 |
|

Legal news from Tuesday, October 11, 2011 |
 |
|


Supreme Court to hear double jeopardy case
Sarah Posner on October 11, 2011 1:19 PM ET

[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] on Tuesday granted certiorari [order list, PDF] in two cases. In Blueford v. Arkansas [docket; cert. petition, PDF], the court will decide whether the Double Jeopardy [Cornell LII backgrounder] clause prevents the re-prosecution of a greater offense after the jury announces voting for a not guilty verdict, if a jury deadlocks on a lesser-included offense. Alex Blueford contends that jeopardy attached to the jury's determination that he is not guilty of capital murder and its lesser-included offense of first-degree murder. The Arkansas Supreme Court upheld [opinion, PDF] the order denying Blueford's motions to prevent his retrial on the charge of capital murder and its lesser-included offenses.
In Freeman v. Quicken Loans, Inc. [docket; cert. petition, PDF], the court will decide whether Section 8(b) of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) [text] prohibits a real estate settlement services provider from only charging an unearned fee when the fee is divided between two or more parties. The US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held [opinion, PDF] that the RESPA prohibits only kickbacks and referral fees, not unearned fees by a sole provider of settlement services. Therefore, charges that Quicken imposed on the appellants for loan discount fees and a loan processing fee are not prohibited by Section 8(b) of the RESPA.
Also Tuesday, the court denied certiorari in Adar v. Smith [docket; JURIST report], in which a same-sex couple wants both their names on the birth certificate of an adopted child. The issue presented was whether denying non-married couples from having both names appear on an adopted child's birth certificate is a violation of the Equal Protection Clause of Fourteenth Amendment to the US Constitution.
The court also denied certiorari in the case of Mumia Abu-Jamal [docket; JURIST Philadelphia Inquirer backgrounder], letting stand the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit's decision [JURIST report] granting a new sentencing hearing for Abu-Jamal. Abu-Jamal is a former member of the Black Panthers who was convicted and sentenced to death for killing a police officer in Philadelphia in 1981.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Syria rejects calls to join ICC
Jennie Ryan on October 11, 2011 11:11 AM ET

[JURIST] Syria has rejected calls from several nations for it to join the International Criminal Court (ICC), according to a report adopted Tuesday by the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) [official websites]. The report also includes a number of recommendations to the country aimed at improving its human rights record which has been widely criticized since the country began to crackdown on anti-government protests early this year. In statements contained in the report, Syria asserts that the violence in the country is the result of "terrorist threats" prompted by "a media war" and "the hegemony of the West, the US and Israel." The government of President Bashar al-Assad [BBC profile] has continued to crack down on anti-government protests in the country, killing and estimated 3,000 civilians since mid-March.
Last month, the UNHRC voted 33-4 to adopt a resolution [JURIST report] ordering an investigation [press release] into crimes against humanity in Syria and urging the Syrian government once again to halt its violent crackdown against peaceful protesters. An emergency meeting was held in response to a plea [JURIST report] from UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay [official profile] to refer Syria to the ICC for an investigation into the violent suppression of anti-government protests. Many steps have been taken to try and halt the violence in Syria. In August, the Los Angeles Times reported that an unknown Western country is funding an investigation [JURIST report] into Syria's recent human rights abuses. In July, two UN rights officials expressed concern over reports of violence [JURIST report] used by Syrian authorities against the country's own people. In June, the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) [official websites] published a preliminary report [JURIST report] describing human rights violations in Syria and calling for an investigation into government-authorized abuses related to pro-democracy protests that began earlier this year. In April, Pillay urged Syria to immediately halt the killings [JURIST report] and violence against civilian protesters in response to the fatal shootings of peaceful anti-government protesters.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Accused war criminal on trial at ICTY admitted to hospital
Jennie Ryan on October 11, 2011 10:11 AM ET

