JURIST Supported by the University of Pittsburgh
PAPER CHASE ARCHIVEDigest RSS feedFull RSS feed
Serious law. Primary sources. Global perspective.
Listen to Paper Chase!


Legal news from Tuesday, May 29, 2012




Washington judge rules for AG in health care suit
Sung Un Kim on May 29, 2012 3:59 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] King County Superior Court [official website] Judge Sharon Armstrong on Tuesday denied [opinion, PDF] a motion for preliminary injunction against Washington Attorney General Rob McKenna [official website] over his participation in a health care challenge. The motion brought by female citizens and the advocacy group Fuse Washington [advocacy website] alleged that McKenna violated his ethical duties as a lawyer when he submitted a brief to the US Supreme Court [official website] on the multistate lawsuit to overturn the individual mandate of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) [text, PDF; JURIST backgrounder]. The judge ruled that McKenna was acting in his capacity as attorney general when he brought suit in the US Supreme Court for the State of Washington and that he maintained his legal position throughout the litigation process based on his belief that his legal judgment will serve the best interest of the citizens of Washington. Armstrong further added:
Had Attorney General McKenna taken the formal legal position that only severability could protect the interests of the State of Washington and its citizens, and then filed contrary briefing in the federal courts, he would have violated his ethical duty to faithfully represent the interests of the State of Washington and its residents, would have improperly relinquished control over his role in the litigation to other attorneys general, and filed an erroneous brief to the US Supreme Court.
The judge noted that the court lacks authority to second-guess what McKenna's legal strategy is and that plaintiffs failed to establish that such strategy is arbitrary or capricious.

The lawsuit was initiated earlier this May when more than 90 women filed suit [JURIST report] against McKenna claiming that his opposition of the PPACA interfered with their full access to medical care. In March, the US Supreme Court heard the oral arguments [JURIST report] in the case of United States Department of Health and Human Services v. Florida [materials] challenging the PPACA. In January, 26 states submitted a brief [text, PDF] to the US Supreme Court challenging [JURIST report] the constitutionality of the expansion of Medicaid for the poor and disabled in the PPACA.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Louisiana legislature passes bill strengthening euthanasia ban
Rebecca DiLeonardo on May 29, 2012 3:08 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] The Louisiana State Senate [official website] on Monday unanimously passed [roll call] a bill [HB 1086, PDF; materials] strengthening Louisiana's ban on euthanasia and assisted suicide [JURIST news archives]. Both practices were already prohibited under other laws in Louisiana. The new bill amends the state's medical consent law, stating: "A. Nothing in this Part shall be construed to condone, authorize, or approve assistance to suicide, mercy killing, or euthanasia; or to permit any affirmative or deliberate act or omission to end life other than to permit the natural process of dying." The bill was unanimously passed by the House of Representatives last week and will now proceed to the governor's office where he is expected to sign it into law.

The right to die [JURIST news archive] has been a contentious issue in the US and around the world. Earlier this month, Georgia Governor Nathan Deal [official website] signed [JURIST report] a piece of legislation banning assisted suicide in the state. In 2011, an India high court ruled passive euthanasia was permitted [JURIST report] under certain circumstances, but rejected a petition for a mercy killing. In 2010, a German court ruled that removing a patient from life support is not a criminal offense [JURIST report] if the patient had previously given consent. In 2009, the Italian president refused to sign a government decree [JURIST report] that would stop the euthanasia of comatose women because it would violate the separation of power overturning a previous court ruling.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Pakistan judges pressured to apply blasphemy law: UN
Sung Un Kim on May 29, 2012 2:58 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] Pakistani judges are being pressured to apply a controversial blasphemy law [text; JURIST news archive], UN Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers [official website] Gabriela Knaul [official profile] reported [OHCHR report] on Tuesday. In her initial observations of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, she expressed concern that judges are "coerced" to rule against the accused without sufficient evidence and fair trials. Moreover, lawyers representing the accused are reportedly compelled to provide inadequate representation and women are one of the targets of the misused law. Pakistani Christians fear that the law will negatively affect their security. According to Knaul, there are additional inadequacies within the judicial system of Pakistan that endanger the courts' ability to provide fair trials. Judges have been threatened and attacked, hindering them from carrying out their duties. Additionally, there is little diversity among the judges with only two female judges sitting in the High Courts. Another inadequacy was the back-log of cases at all levels of the court system interfering with courts' obligation to ensure justice and deteriorating the public confidence in the judicial system.

