JURIST Supported by the University of Pittsburgh
PAPER CHASE NEWSBURSTDigest RSS feedFull RSS feed
Serious law. Primary sources. Global perspective.


Wednesday, June 13, 2012

US senators file brief supporting Defense of Marriage Act
Rebecca DiLeonardo at 3:32 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] Ten US senators on Monday filed an amicus brief [text, PDF] urging the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit [official website] to uphold section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) [text], which denies federal recognition of state-sanctioned same-sex marriages. The brief argues that the federal government had a legitimate interest in creating a uniform federal definition of marriage to "[avoid] massive legal uncertainty." The brief also argues that the district court incorrectly identified Congress's motivation for passing the bill as being based on "animus." The senators' brief addresses an appeal currently pending in the Ninth Circuit from a February decision of the US District Court for the Northern District of California [official website]. In that decision, Judge Jeffrey White ruled that DOMA is unconstitutional [JURIST report] because statutory classifications based on sexual orientation should be subject to heightened scrutiny and DOMA is not "substantially related to an important governmental objective." The appeal is scheduled to be heard by the Ninth Circuit in September.

The bipartisan legal advisory group in charge of defending DOMA filed its brief [JURIST report] last week, defending section 3 of the act. The Obama administration petitioned [JURIST report] the Ninth Circuit appeals court in March for an expedited en banc review of this case. In its request for review, the Obama administration raised the question of "whether classifications based on sexual orientation are subject to rational basis review or instead demand heightened scrutiny under well-established equal protection principles." The request for expedited review came after the US District Court for the Northern District of California ruled that DOMA is unconstitutional. House Speaker John Boehner's (R-OH) DOMA defense group took over the defense.of DOMA in court after the DOJ announced in February that it would no longer defend the legislation [JURIST reports].




Link |  | print | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | Facebook page

For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...


LATEST LEGAL NEWS

 Hungary prosecutors charge accused Nazi with war crimes
1:19 PM ET, June 18

 ICC grants Kenya VP's request to skip parts of upcoming trial
12:23 PM ET, June 18

 Libya senior judge assassinated outside courthouse
9:29 AM ET, June 18

 click for more...

Get JURIST legal news delivered daily to your e-mail!

LATEST FORUM

Is Egypt's Stance on the Blue Nile Dam Legally Justified?
DOMESTIC
Zeray Yihdego
University of Aberdeen School of Law

ABOUT

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible, ad-free format.

CONTACT

Paper Chase welcomes comments, tips and URLs from readers. E-mail us at JURIST@jurist.org