JURIST Supported by the University of Pittsburgh
PAPER CHASE ARCHIVEDigest RSS feedFull RSS feed
Serious law. Primary sources. Global perspective.
Listen to Paper Chase!


Legal news from Friday, August 10, 2012




California AG sues veterans charity for corruption
Max Slater on August 10, 2012 4:50 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] California Attorney General Kamala Harris [official website] filed a lawsuit [complaint, PDF] on Wednesday against a veterans charity organization alleging that its executives engaged in fraudulent fundraising, false reporting to the IRS and other illegal activities. The lawsuit alleges that the veterans charity Help Hospitalized Veterans (HHV) [official website] breached its fiduciary duty by spending its charitable assets on golf memberships and condominiums for top executives. The lawsuit also contends that HHV authorized excessive compensation for its executives. California is seeking to recover more that $4.3 million in improperly diverted funds from HHV. In addition to seeking monetary damages California is also asking the court to issue an injunction barring HHV employees from making false representations. HHV has raised over $108 million dollars over the last three years [Reuters report] with 33.8 percent going toward its programs. It was given only one star out of five by Charity Navigator [official website], which rated 59 veterans charities according to financial health, accountability and transparency. Allegations of questionable financial practices among veterans charities, including HHV, surfaced five years ago when the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform [official website] conducted an investigation [WP report] into such organizations. It is not yet clear when the Riverside County Superior Court [official website] will rule on the California lawsuit.

This week the Supreme Court of California [official website] ruled [JURIST report] that several insurance companies must pay the state up to $60 million to clean up an industrial waste storage site. In a unanimous decision California's high court declared that consecutive state-purchased policies of various insurance companies require that each company pay up to its damage cap for toxic waste spillage at the Stringfellow Acid Pits in Riverside County. Also this week the US Court for the Ninth Circuit [official website] reversed [JURIST report] a decision by the US District Court for the Northern District of California [official website], which had ruled in favor of an Oregon-based Islamic nonprofit corporation challenging the Bush administration's warrantless wiretap program. The California district court had held that the federal government implicitly waived sovereign immunity under Section 1810 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) [LII backgrounder]. Earlier this month the US Department of Justice (DOJ) [official website] filed an amicus brief [JURIST report] with the California Supreme Court arguing that undocumented immigrants should not be able to practice law in the US even if they passed a state bar exam.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


UN welcomes signing of Somalia national stabilization plan
Sung Un Kim on August 10, 2012 4:47 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] UN Special Representative of the Secretary General (SRSG) for Somalia and head of the UN Political Office for Somalia (UNPOS) [official website] Augustine Mahiga [official profile] on Friday welcomed [press release, PDF] the recent presidential decree on the Somalia's National Security and Stabilization Plan (NSSP). Somalia [BBC backgrounder; JURIST news archive] President Sheikh Sharif Sheikh Ahmed [BBC profile] signed the NSSP on Wednesday and stated that it was an historic step for Somalia in its effort to promote human rights and the rule of law in the country. The plan prescribes priority actions from short to long periods of time to strengthen the security and justice institutions. The NSSP also contains priority measures that have to be fulfilled before the current Transitional Federal Government (TFG) [CFR backgrounder] ends its mandate on August 20.

Somalia has been urged by the international community to ensure that the country's transition is proceeding peacefully. Last Wednesday the country's constituent assembly approved [JURIST report] a draft of the new constitution with over 96 percent of the 645 ballots cast in the special 825-member assembly after eight days of debate. The new constitution also has to be ratified by a national referendum. In June President Ahmed and the TFG signed [JURIST report] a decree establishing the legal framework by adopting a new constitution convened by the National Constituent Assembly (NCA). During the same month UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon [official profile] told [JURIST report] officials at the Istanbul II Conference on Somalia [materials] that Somalia must take all efforts to smoothly transit into a permanent government with a new constitution. In May Somalia was called on to address the issue of legitimate judicial systems [JURIST report] in Mogadishu and South Central Somalia after the UN Independent Expert on the situation of human rights in Somalia found that there were significant difficulties in harmonizing Sharia law with modern international and human rights law.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Kuwait asks for review of election law
Sung Un Kim on August 10, 2012 3:32 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] The government of Kuwait [BBC backgrounder; JURIST news archive] on Thursday asked the national Constitutional Court to review the legality of the country's election law. Information Minister Sheikh Mohammad Abdullah Al-Sabah [official website, in Arabic] stated that the decision of referral was made after all constitutional experts agreed that the 2006 election law violates the country's constitution [Al Arabiya News report]. He added that the purpose of the referral is to prevent any nullification of future elections based on the unconstitutionality of the law. Two parliamentary elections have already been held under the law in 2008 and 2009, in addition to the latest one in 2012. The referral to the court is expected to take place before the end of next week.

