 |
|

Legal news from Saturday, March 17, 2012 |
 |
|


Libya intelligence chief arrested
Michael Haggerson on March 17, 2012 3:27 PM ET

[JURIST] Mauritania announced on Saturday that they have arrested former Libyan chief of intelligence Abdullah al-Senussi, who served under Muammar Gaddafi [JURIST news archive]. Libya's National Transitional Council (NTC) [official website, in Arabic], the International Criminal Court (ICC) [official website] and France have all requested custody of al-Senussi. The ICC issued arrest warrants [text, PDF] for al-Senussi in June on charges of murder and persecution for planning attacks on civilians during the Libya conflict [JURIST backgrounder], but he is also suspected of organizing mass rapes [JURIST report]. France requested custody because al-Senussi was sentenced to life in prison in France for his role in a 1989 plane bombing over Niger that killed 170 people, including 54 French citizens. Both members of Gadaffi's "inner circle" [JURIST report], al-Senussi and Gadaffi's son Saif al-Islam, have now been arrested.
In November ICC Chief Prosecutor Luis Moreno-Ocampo detailed the charges [JURIST report] against al-Senussi and Saif al-Islam to the UN Security Council [official website] as well as what was being done to secure their capture. Saif al-Islam was arrested [JURIST report] in November and is currently in Libyan custody. In October the two reportedly attempted to leave Libya in an effort to surrender themselves [JURIST report] to the ICC, according to the NTC. Earlier in the month, Ocampo said that he has evidence against Saif al-Islam for his role in planning attacks on Libyan civilians [JURIST report]. According to Ocampo, Saif al-Islam hired mercenaries to assist him in carrying out his plans to attack civilians that protested the rule of his father.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Guatemala must still seek to solve human rights issues: UN rights chief
Michael Haggerson on March 17, 2012 2:34 PM ET

[JURIST] UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay [official website] stated on Thursday that Guatemalan government authorities remain willing to solve human rights issues in the country but nonetheless have failed to comply [press release] with the 1996 Peace Accords [text] which ended the country's 36-year civil war. Pillay focused on three issues: impunity for certain individuals, insecurity and violence, and rights of indigenous peoples. Pillay commended Guatemala for ratifying the Rome Statute [text] and bringing some human rights violations to justice, such as the Dos Erres massacre [JURIST report], but said additional reform was still needed before courts were truly independent and impartial. Pillay urged the government to continue fighting against crime, without using the high crime rate as an excuse to operate outside the law, by addressing the root causes of crime. Finally, Pillay stated that indigenous peoples must be allowed to participate in government decisions and be allowed to defend their rights.
The Guatemalan civil war, which lasted from 1960-1996 [BBC timeline] resulted in more than 200,000 deaths, mostly among Guatemala's large indigenous Mayan population. According to a UN report [text, in Spanish] released in 1999, the military was responsible for 95 percent of those deaths. Earlier this month a Guatemalan judge denied amnesty [JURIST report] to former dictator Effan Rios Montt, who was in power during the Dos Erres massacre. In February, JURIST guest columnist and Director of the Guatemala Human Rights Commission Kelsey Alford-Jones opined [JURIST op-ed] that prosecuting Rios Montt was necessary to bring justice to his victims, as well as strengthen the Guatemalan judiciary. In August a Guatemalan court sentenced four former soldiers [JURIST report] to over 6,000 years in prison on war crimes charges related to the Dos Erres massacre.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Italy high court recognizes right of same-sex couples to have 'family life'
Jamie Davis on March 17, 2012 9:50 AM ET

[JURIST] The Italian Supreme Court [official website, in Italian] on Friday recognized same-sex couple's right to have a family life after it denied a same-sex couple's right to have their foreign marriage recognized in the country. The ruling is expected to force the country's government officials to reconsider Italy's ban on same-sex marriage [UPI report]. The ban on same sex-marriage has been controversial, but a 2010 attempt to overturn it was unsuccessful. After hearing arguments from same-sex couples, Italy's Constitutional Court upheld the ban [JURIST report]. In 2007, Italy's Cabinet approved a controversial proposal [JURIST report] to grant a number of legal rights to unmarried couples, including those of the same sex. The proposal, harshly criticized by the country's justice minister and bishop [JURIST reports], ultimately failed. Italy is one of few Western European nations that does not offer legal recognition to same-sex couples.
Italy is not the only European country that has been in the news regarding same sex-marriage. In June 2010, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) ruled 4-3 that the European Convention on Human Rights does not mandate that member states recognize same-sex marriages [JURIST report]. Also in June 2010, the Icelandic Althingi unanimously passed legislation legalizing same-sex marriage [JURIST report]. In May 2010, Portuguese President Anibal Cavaco Silva signed a bill that legalizes same-sex marriage [JURIST report] but stops short of allowing same-sex couples to adopt. The bill was approved by the Portuguese Parliament in January and found to be constitutional by the Constitutional Court.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

JURIST needs your support!
Matthew Shames on March 17, 2012 12:30 AM ET

[JURIST announcement] How much is JURIST worth to you? Please let us know by donating today. For as little as $10, you can show you believe in JURIST. We greatly appreciate your support!
To continue to pursue our mission, WE NEED YOUR HELP. Although we receive support from the University of Pittsburgh School of Law, we are in fact a completely separate entity. In fact, the majority of our operating costs are covered by gifts coming from outside the University. Given our increasing costs and continued reduction in government support for higher education, I only expect this gap to widen. Hence, we really, really need help from people who believe there is value in what we are doing.
If you value JURIST, please consider donating so that we can continue to bring you the substantive legal news and commentary that you have come to expect and enjoy. If you are a regular reader, you know what JURIST has to offer. JURIST provides a depth of coverage that is oftentimes unavailable in mainstream media, with links to primary source materials and other contextual information that encourages our readers to form their own opinions about the legal developments that affect their lives. JURIST also highlights legal issues and areas that may get left out by regular legal news coverage in mainstream media. All of this is done in an ad-free, registration-free, open environment.
You can read more at http://jurist.org/supportjurist, or if you are ready to join us, you can donate now!


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|