The blasphemy laws were introduced in 1986 as a way of protecting Muslim beliefs from insults. In response to repeated calls for repeal, Pakistani Federal Minister for Minority Affairs Shahbaz Bhatti has said the laws may be amended to prevent misuse, but they will not be repealed. Advocacy groups such as Human Rights Watch [JURIST report], as well as Lahore High Court advocate Saroop Ijaz [JURIST op-ed] have called for the laws to be repealed.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


France court: Google not liable for copyrighted materials on YouTube
Sung Un Kim on May 29, 2012 2:18 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] A French court ruled Tuesday that Google [corporate website] is not liable for damages to French television company TF1 [media website, in French] for copyrighted sports and movies that were uploaded on YouTube [media website]. TF1 brought the suit against Google claiming 141 million euros in damages arising out of Google allowing or failing to filter copyrighted content on YouTube. The court instead ordered TF1 to pay for Google's legal fees amounting to 80,000 euros. The court reasoned that Google does not have to monitor and police all content on its website. Rather, Google is able to escape liability by merely informing its users that uploading copyrighted materials without prior consent of the owner is not allowed. The implication of this ruling is that website companies are not liable for unauthorized publication on their websites by their users as long as they remove it upon the owner's request.

This ruling is contrary to a recent ruling by a court in Hamburg, Germany, in April. The court in that case ruled [JURIST report] that Google's YouTube must filter all content uploaded by users who do not own the materials. The lawsuit, brought by Germany's music copyright organization, GEMA [official website, in German], resulted in Google being held liable for any infringing materials posted on its website and placed upon the company the responsibility to immediately block such content to prevent further copyright infringement. Another case against Google concerning copyright infringement brought by Viacom [corporate website] was reinstated [JURIST report] by the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit [official website] in April. The case was dismissed [JURIST report] by the lower court holding that the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) [text, PDF] requires more than a "general awareness" that videos might be posted illegally to hold Google and YouTube liable.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Supreme Court to consider challenge to attorney's fees
Rebecca DiLeonardo on May 29, 2012 2:15 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] granted certiorari [order list, PDF] Tuesday in Marx v. General Revenue Corp. [docket; cert. petition, PDF] to determine whether a defendant may be awarded attorney's fees in a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) [15 USC § 1692 text, PDF] where the plaintiff brought the lawsuit in good faith. The FDCPA allows a court to award attorney's fees "[o]n a finding by the court that [the] action...was brought in bad faith and for the purpose of harassment," while the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) allow such an award "[u]nless a federal statute...provides otherwise." The US Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit upheld the award of damages [opinion, PDF], finding it was justified under the FDCPA and the FRCP.

Also on Tuesday, the court issued a per curiam opinion [text, PDF] in Coleman v. Johnson [docket; cert. petition, PDF] upholding the conviction of Lorenzo Johnson as an accomplice and co-conspirator to murder, and overturning the decision below. Johnson argued there was not sufficient evidence to support his conviction, and that the conviction violated his right to due process. The US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit ruled [opinion] that there was not sufficient evidence that Johnson intended to participate in the crime.