In June the Constitutional Court nullified [JURIST report] the latest parliamentary election based on procedural flaws. The court held that the new parliament [official website, in Arabic] was unconstitutional and that the 2009 parliament should be reinstated. It came only two days after Kuwait's ruler Sheikh Sabah al-Ahmad al-Sabah [BBC profile; JURIST news archive] suspended [NYT report] the parliament for a month in response to escalating tensions between the more liberal, western-backed lawmakers and the Islamist-led lawmakers. The tension grew when two cabinet ministers resigned under the pressure of the Islamist-led lawmakers who tried to gain more seats. A similar ruling took place a week earlier when the Supreme Constitutional Court of Egypt [official website] dissolved [JURIST report] the Egyptian Parliament [official websites] because it found that one-third of the parliament's members were elected illegally. The court, by invalidating the entire parliament, affirmed the lower court's decision of February [JURIST report] when the High Administrative Court of Egypt ruled that voting system used in the recent parliamentary election was unconstitutional.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


ACLU asks judge to reject Michigan law denying health insurance to same-sex partners
Max Slater on August 10, 2012 3:29 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) [advocacy website; press release] asked a federal judge on Friday to overturn a Michigan law that bans many public agencies from providing health care to same-sex partners of their employees. The ACLU's lawsuit [complaint, PDF] argues that the Michigan law is discriminatory because it denies coverage only to domestic partners while allowing government employers to offer health benefits to all other family members, including spouses. The lawsuit was filed on behalf of five same-sex couples who contend that the Michigan law unconstitutionally denies health benefits to same-sex partners in committed relationships while affording these benefits to partners in heterosexual couples. ACLU attorney Amanda Goad argued that the law seeks to single out same-sex couples for discrimination:
This discriminatory law serves no purpose other than to single out a small minority of people and deprive them of critical protections. The state is unconstitutionally interfering with the benefit plans established by city and county governments, school districts, and community colleges, and that's hurting hardworking employees and their families.
It is not yet clear when the US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan [official website] will hear the case.

Employer benefits for partners in same-sex couples has been a contentious legal issue recently. In July the Obama administration amended regulations [JURIST report] to offer same-sex domestic partners of federal employees some retirement benefits. The new regulation [text, PDF] adds "same-sex domestic partners to the class of persons for which an insurable interest is presumed to exist," which allows the employee to designate their partner as a recipient to their annuity after they pass away. Another regulation change [text] also permits children of an employee's same-sex domestic partner to receive a child-care subsidy in some instances. In June a same-sex couple in New York filed a class-action lawsuit [JURIST report] against a hospital seeking to compel the hospital to provide spousal healthcare benefits. In April a judge for the US District Court for the Northern District of California [official website] ruled [JURIST report] that denial of insurance benefits to the same-sex spouse of a federal employee is discriminatory.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Romania prosecutors seek investigation into ministerial abuse in presidential referendum
Sung Un Kim on August 10, 2012 2:09 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] Romanian prosecutors on Friday asked the country's Parliament [official website] to approve a planned criminal investigation against Victor Dobre, a former junior minister who oversaw public administration in the country's Ministry of Interior [official website, in Romanian] until he quit this week. The prosecutors are accusing Dobre of having abused public interest [Reuters report] by instructing an aide to write a letter to the Constitutional Court [official website] stating that the ministry could not confirm the turnout numbers for the July 29 national referendum on the resignation of President Traian Basescu [official website, in Romanian]. The letter caused "significant disruption in the activity of institutions" by calling into question the results of the referendum and forcing the court to delay its ruling certifying the results. Under Romanian law only the president and the parliament can request an investigation of a minister.

