubio.senate.gov/public/">Marco Rubio</a> [official websites], who in January <a href="/paperchase/2013/01/us-senators-unveil-immigration-reform-plan.php">released</a> [JURIST report] a <a href="http://www.lgraham.senate.gov/public/_files/_pdfs/Framework%20For%20Immigration%20Reform.pdf">framework</a> [text, PDF] of comprehensive immigration reform legislation. The individual senators involved in building the framework released several statements on what they hoped the legislation will achieve. McCain <a href="http://www.mccain.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressOffice.PressReleases&ContentRecord_id=82b56b33-0e30-667d-596f-8822f3ca36d6&Region_id=&Issue_id=">focused on border security</a> [press release], stating that "greater focus needs to be paid to drug traffickers and criminals that cross the border." He also <a href="http://www.mccain.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressOffice.PressReleases&ContentRecord_id=82b06c86-d403-2a4f-7b86-e59912bf5489&Region_id=&Issue_id=">compared the framework to failed legislation</a> [FAQ text] that was put forward in 2007, and issued more details about the plan, including that funding for some aspects of the program will come from "fees collected from immigrant workers&#8212;both new guest workers and the previously undocumented." These funds, said McCain, were intended to be used for "registering the undocumented, processing visas and other applications, enhancing enforcement and providing English and civics education to immigrants." </p>]]>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <description><![CDATA[&lt;table align="left" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">&lt;tbody>&lt;tr>&lt;td>&lt;img src="/topstoryphoto/frontzimbabweflag.jpg" alt="Photo source or description" valign="top" align="left" border="1" hspace="0" vspace="4">&lt;/td>&lt;td>&lt;img src="/images/s.gif" border="0" height="1" width="5">&lt;/td>&lt;/tr>&lt;/tbody>&lt;/table>[JURIST] Zimbabwe &lt;a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-16010171">President Robert Mugabe&lt;/a> [BBC profile; JURIST &lt;a href="/jurist_search.php?q=mugabe">news archive&lt;/a>] on Wednesday signed the country's &lt;a href="http://www.copac.org.zw/index.php?option=com_content&view=section&id=7&Itemid=154">new constitution&lt;/a> [text] into law, clearing the path to pivotal elections later this year. The new constitution limits future presidents to two five-year terms. The provision limiting presidential terms will not apply retroactively, so the 89-year-old Mugabe will be able to &lt;a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/03/19/us-zimbabwe-referendum-idUSBRE92I0IP20130319">run in the next election&lt;/a> [Reuters report] and potentially continue to serve as president for the next decade. Mugabe has been Zimbabwe's president since the country's independence from Britain in 1980. Wednesday's actions come as a result of a &lt;a href="/paperchase/2013/01/zimbabwe-president-pm-reach-agreement-on-new-constitution.php">January agreement&lt;/a> [JURIST report] between Mugabe and &lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/6439617.stm">Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai&lt;/a> [BBC profile; JURIST &lt;a href="/jurist_search.php?q=morgan+tsvangirai">news archive&lt;/a>], who both pledged their support for the new constitution. In 2008 the two political rivals &lt;a href="/paperchase/2008/09/zimbabwe-leaders-sign-power-sharing.php">formed a coalition government&lt;/a> following &lt;a href="/paperchase/2008/06/zimbabwe-authorities-condemned.php">highly contested elections&lt;/a> [JURIST reports], ultimately finding a compromise to hold elections on the condition that a new constitution was enacted beforehand. Elections should take place within the year, but the date has yet to be determined. 

