Chief justice allows EPA to continue enforcing mercury pollution rule

[JURIST] US Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts [official profile] on Thursday allowed the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) [official website] to continue enforcing [SCOTUSblog report] of its rule aimed at suppressing air pollution caused by mercury as well as other toxins from power plants. Roberts denied a petition [text, PDF] filed [JURIST report] by Michigan and 19 other states last week seeking to block enforcement the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS) [materials, PDF] pending a petition for certiorari. MATS, which requires installation of technology in electricity-generating power plants to curb air pollution caused by mercury and other harmful materials, was promulgated pursuant to the EPA interpretation of a portion of the Clean Air Act (CAA) [materials, PDF]. The states argued that the EPA went beyond "the bounds of reasonable [statutory] interpretation" in reading the CAA to allow the agency to "ignore cost when deciding to regulate power plants." Roberts denied the petition unilaterally [The Hill report] without referring the matter to the other justices.

Last month the Supreme Court ordered that the Obama administration delay enforcement [JURIST report] of the EPA's Clean Power Plan (CPP) [materials] pending a resolution to legal challenges. The request to block the implementation of the CPP was made in late January, with states insisting [JURIST report] that the plan's implementation would create a burden on states. Regulating power plan emissions has been a contentious issue. In June the Supreme Court ruled [JURIST report] 5-4 that the EPA could not make regulations regarding the toxic emissions of power plants without considering costs.

About Paper Chase

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible format.

© Copyright JURIST Legal News and Research Services, Inc., 2013.