President Basescu survived [JURIST report] the national referendum last week when the vote, despite yielding 88 percent majority in favor of Basescu's resignation, was invalidated for failing to achieve the required threshold of 50 percent voter turnout. Prime Minister Victor Ponta [BBC profile], a member of the Social Liberal Union (USL) party that gained the majority seat in the parliament, led the referendum accusing the president. USL had voted [JURIST report] in early July to impeach the president in a 256-114 vote, at the same time passing an elimination of the referendum law's 50 percent turnout provision. The Supreme Court, however, reinstated [JURIST report] the requirement holding that in case of a lower than 50 percent turnout the referendum would be invalid.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Vermont prison forced labor lawsuit allowed to proceed
Max Slater on August 10, 2012 1:47 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] The US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit [official website] ruled [decision] Friday that a Vermont man suing the state under the Thirteenth Amendment to the US Constitution [Cornell LII backgrounder] for labor he was forced to do while awaiting trial in jail will be able to proceed with his suit in federal district court. Finbar McGarry, a former graduate student at the University of Vermont, was arrested in December 2008 for allegedly firing a gun in his home and threatening to kill his family [ABC News report]. McGarry filed suit against Vermont arguing that the state violated his rights under the Thirteenth Amendment, which prohibits slavery and involuntary servitude, when it forced him to work at a state correctional facility while he awaited trial. In 2009 the US District Court for the District of Vermont [official website] dismissed McGarry's claim saying that the situation McGarry faced was nothing like slavery. The Second Circuit, however, overruled the district court, declaring that McGarry did not need to prove that he faced slavery-like conditions:
Contrary to the district court's conclusion, it is well-settled that the term "involuntary servitude" is not limited to chattel slavery-like conditions. The amendment was intended to prohibit all forms of involuntary labor, not solely to abolish chattel slavery.
McGarry filed the $11 million lawsuit pro se. Vermont has 90 days to appeal the Second Circuit's ruling to the US Supreme Court [official website].

Forced labor and slavery are serious legals issue worldwide. Earlier this week the UK High Court ruled [JURIST report] that two government back-to-work schemes do not constitute forced labor. Last week the International Labor Organization (ILO) [official website] Domestic Workers Convention (DWC) [text] was ratified by the Philippines, giving the international treaty its second ratification and paving the way for the convention to enter full force of law. Domestic workers are frequent victims of forced labor, and the ILO created the DWC to set the first global standards for domestic workers worldwide to ensure they receive generally the same protections available to other workers [JURIST report] such as weekly days off, work hour limits, limits on in-kind payment, minimum wage, clear information on terms and conditions of employment, and other benefits. In June the ILO released a report on forced labor, estimating that nearly 21 million people around the world work in forced labor [JURIST report] and noting that women represent 55 percent of forced laborers worldwide. The agency adopted the DWC [JURIST report] at last year's annual meeting of ILO member states, the 100th Session of the International Labor Conference [official website]. The ILO is a specialized agency of the UN.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Michigan AG files suit to remove Detroit school board members from office
Max Slater on August 10, 2012 1:37 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette [official profile] filed suit on Thursday seeking to remove from office seven members of the Detroit school board on grounds that enrollment in Detroit public schools is allegedly too low to justify board members being elected on a by-district basis. Filed in Wayne County Circuit Court [official website], the lawsuit asserts [Detroit Free Press report] that seven school board members are illegally holding office because they were elected in separate districts rather than in an at large election across the entire Detroit school district. In the lawsuit Schuette argues that the Michigan Revised Code [text] mandates that school districts with over 100,000 students may elect board members by district, but that Detroit public schools are expected to enroll only about 49,000 students in the upcoming school year. Schuette said he was filing the lawsuit in order to ensure that Detroit's children receive a qualifty education. School board president LaMarr Lemmons criticized the lawsuit, claiming that it undermines local authority over school board elections.

Michigan has been at the center of controversy recently regarding education law and policy. In July the American Civil Liberties Union of Michigan (ACLU) [official website] filed a lawsuit alleging that the state of Michigan and the Highland Park school district violated state and federal law by failing to ensure that students are reading at grade level [JURIST report]. According to the ACLU two-thirds of students in the Highland Park School District lack the basic reading skills to pass Michigan proficiency standards. The lawsuit, apparently the first of its kind, requested immediate help from the state [press release], including research-based methods of instruction, highly trained educators and administrators, a process for monitoring progress, new educational materials and textbooks and a clean and safe learning environment.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Uruguay government presents bill to legalize production and sale of marijuana
Sung Un Kim on August 10, 2012 1:20 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] The government of Uruguay [BBC backgrounder; JURIST news archive] on Friday presented to its national congress a bill to legalize the production and sale of marijuana in the country. Uruguay President Jose Mujica [official website, in Spanish] stated that the bill is a measure designed to decrease the violent crime [Reuters report] associated with marijuana, adding that its detrimental effects are less harmful than the crimes arising out of the black market that currently sells marijuana illegally. The bill limits sales to individual citizens to 30 grams, or about 1 ounce, per month, while sales to foreigners are prohibited in order prevent the country from attracting marijuana-using tourists. The production and sale of marijuana would be solely the responsibility of the government, which has the obligation to warn citizens of any harms associated with marijuana consumption. The government estimated that Uruguay has to produce around 27 tons of marijuana annually to meet current demand.

