A Collaboration with the University of Pittsburgh

California Supreme Court to hear Proposition 8 arguments in March

[JURIST] The California Supreme Court [official website] announced Tuesday that it will hear oral arguments [press release, PDF] on March 5 in the three cases [case filings] challenging the constitutionality of Proposition 8 [materials], the ballot measure passed in November [JURIST report] that banned same-sex marriage. The court issued an order listing the three issues to be briefed and argued as follows:

(1) Is Proposition 8 invalid because it constitutes a revision of, rather than an amendment to, the California Constitution?
(2) Does Proposition 8 violate the separation of powers doctrine under the California Constitution?
(3) If Proposition 8 is not unconstitutional, what is its effect, if any, on the marriages of same-sex couples performed before the adoption of Proposition 8?
Live broadcast of oral arguments will be available through the court-designated cable network California Channel [media website]. Sixty-three organizations have filed amicus briefs [briefs], forty-three on behalf of petitioners and twenty to uphold the ban.

In November, the California Supreme Court agreed [order, PDF; JURIST report] to hear the three cases [JURIST report], but denied petition to stay [text, PDF] its enforcement. Proposition 8 has become a focal point for gay rights, and during the campaign donors from across the US and several foreign countries contributed $83 million in total for both sides of the issue, setting US fundraising records [JURIST report].

About Paper Chase

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible format.

© Copyright JURIST Legal News and Research Services, Inc., 2013.