JURIST Supported by the University of Pittsburgh
PAPER CHASE ARCHIVEDigest RSS feedFull RSS feed
Serious law. Primary sources. Global perspective.
Listen to Paper Chase!


Legal news from Wednesday, August 18, 2010




Peru judge revokes parole of US woman held for involvement with rebel group
Sarah Miley on August 18, 2010 3:38 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] A Peruvian judge on Wednesday revoked the parole of Lori Berenson [advocacy website], a US citizen held since 1995 for collaboration with a Marxist rebel organization. Berenson was granted parole [JURIST report] in May after serving 14 years of her 20-year sentence with the judge citing good behavior, renunciation of violence and completion of rehabilitation. Judges for the court reinstated her sentence after legal authorities failed to verify addresses of residence [NYT report] provided by Berenson after her release. An arrest warrant has been issued for Berenson, but she was not found at her apartment in Lima and has yet to be located. Berenson also had a son while in prison, which is said to have played a role in her release. Berenson was arrested in 1995 for involvement with the Tupac Amaru Revolutionary Movement (MRTA) [GlobalSecurity backgrounder], a left-wing rebel group. She is alleged to have trained guerrillas [Guardian report] and moved weapons for the MRTA in addition to assisting the group in carrying out an attack on the Peruvian Congress [official website, in Spanish] by gaining access to the body using press credentials.

In 2005, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights [official website] denied an appeal request to reinterpret its November 2004 ruling [JURIST reports] that upheld Berenson's conviction. Lawyers for Berenson claimed that her trial failed to meet international standards for fairness and sought to have her conviction and 20-year sentence overturned. In a 2000 CBS News interview [text], Berenson characterized her original trial proceedings as hostile and coercive, saying that she had faced a panel of hooded judges and that armed guards had aimed assault rifles at her and her lawyer's heads during the 10-minute proceeding. She was initially sentenced to life imprisonment by a military court, but the sentence was reduced to 20 years in a civil retrial in 2001.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Colombia high court suspends US base agreement
Hillary Stemple on August 18, 2010 2:46 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] The Colombian Constitutional Court [official website, in Spanish] announced [press release, in Spanish] Tuesday the suspension of a base agreement [text, PDF] between the US and Colombia, stating the agreement must receive congressional approval before it can legally take effect. The agreement, negotiated between the two countries during the administration of former-Colombian president Alvaro Uribe [BBC profile], allows the US military to have access to seven Colombian military bases in order to combat drug trafficking and rebels. The court did not address whether the agreement was legal, but focused on the manner in which it was enacted. They stated that an agreement requiring the country to take on new obligations must be subjected to the same process as the approval of international treaties, which require congressional approval. A lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the agreement was filed earlier this year [Telegraph report], arguing that Uribe exceeded his authority by approving the agreement without congressional support. Supporters of the agreement argued that the agreement was an extension of a previous military agreement with the US and therefore did not require congressional approval. President Juan Manuel Santos [official website, in Spanish] is now expected to send the agreement to congress [Reuters report], where his party holds a majority of the seats.

The US and Colombia continue working together to fight the continuing drug trafficking [PBS backgrounder] problem in Colombia. In May 2008, Colombia extradited 14 former militia leaders [JURIST report] suspected of organizing violent massacres and drug smuggling operations to the US to face drug trafficking charges. The guerrilla leaders had surrendered to Colombian authorities under a peace deal in which Uribe suspended warrants for their extradition, but Justice Minister Carlos Holguin told local radio that the leaders had broken the deal by continuing to organize gangs or by refusing to cooperate with government officials. In April 2008, a Colombian court temporarily blocked [JURIST report] the extradition of one such leader, Carlos Mario Jimenez-Naranjo, ruling that it would deny the victims of his crime the chance to seek compensation. The US and Colombia signed an extradition agreement [JURIST report] in 2005 that forces Colombian drug traffickers to face trial in the US.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Bangladesh to release 1000 inmates to relieve prison overcrowding
Sarah Miley on August 18, 2010 1:59 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] The Bangladesh Ministry of Home Affairs [official website] announced Wednesday that it will release almost 1,000 prisoners in an effort to resolve the issue of overcrowding [JURIST news archive] throughout the nation's jails. Most Bangladeshi jails currently house three times their designed capacity. Women's facilities are the most affected by the overcrowding, with some facilities accommodating four times the allotted amount. Home Secretary Iqbal Khan Chowdhury stated that the government has selected prisoners that are in good standing [AFP report] and have served more than 20 years of their sentence. Chowdhury concluded that ministry will send the prison authorities an order for release on Wednesday.