The court also declined to hear a series of cases addressing the authority of officers to use "tasers" against suspects. The court declined to hear Daman v. Brooks [docket; cert petition, PDF], Agarano v. Mattos [docket; cert petition, PDF], Brooks v. Daman [docket; cert petition, PDF], and Mattos v. Agarano [docket; cert petition, PDF], all of which deal with police authority to use "tase" suspects in particular situations. The court's denial preserves inconsistent standards set by appeals courts throughout the country.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Turkish police arrest 6 former military officials involved in 1997 coup
Sung Un Kim on May 29, 2012 1:25 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] Turkish police on Tuesday arrested six former military officials for their involvement in the 1997 coup which led Turkey's Islamist-led government to resign. The six officials were among the 10 suspects prosecutors included in their arrest warrants. They have been charged with participating in forcing the resignation of Necmettin Erbakan [NYT profile], an Islamist prime minister. Erbakan was a member of the Islamic Welfare Party [UNHCR backgrounder] when he was elected. Tuesday's arrests come after Turkish prosecutors ordered [JURIST report] the arrest of former military leaders for their alleged role in the coup earlier this month.

The 1997 coup was the fourth of the military coups occurred in Turkey overthrowing sitting governments within 40 years. In April, the Ankara 12th High Criminal Court began its trial [JURIST report] of the last two surviving leaders of Turkey's 1980 coup, former general Kenan Evren [official profile] and former air force commander Tahsin Sahinkaya. The coup led to three years of military rule, during which 50 people were hanged and half a million arrested. The trial came after the court accepted the indictment against the two officials in January based on charges pressed [JURIST reports] by the prosecution a week earlier.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


UK court denies bail for Muslim cleric Abu Qatada
Rebecca DiLeonardo on May 29, 2012 1:03 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] A judge for the UK Special Immigration Appeals Commission [official website] on Monday denied [judgment, PDF] an application for bail by Muslim cleric Abu Qatada [BBC profile; JURIST news archive]. In his decision, Mr. Justice Mitting suggested that the risk of losing Qatada was too great to allow his release, especially given his likely pending deportation [JURIST report]. Qatada has been described as "Osama bin Laden's right-hand man in Europe," and UK officials believe he should be kept in prison for national security reasons. However, he has never formally been charged with an offense, and has been in and out of custody either in prison or some form of house arrest. In early February he was released on bail [JURIST report] after he made an application for bail following the ECHR block of his deportation, but he was arrested again in April to begin deportation proceedings.

Qatada was granted political asylum by the UK in 1994. When he was arrested in 2001 under the Prevention of Terrorism Act 1989, police seized a sizable sum of money in various currencies for which no explanation was given. Later in 2001, he went into hiding to avoid being arrested and detained under the then-proposed Anti-Terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001. He was arrested again in 2002 and held until March 2005 when he was released pursuant to a House of Lords judgment declaring his detention without trial to be unlawful. In February 2009 the ECHR ordered the UK to pay £2,500 in damages [JURIST report] to Qatada after determining that his imprisonment violated the European Convention on Human Rights [materials]. Despite his previous grant of asylum and fears of torture and persecution, UK Law Lords in February 2009 ruled that Qatada could be returned [JURIST report] to Jordan to face terrorism charges. The February decision overruled an April 2008 Court of Appeal decision blocking his deportation [JURIST report].




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Turkish criminal court approves indictment against Israel officials
Sung Un Kim on May 29, 2012 12:33 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] An Istanbul criminal court on Monday unanimously approved a 144-page indictment against four Israeli military leaders for their involvement in the killing of nine Turkish pro-Palestinian activists during the May 2010 flotilla incident [JURIST news archive]. The prosecution is seeking 10 life jail sentences against former Israeli Defense Forces Chief of Staff General Gabi Ashkenazi, Navy commander Vice Admiral Eliezer Marom, military intelligence chief Major-General Amos Yadlin, and the head of Air Force intelligence, Brigadier General Avishai Levi. Israel has denied the allegations against its former military officials and argued that they acted in self-defense. A 2011 UN report [text, PDF] summarizing the findings of an investigation into the May 2010 flotilla incident revealed that although Israel's blockade of Gaza was legal, Israel used excessive force in dealing with the situation. It is questionable whether Turkey will be able to compel the four officials to appear before the Turkish court due to its lack of jurisdiction over them and an international warrant. Additionally, the court's approval of the indictment [NY Times report] only means that the accused cannot enter Turkey, not that they are restrained from leaving Israel because they are not viewed as criminals in their home country. Israel has not apologized for the incident.

