JURIST Supported by the University of Pittsburgh
PAPER CHASE ARCHIVEDigest RSS feedFull RSS feed
Serious law. Primary sources. Global perspective.
Listen to Paper Chase!


Legal news from Tuesday, January 19, 2010




Supreme Court hears arguments in oil franchise, collective bargaining cases
Jaclyn Belczyk on January 19, 2010 3:12 PM ET

[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] heard oral arguments [day call, PDF; merit briefs] Tuesday in two cases. In the combined cases of Mac's Shell Service, Inc. v. Shell Oil Products Co. [oral arguments transcript, PDF; JURIST report] and Shell Oil Products Co. v. Mac's Shell Service, Inc., the Court heard arguments on whether a service station operator can bring a constructive termination action under the Petroleum Marketing Practices Act [15 USC § 2801-2806 text] when the operator continues to run the franchise with the same trademark, fuel, and premises. Additionally, the Court will decide on the requirements for constructive non-renewal of a franchise-franchisee agreement under the act. The US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit affirmed [opinion, PDF] a district court ruling that a franchise may recover for constructive termination even if it continues to use the same trademark, fuel, and premises. The First Circuit additionally reversed the district ruling on constructive non-renewal of an agreement, holding that a franchisee faced with an unlawful lease has to either sign the lease and forgo any potential actions under the act or refuse to sign and bring a challenge to it after receiving a notice of non-renewal. Counsel for Shell Oil argued:

Because the term "terminate," at the very least, requires an end, we and the United States agree that the First Circuit erred in upholding the so-called constructive termination, where the dealers continued to receive each element of the statutory franchise - that is the premises, the trademark, and fuel -
Counsel for Mac's argued:
In this case the jury determined that Shell and Motiva engaged in conduct designed - prohibited by the PMPA when they raised rent to force dealers out of business and convert their stations to direct operations. Nevertheless, Shell and Motiva argue that conduct designed to force the dealers out of business is insufficient to invoke statutory protection because the dealers were not deprived of any of the statutory elements of the franchise and they remained in business for some period following the rental increase.

If accepted, the practical effect of Shell and Motiva's position will allow franchisors to circumvent the PMPA and terminate franchises at any time, at any reason, by simply increasing the burden on their operations.
In Granite Rock Co. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters [oral arguments transcript, PDF; JURIST report], the Court heard arguments on whether a federal court has jurisdiction to determine whether a collective bargaining agreement (CBA) was formed when it is disputed whether any binding contract exists, but no party makes an independent challenge to the arbitration clause apart from claiming it is inoperative before the contract is established. The court also heard arguments on whether Section 301(a) of the Labor Management Relations Act (LMRA) [text], which generally preempts otherwise available state law causes of action, provides a cause of action against a third-party international union that is not a direct signatory to the collective bargaining agreement. The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed [opinion, PDF] the district court's dismissal of a claim against the International Brotherhood of Teamsters (IBT) for tortious interference with a collective bargaining agreement between Granite Rock and Local Union 287. Counsel for the petitioner argued, "the concept that we are advancing is the plain language of the statute. Violation of a contract is right at the heart of this suit. You have for 150 years jurisprudence where in enforcing contracts, which is the central mission of the statute." Counsel for the IBT argued:
that allowing the tort action as, Granite Rock is urging, would work a big change in the structure that Congress has established by which it has decided that major issues of labor law, such as the weapons - economic weapons that parties can use, should be decided by Congress through statute and by the National Labor Relations Board through the application of the statute.





Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


FBI illegally collected phone records by claiming terrorism emergencies: report
Hillary Stemple on January 19, 2010 2:49 PM ET

[JURIST] The FBI illegally collected more than 2,000 telephone records between 2002 and 2006 by claiming the phone calls being made related to possible terrorism emergencies, according to a Washington Post report [text] Tuesday. According to the article, the Department of Justice (DOJ) Office of the Inspector General (OIG) [official website] will soon release a report that is expected to build on an OIG report issued in 2007, which showed the FBI had improperly obtained phone records. The FBI released a statement [text] responding to the article saying the practice was discontinued in 2006, and:


the Bureau did not have in place adequate internal controls to ensure that the appropriate process was used and that appropriate records were kept to document the basis of any request to the phone companies that did not require legal process. Steps were taken as early as 2006 to ensure similar situations do not occur in the future.

The FBI began the practice of allowing supervisors to authorize collection of phone records on the basis of emergency situations shortly after the Patriot Act [JURIST news archive] was passed in October 2001. The collection of telephone records on the basis of non-existent emergencies is a violation of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA) [text].