Marijuana use has created legal controversy around the world, especially in the US. In June the Chicago City Council [official website] voted to decriminalize [JURIST report] the possession of small amounts of marijuana, detailing that police officers may issue tickets to individuals found to be in possession of 10 grams of marijuana or less. In May the Connecticut Senate passed a bill [JURIST report] allowing citizens to obtain marijuana for medical use under certain conditions, making Connecticut the seventeenth state to allow sale of marijuana for medical use. Other states that have passed similar laws have run into trouble with conflicting federal laws regulating the production and sale of marijuana. In March the US District Court for the Eastern District of California [official website] dismissed a suit [JURIST report] challenging US Attorneys' authority to prosecute medical marijuana providers in California. In January the US District Court for the District of Montana [official website] ruled [JURIST report] that the state's laws allowing the sale of medical marijuana did not protect dispensers from federal prosecution. Connecticut has nevertheless been taking steps toward legalization of marijuana, last year passing a law decriminalizing possession [JURIST report] of small amounts of marijuana.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


India high court rules defendants entitled to legal aid at all levels of the judiciary
Max Slater on August 10, 2012 12:13 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] The Supreme Court of India [official website] ruled [opinion] Thursday that persons accused of crimes are entitled to free legal representation in all courts, not just at the trial level. The statute in question was the Legal Services Authorities Act of 1987, which declares that all persons who must defend a case are entitled to free legal services. In its ruling the Indian high court held that the language of the statute made it clear that accused persons should be granted free assistance at all legal proceedings:
It is important to note in this context that Sections 12 and 13 of the [Legal Services Authorities Act] do not make any distinction between the trial stage and the appellate stage for providing legal services. In other words, an eligible person is entitled to legal services at any stage of the proceedings which he or she is prosecuting or defending. In fact the Supreme Court Legal Services Committee provides legal assistance to eligible persons in this Court. This makes it abundantly clear that legal services shall be provided to an eligible person at all stages of the proceedings, trial as well as appellate.
The case involved a criminal defendant whose conviction for rape was upheld in an appeals court even though the defendant did not have legal representation. The high court ordered the appellate court to re-hear his appeal.

The right to counsel has been the subject of numerous court cases worldwide in recent years. In February 2011, the Supreme Court of India ruled [JURIST report] that criminal defendants have a right to counsel under the Indian Constitution. In October 2010 the UK Supreme Court ruled that Scottish police could no longer question a suspect in custody [JURIST report] without the presence of a lawyer. A week earlier the French Court of Cassation ruled that all persons in custody of French law enforcement, including terrorism suspects, are entitled to consult with lawyers [JURIST report] from the outset of criminal proceedings. Also that month the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that Canadians do not have the right to have counsel [JURIST report] present during custodial interrogations under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms [text]. In May 2009 the US Supreme Court ruled that the Sixth Amendment [Cornell LII backgrounder] does not require police to cease interrogations [JURIST report] after a suspect had invoked his right to counsel, ruling that the Fifth Amendment [Cornell LII backgrounder] provides adequate protection.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Mississippi church challenges city zoning ordinance
Sung Un Kim on August 10, 2012 11:38 AM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] The US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit [official website] on Wednesday heard arguments in the challenge brought by a Mississippi church against a municipal ordinance that bans churches from the city's town square. The Opulent Life Church [official website], a Southern Baptist congregation of 18 members, sought a a preliminary injunction via a lawsuit initially filed against the city of Holly Springs in January with the aid of the Liberty Institute [advocacy website]. The church alleged [ABC report] that the city's ban is intended to prevent churches, which do not bring in tax money, from taking up valuable land. The US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi [official website] ruled in favor of the city but the church appealed the decision, stating that the ordinance, which requires churches to get approval of 60 percent of local property owners and the city's mayor before it can move to the downtown area, violates the First Amendment [Cornell LII backgrounder] and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA) [42 USC § 2000cc]. The RLUIPA allows churches and other religious institutions to avoid burdensome zoning law restrictions on their property use and requires towns to treat religious institutions as they would other businesses. The church originally planned to argue that the ordinance discriminates against religious institutions because the 60 percent requirement is not imposed on other businesses and nonprofit organizations such as museums, post offices and social clubs. However, a day before the hearing the city amended the ordinance by completely banning churches from the town square, noting that the town is trying to develop businesses on the square. The city argued that the new ordinance is constitutional, in contrast to the previous law, which the city acknowledged to be unconstitutional.