Bangladesh took similar measures to reduce prison overcrowding in 2008 after the government announced a clampdown on crime and arrested thousands [JURIST reports] of political activists and suspected criminals on corruption charges. This caused prisons to reach triple their intended capacity and required the government to release certain prisoners who have served half their prison sentences in order to reduce the country's overcrowded prison populations. Bangladeshi political parties, the Awami League and the Bangladesh Nationalist Party [party websites] accused the government of using the sweep for political purposes, but government officials defended their actions claiming that the arrests were primarily based on warrants and other crimes and were not for political reasons under the Emergency Power Rules.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Germany prosecutors charge former Rwanda mayor with genocide
Hillary Stemple on August 18, 2010 1:10 PM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] German federal prosecutors announced Wednesday that they have charged a former Rwandan mayor with genocide relating to his involvement in the 1994 Rwandan genocide [HRW backgrounder; JURIST news archive]. According to prosecutors, Onesphore Rwabukombe [Trial Watch profile] allegedly coordinated three massacres [AFP report] in which more than 3,700 Tutsis, who had sought refuge in a church, were killed. Rwabukombe, who was a mayor in northern Rwanda at the time of the killings, is also accused of ordering a local official to turn away Tutsi refugees [AP report] seeking shelter in his home, resulting in at least one of the refugees being killed. German authorities had previously arrested Rwabukombe, but had to release him after they failed to obtain sufficient evidence to charge him with any crimes. Rwabukombe was arrested last month following further investigation which resulted in new evidence. He has been charged with genocide and murder, as well as inciting genocide and murder.

In addition to the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) [official website; JURIST news archive], several countries have utilized their legal systems to try suspects accused of crimes related to the Rwandan genocide. In June, a Finnish court convicted former Rwandan pastor [JURIST report] Francois Bazaramba on charges of genocide and murder and sentenced him to life in prison. Canadian prosecutors announced in November that a second suspect had been charged [JURIST report] under Canada's Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act [text, PDF]. The first man charged under the act was Desire Munyaneza. In October, he was sentenced to life imprisonment [JURIST report] for war crimes committed during the Rwandan genocide. Munyaneza was convicted [JURIST report] in May 2009 of seven counts of genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes under the act.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Second Circuit rules foreign diplomatic housing exempt from property taxes
Hillary Stemple on August 18, 2010 10:51 AM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] A three-judge panel for the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] Tuesday that foreign diplomatic missions are not required to pay property taxes on real property used for housing staff and not diplomatic purposes. The ruling overturned judgments against India and Mongolia, which would have required the countries to pay a total of approximately USD $47 million in back taxes. The controversy arose when New York City attempted to assess property taxes on areas of foreign missions not used specifically for diplomatic work. The city argued that only portions of the diplomatic missions used explicitly for diplomatic purposes were exempt from property taxes, while the Indian and Mongolian missions maintained that entire diplomatic properties were exempt. In its ruling, the court cited a notice [materials] issued in 2009 by the US State Department (DOS) [official website] pursuant to the Foreign Missions Act [22 USC § 4301 et seq, PDF] which designated property tax exemption on real property owned by foreign governments and use for housing as a "benefit." The notice explicitly preempted all inconsistent state and local laws and applied to all property taxes that "have been or will be assessed." The court held that the notice was a lawful exercise of the DOS's authority and that it effectively nullified the existing property taxes owed by India and Mongolia. The city's corporation counsel, Michael Cardozo [official website], expressed his disappointment with the ruling [NYT report] and indicated that the city will appeal the decision to the US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive].

