 |
|

Legal news from Thursday, December 11, 2008 |
 |
|


Illinois AG set to ask state supreme court to force Blagojevich from office
Jaclyn Belczyk on December 11, 2008 5:04 PM ET

[JURIST] Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan [official website] told CNN [transcript text] Thursday that she would go before the Illinois Supreme Court [official website] to have Governor Rod Blagojevich [official website] declared unfit to hold office if he did not resign or get impeached by the state legislature. Blagojevich and his chief of staff John Harris were arrested [JURIST report] Tuesday by agents from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) [official website] on charges of corruption [complaint, PDF]. Madigan told CNN: I am prepared to take action, but obviously, the easiest way for us to move on in the state of Illinois is for Governor Blagojevich to do the right thing for the people and resign. Now, it doesn't appear that he has any inclination to do that. Maybe things will change today or tomorrow. But [if] he fails to, then the two other options are obviously the legislator [sic] moving forward on impeachment, or I have the opportunity to actually go to our Illinois supreme court and ask them to declare, basically, that our governor is unable to serve, and to put in our lieutenant governor as the acting governor. Madigan issued a statement [press release] Tuesday calling for Blagojevich's resignation. President-elect Barack Obama has also called for Blagojevich's resignation.
Both Blagojevich and Harris have been charged [DOJ press release] with conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud and solicitation of bribery. They are accused of conspiring to sell or trade the Senate seat left vacant by Obama and obtaining illegal campaign contributions. They are also accused [Chicago Tribune report] of threatening to withhold assistance to the Chicago Tribune with the sale of Wrigley Field unless two editorial writers who had been critical of Blagojevich were fired. Both men were taken into federal custody early Tuesday morning and were released later in the day after appearing before a federal magistrate. Blagojevich reported to work on Wednesday and Thursday.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

EU members infringing free movement rights: report
Jaclyn Belczyk on December 11, 2008 4:18 PM ET

[JURIST] Vice President of the European Commission Responsible for Justice, Freedom, and Security Jacques Barrot [official website] on Wednesday reported [press release] that European Union (EU) [official website] governments are violating people's right to travel freely among the EU member states. Directive 2004/38/EC [materials] gives nationals of EU member states the right to move and reside freely among any of the states. According to the report, no member states have fully implemented the directive. The two biggest problems are the right of entry and residence of third country family members and the requirement of submitting additional documents for residence not foreseen in the directive. Barrot said: Free movement of persons constitutes one of the fundamental freedoms of the internal market, to the benefit of EU citizens, of the Member States and of the competitiveness of European economy. Flaws in the implementation of EU law in this field might result in a breach of the principles laying at the very core basis of the European construction. This is why the Commission will step up its efforts to ensure that EU citizens and their families effectively and fully enjoy their rights under the Directive. The Commission will use fully its powers under the Treaty to achieve this result, launching infringement proceedings when necessary, providing guidance to the Member States and ensuring that EU citizens are informed of their rights. Barrot added that the responsibility lies ultimately with the member states.
The free movement of people among EU member states is described as a fundamental right [EU materials], but not all members are satisfied with the current rules. Ireland has requested to amend [Irish Times report] the part of the directive giving non-EU spouses the right to live in Ireland, but this was rejected Thursday. Other states including Denmark and Italy have also taken issue with the directive.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

UN bans alleged terrorist front group suspected in Mumbai attacks
Jaclyn Belczyk on December 11, 2008 1:19 PM ET

[JURIST] The UN Security Council [official website] on Wednesday added [press release] the name of a Pakistani charity seen as a front for the group being blamed for the Mumbai terror attacks [BBC backgrounder] to its list of entities subject to asset freeze, travel ban, and arms embargo as a terrorist organization. At the urging of the Indian government [JURIST report], Jamaat-ud-Dawa was added as a pseudonym for the Pakistani terrorist group Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) [ADL backgrounder] that India blames for the attacks. The UN also added the names of four individuals, including LeT leader Zaki-ur-Rehman Lakhvi [START profile], who was arrested in a raid of a militant camp Sunday night. A spokesperson for the US State Department said [press release] the US was "pleased that the Committee has decided to move forward on these high-priority designations. These actions will limit the ability of known terrorists to travel, acquire weapons, plan, carry out, or raise funds for new terrorist attacks." One of Jamaat-ud-Dawa's leaders who was also added to the list, Hafiz Mohammed Saeed, said that the group will petition [AP report] the UN to overturn Wednesday's decision.
The attacks in Mumbai, which claimed at least 170 lives, were carried out at ten locations across the city, including the landmark Taj Mahal Palace hotel [hotel website]. In the wake of the attacks, Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh [official website] pushed for tougher anti-terrorism measures [JURIST report]. Pakistani officials said Tuesday that Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi [official profile] will not hand over to India [JURIST report] any Pakistani citizens arrested in connection with the attacks, insisting instead on a joint investigation with Indian officials. So far Pakistan has arrested more than 20 people believed to be responsible for the attacks.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|

US sees drop in executions, death sentences in 2008: report
Jaclyn Belczyk on December 11, 2008 12:11 PM ET

[JURIST] Executions in the US are at a 14-year low and the number of death sentences has dropped 60 percent since the 1990s, according to a report [text, PDF; DPIC press release, PDF] released Thursday by the Death Penalty Information Center (DPIC) [advocacy website], a non-profit organization that opposes the death penalty. There were 37 executions in 2008 with no more expected this year, down from 42 in 2007 and 98 in 1999. Ninety-five percent of those executions took place in the South, with Texas executing 18 inmates. Only 111 inmates were sentenced to death in 2008, down from 115 in 2007 and 284 in 1999. Public support of the death penalty has also dropped to 64 percent, down from 69 percent in 2007 and 71 percent in 1999. The report also pointed to problems illustrated by stays of executions and exonerations as well as the high costs associated with keeping inmates on death row.
Executions resumed in the US in April after the US Supreme Court lifted an effective moratorium by upholding lethal injection [JURIST reports]. The first execution following the ruling [JURIST report] was conducted in Georgia in May. New Jersey abolished the death penalty [JURIST report] last year. Last December, the UN General Assembly passed [JURIST report] a non-binding worldwide death penalty moratorium, calling for a suspension, rather than a complete abolition, of capital punishment.


Link |
|
subscribe |
|
latest newscast |
archive |
Facebook page

|
| For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...
|
|
|