&lt;p>In March in a &lt;a href="/paperchase/2013/03/zimbabwe-voter-approve-new-constitution.php">nationwide referendum&lt;/a> [JURIST report], nearly 95 percent of voters supported the passage of the draft constitution, which then passed completely unopposed through both houses of Parliament. In February three UN independent human rights experts &lt;a href="/paperchase/2013/02/zimbabwe-urged-to-respect-human-rights-in-advance-of-constitutional-referendum.php">urged&lt;/a> [JURIST report] the government of Zimbabwe to respect international human rights in anticipation of the referendum and potential changes to the system of government. The UN's emphasis on the protection of individuals' right to privacy and freedom of association accompanied &lt;a href="http://www.hrw.org/">Human Rights Watch's&lt;/a> [advocacy website] call for "credible, free and fair elections," a proposition that the advocacy group claims Zimbabwe &lt;a href="/paperchase/2013/01/zimbabwe-must-make-legal-reforms-for-2013-elections-hrw.php">failed to ensure&lt;/a> [JURIST report] in previous elections. Experts point to incidents such as the &lt;a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-03-19/zimbabwe-charges-tsvangirai-aides-with-breaching-secrecy-laws.html">March 17 arrest&lt;/a> [Bloomberg report] of four Tsvangirai aides, working for the prime minister's political party the &lt;a href="http://www.mdc.co.zw/">Movement for Democratic Change&lt;/a> [official website]. Held on charges of breaching state secrecy law, the arrests follow a string of allegations against political associates, including human rights lawyer Beatrice Mtetwa who is being charged with &lt;a href="/paperchase/2013/03/zimbabwe-police-arrest-prominent-rights-lawyer.php">obstructing or defeating the course of justice&lt;/a> [JURIST report]. &lt;/p>]]></description>
      <guid>http://jurist.org/paperchase/2013/05/zimbabwe-president-signs-constitution-into-law.php</guid>
      <pubDate>2013-05-22T11:09:46-05:00</pubDate>
      <title>Zimbabwe president signs new constitution into law</title>
      <link>http://jurist.org/paperchase/2013/05/zimbabwe-president-signs-constitution-into-law.php</link>
      <author>Addison Morris</author>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<![CDATA[<table align="left" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr><td><img src="/topstoryphoto/frontzimbabweflag.jpg" alt="Photo source or description" valign="top" align="left" border="1" hspace="0" vspace="4"></td><td><img src="/images/s.gif" border="0" height="1" width="5"></td></tr></tbody></table>[JURIST] Zimbabwe <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-16010171">President Robert Mugabe</a> [BBC profile; JURIST <a href="/jurist_search.php?q=mugabe">news archive</a>] on Wednesday signed the country's <a href="http://www.copac.org.zw/index.php?option=com_content&view=section&id=7&Itemid=154">new constitution</a> [text] into law, clearing the path to pivotal elections later this year. The new constitution limits future presidents to two five-year terms. The provision limiting presidential terms will not apply retroactively, so the 89-year-old Mugabe will be able to <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/03/19/us-zimbabwe-referendum-idUSBRE92I0IP20130319">run in the next election</a> [Reuters report] and potentially continue to serve as president for the next decade. Mugabe has been Zimbabwe's president since the country's independence from Britain in 1980. Wednesday's actions come as a result of a <a href="/paperchase/2013/01/zimbabwe-president-pm-reach-agreement-on-new-constitution.php">January agreement</a> [JURIST report] between Mugabe and <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/6439617.stm">Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai</a> [BBC profile; JURIST <a href="/jurist_search.php?q=morgan+tsvangirai">news archive</a>], who both pledged their support for the new constitution. In 2008 the two political rivals <a href="/paperchase/2008/09/zimbabwe-leaders-sign-power-sharing.php">formed a coalition government</a> following <a href="/paperchase/2008/06/zimbabwe-authorities-condemned.php">highly contested elections</a> [JURIST reports], ultimately finding a compromise to hold elections on the condition that a new constitution was enacted beforehand. Elections should take place within the year, but the date has yet to be determined. 