The Supreme Court heard arguments [JURIST report] in 2007 in the case of Permanent Mission of India v. New York [Cornell LII backgrounder] in order to determine whether US courts have jurisdiction to hear claims against foreign governments regarding unpaid property taxes for diplomatic residences. The court ruled [opinion, PDF; JURIST report] that foreign governments may be sued for payment of local property taxes on real estate used for diplomatic residences, noting that "property ownership is not an inherently sovereign function," and that the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act [text] "does not immunize foreign governments from lawsuits to declare the validity of tax liens on property held by the government" for diplomatic residences. The court remanded the case to the district court for further proceedings on the issue. The district court ruled in favor of New York in the second set of proceedings and India and Mongolia appealed the district court's ruling to the Second Circuit. The 2009 DOS notice went into effect during the appeals process.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Ninth Circuit strikes down law criminalizinng false claims of military honors
Sarah Miley on August 18, 2010 10:23 AM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit [official website] on Tuesday struck down a federal law [opinion, PDF] criminalizing the act of falsely claiming to have received a medal from the US military. Xavier Alvarez was convicted under the Stolen Valor Act [text] in 2007 after he announced at a public water district board meeting that he was a retired Marine and had received the Congressional Medal of Honor. Alvarez had never received the nation's highest military honor nor had he ever served in any military service. After a fellow board member alerted the FBI to Alvarez's false statements, he was charged under the act and agreed to plead guilty if he was allowed to appeal the conviction on First Amendment [text] grounds. The Ninth Circuit held that the speech prohibited under the Stolen Valor Act did not fit within the narrow categories of false speech held to be beyond the First Amendment's "protective sweep." Judge Milan Smith, writing the opinion for the panel, stated that the district court's expansion of the scope of existing categorical exceptions to First Amendment protection would open the door to criminalization of false statements that were never intended to lie outside the amendments protective ground:
[I]f the Act is constitutional under th[is] analysis..., then there would be no constitutional bar to criminalizing lying about one's height, weight, age, or financial status on Match.com or Facebook, or falsely representing to one's mother that one does not smoke, drink alcoholic beverages, is a virgin, or has not exceeded the speed limit while driving on the freeway. The sad fact is, most people lie about some aspects of their lives from time to time. Perhaps, in context, many of these lies are within the government's legitimate reach. But the government cannot decide that some lies may not be told without a reviewing court's undertaking a thoughtful analysis of the constitutional concerns raised by such government interference with speech. ... We then apply strict scrutiny review to the Act, and hold it unconstitutional because it is not narrowly tailored to achieving a compelling governmental interest.
In his dissent, Judge Jay Bybee argued that the majority refused to follow clear US Supreme Court [official website] precedent that false statements of fact are not entitled to First Amendment protection. The US Attorney's Office has not yet decided whether to appeal [AP report] the court's ruling.

The Stolen Valor Act was unanimously approved by the Senate and signed into law by former president George W. Bush in 2006. The act broadened provisions of previous US law and criminalizes the unauthorized wear, manufacture, sale or written or oral claim of any military decorations and medals. According to the circuit court opinion, Alavarez had a history of making false claims about serving in the military. He had previously told another board member that he won the Medal of Honor for rescuing the American ambassador during the Iranian hostage crisis and that he had been shot in the back as he returned to the embassy to save the American flag. Alvarez reportedly told another woman that he was a Vietnam veteran helicopter pilot who had been shot down but then, with the help of his fellow soldiers, was able to get the helicopter back into the sky. Alvarez had also claimed to have played hockey for the Detroit Red Wings, to have worked as a police officer and to have been secretly married to a Mexican starlet.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Federal judge dismisses piracy charges against 6 Somalis
Hillary Stemple on August 18, 2010 9:15 AM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] A judge for the US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia [official website] on Tuesday dismissed piracy charges [order, PDF] against six Somali men accused of involvement in the April attack on the USS Ashland in the Gulf of Aden. During the attack on the Ashland, the defendants allegedly fired on the vessel but did not board or attempt to board the ship. The defendants were taken into custody by the crew of the Ashland after their boat caught fire. Lawyers for the defendants had argued that the charge of piracy, which carries a mandatory life sentence, should be dismissed because the act of piracy cannot occur where the defendants did not board or take control of the vessel and where nothing of value was taken during the act. Government lawyers maintained that the historical definition of piracy included different types of conduct and should not be limited to the common law definition. The prosecution also argued that piracy does not require the actual taking of property and that an armed assault or direct violent attack on the high seas is enough to constitute piracy. In his dismissal of the charges Judge Raymond Jackson stated that the definition of piracy as defined by the law of nations under 18 USC § 1651 [text] does not include violence or aggression committed on the high seas. He rejected the government's argument for an expanded reading of the statute stating that the government's definition would, "subject defendants to an enormously broad standard under a novel construction of the statute that has never been applied under United States law, and would in fact be contrary to Supreme Court case law." The defendants still face six remaining charges including assault, conspiracy and weapons charges. The district court is expected to hear similar arguments [AP report] in September from lawyers for another group of five suspected Somali pirates who face similar charges in relation to the April attack on the USS Nicholas. Charges against the 11 men associated with the attacks on the Ashland and the Nicholas were filed in April [JURIST report].

