 |
|

Legal news from Friday, May 15, 2009 |
 |
|


US releases Guantanamo detainee Boumediene to France
Jaclyn Belczyk on May 15, 2009 2:53 PM ET

[JURIST] US officials said Friday that Algerian Guantanamo Bay [JURIST news archive] detainee Lakhdar Boumediene [BBC profile] has been released and sent to France [DOJ press release]. Boumediene was the named plaintiff in the US Supreme Court case Boumediene v. Bush [opinion, PDF; JURIST report], in which the Court held that Guantanamo detainees could challenge their imprisonment in federal court through the use of habeas corpus motions. Last week, the French government confirmed that it would accept Boumediene after French President Nicholas Sarkozy told US President Barack Obama [official profiles] at an April meeting that the country would accept one Guantanamo prisoner as part of a symbolic measure [JURIST report] to assist in the closing of the facility. The framework for the agreement was established at the first meeting between the two heads of state, at which Sarkozy congratulated Obama on his January decision to order the closure of Guantanamo [executive order; JURIST report].
Obama's order directed that the military prison be closed "as soon as practicable, and no later than 1 year from the date of this order." The order did not specify where detainees would go upon release, but did call for diplomatic efforts with foreign states in order to facilitate the closure of the facility. Last week, a spokesperson for the German Interior Ministry [official website, in German] said that the US has asked Germany to take in up to 10 detainees [JURIST report]. In April, UK Minister of Justice Jack Straw reiterated his country's willingness to accept Guantanamo detainees [JURIST report] in order to speed the closure of the facility. In March, top officials from the Obama administration met with leaders from the European Union (EU) [official website; JURIST news archive] to discuss plans to transfer [JURIST report] Guantanamo Bay detainees to European countries. Individual member states have also indicated their openness to accepting detainees, including Lithuania, Ireland, and Portugal [JURIST reports]. Other states have expressed reservations about accepting detainees, including Poland and Spain, while Italy [JURIST reports] and the Netherlands [AFP report] have said they will not accept detainees.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Obama administration reviving military commission system with changes
Jaclyn Belczyk on May 15, 2009 1:41 PM ET

[JURIST] US President Barack Obama [official website] announced Friday that he is reinstating the controversial military commission system [DOD materials; JURIST news archive] to try some Guantanamo Bay [JURIST news archive] detainees. Obama said that there will be changes to the system to increase defendants' rights, including barring statements obtained under harsh interrogation methods and making it more difficult to introduce hearsay evidence. The administration will also seek a 90-day continuance of pending proceedings to implement the new rules, ask Congress to make changes to the Military Commissions Act of 2006 [text, PDF] to give defendants expanded rights. Obama said [statement text]: Today, the Department of Defense will be seeking additional continuances in several pending military commission proceedings. We will seek more time to allow us time to reform the military commission process. The Secretary of Defense will notify the Congress of several changes to the rules governing the commissions. The rule changes will ensure that: First, statements that have been obtained from detainees using cruel, inhuman and degrading interrogation methods will no longer be admitted as evidence at trial. Second, the use of hearsay will be limited, so that the burden will no longer be on the party who objects to hearsay to disprove its reliability. Third, the accused will have greater latitude in selecting their counsel. Fourth, basic protections will be provided for those who refuse to testify. And fifth, military commission judges may establish the jurisdiction of their own courts.
These reforms will begin to restore the Commissions as a legitimate forum for prosecution, while bringing them in line with the rule of law. In addition, we will work with the Congress on additional reforms that will permit commissions to prosecute terrorists effectively and be an avenue, along with federal prosecutions in Article III courts, for administering justice. This is the best way to protect our country, while upholding our deeply held values. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) decried [press release] the move as, "a striking blow to due process and the rule of law." The Constitution Project [advocacy website] called the announcement "troubling" [press release], saying, "[m]ilitary commissions are designed to provide lesser due process protections for terrorism suspects than our federal courts do."
Earlier this week, rights groups harshly criticized plans to revive the military commissions process [JURIST reports]. This is the second time this week Obama has drawn criticism from liberal supporters. On Wednesday, White House officials announced that Obama had decided to seek a delay of the release of photographs [JURIST report] depicting the allegedly abusive treatment of detainees in Iraq and Afghanistan, reversing an earlier decision.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