The discussion surrounding the expansion of government powers following enactment of the Patriot Act has been ongoing. The US Senate Judiciary Committee voted to reauthorize three of the Patriot Act in October, which was supported [JURIST reports] by the DOJ. In July, former DOJ Office of Legal Counsel lawyer John Yoo [JURIST news archive] defended [JURIST report] the Bush administration's use of warrantless wiretapping [JURIST news archive] following the release [JURIST report] of a a multi-agency report questioning its effectiveness.

1/20/10 - The OIG report [text, PDF] has been released to the public.





Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Slovakia to accept 3 Guantanamo Bay detainees
Sarah Miley on January 19, 2010 2:03 PM ET

[JURIST] Slovakia's Foreign Ministry [official website, in Slovak] announced Tuesday that the government will accept three inmates from the Guantanamo Bay [JURIST news archive] detention facility. The ministry stated that this was a "gesture of solidarity" in support of President Barack Obama's foreign policy. The US Embassy in Slovakia [official website] released a statement stating:


The United States welcomes the announcement today by Slovak officials that the Government of Slovakia will accept 3 Guantanamo detainees for resettlement. The United States appreciates this act as a productive step in realizing President Obama's vision of closing the Guantanamo Bay detention center once and for all. We have had fruitful cooperation with Slovak authorities on this issue and will continue to collaborate as called for by our Slovak allies.

The Slovak government gave no details on the nationality, date of arrival, or location of the inmates, citing security reasons.

Earlier this week, a Spanish foreign ministry official confirmed that Spain will be accepting two detainees currently being held at Guantanamo Bay. Closure of the detention facility was initially due by January 22, 2010, but Obama recently confirmed [NYT report] that this deadline would not be met. The administration has run into several hurdles in closing the prison, including opposition from members of Congress and the recent suspension of detainee transfers to Yemen [JURIST report]. In November, the Center for American Progress [advocacy website] issued a report [JURIST report] blaming missteps by the Obama administration for the delay.





Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Malaysia court rules sodomy ban constitutional
Sarah Paulsworth on January 19, 2010 1:47 PM ET

[JURIST] An appeals court in Malaysia ruled on Tuesday that the country's ban on sodomy is constitutional. The court made the ruling [AFP report] while considering the appeal of Abdul Rahim Abdul Rahaman, who was convicted of sodomizing a 14-year-old boy and sentenced to 60 years imprisonment. Abdul Rahim claimed the intercourse with the boy was consensual, but the court said that was irrelevant, rejecting arguments that the ban violates the Malaysian Constitution [text, PDF], which prohibits discrimination.

This ruling could have implications for the trial of Malaysian opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim [official website; JURIST news archives], who is accused of sodomizing his former aide, Mohd Saiful Bukhari, in 2008. Anwar has pleaded not guilty [JURIST report] and contends that the charge is part of a government conspiracy to undermine his political agenda. Anwar's counsel sought unsuccessfully [JURIST report] to have the case thrown out last month. This is the second sodomy charge against Anwar in the past 11 years. Anwar was Malaysia's deputy prime minister until he was fired in 1998 following sodomy charges of which he was initially convicted but later acquitted. He only recently reentered Malaysian politics following the expiration of a ten-year ban [JURIST report] against him for unrelated corruption charges. The trial date [Bernama report] for this second charge of sodomy against Anwar has been set for January 25. If convicted, Anwar faces up to 20 years in prison.






Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Former UK AG warned Cabinet Iraq invasion may have been illegal
Sarah Miley on January 19, 2010 1:16 PM ET

[JURIST] The UK Iraq Inquiry [official website] released a 2002 letter [text, PDF] on Tuesday from former UK attorney general Peter Goldsmith [professional profile] to former secretary of defense Geoffrey Hoon [personal profile] in which Goldsmith warned the Cabinet that the Iraq invasion was not supported by international law. The letter stated that Goldsmith was having "considerable difficulty" supporting a legal foundation for the Iraq invasion:


As you are aware, the Law Officers' opinion has not been sought on the legality of possible action and I have not therefore offered any views on the legal position. The clarity of your statement and the apparently authoritative way it was produced puts me however in a difficult position. I see considerable difficulties in being satisfied that military action would be justified on the basis of self defence. In particular I am not aware of the existence of material indicating the existence of an imminent threat from Iraq of the sort which would justify military action without support of a Security Council ... authorisation.