[JURIST] Accused war criminal Ratko Mladic [ICTY backgrounder, PDF; JURIST news archive] has been hospitalized suffering from pneumonia, his lawyers said Tuesday. Mladic is awaiting trial at the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) [official website] on charges of genocide and war crimes allegedly committed during the Bosnian civil war [JURIST news archive]. The ICTY confirmed that Mladic is receiving medical treatment [Reuters report], but it could not confirm the reason for the hospitalization. Mladic has complained of ill health since his trial began, prompting officials to propose splitting the case in two in order to accelerate the pace of the proceedings. It is not immediately clear what this hospitalization will mean for the proceedings.
Serbian authorities captured Mladic [JURIST report] in May, ending a 16-year manhunt for the former general colonel and commander of the army of the Serbian Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina. During his appearance at the ICTY in July he was removed from the courtroom [JURIST report] for disrupting the proceedings. Mladic made his first appearance [JURIST report] at the ICTY in June, contesting the charges while simultaneously asking for more time to review them, which he was granted. He lost his final appeal in Serbia to avoid extradition and was transported to The Hague [JURIST reports] in early June. Mladic faces charges of genocide and crimes against humanity, including murder, political persecution, forcible transfer and deportations, cruel treatment and the taking of peacekeepers as hostages. He is most infamous for allegedly ordering the slaughter of 8,000 Muslim men and boys in the massacre of Srebrenica during the Bosnian civil war.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

UN rights expert urges states to prevent violence against women
Alexandra Malatesta on October 11, 2011 9:50 AM ET

[JURIST] UN Special Rapporteur on Violence Against Women [official website] Rashida Manjoo [official profile] appeared in front of the UN General Assembly [official website] Monday to urge states to fulfill their obligations to prevent violence against women. Presenting her report [text, PDF] on the pervasive, widespread violence against women throughout the world and its causes and consequences, Manjoo reminded states [APP report] of their international human rights obligation to protect women from all manifestations of discrimination, whether it be from violence, inequality or oppression. Though there has been an increase in women's educational enrollment and employment opportunities and progress made in repealing some discriminatory legislation, there is a lot left to be accomplished [UN News Centre report] in order "to ensure their full enjoyment by all women and girls worldwide." Also discussed during the session was a wide range of other forms of discrimination, from sexual violence such as genital mutilation to under-representation of women in corporate executive positions: Throughout the world, violence against women is pervasive, widespread and unacceptable. Rooted in multiple and intersecting forms of discrimination and inequalities, and strongly linked to the social and economic situation of women, violence against women constitutes a continuum of exploitation and abuse. Whether it occurs in times of conflict, post conflict or so called peace, the various forms and manifestations of violence against women are simultaneously causes and consequences of discrimination, inequality and oppression. Manjoo's presentation follows her earlier request for the US government to reevaluate its domestic violence policies [JURIST report].
Equality and women's rights continue to be an issue for much of the world. Manjoo also released a report in June that said there is a continued prevalence of violence and discriminatory treatment of women in the US [JURIST report], with a heightened impact on poor, minority and immigrant women. In March, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay [official profile] pressed [JURIST report] Tunisia and Egypt to ensure that women's rights receive constitutional protection and to include women in the dialogue to shape the future of their countries. In January, a US Military panel recommended [JURIST report] that women should be allowed to serve on the front lines of combat. Last year, Human Rights Watch (HRW) [official website] called on the Afghan government to protect the rights of women [JURIST report] during integration and reconciliation efforts conducted with the Taliban [GlobalSecurity backgrounder] and other militants. Earlier in 2010, India's upper house of parliament, the Rajya Sabha [official website], approved a bill [JURIST report] to ensure that one-third of seats in parliament are reserved for women.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

HRW urges justice for DRC rights abuses
John Paul Putney on October 11, 2011 9:43 AM ET