Religious freedom is an issue throughout the world. Last month the US Department of State (DOS) [official website] released [JURIST report] its annual International Religious Freedom Report [materials] documenting threats to religious freedom around the globe. The report detailed current international threats to religious liberty, especially laws that punish religious traditions and blasphemy laws that are often used to punish religious tolerance. In June a German court ruled [JURIST report] that circumcising young boys based on religious traditions is prohibited even if the parents consent to the procedure. In March a UN expert urged states to refrain from using official state religions [JURIST report] as a means to enhance their national identity politics, "as this may have detrimental effects for the situation of individuals from minority communities." Last August Hungarian churches challenged a law [JURIST report] that officially recognized only 14 of the 358 religious groups in the country.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


California Supreme Court orders insurance companies to pay for toxic waste cleanup
Max Slater on August 10, 2012 10:25 AM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] The Supreme Court of California [official website] on Thursday ruled [opinion, PDF] that several insurance companies must pay the state up to $60 million to clean up an industrial waste storage site. In a unanimous decision California's high court declared that consecutive state-purchased policies of various insurance companies require that each company pay up to its damage cap for toxic waste spillage at the Stringfellow Acid Pits in Riverside County. The insurance companies argued that they should only be liable for the share of damages that occurred when each insurer's policy was in place. The state high court ruled that the insurance companies' argument was flawed because it was not possible to calculate the exact damages under each policy period:
Neither the State nor the insurers dispute that progressive damage to property at the Stringfellow site "occurred" during numerous policy periods. In addition, the insurers concede that in cases such as this it is impossible to prove precisely what property damage occurred during any specific policy period. The fact that all policies were covering the risk at some point during the property loss is enough to trigger the insurers' indemnity obligation.
Stringfellow Acid Pits waste site was an industrial waste disposal facility that the state designed and operated from 1956 to 1972. California has estimated that cleaning up Stringfellow will cost several hundred million dollars.

Environmental cleanups have been a contentious legal issue both in the US and abroad recently. Last week the UN welcomed a new project [JURIST report] initiated by the government of Nigeria to resolve the oil contamination affecting the people of Ogoniland. Earlier this month a court in Brazil ordered Chevron to suspend all oil drilling in Brazil [JURIST report] in the wake of two recent oil spills off the coast of Rio De Janeiro. In April a Brazilian prosecutor filed another lawsuit against Chevron [JURIST report] relating to a leak in one of its coastal oil fields. In March 35 Nigerian villages filed suit [JURIST report] against Shell [corporate website] in a London court alleging Shell's slow response in cleaning up two oil spills in a neighboring river ruined their livelihoods. A similar suit was filed in November of last year by a Nigerian village against Royal Dutch Shell PLC in the US District Court in the Eastern District of Michigan [official website].




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


UN humanitarian chief calls on Myanmar to increase access for aid agencies
Sung Un Kim on August 10, 2012 10:24 AM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] The UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) [official website] on Thursday expressed concern [press release, PDF] over the shortage of humanitarian assistance for the over half a million internally displaced people in Myanmar [BBC backgrounder; JURIST news archive] and called for increased access for aid agencies. At the end of his four-day mission to the country OCHA Director of Operations John Ging [official profile] acknowledged the results gained from the Myanmar authorities' efforts toward democratization and peace, but he warned that there are still "significant humanitarian needs" to be addressed. Ging also noted that aid agencies are denied access to the displaced people in Kachin and Rakhine States where they are in immediate need of humanitarian assistance:
Emotions are running high, grievances are decades old and the recent violence has ignited a potent combination of fear and anger within both communities. It is vital that people's immediate humanitarian needs are met, while, at the same time, fundamental issues are addressed to prevent future occurrences of communal conflict.
Ging called all parties to respect the rule of law and to resolve their tension in a peaceful way rather than through armed conflict. He also addressed the recent detention of 14 humanitarian staff from the UN and international nongovernmental organizations by calling for their immediate release. Lastly Ging urged donors to support the $32.5 million Rakhine Humanitarian Response Plan [text], which focuses on immediate relief requirements such as shelter, food and sanitation support for the displaced people in Myanmar until December of this year.

