 |
|

Legal news from Monday, April 5, 2010 |
 |
|


Algeria national seeks emergency stay of transfer from Guantanamo
Steve Dotterer on April 5, 2010 12:59 PM ET

[JURIST] Lawyers for an Algerian national detained at Guantanamo Bay [JURIST news archive] on Monday filed an emergency motion [text, PDF] in the US District Court for the District of Columbia [official website] to block the detainee's transfer to his home country. Petitioner Ahmed Belbacha renewed his request for an administrative stay of a February court order mandating the transfer. The motion alleges that flaws in an earlier court order and new circumstances in the case motivate a ruling in favor of Belbacha:
With respect, the Court seriously misapprehended Mr. Belbacha's earlier request for an administrative stay. In addition, a fresh development an announcement on Friday that the Attorney General will meet this week with the Algerian Minister of Justice underscores the need for an administrative stay. As this Court recently recognized, the "potential harm" that Mr. Belbacha faces if he is transferred to Algeria is "significant" and "substantial." The case for an administrative stay is especially strong because there is substantial question as to the Court's jurisdiction to issue the February 4 Order.
Belbacha has argued that he will be subjected to abuse and criminal prosecution if returned to Algeria, a situation that his counsel argues necessitates the emergency court order. Belbacha relies on the 2008 Supreme Court ruling in Boumediene v. Bush [JURIST report] that Guantanamo detainees have a right to challenge their imprisonment, which resulted in a spate of detainee suits against the federal government.
Last month, the US Supreme Court [official website] declined to rule [JURIST report] in the case known as Kiyemba II, in which the court was asked to consider issues surrounding the transfer of Guantanamo Bay detainees. Lawyers for four Chinese Muslim Uighurs [JURIST news archive] detained at Guantanamo were appealing [JURIST report] an April ruling [opinion, PDF; JURIST report] by the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Columbia Circuit, which held that US courts cannot prevent the government from transferring Guantanamo detainees to foreign countries on the grounds that detainees may face prosecution or torture in the foreign country. The case is separate from a case the court remanded [JURIST report] to the DC circuit court earlier last month, known as Kiyemba I. The US government has prevailed in 12 of the 46 habeas corpus cases decided [JURIST news archive] in the DC District Court since the Boumediene ruling.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Australia to accept Cuban aslyum seekers held at Guantanamo Bay
Patrice Collins on April 5, 2010 11:10 AM ET

[JURIST] Australia confirmed Monday that it will accept three Cuban asylum seekers currently held at the Guantanamo Bay [JURIST news archive] Migrations Operation Center. The center, utilized [CIP report] by the US military after the recent Haitian earthquake [JURIST news archive] to house mainly Haitian asylum seekers, is not affiliated with the US detention center at Guantanamo Bay. Upon the announcement, Australian Minister for Immigration and Citizenship, Chris Evans [official profile], denied [Australian report] any connection between Australia's acceptance of the Cuban asylum seekers and US acceptance of Tamil [JURIST news archive] asylum seekers intercepted by the Australian Customs Service [official website] in October and denied [press release] entrance into Australia. All 78 asylum seekers aboard an Australian Customs Service vessel have been declared refugees [Radio Australia report] by the UN High Commissioner on Refugees (UNHRC) [official website]. The Australian government has been actively seeking resettlement [ABC report] of the refugees in countries other than Australia.
Australia has been criticized for its Immigration Detention Policy [HREOC backgrounder], which requires any non-citizen seeking entrance into Australia to be detained. In 2006, the High Court of Australia [official website] held [JURIST report] that a "holder of a temporary protection visa is not entitled to further protection in Australia if they are no longer in danger in the country from which they fled" and that the person may not remain a refugee. The UNHCR criticized [JURIST report] Australia for its strict policy of detaining illegal immigrants, refugees and asylum seekers. A representative of the UNHCR said that detention of asylum seekers and refugees is inherently undesirable and should only be used while authorities checked identities, where travel and identification papers had been lost or destroyed, or to protect public security.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

More than 100 Haitians arrested for illegally entering US after earthquake
Ann Riley on April 5, 2010 10:40 AM ET

[JURIST] The US Customs and Border Protection [official website] has arrested 115 Haitians who have crossed the border illegally since the January 12 earthquake [NYT backgrounder, JURIST news archive], according to Sunday reports. Mark Henry, operations officer for the Border Patrol's Swanton sector [official website], which covers 261 miles of the US-Canada border from New Hampshire through Vermont to New York said that 114 Haitians have been arrested in Vermont [Burlington Free Press report] and one in New York. Many of the Haitians, previously deported from the US and seeking refugee status in Canada, returned to reconnect with remaining relatives in the US after losing family in the earthquake. Additionally, it is suspected that the illegal entrants are returning to the US with hopes that the 18-month Temporary Protected Status (TPS) [JURIST report] will allow them to reestablish themselves and strengthen their case for citizenship. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) [official website] granted TPS and placed a ban on deportation and removal proceedings of Haitian nationals in order to provide a temporary refuge for those already present in the US on January 12, regardless of their immigration status.
US Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano [official profile] said in January that Haitians who arrived illegally after the earthquake would be sent back to Haiti [JURIST report]. Napolitano told a news conference that Haitians should not view the earthquake as an open opportunity to migrate to the US, but should remain in their country to help rebuild. Additionally, the DHS announced that the US would allow Haitian orphans into the country [JURIST report] to receive needed care in the aftermath of the 7.0 magnitude earthquake [USGS backgrounder] that caused massive damage to property and infrastructure in Haiti. The UN Stabilization Mission in Haiti [official website] has said that up to 50 percent of buildings [statement, PDF] have been destroyed or damaged, including the presidential palace, the UN Mission headquarters, and the main prison, allowing nearly 4,000 inmates to escape [JURIST report]. Thousands of US military troops have been deployed to assist the Haitian police and international peacekeepers as they confront rising lawlessness [JURIST report] in the country. UN officials say the death toll may never be known [WP report], but Haitian officials have estimated that between 100,000 to 200,000 have died as a result of the earthquake.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Thailand court denies injunction request against protesters
Dwyer Arce on April 5, 2010 9:44 AM ET