The relationship between Israel and Turkey deteriorated after Israel's Gaza blockade. In September, Turkey's Minister of Foreign Affairs Ahmet Davutoglu [official profile] announced [JURIST report] that Turkey will take Israel to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) [official website] for the legality of Israel's Gaza Strip [BBC backgrounder] blockade. In February of the last year, contrary to the UN report, the Turkish investigation into the flotilla incident concluded, after a year of investigation [JURIST reports], that Israel's naval blockade was illegal in violation of international law and that the Israeli soldiers used excessive, indiscriminate and disproportionate force on unarmed civilians as part of a full-fledged and well-planned attack. This report was also in direct contradiction to the findings of Israel's Turkel Commission [official website] which concluded that Israel did not violate [JURIST report] international law.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Second Papua New Guinea judge arrested on sedition charges
Rebecca DiLeonardo on May 29, 2012 12:00 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] Police in Papua New Guinea on Monday arrested and charged Supreme Court Justice Nicholas Kirriwoma with sedition. Kirriwoma is the second Supreme Court justice that has been arrested for Sedition this month. Last week, police stormed the country's Supreme Court and arrested Chief Justice Salamo Injia [JURIST report] on similar charges. Both judges were part of the three-judge panel that ruled in May for the second time that former prime minister Michael Somare should be reinstated. There has been a struggle for power since last August when Prime Minister Peter O'Neill took office after Somare was ruled ineligible because of an extended absence due to illness. The Supreme Court ruled in December that Somare should be reinstated and ruled again last week that Somare should serve as caretaker prime minister during upcoming elections. O'Neill has refused to accept the court's rulings, creating a standoff with the judiciary. Kirriwoma has been released on bail [AFP report] pending a trial.

Last month UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay [official website] expressed concern [JURIST report] about threats to rule of law [press release] in Papua New Guinea. Pillay's concerns stemmed from actions taken by the government that she believed breach international human rights standards and adversely affect the judiciary and its ability to act independently. Pillay said the actions of both the legislature and the executive have curtailed the power of the judiciary and it can no longer function independently. In March, the Parliament passed a bill to refer judges to a system for dealing with misconduct. When the Supreme Court held that such a system was unconstitutional the legislature passed another law creating criminal sanctions [amendment text] against anyone who would not comply with the first law.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Rwanda genocide suspect pleads not guilty before Canada court
Sung Un Kim on May 29, 2012 11:59 AM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] Jacques Mungwarere, a former Rwandan school teacher, pleaded not guilty before the Ontario Superior Court Monday to two charges relating to his involvement in the Rwandan genocide [BBC backgrounder; JURIST news archive]. Mungwarere was charged [JURIST report] with one count of genocide by murder and one count of crimes against humanity by murder. He is the second Rwandan genocide suspect to be charged under Canada's Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act [text, PDF] since its enactment in 2000. Mungwarere was arrested by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) [official website] in 2009. He opted for a trial by judge only. The trial proceeded [CBC report] Monday with testimony from professor Timothy Longman who lived in Rwanda before the genocide.

Desire Munyaneza [Trial Watch profile] was the first suspect who was charged under the act. He was sentenced [JURIST report] to life in prison by the Superior Court of Quebec [official website] after being convicted [JURIST report] on seven counts of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes. In January, the Canadian government deported [JURIST report] Leon Mugesera, another Rwandan war crimes suspect, because the Superior Court of Quebec ruled that the court did not have jurisdiction over immigration cases. He was accused of delivering a speech urging fellow Hutus to murder members of the Tutsi minority which directly led to the mass killing during the genocide.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Philippines chief justice found guilty in impeachment trial
Rebecca DiLeonardo on May 29, 2012 11:37 AM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] The Senate of the Philippines [official website] on Tuesday voted to remove Chief Justice Renato Corona [official profile] on charges of violating the constitution through failure to declare his assets in a sworn statement. Renato was impeached on eight charges [JURIST report], but only one issue was brought to a vote. The most high profile of the allegations included a charge of partiality in the trial of former president Gloria Macapagal Arroyo [BBC profile; JURIST news archive]. Arroyo is currently in prison facing charges of corruption and electoral fraud. It was alleged Corona granted temporary restraining order on the travel restriction of Arroyo without legal grounds in order to give her a chance to escape. The senate vote makes Corona the first public official to be removed by impeachment in the Philippines. Corona maintains that the charges against him were politically motivated [Reuters report] and will explore options of appeal.

