A Collaboration with the University of Pittsburgh

Federal judge dismisses challenge to Trump's border wall

[JURIST] A judge for the US District Court for the Southern District of California granted summary judgment [order, PDF] for the Trump administration Tuesday, allowing construction of a border wall between the US and Mexico to proceed.

Plaintiffs, including the Center for Biological Diversity, Defenders of Wildlife, Sierra Club, Animal Legal Defense Fund [advocacy websites], the state of California and the California Coastal Commission [official websites] had sought summary judgement and injunctive relief over waiver determinations issued by the Department of Homeland Security that regarded San Diego and El Centro as "high areas of illegal entry," both which of needed replaced border fences, according to the Secretary of DHS.

Plaintiffs claimed that the Waiver Determinations were ultra vires and unconstitutional according to the Non-Delegation Doctrine, the Take Care Clause, the Presentment Clause, the First Amendment and the Tenth Amendment. Judge Gonzalo Curiel rejected these arguments, instead granted summary judgment for the defendants.

Trump called Tuesday's ruling a "win," but is still seeking funding to complete the border wall.

About Paper Chase

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible format.

© Copyright JURIST Legal News and Research Services, Inc., 2013.