 |
|

Legal news from Friday, November 27, 2009 |
 |
|


Federal appeals court rules Ohio executions can resume
Dwyer Arce on November 27, 2009 10:11 AM ET

[JURIST] The US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit [official website] has ruled [opinion, PDF] that the execution of Kenneth Biros could proceed as scheduled, overturning a stay of execution issued by the district court [JURIST report] last month. The appeals court held Wednesday that the change to the execution procedure in Ohio removed the legal question from the case: [T]he district courts stay order must be vacated because any challenge to Ohios three drug execution protocol is now moot. Since Biros filed his lawsuit, the State has amended its lethal injection protocol. ... Ohio no longer follows the principal procedures that Biros challenges, the motion no longer presents a live dispute. The challenged execution method, the so-called "set-to-die" procedure, was introduced [JURIST report] earlier this year, replacing the three-drug method used in most states. Executions in Ohio will be conducted with a single intravenous injection starting November 30, with two intramuscular injections serving as a backup in case a suitable vein cannot be found. Biros will be the first death row inmate to be executed using this procedure. Biros's attorney has promised to appeal the decision to the full Sixth Circuit or the US Supreme Court [official website], claiming [NYT report] that the execution order amounts to human experimentation.
The US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio [official website] issued a stay of execution for Biros last month, as the review of the lethal injection procedures in Ohio continued. Biros was the fourth Ohio death row inmate to be granted a stay of execution since the failed attempt to execute Romell Broom [JURIST report] in September. Along with Broom, the executions Darryl Durr and Lawrence Reynolds were also postponed until spring [JURIST report]. Biros was convicted of a 1991 murder and attempted rape and is scheduled to be executed on December 8.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Iran government confiscates Nobel medal from rights lawyer Ebadi
Sarah Miley on November 27, 2009 7:58 AM ET

[JURIST] The Iranian government was accused Thursday of confiscating the Nobel Peace Prize medal awarded to human rights lawyer Shirin Ebadi [Nobel profile; JURIST news archive]. The government seized the medal from Ebadi's safety deposit box in Tehran and froze her bank accounts three weeks ago, claiming that Ebadi owes $400,000 in taxes for the $1.3 million she was awarded by the Norwegian Nobel Committee [official website]. The Chairman of the Committee penned a letter [text, PDF] to the Iranian embassy in Oslo stating It is...totally unacceptable that parts of Dr. Ebadi's property, including the Nobel medal and the Nobel Diploma, have been confiscated by the authorities...The Norwegian Nobel Committee urge Iran to live up to its commitments, in particular the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights...Many laureates, including Shirin Ebadi, have received the Prize because they insisted that their governments follow the basic principles of human rights. Some of these laureates were put in prison for an extended period of time. Yet, even in these cases their Nobel medals and diplomas were not confiscated. The act is seen as an effort by Tehran to quiet dissidents, who have been actively protesting the controversial reelection [JURIST news archive] in June of Iran's president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad [BBC profile; JURIST news archive]. Ebadi won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2003 for her promotion of democracy in Iran and defending the rights of women and children. She openly criticized the recent presidential elections and the treatment of protesters detained by the government. Ebadi has declared that she will not be deterred [AFP report] by the pressure of the Tehran government, and will continue fighting against human rights violations in Iran.
Ebadi has a history of conflict with Iranian government. In June Ebadi penned an open letter [text] to Ahmadinejad requesting for him to reopen the offices of her human rights group, which the Iranian security forces raided and closed [JURIST report] in December 2008. The Iranian judiciary declared that the office of Ebadi's Defenders of Human Rights Center [official website] did not have the proper legal permits. In May 2008 Ebadi's organization released its annual report in which it condemned the government [JURIST report] for continued harassment and intimidation of dissidents, students, reporters, labor activists, and other government critics. The report also criticized the government's increased policing of women's veils and the harsh punishments meted out to women found to be insufficiently covered, considering the practices to be violations of women's rights. In 2007, Ebadi urged the UN to investigate allegations that the Iranian government had been detaining women's rights activists [JURIST report] and charging them with national security offenses.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|