 |
|

Legal news from Saturday, April 16, 2011 |
 |
|


UN rights office urges probe into Iraq military raid
Maureen Cosgrove on April 16, 2011 1:44 PM ET

[JURIST] The UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) [official website] on Friday denounced a deadly Iraqi military raid [press release] on a camp housing Iranian exiles. At least 34 people, including women, were shot to death or trampled by military vehicles during the Iraqi military's April 8 operation at Camp Ashraf. The camp is composed of members of the People's Mujahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI) who seek to overthrow Iranian government officials. The Iraqi militants initiated the raid after Ashraf exiles allegedly threw rocks at soldiers [AP report]. UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay [official profile] indicated that few measures are available for resolving the discord between the Iranian exile group and the Iraqi government:Everyone had been fearing a tragedy like this for a long time. I am well aware that this is a contentious group, with a complicated history, but leaving them to fester in Camp Ashraf was never going to be a solution. Clearly, since they are unable to go back to Iran, and are in danger in Iraq, the solution is most likely to involve moving them to third countries. I urge governments to take the necessary pragmatic and generous steps to resolve what is an untenable situation. Pillay also called for a "full, independent and transparent inquiry" into the military operation to ensure that those who exercised excessive force are prosecuted.
The PMOI has been designated a foreign terrorist group by the US since 1997, but it stopped military action in 2001 [WP report], and, since 2003, has been without weapons. The group has also touted its actions in providing information about Iran's nuclear program. In July, a three-judge panel of the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit [official website] ordered [opinion, PDF] the State Department to reconsider the status of the PMOI [JURIST report]. In 2008, the European Court of First Instance [official website] annulled a decision by the EU [JURIST report] to place the PMOI on a list of terrorist groups. That decision followed an order by the UK Parliament to remove the PMOI from a British list of terrorist groups [JURIST report]. PMOI is Iran's main political opposition organization and part of the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI) [group website], an umbrella coalition of Iranian opposition groups. The PMOI has been at odds with the Iranian government since it chose to support Saddam Hussein in the Iran-Iraq war [GlobalSecurity backgrounder] during the 1980s.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Government asks Supreme Court to rule on warrantless GPS tracking
LaToya Sawyer on April 16, 2011 11:21 AM ET

[JURIST] The Obama administration on Friday asked [cert. petition, PDF] the US Supreme Court [official website] to determine whether police need warrants to track a suspect's movement using global position systems (GPS) technology. The government is appealing last year's lower court decision that prohibits the use of warrantless GPS technology [JURIST report]. In that decision, the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit [official website] ruled that prolonged use of GPS to monitor suspects' vehicles violates the Fourth Amendment [text] protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. The government rejects the argument that using a GPS tracking system violates a suspect's reasonable expectation of privacy. This view hinges on the Supreme Court decision in United States v. Knotts [opinion, PDF], which allowed for electronic surveillance in public based on a lower expectation of privacy on public roads. The Supreme Court's resolution on the issue, the Justice Department believes, is critical for future law enforcement decisions.
The use of GPS technology and other surveillance devices by law enforcement agents continue to be a controversial issue in the US, with courts across the country coming to divergent conclusions. Last week, the Court of Appeals of Virginia [official website] ruled that using a GPS device to track the movement of a suspect in a string of sexual assaults without obtaining a warrant did not violate the Fourth Amendment [JURIST report]. A Pennsylvania appeals court allowed use of evidence obtained with GPS technology [JURIST report] in December. In September, a three-judge panel for the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] that, at times, the government might need a warrant to obtain cell phone data [JURIST report] to track a person's location. Last year, the US Supreme Court unanimously held that, even if there is a reasonable expectation of privacy in work-issued electronic devices, that an employer's search of private text messages does not violate [JURIST report] the Fourth Amendment so long as the search is not excessive and is pursuant to a legitimate work-related purpose.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Chile judge orders body of ex-President Salvador Allende exhumed
LaToya Sawyer on April 16, 2011 10:23 AM ET

[JURIST] Chilean Judge Mario Carroza on Friday ordered the exhumation of former president Salvador Allende [BBC profile] as part of investigations into his death [JURIST report] that began in January. The order follows a request [CNN video, in Spanish] for a new autopsy of the former president from Allende's daughter, Senator Isabel Allende, and other relatives who want to determine the causes of his death. Allende died in a 1973 coup [BBC], in what has since been ruled a suicide. However, many human rights groups and Allende supporters question the suicide and believe he was killed by soldiers during the coup. The investigation into Allende's death is part of a larger probe into alleged human rights abuses under 1973-1990 military dictatorship [press release, in Spanish] of General Augusto Pinochet [BBC profile; JURIST news archive], who seized power after the coup. The autopsy is expected take place later in May.
Allende, a Marxist, was met with opposition after winning the 1970 elections in Chile from those fearing his presidency would support a pro-Soviet communist government. The 1973 coup, backed by the US [JURIST report], was followed by a 17-year military regime lead by Pinochet. In an extraordinary statement released on his 91st birthday Pinochet publicly assumed "full political responsibility" [JURIST report] for the actions of his military regime. Pinochet nonetheless justified the military coup against Allende that brought him to power as having being necessary to preserve Chile's integrity amid "the continuation and worsening of the worse political and economic crisis than one can remember." Pinochet died [JURIST report] in 2006 at the age of 91 without ever facing trial for multiple human rights abuses and tax evasion charges against him.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|