JURIST Supported by the University of Pittsburgh
PAPER CHASE NEWSBURSTDigest RSS feedFull RSS feed
Serious law. Primary sources. Global perspective.


Friday, November 30, 2012

Senate committee approves bill requiring warrant to search emails
Alison Sacriponte at 2:18 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] The Senate Judiciary Committee [official website] on Thursday approved a bill [text, PDF] that would prevent police from searching emails and other electronic content without a warrant. Currently, under the 1986 Electronic Communications Privacy Act [text], law enforcement agents only need a warrant to access emails less than 6 months old. The new bill is sponsored by committee chairman Senator Patrick Leahy [official website], who was also the lead author of the 1986 law. Leahy explained during the committee vote that with new technologies and expanding government surveillance, Americans face a greater threat to their digital privacy [AP report]. The full Senate is currently in a lame-duck session and is not expected to consider the bill until it reconvenes early next year. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) [advocacy website] has applauded the proposed legislation [press release], but the Department of Justice (DOJ) [official website] and other law enforcement groups have voiced opposition to the bill, saying it would impede criminal investigations.

Communications privacy has become a controversial issue in recent years in light of technological advances. Leahy introduced a similar email protection bill [JURIST report] in May 2011, stating the law needed an update to reflect the realities of our time. In 2010, the Federal Bureau Investigation (FBI) came under fire after it was discovered that it had collected more than 2,000 telephone records [JURIST report] between 2002 and 2006 by claiming the phone calls being made related to possible terrorism emergencies. In 2005, the US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit [official website] held that the Electronic Communications Privacy Act should be broadly interpreted [JURIST report] allowing an email provider alleged to have read correspondence in transit to customers to be tried on federal charges.




Link |  | print | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | Facebook page

For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...


LATEST LEGAL NEWS

 US House votes for 20-week abortion ban
3:57 PM ET, June 19

 UK Supreme Court allows families of Iraq soldiers to sue government
2:28 PM ET, June 19

 AI: China mining companies contributing to Congo rights abuses
12:51 PM ET, June 19

 click for more...

Get JURIST legal news delivered daily to your e-mail!

LATEST FORUM

Is Egypt's Stance on the Blue Nile Dam Legally Justified?
DOMESTIC
Zeray Yihdego
University of Aberdeen School of Law

ABOUT

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible, ad-free format.

CONTACT

Paper Chase welcomes comments, tips and URLs from readers. E-mail us at JURIST@jurist.org