<p>In March in a <a href="/paperchase/2013/03/zimbabwe-voter-approve-new-constitution.php">nationwide referendum</a> [JURIST report], nearly 95 percent of voters supported the passage of the draft constitution, which then passed completely unopposed through both houses of Parliament. In February three UN independent human rights experts <a href="/paperchase/2013/02/zimbabwe-urged-to-respect-human-rights-in-advance-of-constitutional-referendum.php">urged</a> [JURIST report] the government of Zimbabwe to respect international human rights in anticipation of the referendum and potential changes to the system of government. The UN's emphasis on the protection of individuals' right to privacy and freedom of association accompanied <a href="http://www.hrw.org/">Human Rights Watch's</a> [advocacy website] call for "credible, free and fair elections," a proposition that the advocacy group claims Zimbabwe <a href="/paperchase/2013/01/zimbabwe-must-make-legal-reforms-for-2013-elections-hrw.php">failed to ensure</a> [JURIST report] in previous elections. Experts point to incidents such as the <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-03-19/zimbabwe-charges-tsvangirai-aides-with-breaching-secrecy-laws.html">March 17 arrest</a> [Bloomberg report] of four Tsvangirai aides, working for the prime minister's political party the <a href="http://www.mdc.co.zw/">Movement for Democratic Change</a> [official website]. Held on charges of breaching state secrecy law, the arrests follow a string of allegations against political associates, including human rights lawyer Beatrice Mtetwa who is being charged with <a href="/paperchase/2013/03/zimbabwe-police-arrest-prominent-rights-lawyer.php">obstructing or defeating the course of justice</a> [JURIST report]. </p>]]>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <description><![CDATA[&lt;table align="left" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">&lt;tbody>&lt;tr>&lt;td>&lt;img src="/topstoryphoto/frontfederalcourtruling.jpg" alt="Photo source or description" valign="top" align="left" border="1" hspace="0" vspace="4">&lt;/td>&lt;td>&lt;img src="/images/s.gif" border="0" height="1" width="5">&lt;/td>&lt;/tr>&lt;/tbody>&lt;/table>[JURIST] The &lt;a href="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/"US >Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit&lt;/a> [official website] &lt;a href="http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2013/05/21/12-16670.pdf">ruled&lt;/a> [opinion, PDF] Tuesday that the Arizona law banning abortions at 20 weeks violates women's rights, making it "per se unconstitutional." The opinion, authored by Judge Marsha Berzon, focused on balancing fetal viability and a woman's right to medical autonomy.  The state defended the &lt;a href="http://www.azleg.gov/legtext/50leg/2r/adopted/s.2036jud.pdf">statute&lt;/a> [text, PDF] by arguing that it was not an outright ban because it permitted procedures in the event of a medical emergency. The court rejected this argument: "the state may not ... impose an undue burden on her [the mother's] choice through regulation.  Allowing a physician to decide if abortion is medically necessary is not the same as allowing a woman to decide whether to carry her own pregnancy to term." Citing a "long line of invariant" precedent, the court further held that the statute crossed the line from a permissible medical regulation to an outright ban on procedures during gestation. It was not convinced that gestation at 20 weeks produced fetuses that could be viable outside the womb. Viability is the medical threshold for state bans as determined by the Supreme Court in &lt;a href="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&navby=case&vol=410&invol=113">Roe v. Wade&lt;/a> [opinion]. Because the law does not meet this threshold, the state's interest in protecting the fetus is subject to the woman's federal right of medical autonomy.

