JURIST Supported by the University of Pittsburgh
PAPER CHASE NEWSBURSTDigest RSS feedFull RSS feed
Serious law. Primary sources. Global perspective.


Friday, August 31, 2012

Japan court dismisses Apple patent suit against Samsung
Michael Haggerson at 2:07 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] A Tokyo court on Friday dismissed a claim by Apple that Samsung Electronics [corporate websites] violated Apple's patents with its smartphones and tablets. The technology at issued involved synchronizing music and video data [Bloomberg report]. The judge stated that Samsung's technology did not fall within the scope of Apple's patents. Apple had claimed USD $1.3 million in damages. The Tokyo court also dismissed Apple's request for an injunction to block the sale of eight Samsung products in Japan. Apple was ordered to pay Samsung's litigation costs as a result of the verdict. Analysts suggest that this ruling may turn the tide in the companies' global patent battle in favor of Samsung.

Apple and Samsung have been embroiled in continuous patent litigation in courts around the world. This ruling comes on the heels of Apple winning a USD $1.05 billion judgment [JURIST report] against Samsung last week in the US District Court for the Northern District of California [official website]. The suit covered everything from the shape and design of the competing companies' tablets and smartphones to the technology employed in the devices' software interface. Following the jury award Apple moved to block [JURIST report] eight Samsung products from being produced and sold in the US on Tuesday. Last week a South Korean court found that Apple and Samsung had violated each others' patents [JURIST report] and banned the sales of some of the companies' products in the country. In July a UK court ruled [JURIST report] that Samsung tablets do not infringe on Apple's design. Earlier in July a federal judge issued an injunction [JURIST report] against Samsung to stop the sale of its Galaxy Nexus smartphone in the US. A week earlier the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit had rejected [Bloomberg report; CAFC notice] Samsung's appeal of the decision that remanded the case to the district court giving Apple another opportunity to ban Samsung's Galaxy products in the states after it partially reversed [JURIST report] the district court's refusal to grant a temporary injunction for Apple against Samsung. Apple's request for a temporary injunction was denied [JURIST report] by the district court in December.




Link |  | print | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | Facebook page

For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...


LATEST LEGAL NEWS

 Supreme Court rules on scope of federal agencies' jurisdiction
2:35 PM ET, May 20

 Supreme Court rules on foreign taxes
1:36 PM ET, May 20

 Supreme Court rules defendant not entitled to federal habeas relief
12:53 PM ET, May 20

 click for more...

Get JURIST legal news delivered daily to your e-mail!

LATEST FORUM

The War on Terror and the Need for Muslim Support
DOMESTIC
Faisal Kutty
Valparaiso University Law School

ABOUT

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible, ad-free format.

CONTACT

Paper Chase welcomes comments, tips and URLs from readers. E-mail us at JURIST@jurist.org