Former president Arroyo has been a target of anti-corruption efforts by President Benigno Aquino [BBC profile]. Arroyo was arrested [JURIST report] in November in the hospital before she was able to leave the country to seek medical treatment. Corona presided over the court that voted to allow Arroyo to travel [JURIST report] to receive medical care, temporarily restraining the restrictions on Arroyo's travel in connection with several pending charges against her. Arroyo was president of the Philippines from 2001-2010. She left office after the Philippine Department of Justice (PDOJ) [official website] brought allegations of corruption against her. Arroyo was elected to the House of Representatives last year after the Philippine Supreme Court ruled her eligible to run [JURIST report], despite protests that she had an unfair advantage. In July 2010, Aquino signed an executive order [JURIST report] to set up a "truth commission" to investigate allegations that the outgoing administration engaged in corruption and rights violations.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Israel military court sentences Palestine protest leader to 13-months
Sung Un Kim on May 29, 2012 11:28 AM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] An Israeli military court on Sunday sentenced Palestinian protest leader Bassem al-Tamimi to 13 months imprisonment for encouraging youth to throw rocks at Israeli soldiers. He was charged [AP report] with urging the youth to throw the rocks during a demonstration he led in the West Bank village of Nabi Saleh to protest Israeli settlers taking Palestinian lands for their own use. He was arrested in March of last year. The court convicted al-Tamimi mainly based on a statement by a 15-year-old who was interrogated by Israeli officials without representation. Despite the sentence, al-Tamimi was released immediately because he had already served that much time waiting for trial. Another 17-month suspended sentence was leveled against al-Tamimi based on statements by two other Palestinians, but the court rejected the evidence because the statements contradicted each other. Al-Tamimi's case drew significant international attention. In March, Amnesty International [advocacy website] called for the immediate release [text, PDF] of al-Tamimi, a "prisoner of conscience," because he was detained for his role in organizing a peaceful protest. Catherine Ashton [official profile], the Vice President of the European Commission, also expressed her concern [text, PDF] at al-Tamimi's conviction:
The EU considers Bassem Tamimi to be a 'human rights defender' committed to non-violent protest against the expansion of an Israeli settlement on lands belonging to his West Bank village of Nabi Saleh. The EU attended all court hearings in his case and is concerned at the use of evidence based on the testimony of a minor who was interrogated in violation of his rights.
Israeli officials, on the other hand, argue that Palestinian detainees were offered fair trials.

Israel has been heavily criticized failing to provide fair trials for Palestinian detainees and to maintain adequate prison conditions. Earlier in May, UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon [official profile] urged [JURIST report] the Israeli government to try or release more than 1,000 Palestinian prisoners, who were on an open-ended hunger strike, without delay to avoid any further risk on their health condition. Several days earlier, the Israeli Supreme Court refused [JURIST report] to grant release of two Palestinian prisoners. It reasoned that such policies were necessary to combat terrorism in Israel. A UN rights expert called [JURIST report] on Israel to comply with international standards on how to treat prisoners on hunger strike after he found that Israeli officials have taken punitive measures against the Palestinian prisoners who went on hunger strike.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