Myanmar has been unsuccessful in resolving the sectarian violence prevalent in the country despite attempts by President Thein Sein [BBC profile] to bring peace to the communities, making the country subject to international criticism. Earlier this month the US Congress on a voice vote approved a bill [JURIST report] extending the ban on imports from Myanmar. A day earlier Human Rights Watch (HRW) [advocacy website] released a 56-page document [report, PDF] accusing Myanmar security forces of human rights abuses against a minority religious community [JURIST report] in June. In July UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay [official profile] expressed concern over the continued violence and human rights violations prevalent in Myanmar's Rakhine state since clashes began between its Buddhist and minority Rohingya [BBC backgrounder] Muslim communities in May. A week earlier Amnesty International (AI) [advocacy website] reported [JURIST report] that the violence between the two groups has increased since a state of emergency was declared in the western state of Rakhine. Earlier in July a spokesperson for the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) [official website] reported that 10 UN staff and aid workers had been arrested [JURIST report] in the northwestern Rakhine state and three of them are facing unknown criminal charges.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Florida court dismisses lawsuit against three state supreme court justices
Max Slater on August 10, 2012 10:09 AM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] Florida's Second Judicial Circuit [official website] on Wednesday dismissed a lawsuit that sought to disqualify from the November 6th ballot three Florida Supreme Court justices who face a retention vote. The lawsuit alleged that the three justices unlawfully used court employees to further their election campaigns [AP report] in that the employees helped prepare the justices' election papers. In dismissing the lawsuit Circuit Judge Terry Lewis [official profile] ruled that the plaintiffs, two voters in Florida, lacked standing to sue because they failed to show how their situation differs from other voters. Many critics have labeled the lawsuit as a political power grab, as Florida Governor Rick Scott [official profile] would get to appoint replacements for the justices if they were disqualified from the ballot. The two voters who filed the lawsuit plan to appeal the trial court's decision.

Florida has been at the center of several election law controversies recently. Earlier this month a federal judge blocked enforcement [JURIST report] of a Florida statute that prevents minors from donating more than $100 to any political candidate or committee within an election period. Last month Florida Secretary of State Ken Detzner [official profile] announced that the federal government will allow Florida access [JURIST report] to a US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) [official website] immigration database to challenge individuals' voting rights if the state suspects them of not being US citizens. In June a judge for the US District Court for the Northern District of Florida denied a request by the US Department of Justice (DOJ) [official websites] to issue a temporary injunction barring Florida from continuing the practice of purging its voter rolls [JURIST report]. The DOJ alleged that Florida's policy violates the Voting Rights Act (VRA) [text] as well as the National Voter Registration Act [text], which requires all voter roll maintenance to cease 90 days before the primary election, meaning all purging in Florida should have stopped by May 16. Florida also faces challenges to its purging policy from the ACLU-FL and a coalition of rights groups [JURIST reports] on behalf of several Florida citizens.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Federal court rejects challenge to Hawaii same-sex marriage prohibition
Michael Haggerson on August 10, 2012 9:14 AM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] The US District Court for the District of Hawaii [official website] on Wednesday denied a state law challenge brought by a lesbian couple who seek to be married rather than enter into a civil union. Natasha Jackson and Janin Kleid filed the lawsuit [JURIST report] in December, claiming they are being denied the "fundamental right" to marry under Hawaii's marriage law [text], which restricts the legal definition of marriage to a union between a man and a woman. The court upheld the law, agreeing with intervenor Hawaii Family Forum [advocacy website] that such a definition is not unconstitutional and holding that it is the role of the state legislature, not the courts, to change the definition of marriage. Hawaii Governor Neil Abercrombie (D) [official profile], who signed a same-sex civil unions bill [JURIST report] into law in February, was in a unique position as being a named defendant in the lawsuit while simultaneously supporting the plaintiffs' claims [AP report]. After the ruling Abercrombie stated [press release] that he disagreed with the decision and that "[t]o refuse individuals the right to marry on the basis of sexual orientation or gender is discrimination in light of our civil unions law." Abercrombie further stated that he plans to join the plaintiffs' appeal.

