JURIST Supported by the University of Pittsburgh
PAPER CHASE NEWSBURSTDigest RSS feedFull RSS feed
Serious law. Primary sources. Global perspective.


Wednesday, June 30, 2010

ACLU finds incidents of political surveillance increasing
Erin Bock at 7:16 AM ET

Photo source or description
[JURIST] The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) [advocacy website] reported Tuesday that there have been more than 100 incidents of political surveillance [report, PDF; press release] and harassment by authorities in 33 states since 9/11 [JURIST news archive]. The report is broken down by state and lists incidents ranging from undercover police officers attending protests to authorities arresting individuals for taking pictures of police activity and government buildings. The report compares current surveillance practices to those conducted during the Cold War era [BBC backgrounder] by the FBI and CIA. ACLU Policy Counsel Michael German criticized these practices:
In our country, under our Constitution, the authorities aren't allowed to spy on you unless they have specific and individual suspicion that you are doing something illegal. Unfortunately, law enforcement in our country seems to be reverting to certain old, bad behaviors when it comes to political surveillance. ... Americans have been put under surveillance or harassed by the police just for deciding to organize, march, protest, espouse unusual viewpoints and engage in normal, innocuous behaviors...
California had the highest reported frequency of surveillance activities with 22 separate incidents, many involving undercover police infiltrating political activist group meetings to gather intelligence regarding possible terrorism threats.

The report cited incidents of cross-country surveillance where undercover police officers infiltrated groups that were planning to attend protests during the 2004 Republican National Convention (RNC). Earlier this month, a panel of the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit [official website] ruled that the city of New York could withhold documents related to their surveillance practices [JURIST report] that led to the arrest of 1,800 protesters during the convention. The court found that the documents needed to remain confidential because their release could compromise future surveillance efforts.




Link |  | print | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | Facebook page

For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...


LATEST LEGAL NEWS

 Supreme Court rules on scope of federal agencies' jurisdiction
2:35 PM ET, May 20

 Supreme Court rules on foreign taxes
1:36 PM ET, May 20

 Supreme Court rules defendant not entitled to federal habeas relief
12:53 PM ET, May 20

 click for more...

Get JURIST legal news delivered daily to your e-mail!

LATEST FORUM

The War on Terror and the Need for Muslim Support
DOMESTIC
Faisal Kutty
Valparaiso University Law School

ABOUT

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible, ad-free format.

CONTACT

Paper Chase welcomes comments, tips and URLs from readers. E-mail us at JURIST@jurist.org