UN SG disappointed with Nepal's failure to meet deadline for new constitution
Sung Un Kim on May 29, 2012 10:32 AM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon expressed disappointment [official statement] Monday with Nepal [BBC backgrounder; JURIST news archive] for its failure to meet the Sunday deadline to write a new constitution. With the country's failure to draft a new constitution, Ban is concerned that the country may face another period of turmoil and urges the government should undertake every effort to prevent such:
Nepal has entered an uncertain constitutional and political period. The Government and the political leaders, as well as leaders of various communities, need to demonstrate the courage and wisdom to come together to address the challenges the nation faces. As an immediate priority, a political consensus on the way forward is essential to ensure stability and continuity. The work of constitution-making should resume without delay, building on what has so far been achieved, and the appropriate legitimate and representative mechanism for this should be found through consensus. These decisions will require flexibility, creativity, and above all the willingness to set aside lesser differences in the national interest.
Nepalese Prime Minister Baburam Bhattarai [BBC profile] announced on Sunday that new elections will be held this November while the current parliament, which was elected in 2008 with the responsibility to write a new constitution, will be dissolved.

Last week, the Supreme Court of Nepal [official website, in Nepali] ordered [JURIST report] the government to complete the final version of the new constitution by Sunday thereby rejecting the administration's request to extend the deadline by three months. The Constituent Assembly of Nepal (CA) [official website], responsible for drafting the constitution, was elected to a two-year term in 2008, but the term has already been extended four times [AP report] despite its pledge [JURIST report] to finish it by the end of April 2010. In April UN Deputy High Commissioner for Human Rights Kang Kyung-wha [official profile] spoke to the CA concerning the allegations [JURIST reports] of human rights violations committed during the country's civil war that lasted for a decade and took more than 13,000 lives. Nepal abolished [JURIST report] its monarchy and established the Republic of Nepal on December 28, 2007, and has since attempted to create a new constitution for the country but has failed to do so.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Bahrain rights activist released on bail
Rebecca DiLeonardo on May 29, 2012 9:59 AM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] Bahraini rights activist Nabeel Rajab was released on bail on Monday, according to his lawyer. Rajab was arrested [JURIST report] for insulting a statutory body through messages he posted on Twitter [website] criticizing the Interior Ministry. Rajab is the president of the Bahrain Center for Human Rights (BCHR) [advocacy website], a group that has been critical of the Bahraini regime's response to protests and demonstrations in Bahrain which have been ongoing since February 2011 [JURIST report]. Following Rajab's arrest, the BCHR expressed concern that "[t]he authorities in Bahrain have used many methods in attempting to prevent and/or limit human rights defenders in Bahrain from carrying out their work of documenting and reporting on human rights violations in the country." Rajab was released with travel restrictions [AFP report] after paying a fine.

Tension between Bahrain's government and protesters has escalated recently. On Monday pro-democracy activist Abdulhadi Al-Khawaja [BBC profile; JURIST news archive] ended his hunger strike [JURIST report] weeks after he and 20 other incarcerated protestors were granted a retrial [JURIST report] by a Bahrain appeals court. Last week, Al-Khawaja's daughter, Zainab Al-Khawaja, was sentenced[JURIST report] to one month in prison for trying to organize an anti-government protest. Earlier this month, Human Rights Watch (HRW) [advocacy website] called for the immediate release [JURIST report] of the leader's of last year's anti-government protests, including Abdulhadi Al-Khawaja. In April, HRW issued a report claiming that Bahraini police were abusing detained protesters [JURIST report]. Earlier in April, Amnesty International [advocacy website] declared that Bahrain's government committed human rights violations [JURIST report] against anti-government protesters.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Syria women, children executed: UN rights office
Sung Un Kim on May 29, 2012 9:45 AM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] Most of the victims of a recent massacre in Houla, Syria [BBC backgrounder; JURIST news archive], were shot at close range, including women and children, the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) [official website] revealed Tuesday. UN officials disclosed [AP report] that most of the civilians killed during last week's massacre appeared to be victims of execution, including 32 women and 49 children. This recent event sheds a critical light on the success of the peace plan [text, PDF] laid out by Kofi Annan [official profile], Joint Special Envoy of the UN and the League of Arab States. The plan was supposed to begin on April 12 but has not yet been successfully executed despite a resolution approved [JURIST report] by the UN Security Council [official website] to send 300 unarmed soldiers and other civilian aid for 90 days to supervise the implementation of the plan. The resolution which calls for an end of violence [JURIST report] was also the first legally binding resolution passed by the Security Council since the beginning of turmoil in Syria. The killings were blamed on pro-regime militias, shabiha [BBC backgrounder], that according to the UN are used by the Assad's government to counter protests. However, the government has never admitted to be in any connection with this military group. UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay said Sunday that the killings may amount to war crimes [press release].

