A Collaboration with University of Pittsburgh   
advertisement

Supreme Court hears arguments on workplace pregnancy discrimination

[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] heard oral arguments Wednesday in two cases. In Young v. United Parcel Service [transcript, PDF] the justices considered whether the Pregnancy Discrimination Act [EEOC backgrounder] requires an employer that provides work accommodations to non-pregnant employees with work limitations to provide work accommodations to pregnant employees who are similar in their ability or inability to work. In 2006 the petitioner requested light-duty work to limit her package assignments to 20lbs or less on the grounds that other United Parcel Service (UPS) workers were given light-duty work. UPS refused [Guardian report] to accommodate Young and she left the company in 2009. Young's counsel argued [SCOTUSblog report] for a textural reading of the statute, while counsel for UPS defended the light-duty policy for certain types of employees. A decision is expected by June.

In Hana Financial, Inc. v. Hana Bank [transcript, PDF] the issue before the court is whether a judge or the jury should determine whether the use of an older trademark may be tacked to a newer one, thereby rendering them legal equivalents [Arent Fox, LLP backgrounder] in a determination of legal trademark priority. The doctrine of tacking [SCOTUSblog report] involves the ability of a trademark user to "tack" the priority of an early mark onto a later mark, which has the effect of giving the later mark priority over an intervening mark of a third party. There is a split among the federal circuit courts over the division of labor between the court and the jury regarding patent infringement in a trademark tacking dispute. This is the second trademark case [JURIST report] before the court in as many days; while the most recent court opinion on the tacking doctrine was decided almost 90 years ago.

About Paper Chase

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible format.

© Copyright JURIST Legal News and Research Services, Inc., 2013.