Several states will include a same-sex marriage question on their ballot in the upcoming election. In June citizens in Washington and Maryland [JURIST reports] received enough votes to challenge newly passed same-sex marriage legislation. Each state's ballot will contain a section asking voters to accept or reject the new legislation. Similarly, a group supporting same-sex marriage in Maine achieved enough signatures [JURIST report] in February to have the question of same-sex marriage appear on its ballot. Earlier that month New Jersey governor Chris Christie vetoed legislation [JURIST report] that would have legalized same-sex marriage in the state, and called for a state-wide referendum on the issue. Also in February the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit [official website] struck down [JURIST report] California's Proposition 8 [JURIST news archive], a voter-approved [JURIST report] same-sex marriage [JURIST news archive] ban.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Ivory Coast commission reports war crimes committed during post-election violence
Michael Haggerson on August 10, 2012 8:45 AM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] The Ivory Coast's commission of inquiry into the country's 2010 post-election violence [JURIST news archive] submitted a report to President Alassane Ouattara [BBC profile] on Wednesday revealing that hundreds of fighters on both sides of the hostilities committed war crimes and human rights violations. Following the disputed November 2010 election pro-Ouattara forces clashed with forces loyal to former president Laurent Gbagbo [BBC profile], who had refused to concede after Ouattara was declared the winner. According to the commission's findings [AP report] 545 pro-Ouattara fighters committed executions and 54 committed torture, and on the other side 1,009 pro-Gbagbo fighters committed executions and 136 committed torture. The Ivory Coast has been criticized because several Gbagbo supporters have been arrested for their roles in the conflict, but no Ouattara supporters have been arrested. Justice Minister Matto Loma Cisse has stated that prosecutions would begin now that the investigation was finished, and Ouattara has reaffirmed his commitment to evenly prosecuting both sides. The commission to investigate the post-election hostilities was established [JURIST report] in July 2011, and while the commission's full report has yet to be released to the public, Ouattara stated that it would be made available soon. Over 3,000 individuals died in the Ivory Coast during the post-election violence.

In February Human Rights Watch [advocacy website] expressed concern [JURIST report] over the short time-frame of the investigation and advocated six-month extension of the probe. Earlier that month International Criminal Court (ICC) [official website] then-Prosecutor [official website] Luis Moreno-Ocampo was granted permission [JURIST report] by a pretrial chamber to expand his investigation of war crimes in the Ivory Coast to incidents dating back to 2002. In December Gbagbo appeared before the Pre-Trial Chamber III of the ICC [JURIST report] for an initial hearing, during which the court verified Gbagbo's identity and ensured that he was informed of the four charges against him, including murder, persecution, inhumane acts and rape and other forms of sexual violence. Gbagbo was taken into custody [JURIST report] in November for his appearance before the court. In October Moreno-Ocampo traveled to the Ivory Coast [JURIST report] to investigate allegations of war crimes committed during post-election violence following the November 2010 elections.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page

For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...


LATEST OP-ED

The War on Terror and the Need for Muslim Support
DOMESTIC
Faisal Kutty
Valparaiso University Law School

Get JURIST legal news delivered daily to your e-mail!

SYNDICATION

Add Paper Chase legal news to your RSS reader or personalized portal:
  • Add to Google
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Add to My AOL

E-MAIL

Subscribe to Paper Chase by e-mail. JURIST offers a free once-a-day digest [sample]. Enter your e-mail address below. After subscribing and being returned to this page, please check your e-mail for a confirmation message.


R|mail e-mails individual Paper Chase posts through the day. Enter your e-mail address below. After subscribing and being returned to this page, please check your e-mail for a confirmation message.

PUBLICATION

Join top US law schools, federal appeals courts, law firms and legal organizations by publishing Paper Chase legal news on your public website or intranet.

JURIST offers a news ticker and preformatted headline boxes updated in real time. Get the code.

Feedroll provides free Paper Chase news boxes with headlines or digests precisely tailored to your website's look and feel, with content updated every 15 minutes. Customize and get the code.

ABOUT

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible, ad-free format.

CONTACT

Paper Chase welcomes comments, tips and URLs from readers. E-mail us at JURIST@jurist.org