On Thursday the UN's three-member Independent International Commission of Inquiry on Syria released [JURIST report] a report [text, PDF] that alleged Syrian security forces as well as anti-government groups are responsible for the continuing violence in Syria including torture of children. Syria has been urged to end the escalating violence against civilians that started in March of last year. Human Rights Watch (HRW) [advocacy website] released numerous reports alleging that Syrian government forces committed war crimes against civilians and thereby violated human rights within the last few months. In early May, HRW reported [JURIST report] such violation when government forces killed at least 95 civilians in the province of Idlib during ceasefire negotiations. In April, HRW released [JURIST report] a report showing that Syrian security forces have executed more than 100 civilians and opposition fighters.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Bahrain rights activist ends hunger strike
Rebecca DiLeonardo on May 29, 2012 9:41 AM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] Bahraini human rights activist Abdulhadi Al-Khawaja [BBC profile; JURIST news archive] has ended his hunger strike because he believes he has adequately raised awareness of his cause [Reuters report], Al-Khawaja's wife told Reuters on Monday. Al-Khawaja has been on a hunger strike for over three months to protest the imprisonment of Bahraini pro-democracy demonstrators, including himself. He was sentenced to life in prison [JURIST report] by a military tribunal in June 2011. In late April of this year, a Bahrain appeals court ruled that Al-Khawaja and 20 others should be retried in a civilian chamber [JURIST report], but they must stay incarcerated pending a new verdict. Al-Khawaja will consent to medical treatment to assist in his recovery. He will not attend a retrial hearing on Tuesday due to his health.

Tension between Bahrain's government and protesters has escalated recently. A court in Bahrain on Thursday sentenced [JURIST report] Zainab Al-Khawaja, Abdulhadi Al-Khawaja's daughter, to one month in prison for trying to organize an anti-government protest. Earlier this month, Bahraini authorities arrested [JURIST report] prominent human rights activist Nabeel Rajab. Also in May, Human Rights Watch (HRW) [advocacy website] called for the immediate release [JURIST report] of the leader's of last year's anti-government protests, including Abdulhadi Al-Khawaja. In April, HRW issued a report claiming that Bahraini police were abusing detained protesters [JURIST report]. Earlier in April, Amnesty International [advocacy website] declared that Bahrain's government committed human rights violations [JURIST report] against anti-government protesters.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page

For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...


LATEST OP-ED

In Alabama, "Back Door" Restrictions on Abortion and Roe
DOMESTIC
LaJuana Davis
Cumberland School of Law

Get JURIST legal news delivered daily to your e-mail!

SYNDICATION

Add Paper Chase legal news to your RSS reader or personalized portal:
  • Add to Google
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Add to My AOL

E-MAIL

Subscribe to Paper Chase by e-mail. JURIST offers a free once-a-day digest [sample]. Enter your e-mail address below. After subscribing and being returned to this page, please check your e-mail for a confirmation message.


R|mail e-mails individual Paper Chase posts through the day. Enter your e-mail address below. After subscribing and being returned to this page, please check your e-mail for a confirmation message.

PUBLICATION

Join top US law schools, federal appeals courts, law firms and legal organizations by publishing Paper Chase legal news on your public website or intranet.

JURIST offers a news ticker and preformatted headline boxes updated in real time. Get the code.

Feedroll provides free Paper Chase news boxes with headlines or digests precisely tailored to your website's look and feel, with content updated every 15 minutes. Customize and get the code.

ABOUT

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible, ad-free format.

CONTACT

Paper Chase welcomes comments, tips and URLs from readers. E-mail us at JURIST@jurist.org