&lt;p>This ruling comes on the heels of several developments in controversial state abortion statutes. Last Friday a judge for the &lt;a href="http://www.are.uscourts.gov/default.cfm">US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas&lt;/a> [official website] temporarily blocked enforcement of a law banning abortions &lt;a href="/paperchase/2013/05/federal-judge-allows-challenge-to-arkansas-abortion-law-to-proceed.php">12 weeks into a pregnancy&lt;/a> [JURIST report]. In December a state judge in Georgia &lt;a href="/paperchase/2012/12/georgia-state-judge-enjoins-post-20-week-abortion-ban.php">enjoined a law &lt;/a>[JURIST report] banning doctors from providing abortions for women more than 20 weeks into gestation. Montana voters in November &lt;a href="/paperchase/2012/11/montana-approves-parental-notification-abortion-law.php">passed a referendum&lt;/a> [JURIST report] requiring notice to parents of minors before a planned abortion procedure. &lt;a href="http://www.plannedparenthood.org/">Planned Parenthood&lt;/a> [advocacy website] also &lt;a href="/paperchase/2012/10/planned-parenthood-sues-texas-regarding-low-income-health-program.php">sued Texas&lt;/a> [JURIST report] in October claiming that its law preventing state funding from going to any clinics affiliated with providing abortions violates another state law.&lt;/p>]]></description>
      <guid>http://jurist.org/paperchase/2013/05/ninth-circuit-strikes-down-arizona-20-week-abortion-ban.php</guid>
      <pubDate>2013-05-22T09:47:10-05:00</pubDate>
      <title>Ninth Circuit strikes down Arizona 20-week abortion ban</title>
      <link>http://jurist.org/paperchase/2013/05/ninth-circuit-strikes-down-arizona-20-week-abortion-ban.php</link>
      <author>G. Redd</author>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<![CDATA[<table align="left" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr><td><img src="/topstoryphoto/frontfederalcourtruling.jpg" alt="Photo source or description" valign="top" align="left" border="1" hspace="0" vspace="4"></td><td><img src="/images/s.gif" border="0" height="1" width="5"></td></tr></tbody></table>[JURIST] The <a href="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/"US >Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</a> [official website] <a href="http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2013/05/21/12-16670.pdf">ruled</a> [opinion, PDF] Tuesday that the Arizona law banning abortions at 20 weeks violates women's rights, making it "per se unconstitutional." The opinion, authored by Judge Marsha Berzon, focused on balancing fetal viability and a woman's right to medical autonomy.  The state defended the <a href="http://www.azleg.gov/legtext/50leg/2r/adopted/s.2036jud.pdf">statute</a> [text, PDF] by arguing that it was not an outright ban because it permitted procedures in the event of a medical emergency. The court rejected this argument: "the state may not ... impose an undue burden on her [the mother's] choice through regulation.  Allowing a physician to decide if abortion is medically necessary is not the same as allowing a woman to decide whether to carry her own pregnancy to term." Citing a "long line of invariant" precedent, the court further held that the statute crossed the line from a permissible medical regulation to an outright ban on procedures during gestation. It was not convinced that gestation at 20 weeks produced fetuses that could be viable outside the womb. Viability is the medical threshold for state bans as determined by the Supreme Court in <a href="http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&navby=case&vol=410&invol=113">Roe v. Wade</a> [opinion]. Because the law does not meet this threshold, the state's interest in protecting the fetus is subject to the woman's federal right of medical autonomy.