In response, Hoon wrote in a letter [text, PDF] to Goldsmith that Hoon's statements were being misconstrued, and clarified by stating that military action would be warranted "in principle" if weapons of mass destruction were found in Saddam Hussein's possession. Hoon stated in the letter, "I do not think that my statements curtail your ability to offer an opinion on the legal position in due course. As you say, we will need to satisfy ourselves that this threat exists should we want to justify legal action on the basis of self-defence." Hoon will be questioned by the Iraq Inquiry on Tuesday concerning his role in the invasion. He will be the first former minister to appear before the inquiry, following a string of military leaders, advisers and officials.

Former UK prime minister Tony Blair [official profile; JURIST news archive] is also facing criticism after the Inquiry released a letter from Goldsmith written to Blair in July 2002, warning [JURIST report] Blair that the planned invasion of Iraq could be illegal. The letter laid out the reasons that Goldsmith believed the Iraq invasion might be illegal, including that an invasion could not be based on "regime change" alone. The existence of this letter will increase the difficulty for Blair to use a good-faith defense against charges that he knowingly led the country into an illegal invasion. Blair is scheduled to testify before the Inquiry next week.





Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


China high court ex-vice president sentenced to life on corruption conviction
Sarah Paulsworth on January 19, 2010 12:15 PM ET

[JURIST] Former vice president of China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) [official website, in Chinese] Huang Songyou was convicted on bribery and embezzlement charges on Tuesday and sentenced to life imprisonment [Xinhua report]. Huang is the highest-ranking judge to be charged with corruption [China Daily report] since the founding of the People's Republic of China. Between 2005 and 2008, Huang allegedly embezzled 3.9 million yuan (about $574,000 USD) while serving as vice president of the SPC, and he allegedly embezzled 1.2 million yuan (about $175,000 USD) while serving as president of the Intermediate People's Court of Zhanjiang in 1997.

In August, the Communist Party of China (CPC) revoked [JURIST report] Huang's membership, following the corruption investigation. Huang was removed [JURIST report] from his position as vice president of the SPC in October 2008 by a vote of the legislators. In March, the SPC pledged to take steps to eliminate judicial corruption [JURIST report] with improved ethics education.






Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


New Jersey governor signs bill legalizing medical marijuana
Hillary Stemple on January 19, 2010 12:05 PM ET

[JURIST] Former New Jersey governor Jon Corzine signed the "Compassionate Use of Medical Marijuana" bill [text, PDF] on his last full day in office Monday, legalizing the use of medical marijuana [JURIST news archive] in the state. The bill allows doctors to prescribe marijuana [NYT report] to patients with chronic illnesses such as cancer, AIDS, Lou Gehrig's disease, muscular dystrophy, and multiple sclerosis, which will be distributed through state-monitored dispensaries. Backers of the legislation have described [UPI report] the bill as the toughest medical marijuana law passed in the US. The measure limits use of medical marijuana to specific types of chronic illness and forbids users to grown their own marijuana or use it in public. The New Jersey legislature passed the bill [JURIST report] last week, and Corzine signed the bill as one of his last acts as governor. Republican Chris Christie [official website] was sworn in as New Jersey's governor on Tuesday.

This legislation makes New Jersey the fourteenth US state to legalize medical marijuana. In November, voters in Maine approved [JURIST report] an expansion [proposed legislation, PDF] of the state's existing medical marijuana laws, making Maine became the fifth state to allow dispensaries [ABC News report], following California, Colorado, Rhode Island, and New Mexico. In October, US Attorney General Eric Holder issued guidelines for a new policy [JURIST report] for investigating and prosecuting state-sanctioned medical marijuana use. Those guidelines reflect a pledge made by Holder in March to stop federal raids [JURIST report] on medical marijuana dispensaries that comply with state laws. Ending such raids was one of President Barack Obama's campaign promises [Boston Globe report], a view that differed sharply from the policy of the Bush administration.






Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


UK introduces compensation scheme for victims of overseas terrorist attacks
Ann Riley on January 19, 2010 11:29 AM ET

[JURIST] The British Government announced [press release] Monday plans for a new scheme to compensate victims of terrorist attacks abroad. Home Secretary Alan Johnson [official profile] introduced the Victims of Overseas Terrorism Compensation Scheme [text, PDF] as part of the Crime and Security Bill [materials] that is currently before Parliament. The scheme will be limited to British nationals who sustain any injury from an act of terrorism occurring outside the United Kingdom after January 1, 2002. Justice Secretary Jack Straw [official profile] said:


Terrorism is intended as a political statement and an attack on society as a whole. Therefore it is right that, as a tangible expression of sympathy, society should compensate the victims of terrorist attacks abroad in recognition of the injuries suffered… Although we will never be able to compensate fully the trauma victims of terrorism experience, we hope the new scheme will provide some much needed relief and recognition that victims and their loved ones go through.

