 |
|

Legal news from Monday, September 24, 2012 |
 |
|


Egypt court upholds death sentences for 14 Islamists
Brandon Gatto on September 24, 2012 3:55 PM ET

[JURIST] An Egyptian criminal court on Monday upheld death sentences for 14 Islamists convicted of murdering several people in Sinai Peninsula attacks last year. In particular, the Ismailia court ordered the convicts, all members of the monotheist and militant group Tawheed wal Jihad [advocacy website], to be hanged [Reuters report] for killing [JURIST report] three police officers, one army officer, and one civilian during June and July attacks on a police station and a bank in Arish, Egypt. Eight of the group's members were tried in absentia, while four additional members were sentenced to life imprisonment. Tawheed wal Jihad is a Salafist [PBS backgrounder] organization and is one of several banned groups that the Egyptian government is targeting in a security crackdown. The group was also accused of bombing tourist resorts in South Sinai in 2004 and 2005, attacks that left 34 people dead.
Salafists, who adhere to an ideology that seeks to restore Islam to its original meanings and teachings, have played a significant role in recent conflicts in the Middle East. Earlier in August there was speculation [BBC report] that Salafist cleric Mohammed Yursi Ibrahim would be appointed to the cabinet of Egyptian President Mohammed Morsi [BBC profile; JURIST news archive], possibly increasing tensions between Muslims and Coptic Christians in Egypt. In June an Israeli missile strike killed two Salafist militants in the Gaza Strip [BBC report].


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Israel ex-PM given suspended sentence, fine for breaching public trust
Brandon Gatto on September 24, 2012 3:03 PM ET

[JURIST] The Jerusalem District Court [Times of Israel news archive] on Monday sentenced former Israeli prime minister Ehud Olmert [official profile; JURIST news archive] to a one-year suspended sentence and a fine of about USD $19,000 on a charge of breaching public trust. The conviction stems from Olmert's role in a corruption case that forced him to resign from office in 2008 despite being eventually cleared of the corruption charge. In July the court found that Olmert had been illegally granting favors [JURIST report] to a long-time friend and business partner while serving as minister of industry, trade and labor between 2002 and 2007. Olmert's light sentence [BBC report] allows him to run for parliament, though he will remain barred from serving in the cabinet throughout his upcoming corruption trial. Former Jerusalem District Attorney Eli Abarbanel has reportedly not ruled out an appeal [INN report] of the decision.
In July Olmert was acquitted of the key charges [Reuters report] that, as a cabinet minister and Jerusalem's mayor before becoming prime minister, he received USD $150,000 in bribes from US businessman Moshe Talansky, and that he defrauded Israeli charities by double-billing them for overseas fundraising trips, a charge popularly referred to as the Rishon Tours double-billing affair. The former prime minister has maintained his innocence throughout a series of scandals, including a plea of not guilty to three corruption charges in December 2009 that encompass the Talansky scandal and the Rishon Tours affair [JURIST reports]. Before he resigned, Israeli police raided Olmert's offices as part of the corruption investigation [JURIST reports] launched by the Israeli Ministry of Justice. Despite acquittals, Olmert still faces bribery charges [JURIST report] related to the construction of a luxury apartment complex during his 10-year tenure as mayor of Jerusalem. Olmert was indicted on the bribery charges in the case in January of this year after having been officially named as a suspect [JURIST report] in the investigation in April 2010.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Vietnam court jails bloggers for anti-state propaganda
Michael Haggerson on September 24, 2012 1:33 PM ET

[JURIST] A court in Vietnam ordered three bloggers jailed for anti-state propaganda on Monday. Bloggers Nguyen Van Hai, alias Dieu Cay, Phan Thanh Hai, alias Anhbasg, and Ta Phong Tan [blogs, in Vietnamese] were charged [JURIST report] in April in the People's Court of Ho Chi Minh City [official website, in Vietnamese] on charges of spreading propaganda to defame the Vietnamese government, in violation of Article 88 of the Criminal Code [text, PDF]. The three bloggers belonged to the Club for Free Journalists, established in 2007, which promoted journalism that was separate from the state-run media. Blogger Nguyen Van Hai was sentenced [AFP report] to 12 years in prison, and Ta Phong Tan was sentenced to 10 years. Phan Thanh Hai pleaded guilty and was sentenced to four years. The US Embassy in Hanoi stated that they were concerned with the verdict and called on Vietnam to release the bloggers.
Human Rights Watch (HRW) and Amnesty International (AI) [advocacy websites] have called for the writers' release [HRW report], calling the charges "politically-motivated" [AI report]. According to the HRW 2012 Annual Report released in January [JURIST report], the Middle Eastern "Arab Spring" revolutions and protests may have inspired Vietnamese citizens to combat oppression in their country, especially restrictions on freedom of speech. However, the Vietnamese government has reacted strongly against pro-democracy bloggers. In November a Vietnamese appeals court reduced the sentence [JURIST report] of pro-democracy blogger and professor Pham Minh Hoang [blog, in Vietnamese], who had been sentenced [JURIST report] to three years in prison after writing anti-government articles on his blog under his pen name. In August 2011 a Vietnamese appeals court upheld the seven-year sentence of prominent rights lawyer and dissident Cu Huy Ha Vu, convicted in April [JURIST reports] of carrying out anti-state propaganda. In January 2010 a Vietnamese court sentenced [JURIST report] writer and democracy activist Pham Thanh Nghien to four years in prison on charges of spreading anti-state propaganda. The same month, a Vietnamese court convicted four democracy activists [JURIST report] of subversion.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Federal judge rejects challenge to Colorado ballot identification process
Dan Taglioli on September 24, 2012 12:33 PM ET