<p>This ruling comes on the heels of several developments in controversial state abortion statutes. Last Friday a judge for the <a href="http://www.are.uscourts.gov/default.cfm">US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas</a> [official website] temporarily blocked enforcement of a law banning abortions <a href="/paperchase/2013/05/federal-judge-allows-challenge-to-arkansas-abortion-law-to-proceed.php">12 weeks into a pregnancy</a> [JURIST report]. In December a state judge in Georgia <a href="/paperchase/2012/12/georgia-state-judge-enjoins-post-20-week-abortion-ban.php">enjoined a law </a>[JURIST report] banning doctors from providing abortions for women more than 20 weeks into gestation. Montana voters in November <a href="/paperchase/2012/11/montana-approves-parental-notification-abortion-law.php">passed a referendum</a> [JURIST report] requiring notice to parents of minors before a planned abortion procedure. <a href="http://www.plannedparenthood.org/">Planned Parenthood</a> [advocacy website] also <a href="/paperchase/2012/10/planned-parenthood-sues-texas-regarding-low-income-health-program.php">sued Texas</a> [JURIST report] in October claiming that its law preventing state funding from going to any clinics affiliated with providing abortions violates another state law.</p>]]>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <description><![CDATA[&lt;table align="left" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">&lt;tbody>&lt;tr>&lt;td>&lt;img src="/topstoryphoto/frontsame-sex.jpg" alt="Photo source or description" valign="top" align="left" border="1" hspace="0" vspace="4">&lt;/td>&lt;td>&lt;img src="/images/s.gif" border="0" height="1" width="5">&lt;/td>&lt;/tr>&lt;/tbody>&lt;/table>[JURIST] The &lt;a href="http://www.parliament.uk/business/commons/">House of Commons&lt;/a> of the UK &lt;a href="http://www.parliament.uk/">Parliament&lt;/a> [official websites] voted 366-161 on Tuesday to approve the &lt;a href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/cbill/2013-2014/0003/cbill_2013-20140003_en_1.htm">Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill&lt;/a> [HC Bill 3]. The legislation was &lt;a href="/paperchase/2013/01/uk-government-introduces-same-sex-marriage-bill.php">introduced in January&lt;/a> [JURIST report] and will effectively extend the application of the &lt;a href="http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Geo6/12-13-14/76/contents">Marriage Act of 1949&lt;/a> [materials] to same-sex as well as opposite-sex couples. The bill allows for an exception for any religious institutions that do not wish to perform same-sex weddings. Same-sex couples in England and Wales have been permitted to &lt;a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-21194052">enter into civil partnerships since 2005&lt;/a> [BBC report], which has allowed them to receive many of the same legal rights as married opposite-sex couples. &lt;a href="http://www.conservatives.com/People/David_Cameron.aspx">Prime Minister David Cameron&lt;/a> [official website], who also serves as the Leader of the &lt;a href="http://www.conservatives.com/">Conservative Party&lt;/a> [official website], strongly supports the bill. His support has &lt;a href="/paperchase/2013/02/uk-parliament-approves-same-sex-marriage.php">created tension&lt;/a> [JURIST report] within the Conservative Party. The bill will next proceed to the &lt;a href="http://www.parliament.uk/business/lords/">House of Lords&lt;/a> [official website] for final approval.

&lt;p>&lt;a href="/feature/featured/same-sex-marriage/">Same-sex marriage&lt;/a> [JURIST backgrounder] continues to be a controversial issue internationally. &lt;a href="/paperchase/2013/05/france-president-signs-same-sex-marriage-and-adoption-bill.php">France legalized&lt;/a> [JURIST report] same-sex marriage last week. Earlier this month Brazil &lt;a href="/paperchase/2013/05/brazil-justice-council-effectively-legalizes-same-sex-marriage.php">effectively legalized&lt;/a> [JURIST report] same-sex marriage in a court ruling that prevented notaries from denying to perform ceremonies for same-sex couples. Also this month same-sex marriage legislation was approved in the US states of &lt;a href="/paperchase/2013/05/minnesota-governor-signs-same-sex-marriage-bill-into-law.php">Minnesota&lt;/a>, &lt;a href="/paperchase/2013/05/delaware-governor-signs-same-sex-marriage-bill-into-law.php">Delaware&lt;/a> and &lt;a href="/paperchase/2013/05/rhode-island-governor-signs-same-sex-marriage-bill.php">Rhode Island&lt;/a> [JURIST reports]. Last month Ireland announced it would hold a &lt;a href="/paperchase/2013/04/ireland-to-hold-same-sex-Marriage-referendum.php">referendum&lt;/a> [JURIST report] on same-sex marriage. In March, the US Supreme Court heard oral arguments in two same-sex marriage cases regarding the &lt;a href="/paperchase/2013/03/supreme-court-hears-arguments-on-doma.php">Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act&lt;/a> and &lt;a href="/paperchase/2013/03/supreme-court-hears-arguments-in-proposition-8-case.php">Proposition 8&lt;/a> [JURIST reports], with decisions expected next month.&lt;/p>]]></description>