Complete details of the plan have not yet been released.

The Victims of Overseas Terrorism Compensation Scheme broadly mirrors the country’s Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority (CICA) [official website] scheme [text, PDF], which provides compensation for injuries, loss of earnings, death of a loved one, and expenses to Britons who are blameless victims of violent crimes occuring within the UK. The UK compensated victims [JURIST report] of the London bombings [BBC report] in 2005 via the CICA compensation scheme. Victims were awarded [JURIST report] between of £11,000 ($19,543 USD) with a maximum payout total of £500,000 ($888,542 USD). Following the US 9/11 attacks [JURIST news archive], the US Justice Department [official website] established a Victim Compensation Fund [official website], which made more than 5,000 payments [JURIST report] to survivors and families of victims ranging from $250,000 to over $8 million.





Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Supreme Court remands Mumia case to reconsider death sentence
Jaclyn Belczyk on January 19, 2010 10:20 AM ET

[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Tuesday issued two per curiam opinions [order list, PDF], remanded the case of Mumia Abu-Jamal [JURIST news archive], and denied a preliminary injunction to Michigan in a dispute over Asian carp. The Court granted certiorari in Beard v. Abu-Jamal [docket] and granted the respondent's motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court vacated the judgment below and remanded the case to the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit for further consideration in light of the Court's decision in Smith v. Spisak [opinion, PDF; JURIST report]. The only issue is whether the Third Circuit erred in allowing a new sentencing hearing [JURIST report] solely on the issue of life imprisonment or a death sentence. The Court declined to review [JURIST report] Abu-Jamal's conviction in April. Abu-Jamal was convicted of killing police officer Daniel Faulkner [advocacy website] after Faulkner pulled over Abu-Jamal's brother for a traffic violation. The case has become a focal point for death penalty opponents, attracting the attention of artists, civil rights activists, and politicians.

In Presley v. Georgia [opinion, PDF], the Court ruled that a defendant's Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment [texts] right to a public trial was violated when the trial court excluded the public from the voir dire of prospective jurors. The Court granted the petition for certiorari and petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and reversed the judgment of the Supreme Court of Georgia. Justice Clarence Thomas filed a dissenting opinion, joined by Justice Antonin Scalia.

In the capital case of Wellons v. Hall [opinion, PDF], the Court granted the petition for certiorari and petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, vacated the decision below, and remanded the case to the US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit for further consideration in light of the Court's decision in Cone v. Bell [opinion, PDF; JURIST report]. The Court ruled in Cone that a federal habeas court has the power to recognize that a state court erred in holding that state law precludes reviewing a claim and that a federal habeas claim is not "procedurally defaulted" because it has been presented twice to the state court. Scalia filed a dissenting opinion, joined by Thomas. Justice Samuel Alito filed a separate dissent, joined by Chief Justice John Roberts.

In Michigan v. Illinois [JURIST report], the Court denied an injunction sought by Michigan to compel Illinois to close two waterways that allow invasive Asian carp to reach the Great Lakes. The Court issued the order without comment. The Court must still determine whether to reopen a longstanding controversy over the diversion canal, created in the 1890s to keep Chicago's sewage from flowing into Lake Michigan.

Finally, the Supreme Court declined to review an order requiring the state of California to release more than 40,000 inmates from its state prisons to ease overcrowding. The Court dismissed the appeals in Schwarzenegger v. Plata and California State Republican Legislator Intervenors v. Plata [dockets] for lack of jurisdiction but noted "that a further order has been entered in this case, but that order is not the subject of these appeals. It is also noted that the district court has stayed its further order pending review by this Court." Last week, a panel of federal judges approved [JURIST report] a new prison reduction plan, but stayed the order pending Supreme Court action.






Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


US grants humanitarian parole to Haiti orphans
Andrea Bottorff on January 19, 2010 9:23 AM ET

[JURIST] The US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) [official website] announced on Monday that the US will allow Haitian orphans into the country [press release] to receive needed care in the aftermath of last week's earthquake [JURIST news archive]. The humanitarian parole policy [USCIS backgrounder], which grants individuals temporary admission to the US in emergency cases, will apply to certain groups of Haitian orphans [fact sheet], including those in the process of being adopted by Americans. US Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano [official profile] described the policy:


We are committed to doing everything we can to help reunite families in Haiti during this very difficult time. While we remain focused on family reunification in Haiti, authorizing the use of humanitarian parole for orphans who are eligible for adoption in the United States will allow them to receive the care they need here.

DHS is working with the State Department [official website] to issue immigrant visas and other documents on an individual basis to children who qualify. Groups of Haitian children are expected to arrive in the US [Miami Herald report] as early as Tuesday.

Last week, DHS also granted Temporary Protected Status [JURIST report] to Haitian nationals already present in the US when the earthquake hit and allowed them to continue living and working in the US for the next 18 months regardless of their immigration status. On January 12, a 7.0 magnitude earthquake [USGS backgrounder] caused massive damage to property and infrastructure in Haiti. The UN Stabilization Mission in Haiti [official website] has said that up to 50 percent of buildings [statement, PDF] have been destroyed or damaged, including the presidential palace, the UN Mission headquarters, and the main prison, allowing nearly 4,000 inmates to escape [JURIST report]. Thousand of US military troops have been deployed to assist the Haitian police and international peacekeepers as they confront rising lawlessness [JURIST report] in the country. Haitian government officials estimate [Al Jazeera report] the death toll to be as high as 100,000 to 200,000.





Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Spain court orders pilot extradited to Argentina for alleged role in 'Dirty War'
Megan McKee on January 19, 2010 8:19 AM ET

[JURIST] The Spanish High Court [official website, in Spanish] on Monday ordered the extradition of pilot Julio Alberto Poch so that he may be tried in Argentina for his alleged role in the nation's 1976-83 "Dirty War" [GlobalSecurity backgrounder; JURIST news archive]. Poch was a navy officer at Argentina's Naval Mechanics School [backgrounder, in Spanish], one of the most notorious detention centers of the military dictatorship, and is believed to have piloted flights, known as "death flights," which were used to dump the military junta's political opponents into the Plata river and the Atlantic Ocean. Poch holds dual Dutch and Argentine citizenship, which had protected him from earlier attempts at extradition [ABC report, Spanish], but he was arrested and imprisoned last September when he landed in Valencia while en route to the Netherlands. The Spanish court found that there are adequate measures in place to guarantee that Poch will receive a fair trial [BBC report] in Argentina. Poch continues to deny the charges against him but has accepted extradition.

Last month, an Argentine court sentenced [JURIST report] former judge Victor Brusa to 21 years in prison for crimes against humanity during the country's Dirty War. The Federal Court of Santa Fe found Brusa guilty of eight counts of crimes against humanity in his capacity as a judicial officer during the dictatorship. The court also sentenced five former police officers to between 19 and 23 years in prison for their roles in kidnapping and torture. Brusa was arrested in 2005 after Argentina's Supreme Court struck down amnesty laws [JURIST report] adopted in the 1980s to deter military insurrection against the democratic government, prompting the government to reopen hundreds of human rights cases. During the Dirty War, an estimated 20,000 to 30,000 people were forcibly kidnapped or "disappeared" in a government-sponsored campaign against suspected dissidents.






Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page

For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...


LATEST OP-ED

The War on Terror and the Need for Muslim Support
DOMESTIC
Faisal Kutty
Valparaiso University Law School

Get JURIST legal news delivered daily to your e-mail!

SYNDICATION

Add Paper Chase legal news to your RSS reader or personalized portal:
  • Add to Google
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Add to My AOL

E-MAIL

Subscribe to Paper Chase by e-mail. JURIST offers a free once-a-day digest [sample]. Enter your e-mail address below. After subscribing and being returned to this page, please check your e-mail for a confirmation message.


R|mail e-mails individual Paper Chase posts through the day. Enter your e-mail address below. After subscribing and being returned to this page, please check your e-mail for a confirmation message.

PUBLICATION

Join top US law schools, federal appeals courts, law firms and legal organizations by publishing Paper Chase legal news on your public website or intranet.

JURIST offers a news ticker and preformatted headline boxes updated in real time. Get the code.

Feedroll provides free Paper Chase news boxes with headlines or digests precisely tailored to your website's look and feel, with content updated every 15 minutes. Customize and get the code.

ABOUT

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible, ad-free format.

CONTACT

Paper Chase welcomes comments, tips and URLs from readers. E-mail us at JURIST@jurist.org