Federal judge finds Pentagon in contempt for failing to record Guantanamo testimony

[JURIST] A judge in the US District Court for the District of Columbia [official website] on Thursday found [order, PDF] the US Department of Defense (DOD) [official website] in contempt for failing to videotape the testimony of Guantanamo Bay [JURIST news archive] detainee Mohammed Al-Adahi. Al-Adahi had petitioned for habeas relief in 2005, which the court granted [JURIST report] in August, and Judge Gladys Kessler had directed the DOD to videotape the testimony at the merits hearing in June so that the public and news media could see it. The government failed to comply with that order, claiming it was "due to oversight and miscommunication." In her order, Kessler wrote:


The purpose of the Court's Order requiring the Government to videotape Petitioner's testimony was to ensure the maximum amount of public accessibility to the judicial process. By requiring the Government to videotape Petitioner's direct testimony and crossexamination, and then make it public after classification review, the Court sought to ensure that the public would have an opportunity to observe as much of the testimony as possible. Thus, there are two other justifications for imposing sanctions against the Government: to minimize the damages to the public's lost opportunity to observe an actual Guantanamo Bay trial (or "Merits Hearing," as it is referred to), and to deter further noncompliance with court orders.

Kessler order the government to post a transcript of Al-Adahi's testimony and to provide a detailed explanation as to how it will avoid such oversight in the future.

The government is currently appealing [AP report] Kessler's decision to grant Al-Adahi's petition for habeas corpus. The government argues that Al-Adahi, who has been detained at Guantanamo Bay since 2002, was a supporter or member of the Taliban and/or al Qaeda, claiming that Al-Adahi had acted as an instructor at al Qaeda camp al Farouq, had familial ties to both the Taliban and al Qaeda, had been employed as a bodyguard for Osama bin-Laden and that Al-Adahi's story lacked credibility. Kessler rejected the government's arguments, finding "no reliable evidence in the record" to support its position.


 

About Paper Chase

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible format.

© Copyright JURIST Legal News and Research Services, Inc., 2013.