[JURIST] Human Rights Watch (HRW) [advocacy website] on Monday called [press release] on governments around the world to "intensify efforts to bring to justice those responsible for grave abuses" in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) [BBC backgrounder], highlighted by the UN's recent mapping report [PDF]. A full year after the report was published, detailing over 600 violations of international law [UPI report], HRW says there has been not be sufficient follow-up by African governments or the UN. HRW Africa director Daniel Bekele called for action:With the best will in the world, the Congolese government cannot deal with the legacy of the country's massive abuses alone. The crimes committed in Congo involved border-crossing perpetrators, placing responsibilities on many governments to ensure that justice is done. ... While some of the incidents covered in the mapping report were well known, the compilation of so many atrocities into one report was a shocking wake-up call. All concerned governments, as well as those named, should ensure that the report is not simply shelved, and take action on its findings. HRW indicated its support for the establishment of a specialized mixed court, with jurisdiction over past and current serious international crimes, including war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide, committed in Congo.
Rights groups have consistently called for more accountability for human rights abuses in the DRC. In August, Amnesty International (AI) [advocacy website] called for justice system reform in the DRC. The report [text, PDF] stated that the justice system has allowed the Congolese army and other armed groups to engage in a "cycle of violence and human rights violations for decades," alleging that the groups have engaged in torture, sexual violence and murder against citizens and that very few perpetrators have been brought to justice. In July, the UN Organization Stabilization Mission in DR Congo (MONUSCO) in conjunction with the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) [official websites] released a report [text, PDF] accusing soldiers in the Armed Forces of the Democratic Republic of Congo (FARDC) of committing mass rape [JURIST report]. The report is the first to officially provide evidence that national forces perpetrated mass rape, as opposed to reports of opposition forces using it as a weapon [JURIST report]. In May, UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon and the UN Security Council [official websites] called for continued reforms [JURIST report] in the DRC in order to strengthen the country's rule of law.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Myanmar to free hundreds of political prisoners
John Paul Putney on October 11, 2011 8:58 AM ET

[JURIST] US Assistant Secretary of State Kurt Campbell [official profile] on Monday indicated Myanmar's civilian-led government is planning dramatic changes including releasing hundreds of political prisoners and consequential dialogue with pro-democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi [BBC profile; JURIST news archive]. Journalists, lawyers and democracy advocates are among the detainees to be released and pardoned [AFP report], although no date has been set. Campbell has expressed cautious optimism [BBC report] but indicated reforms must be substantial and enduring. The National League for Democracy [official website], led by Suu Kyi, appears poised to participate in parliamentary elections [Telegraph report] later this year after the military-backed government agreed to reforms including permitting candidates to compete without accepting the controversial 2008 constitution [text, PDF].
Myanmar has sought to improve its international reputation following a transfer of power [BBC report] from a military regime to a civil system in March after holding its first elections in 20 years. Last month, Myanmar's government formed the Myanmar National Human Rights Commission (MNHRC) [JURIST report] to promote and safeguard the country's constitutional rights. In August, UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Myanmar Tomas Ojea Quintana [official profile] urged the government of Myanmar to investigate human rights abuses [JURIST report] and improve its rights record. In May, Myanmar began releasing as many as 15,000 prisoners [JURIST report] as part of an amnesty program after a visit from a special envoy from the UN secretary-general, but rights groups claim the government has not gone far enough. Critics of the new regime argue it is merely a sham since it is made up of military generals and with the military party winning 80 percent of the vote.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

UN expert condemns Thailand royal insult law
Drew Singer on October 11, 2011 7:04 AM ET

[JURIST] UN Special Rapporteur on freedom of expression Frank La Rue [official website] on Monday condemned [press release] a law in Thailand that criminalizes insulting the country's royal family. Section 112 of the Thai Penal Code [text] says that "whoever defames, insults or threatens the King, the Queen, the Heir to the throne or the Regent shall be punished with imprisonment of three to fifteen years." The statement came after Thai-born US citizen Joe Gordon pleaded guilty Monday to defaming the royal family by translating excerpts of a locally banned book and posting them online. La Rue also condemned the country's 2007 Computer Crimes Act [unofficial text], which imposes a prison sentence of up to five years for any views expressed on the Internet in relation to the monarchy deemed to be a threat to national security. The Act is used to further enforce the country's insult law, La Rue said, "[t]he threat of a long prison sentence and vagueness of what kinds of expression constitute defamation, insult, or threat to the monarchy, encourage self-censorship and stifle important debates on matters of public interest, thus putting in jeopardy the right to freedom of opinion and expression. ... This is exacerbated by the fact that the charges can be brought by private individuals and trials are often closed to the public."
In 2009, Amnesty International (AI) [advocacy website] called for a public trial [JURIST report] for a Thai political activist accused of lese majeste, or insulting the royal family. Judge Prommat Toosang ordered [Reuters report] that the trial of Darunee Charnchoengsilpakul [advocacy website] be closed for national security reasons. AI's Asia-Pacific director Sam Zarifi noted that although the closure of trials is legitimate under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and the Thai Constitution, the government "will have a very difficult time explaining why the trial of someone charged with making an insulting remark could compromise Thailand's national security." Zafiri said that Prommat's guarantee of a fair trial was inadequate and "simply not verifiable" unless the trial is conducted in public.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|