      <guid>http://jurist.org/paperchase/2013/05/uk-house-of-commons-approves-same-sex-marriage-bill.php</guid>
      <pubDate>2013-05-22T08:37:22-05:00</pubDate>
      <title>UK House of Commons approves same-sex marriage bill</title>
      <link>http://jurist.org/paperchase/2013/05/uk-house-of-commons-approves-same-sex-marriage-bill.php</link>
      <author>Theresa Donovan</author>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<![CDATA[<table align="left" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr><td><img src="/topstoryphoto/frontsame-sex.jpg" alt="Photo source or description" valign="top" align="left" border="1" hspace="0" vspace="4"></td><td><img src="/images/s.gif" border="0" height="1" width="5"></td></tr></tbody></table>[JURIST] The <a href="http://www.parliament.uk/business/commons/">House of Commons</a> of the UK <a href="http://www.parliament.uk/">Parliament</a> [official websites] voted 366-161 on Tuesday to approve the <a href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/cbill/2013-2014/0003/cbill_2013-20140003_en_1.htm">Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill</a> [HC Bill 3]. The legislation was <a href="/paperchase/2013/01/uk-government-introduces-same-sex-marriage-bill.php">introduced in January</a> [JURIST report] and will effectively extend the application of the <a href="http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Geo6/12-13-14/76/contents">Marriage Act of 1949</a> [materials] to same-sex as well as opposite-sex couples. The bill allows for an exception for any religious institutions that do not wish to perform same-sex weddings. Same-sex couples in England and Wales have been permitted to <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-21194052">enter into civil partnerships since 2005</a> [BBC report], which has allowed them to receive many of the same legal rights as married opposite-sex couples. <a href="http://www.conservatives.com/People/David_Cameron.aspx">Prime Minister David Cameron</a> [official website], who also serves as the Leader of the <a href="http://www.conservatives.com/">Conservative Party</a> [official website], strongly supports the bill. His support has <a href="/paperchase/2013/02/uk-parliament-approves-same-sex-marriage.php">created tension</a> [JURIST report] within the Conservative Party. The bill will next proceed to the <a href="http://www.parliament.uk/business/lords/">House of Lords</a> [official website] for final approval.

<p><a href="/feature/featured/same-sex-marriage/">Same-sex marriage</a> [JURIST backgrounder] continues to be a controversial issue internationally. <a href="/paperchase/2013/05/france-president-signs-same-sex-marriage-and-adoption-bill.php">France legalized</a> [JURIST report] same-sex marriage last week. Earlier this month Brazil <a href="/paperchase/2013/05/brazil-justice-council-effectively-legalizes-same-sex-marriage.php">effectively legalized</a> [JURIST report] same-sex marriage in a court ruling that prevented notaries from denying to perform ceremonies for same-sex couples. Also this month same-sex marriage legislation was approved in the US states of <a href="/paperchase/2013/05/minnesota-governor-signs-same-sex-marriage-bill-into-law.php">Minnesota</a>, <a href="/paperchase/2013/05/delaware-governor-signs-same-sex-marriage-bill-into-law.php">Delaware</a> and <a href="/paperchase/2013/05/rhode-island-governor-signs-same-sex-marriage-bill.php">Rhode Island</a> [JURIST reports]. Last month Ireland announced it would hold a <a href="/paperchase/2013/04/ireland-to-hold-same-sex-Marriage-referendum.php">referendum</a> [JURIST report] on same-sex marriage. In March, the US Supreme Court heard oral arguments in two same-sex marriage cases regarding the <a href="/paperchase/2013/03/supreme-court-hears-arguments-on-doma.php">Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act</a> and <a href="/paperchase/2013/03/supreme-court-hears-arguments-in-proposition-8-case.php">Proposition 8</a> [JURIST reports], with decisions expected next month.</p>]]>]]></content:encoded>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
