 |
|
 Legal news from Sunday, June 10, 2012 |
|
|
Rights group urges Israel to end migrant detention law
Keith Herting on June 10, 2012 11:34 AM ET
[JURIST] Human Rights Watch (HRW) [advocacy website] urged Israel [press release] on Sunday not to enforce its "Anti-Infiltration" policy, claiming the law violates asylum-seekers' "basic rights." According to HRW, Israel will soon begin enforcing the new law which reflects amendments made in January [JURIST report] by the Knesset [official website] to the 1954 Prevention of Infiltration Law that regards all irregular border-crossers as "infiltrators" who are subject to detention without a trial for as long as three years before being deported. The amendment to the law comes during a time of increased anti-immigrant violence and xenophobia towards African immigrants in Israel including a recent statement by Miri Regev, a member of the Knesset claiming that "the Sudanese are a cancer in our body." HRW has asked that the law not be enforced until it can be brought into compliance with international law protecting immigrants' human rights.
This is not the first time HRW has been critical of Israel's treatment of migrants. Last February, HRW criticized [JURIST report] Israel's residency restrictions that forbid Palestinians from traveling through and living in Gaza and the West Bank. While HRW has urged Israel to change its policies concerning Palestinian residencies, Israel has recently made some changes on its own accord to certain legislative policies. In January, an Israeli government panel approved a bill [JURIST report] that would make it illegal to use any Nazi symbols, names, or images, including the use of the term "Nazi" and any clothing resembling that worn by prisoners at concentration camps.
Link |
|
subscribe |
 |
latest newscast |
archive |
 Facebook page
|
Arizona sheriff seeks dismissal of discrimination suit
Jamie Davis on June 10, 2012 10:18 AM ET
[JURIST] Lawyers for Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio [official website] asked the US District Court for the District of Arizona [official website] in a motion on Friday to dismiss the lawsuit pending against him that claims his office discriminated against Latinos and disregarded their constitutional rights. The motion to dismiss the case comes a month after the US Department of Justice (DOJ) [official website] filed suit [complaint, PDF] against Arpaio for allegedly racially profiling Latinos [AP report], punishing Spanish speaking inmates, and conducting immigration patrols based solely on reports that there were Spanish speaking individuals with dark skin. As part of its suit, the DOJ requested that officers at the Maricopa County sheriff's office receive training on how to conduct constitutional traffic stops and protect Latinos as much as other citizens of the county. Arpaio denies the allegations and believes that the allegations against him are politically motivated as an attempt by the Obama administration to win the Latino vote in the upcoming election.
The DOJ originally filed suit [JURIST report] against Arpaio last month after the conducting a comprehensive and independent investigation initiated in June 2008 under Section 14141 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 [text, PDF] and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 [DOJ materials]. In December the DOJ issued a 22-page letter of findings [text, PDF], which found reasonable cause that sheriff's office and Arpaio were engaged in a pattern or practice of unconstitutional conduct and violations of federal law. The DOJ attempted to reach a settlement, but negotiations were unsuccessful, and the lawsuit followed. Arpaio, who took office in 1993, has called himself "America's Toughest Sheriff." In 2008 a federal judge ordered him to take steps to remedy overcrowded and unhygienic conditions [JURIST report] in Maricopa County prisons.
Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page
|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|