[JURIST] A Thai court on Monday dismissed the government's application for an injunction against protesters gathered in Bangkok's business district. The Internal Security Operations Command, under the direction of Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva [official profile], applied for an injunction [Bangkok Post report] that would have ordered the protest organizers to lead the group out of the area after three days of protests. The court was also asked to ban rallies in 11 other areas, which, on Sunday, were declared by the government to be covered under the Internal Security Act (ISA) [text, PDF], restricting protesters from entering. The court denied the request [AFP report], stating that it was unnecessary given that the government already had the power to evict protesters under the ISA. The protesters, known as the red shirts [BBC backgrounder], are supporters of former prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra [BBC profile; JURIST news archive], who was removed from power in 2006 following a coup. They converged on Bangkok's commercial hub on Saturday, demanding that the Election Commission (EC) [official website] agree to expedite a corruption case against the ruling Democrat Party [party website, in Thai]. The party has been accused of receiving a 258 million baht (USD $8 million) donation in violation of a 10 million baht (USD $300,000) annual limit contained in the Thai Constitution [text, PDF].
The Thai Cabinet [official website, in Thai] approved [JURIST report] the invocation of the ISA last month to allow for increased security measures in anticipation of large anti-government protests. The Cabinet later extended [AFP report] application of the ISA after protests continued beyond the original March 23 mandate. The law was designed to provide more power to security forces [BBC report] and allow for the movement of protesters to be restricted through the imposition of curfews, checkpoints, and restrictions on the size of gatherings, in the event demonstrations turn violent. In February, the Thai Constitutional Court seized [JURIST report] 46.4 billion baht (USD $1.4 billion) in assets from Thaksin for abuses of power while in office. Thaksin has been convicted of corruption in Thailand, but Cambodia has refused [JURIST reports] to extradite him. Last April, Abhisit instituted a state of emergency [JURIST report] in Bangkok and several provinces following an outbreak of protests calling for his resignation. He also canceled [press release] the summit of the Association of South-East Asian Nations [official website] leaders, which was being held in the country.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

UN SG urges Uzbekistan to enforce human rights agreements
Daniel Richey on April 5, 2010 8:25 AM ET

[JURIST] UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon [official website] called on Uzbekistan Monday to deliver on promises to improve its human rights record. In a speech [text] to the University of World Economy and Diplomacy in Tashkent, Ban challenged the former Soviet republic to live up to its obligations as a signatory to various international treaties banning torture and civil rights violations. The rapidly growing Central Asian nation has long faced accusations from the West of rampant political oppression and a litany of human rights abuses, including the use of torture on its prisoners [HRW report]. Ban emphasized the importance of civil rights to the nation's growth as a democracy and as a member of the international community:
Central Asia is central to this world - a key player. ... You have an important place in the universal agreements that bind us as a community of nations. You have committed yourselves to many them, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the Convention Against Torture, more than 60 other international treaties on human rights. ... It is time to deliver.
Uzbek President Islam Karimov [official profile, in Uzbek] dismissed criticism from the West, saying that his secular rule of the primarily Muslim nation is threatened by a rising Islamist movement [Reuters report]. He and Ban met privately Monday to discuss the issue further. Ban visited Uzbekistan as part of a week-long tour of Central Asia, including stops in Turkmenistan and Kyrgyzstan [JURIST reports] to urge compliance with international human rights standards.
Ban's comments come on the heels of demands [JURIST report] from the UN Human Rights Committee [official website] that Uzbekistan conduct an independent investigation of May 2005 clashes [BBC backgrounder; JURIST news archive] between protesters, soldiers, and police in the city of Andijan that rights groups estimate left as many as 500 people dead [JURIST report]. Last month, the committee urged [report, DOC] Uzbekistan to comply with previous recommendations and supply the UN with information on Uzbek policies regarding police use of firearms on civilians. The report was the first to be issued [Reuters report] on Uzbekistan by the Committee since the Andijan clashes, which were sparked when thousands of protesters gathered [JURIST report] after rebels stormed a prison and freed a group of businessmen on trial for alleged Islamic extremism. In October 2009, the European Union (EU) announced that it would lift the last of the sanctions [JURIST report] it imposed on the country in November 2005 for its refusal to investigate the Andijan incident.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|