 |
|

Legal news from Monday, February 9, 2009 |
 |
|


China defends rights record in review by UN council
Jaclyn Belczyk on February 9, 2009 5:37 PM ET

[JURIST] The Chinese delegation to the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) [official website] defended China's human rights record Monday while presenting a report [text, PDF] in compliance with the UNHRC's Universal Periodic Review (UPR) [official website] process. Ambassador Li Baodong said that China has been taking steps to improve its legal system [press release], promote democracy, and encourage non-governmental organizations (NGOs). The report asserted that [s]ince 1978, when China launched its policy of reform and opening up, there has been a significant advancement in the level and extent of the Chinese peoples enjoyment of all human rights. The Chinese people, who once lacked basic necessities, are now enjoying relative prosperity. There has been constant progress in such social spheres as education, culture and public health. Democracy and the rule of law have gradually improved. Political restructuring has progressed steadily, with more extensive citizen participation in the political life of the country. Governments at all levels are now conscientiously implementing the Scientific Outlook on Development, an approach that places people first and seeks to ensure comprehensive, coordinated and sustainable development, in an effort to build a harmonious society characterized by democracy, the rule of law, equity and justice. China will further deepen its political restructuring and accelerate social development, focusing on education, health care, employment and other aspects of the peoples welfare in order to ensure that all people enjoy their rights to equal participation and equal development. Although Chinese delegates took a series of questions from delegates from other nations, denying that the government runs secret prisons or engages in torture, Amnesty International (AI) [advocacy website] said it did not believe the questioning went far enough. Asia-Pacific Deputy Director at AI Roseann Rife said [press release], "We didn't hear enough about the on-going repression of the Tibetans, the Uighurs, as well as the persecution of various religious groups, including Christians and members of the Falun Gong."
China continues to be widely criticized for its human rights record. In November, the UN Committee Against Torture [official website] expressed deep concern over repeated allegations that China authorities continued the routine and widespread practice of torture [JURIST report] and ill-treatment of suspects to extract confessions. Earlier that month, the State Council Information Office of China [official site, in Mandarin] announced that the country would draft a plan to protect human rights [JURIST report]. No information was provided as to when the plan would be released.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Italy woman in right-to-die controversy dies
Devin Montgomery on February 9, 2009 4:47 PM ET

[JURIST] Eluana Englaro [materials, in Italian], an Italian woman at the center of a right-to-die controversy in the country, died Monday, shortly after the Italian Senate [official website, in Italian] began debate on legislation [draft text, in Italian] that would make it a crime to remove a feeding tube from a comatose patient. Englaro's father removed her feeding tube on Friday, following the refusal [JURIST report] of Italian President Giorgio Napolitano [BBC profile] to sign a order prohibiting the action. Napolitano said he could not issue the order given a decision [JURIST report] by the country's Court of Cassation [official website, in Italian] allowing removal of the tube. The legislation, heavily supported by Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi [BBC profile; JURIST news archive], is scheduled to be voted on by the Senate on Tuesday, and it is not clear whether Englaro's death will effect its passage. Euthanasia [JURIST news archive] is currently illegal in Italy [JURIST report], but the Court of Cassation distinguished between the removal of a feeding tube and more affirmative steps to end a patient's life.
Eluana Englaro has been in a coma since an automobile accident in 1992. Her father, Beppino Englaro, has been fighting to have her feeding tube removed since 1999. In 2005, Italy's Constitutional Court [official website, in Italian] upheld [JURIST report] a lower court's ruling to keep her feeding tube in place because they could not find specific evidence on Englaro's personal views of life and death. In October of last year, the Constitutional Court rejected [decision text, in Italian; JURIST report] a parliamentary challenge to a Milan appeals court decision which held doctors could remove Enlargo's feeding tube because she was found to be in an "irreversible" vegetative state. The Court of Cassation's November ruling affirmed that decision. Catholic groups and conservative politicians opposed the decision arguing [Independent report] that the court is permitting euthanasia.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Europe must help US close Guantanamo: UK ex-AG Goldsmith
Tarah Park on February 9, 2009 12:06 PM ET

[JURIST] Former British attorney general Peter Goldsmith [BBC profile] on Monday urged [Independent op-ed] the UK and other European states to create an "international coalition" to assist the US in closing the Guantanamo Bay [JURIST news archive] detention facility as soon as possible. Goldsmith said he understands that some countries do not want to accept released detainees, but that he believes a lack of cooperation could prevent the facility from being closed as intended [JURIST report]. Goldsmith praised Ireland, Portugal and other countries for their willingness to accept former prisoners, but called on those who refused or offered only limited assistance [JURIST reports] to reconsider their positions. He added that while the problem may have originated in the US, it could only be solved with the help of other countries: Whatever the rights and wrongs of Guantanamo the US was originally responding to an international terrorist threat as well as the need to bring people to justice for killing nearly 3,000 people on 11 September 2001. The means were wrong but the cause was right and past international critics of America's actions should now do what they can to undo the knot of illegality and shoddy malpractice that traps those still caged at Guantanamo. What's more, the camp's continued existence damages us too: as a symbol of the West's injustice and a recruiting sergeant for terrorism. It's our problem too. [sic] Last week, the European Parliament passed [JURIST report] a resolution [text, DOC] encouraging EU member states to accept former detainees for resettlement, and last month several states indicated willingness [EU press release, JURIST report] to consider accepting detainees after safety screenings by the US. On January 22, US President Barack Obama issued an executive order [text, PDF; JURIST report] requiring the closure of the Guantanamo Bay prison camp "as soon as practicable, and no later than 1 year from the date of this order."


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

Spain court bars 2 ETA-linked Basque parties from upcoming election
Tere Miller-Sporrer on February 9, 2009 8:36 AM ET

[JURIST] Spain's Supreme Court [official website, in Spanish] on Sunday unanimously banned the Basque separatist political groups Democracy 3 Million (D3M) and Askatasuna [orders, PDF, in Spanish] from participation in the coming March elections. The court found that Askatasuna was a "fraudulent instrument used to give continuity to the activities of political parties outlawed" such as the ETA [BBC backgrounder, JURIST news archive] and Batasuna [BBC backgrounder; JURIST news archive]. The court further found that D3M was "directed, produced, energized and encouraged by Batasuna." The decision of the Supreme Court is subject to review [El Pais report, in Spanish] by the Constitutional Court [official website, in Spanish].
In January, prosecutors filed charges [JURIST report] alleging that the Basque regional prime minister and two other leaders of the Basque socialist party had improper contact with Batasuna, but later requested that the charges be dismissed [JURIST report]. Last year, a Spanish judge blocked [JURIST report] the ETA-affiliated groups the Basque Nationalist Action Party (ANV) [party website] and the Communist Party of the Basque Lands (PCTV), finding that Batasuna had used the groups to circumvent its ban from participating in elections. The Spanish government barred the Basque separatist group Batauna in 2003, finding that it refused to cut ties with ETA.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|