[JURIST] A judge for the US District Court for the District of Colorado [official website] on Friday dismissed a lawsuit [complaint, PDF] filed by an elections transparency group aiming to prevent Colorado counties from using election ballots that have identifying numbers or bar codes printed on them. The Citizen Center [advocacy website] filed the lawsuit in February seeking an injunction and declaratory judgment requiring Colorado Secretary of State Scott Gessler [official website] and the counties of Boulder, Jefferson, Larimer, Mesa, Eagle and Chaffee to refrain from using such ballots because they allegedly can be traced back to individual voters. The election activists claim that US law prevents governments, not just fellow citizens, from being able to trace a voter's ballot. Judge Christine Arguello first denied Citizen Center's request for a temporary restraining order [motion, PDF] to prevent three counties from printing ballots with barcodes or identifying numerals, then she dismissed the entire complaint because the plaintiffs had not shown that they had suffered or would suffer [Denver Post report] any specific injury that could be remedied by a federal court. Arguello went on to state that the US Constitution [Cornell LII materials] does not guarantee a right to a secret vote and that merely demonstrating that a ballot could be traced back to an individual voter does not demonstrate that the individual's voting rights were violated.
Voting rights are a controversial issue this year with the recent spate of voter identification laws from state legislatures. There are now 32 US states [NCSL backgrounder] that require voters to present some form of ID at the polls, and the issue remains controversial. Last week the Pennsylvania Supreme Court remanded to a lower court a challenge to Pennsylvania's new voter identification law [JURIST report]. Last month a three-judge panel in the US District Court for the District of Columbia unanimously rejected a Texas law [JURIST report] requiring voters to present photo ID to election officials before casting their ballots. In May the ACLU of Minnesota filed a petition [JURIST report] sought to eliminate a proposed ballot initiative that would amend the Minnesota Constitution to require citizens to present photo identification in order to vote.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

UN refugee agency issues new guidelines on detention of asylum-seekers
Dan Taglioli on September 24, 2012 11:11 AM ET

[JURIST] The Office of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) [official website] on Friday issued new international guidelines [materials, PDF; press release] regarding the detention of asylum-seekers. The new guidelines were presented amid statements of concern over the growing use of detention in a number of countries as global asylum claims have risen [UN News Centre report] over the last few years, with 441,300 claims recorded in 2011 where the previous year saw only 368,000. The UNHCR issued the new guidelines as part of an effort to promote alternatives to detention such as surrender of documentation, periodic reporting to authorities, directed residence or residence at free-movement asylum centers, bail or bond requirements, and community supervision arrangements. As the UNHCR opposes all forms of detention of non-criminal immigrant refugees and other migrant non-refugees who seek international protection, the new guidelines begin by making clear that seeking asylum is not a criminal act and those who seek it should not be detained:Every person has the right to seek and enjoy in other countries asylum from persecution, serious human rights violations and other serious harm. Seeking asylum is not, therefore, an unlawful act. Furthermore, the 1951 Convention [relating to the Status of Refugees] provides that asylum-seekers shall not be penalised for their illegal entry or stay, provided they present themselves to the authorities without delay and show good cause for their illegal entry or presence. The guidelines go on to state that any detention is an exceptional measure that must be in accordance with national law, that such detention laws must be crafted so as to prescribe foreseeable and predictable consequences, that unlawful and arbitrary detentions are guarded against by international law, that detention must be neither discriminatory nor indefinite, and that detention conditions must be human and dignified.
Laws and policies governing the treatment of migrants continue to raise international human rights concerns. Last month the UNHCR and the UN Office of the High Commissioner on Human Rights [official website] together expressed concern over a recently passed law in Australia [JURIST report] that will reopen offshore detention centers used to process migrants and asylum-seekers who arrive in the country by sea. In July Human Rights Watch [advocacy website] reported that migrants residing in Greece face a rising culture of discrimination and violence [JURIST report]. In June Amnesty International [advocacy website] stated that the Cyprus government's practice of detaining all illegal migrants seeking asylum in the island nation violates international law [JURIST report].


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|