A Collaboration with the University of Pittsburgh
advertisement

Equally divided Supreme Court upholds Appeals judgment in Washington fisheries case

[JURIST] In a per curiam opinion [opinion, PDF] Monday, an equally divided US Supreme Court [official website] affirmed the judgment of the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit [official website] in Washington v. United States [docket].

The court was to determine whether road culverts that reduce fish habitat in Washington state violate a Native American fishing treaty, but said that the appeals decision would stand because the court was divided at 4-4, with Justice Kennedy abstaining.

The appeals court had determined [opinion, PDF] that in building and maintaining barrier culverts within what was known as the Case Area—large swaths of land, watersheds, and offshore waters adjacent to those areas—Washington violated, and was continuing to violate, its obligation to the tribes under treaties that required enough fish supplied to them.

About Paper Chase

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible format.

© Copyright JURIST Legal News and Research Services, Inc., 2013.