Supreme Court declines to hear Guantanamo wiretapping appeal

[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Monday denied certiorari [order list, PDF] in Wilner v. NSA [docket; cert. petition, PDF], in which lawyers for Guantanamo Bay [JURIST news archive] detainees were seeking disclosure of whether conversations with their clients were wiretapped by the National Security Agency (NSA) [official website]. The detainees' lawyers appealed a decision [opinion, PDF; JURIST report] by the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit [official website] holding that the NSA and the Department of Justice (DOJ) [official website] are not required to confirm nor deny the existence of electronic surveillance records under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) [text]. The case was brought on behalf of the lawyers by the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) [advocacy website] after the agencies invoked FOIA exceptions to information requests regarding warrantless electronic surveillance conducted pursuant to the Terrorist Surveillance Program (TSP) [JURIST news archive]. The CCR claims that the Supreme Court's refusal to hear the case has enabled the NSA and DOJ to get away with potentially illegal behavior [press release].

The intelligence agencies were given the authority to conduct warrantless wiretaps [AFP report] after the 9/11 attacks, but their existence was not known until 2005. The NSA's warrantless surveillance program has been harshly criticized since being disclosed by then-president George W. Bush. Last year, former DOJ attorney John Yoo defended [JURIST report] warrantless wiretapping practices in the Wall Street Journal, criticizing the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) [text] as being obsolete and contributory in the government's failure to prevent the 9/11 attacks. In April 2009, the DOJ announced that it had limited [JURIST report] the NSA's electronic surveillance, but maintained that the information being received was still important. In February of that year, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit [official website] denied an appeal by the DOJ seeking to stop a lawsuit [JURIST report] brought by an Islamic charity alleging it was the subject of an illegal NSA wiretap.

 

About Paper Chase

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible format.

© Copyright JURIST Legal News and Research Services, Inc., 2013.