A Collaboration with the University of Pittsburgh

Supreme Court hears oral arguments for Indian tribe immunity case

[JURIST] The Supreme Court heard oral arguments [transcript, PDF Wednesday in Upper Skagit Indian Tribe v. Lundgren [SCOTUSblog materials] on whether a court may exercise jurisdiction over property owned by a tribal government despite a generally applicable sovereign immunity to suit.

In this case [JURIST report], the Upper Skagit Indian Tribe and the Lundgrens owned adjacent properties in which a Washington state trial court denied the tribe's motion to dismiss a quiet title action filed by the Lundgrens based upon an application of tribal sovereign immunity.

The Supreme Court of Washington upheld the denial [opinion, PDF], finding that the Lundgren's acquisition of the property by adverse possession "decades before the Tribe acquired record title in 2013" would have been uncovered in a pre-purchase title search, and thus that the tribe had "wielded sovereign immunity as a sword in disguise."

During argument, the justices appeared critical of the idea that the tribe could be immune from state jurisdiction over off-reservation land. Justice Samuel Alito questioned the implications of this immunity if a state or the federal government wanted to construct a pipeline with heavy public opposition.

About Paper Chase

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible format.

© Copyright JURIST Legal News and Research Services, Inc., 2013.