Several suspected Somali pirates have faced charges in federal court this year. A Somali man charged with piracy pleaded guilty [JURIST report] in May to charges of hijacking, kidnapping and hostage-taking related to an April 2009 attack on the US container ship Maersk Alabama [GlobalSecurity backgrounder]. Somali officials have criticized [BBC report] the US for exercising jurisdiction over suspected pirates, insisting that piracy prosecutions should be conducted by an international tribunal. They have also asked that Somali pirate suspects be returned to Somalia, which lacks a functioning central government to address the piracy problem. Piracy remains an issue of international concern, as few countries have been willing to prosecute suspected pirates. The few that have attempted to do so include Kenya, Seychelles, the Netherlands, Mauritius, Yemen, Somalia and Spain [JURIST reports].




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Blagojevich guilty of false statements to FBI, jury hung on other 23 counts
Sarah Miley on August 18, 2010 8:50 AM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] Former Illinois governor Rod Blagojevich [JURIST news archive] was found guilty Tuesday of making false statements to the FBI, but the jury in the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois [official website] was deadlocked on 23 additional charges. The jury deliberated for 14 days after the 11-week trial but was unable to reach a consensus on all but one of the charges, which included attempting to sell the Senate seat vacated by US President Barack Obama, making appointments based on anticipated campaign contributions and taking kickbacks from a number of companies. According to reports, there was a lone holdout [Chicago Tribune report] on the convictions regarding the sale of Obama's Senate seat. The female juror allegedly stated that due to the lack of a "smoking gun" she was unable to convict Blagojevich of the crimes. Blagojevich continues to deny the false statements charge for which he could spend up to five years in prison, and plans to appeal the conviction. The prosecution has said they are already preparing for a retrial on the 23 undecided counts. Presiding judge James Zagel has scheduled a hearing [NPR report] to discuss the retrial for August 26.

In June, Zagel denied a request [JURIST report] to delay the Blagojevich trial in order for his defense lawyers to review a decision by the US Supreme Court [official website] limiting the scope of the federal honest services fraud statute [18 USC § 1346 text]. Zagel held that the trial delay was unnecessary because the Supreme Court's decision in Skilling v. United States [Cornell LII backgrounder; JURIST report] was unlikely to affect Blagojevich's case. In April, the prosecution was ordered [JURIST report] to release a 91-page government proffer outlining evidence in its case against Blagojevich. In March, Blagojevich pleaded not guilty [JURIST report] to eight amended corruption charges. In January 2009, the Illinois State Senate voted unanimously [JURIST report] to convict Blagojevich of abuse of power and remove him from office. Blagojevich and his former chief of staff John Harris were initially arrested [JURIST report] in December 2008.




Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page

For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...


LATEST OP-ED

In Alabama, "Back Door" Restrictions on Abortion and Roe
DOMESTIC
LaJuana Davis
Cumberland School of Law

Get JURIST legal news delivered daily to your e-mail!

SYNDICATION

Add Paper Chase legal news to your RSS reader or personalized portal:
  • Add to Google
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Add to My AOL

E-MAIL

Subscribe to Paper Chase by e-mail. JURIST offers a free once-a-day digest [sample]. Enter your e-mail address below. After subscribing and being returned to this page, please check your e-mail for a confirmation message.


R|mail e-mails individual Paper Chase posts through the day. Enter your e-mail address below. After subscribing and being returned to this page, please check your e-mail for a confirmation message.

PUBLICATION

Join top US law schools, federal appeals courts, law firms and legal organizations by publishing Paper Chase legal news on your public website or intranet.

JURIST offers a news ticker and preformatted headline boxes updated in real time. Get the code.

Feedroll provides free Paper Chase news boxes with headlines or digests precisely tailored to your website's look and feel, with content updated every 15 minutes. Customize and get the code.

ABOUT

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible, ad-free format.

CONTACT

Paper Chase welcomes comments, tips and URLs from readers. E-mail us at JURIST@jurist.org