UN rights chief urges US to hold Bush-era officials accountable for 'torture'
Benjamin Hackman on May 15, 2009 11:50 AM ET

[JURIST] UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay [official website] urged the US [NYT op-ed] Wednesday to hold accountable those accused of committing torture under the Bush administration. Pillay welcomed the US as a new member of the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) [official website] and lauded decisions by US President Barack Obama [official website] to ban torture and close CIA prisons [JURIST report] and to review detentions [JURIST report] at Guantanamo Bay [JURIST news archive], but said that the US should hold accountable anyone who committed human rights abuses: Although much more needs to be done, President Obama's determination to resolve the untenable situation of detainees at Guantanamo Bay, ban C.I.A. prisons and implement the prohibition on torture in compliance with international standards is highly welcome. The U.S. should also shed light into the still opaque areas that surround capture, interrogation methods, rendition and detention conditions of those alleged to have been involved in terrorism, and ensure that perpetrators of torture and abuse are held to account. Pillay said the US can benefit the UNHRC if it supports international human-rights standards and said the US has the responsibility of approaching human rights in a way that sets an example for the rest of the world.
After announcing in April [JURIST report] that it would seek a seat on the UNHRC, the US was elected [JURIST report] to the 47-member council for the first time Tuesday. In anticipation of the election, the State Department [official website] released its set of human-rights commitments and pledges [text, PDF]. When the UNHRC was created [JURIST report] in 2006, the Bush administration declined to seek a Council seat or participate in its proceedings due to a perceived anti-Israeli sentiment by the UNHRC. Last month, UN special rapporteur on torture Manfred Nowak [official profile, DOC] insisted that under international law the US must prosecute Department of Justice lawyers who drafted recently released memos [JURIST reports] detailing harsh interrogation techniques. Obama has said that he would not rule out the possibility of prosecuting [transcript; JURIST report] lawyers responsible for authoring the memos.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Fourth Circuit rules insurer not liable for alleged Iraq abuses by military contractor
Benjamin Hackman on May 15, 2009 10:57 AM ET

[JURIST] The US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] Thursday that the insurance company for defense contractor CACI Internationals [corporate website] has no duty to defend or indemnify CACI against claims of torture at Iraq prisons such as Abu Ghraib [JURIST news archive]. CACI conceded that its insurance policy from St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. generally covered the intelligence contractor only in the US, Canada, and Puerto Rico but argued that its policy covered some claims involving CACI employees who were abroad for a "short time" on business. The Fourth Circuit affirmed a district court decision [opinion, PDF], writing that St. Paul would have a duty to defend CACI from lawsuits "if there is any potential that the policies would cover the claims alleged in the underlying complaints." The court determined that abuses and injuries alleged in Iraq in two complaints filed against CACI did not occur in the territory CACI's policy covered because "it is the location of the injury not of some precipitating cause that determines the location of the event for purposes of insurance coverage." The court also determined that the complaints' allegations "make it difficult to infer that those engaged in [repetitive] activities were present in Iraq only for a few days." Thus, the complaints' allegations "foreclose the possibility of coverage under the territorial provision or 'short time' exception of the policies."
In 2003, CACI contracted with the US government to provide intelligence services in Iraq. CACI agreed to interrogate prisoners at Abu Ghraib. CACI took out an insurance policy with St. Paul that indemnified CACI for up to $2 million. In 2004, two groups of former Iraq detainees sued [JURIST report] CACI. One complaint alleged CACI engaged in a conspiracy to commit torture, and the other complaint alleged CACI engaged in a "multi-year pattern of criminal conduct." CACI has faced several lawsuits from detainees. In March, a judge in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia [official website] ruled [order, PDF] that CACI is not immune from a lawsuit [JURIST report] brought in 2008 by Abu Ghraib detainees, denying CACI's motion to dismiss.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|