JURIST Supported by the University of Pittsburgh
PAPER CHASE ARCHIVEDigest RSS feedFull RSS feed
Serious law. Primary sources. Global perspective.
Listen to Paper Chase!


Legal news from Friday, September 19, 2008




New class action filed over US warrantless surveillance program
Andrew Gilmore on September 19, 2008 4:30 PM ET

[JURIST] The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) [advocacy website] on Thursday filed a class action lawsuit [complaint, PDF; EFF press release] seeking injunctive, declaratory and equitable relief from the National Security Agency (NSA) [agency website] warrantless surveillance program [JURIST news archive], which gave government agencies access to over 300 terabytes of data concerning communication sent and received by AT&T [corporate website] customers. Filed on behalf of those customers, the suit names as defendants the US government, the NSA, President George W. Bush [official profile], Vice President Dick Cheney [official profile], and several other officials. EFF alleges violations of the First and Fourth Amendments, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) [text; JURIST news archive], and federal electronic surveillance law. The complaint also argues that the surveillance program violated the Federal Administrative Procedure Act [text] because it exceeded Congressionally-mandated limitations established by FISA, and alleges that it violates the Constitutional separation of powers principle

because it was authorized by the Executive in excess of the Executive’s authority under Article II of the United States Constitution ... and exceeds the statutory limits imposed on the Executive by Congress.
The New York Times has more.

The lawsuit filed Thursday follows an earlier class-action lawsuit [JURIST report] filed by EFF against AT&T in January 2006 over the company's participation in the warrantless surveillance program. The most recent lawsuit is aimed at the US government, reflecting the July amendment to FISA which granted retroactive immunity to telecommunications companies participating in the surveillance program. The amendment was signed into law [White House press release] by President Bush on July 10, after the US Senate voted 69-28 [roll call; JURIST report] to approve the amendment. Earlier that day, the Senate rejected three proposed amendments [WH fact sheet] to the bill that would have limited the immunity. In June, the US House of Representatives passed [roll call] HR 6304, amending FISA and including the granting of retroactive immunity. The bill also grants the FISA court [governing provisions] authority to review a wider range of wiretapping orders, would prohibit the executive branch from overriding the court's authority, and orders the Department of Justice [official website] and other agencies to issue a report on the country's use of wiretapping orders.





Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Cambodia genocide court to hold Khmer Rouge leader for additional year
Devin Montgomery on September 19, 2008 2:43 PM ET

[JURIST] The Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC) [official website; JURIST news archive] on Friday announced that former Khmer Rouge official Nuon Chea [PBS backgrounder] will be held for another year as prosecutors continue to build a war crimes case against him. Nuon Chea, known as Brother Number Two in the Khmer Rouge [BBC backgrounder], was arrested and charged [JURIST report] in September 2007. He has been in court custody since his arrest, and the court has rejected his lawyers' attempts to have him released [JURIST reports] until trial. AFP has more.

In February, a Cambodian genocide survivor testified against Nuon Chea [JURIST report] at a pre-trial hearing, marking the first time that a victim has ever taken the stand against a former Khmer Rouge official. The ECCC has said it plans to try as many as eight suspects [JURIST report] on charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity for their roles in the Khmer Rouge regime, which is generally held responsible for the genocide of an estimated 1.7 million Cambodians [PPU backgrounder] who died between 1975 and 1979. In June, the court announced plans [JURIST report] to complete operations a year early and to significantly reduce its budget, but said that it would still be able to prosecute all of its suspects despite the cutbacks.






Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


New York AG to investigate allegations of stock price manipulation
Devin Montgomery on September 19, 2008 2:43 PM ET

[JURIST] New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo [official website] Thursday said his department is conducting an investigation [AP report] into whether some investors used illegal methods to profit from recent declines in banking and insurance stocks. It is alleged that some investors combined the short-selling [Forbes backgrounder] of stock with the spreading of false information to illegally gain from recent devaluations in Lehman Brothers, AIG [corporate websites] and other stocks. Cuomo said his office will prosecute those found to have intentionally contributed to the declines under a New York law [Martin Act backgrounder, PDF], which gives him broad authority to investigate financial crimes. On Friday, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) implemented a temporary ban [press release; revised rules, PDF] on certain kinds of short-selling of key financial stocks in an attempt to stabilize their values [NYT report]. Bloomberg has more.

In an effort to better detect other kinds of financial fraud, including insider trading [JURIST news archive], in August the SEC announced [press release; JURIST report] that it had reached a tentative agreement [PDF text] with ten US stock exchanges to centralize insider trading controls among the institutions. Under that plan, the programs to prevent and detect insider trading will be monitored by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) and a section of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) [corporate websites], instead of having each exchange run its own program.






Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


US psychologist group bars participation in military interrogations
Leslie Schulman on September 19, 2008 2:35 PM ET

[JURIST] The American Psychological Association (APA) [official website] announced Wednesday that it had adopted a measure [petition text; APA press release] prohibiting members from participating in interrogations of terrorism suspects at Guantanamo Bay [JURIST news archive] and other military prisons where suspects have allegedly been tortured. The resolution, approved by a vote of 8,792 to 6,157 members, represents a reversal in position by the group, which last year rejected a similar ban [JURIST report]. The measure states:

Whereas torture is an abhorrent practice in every way contrary to the APA's stated mission of advancing psychology as a science, as a profession, and as a means of promoting human welfare.

Whereas the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Mental Health and the UN Special Rapporteur on Torture have determined that treatment equivalent to torture has been taking place at the United States Naval Base at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba.

Whereas this torture took place in the context of interrogations under the direction and supervision of Behavioral Science Consultation Teams (BSCTs) that included psychologists....

Be it resolved that psychologists may not work in settings where persons are held outside of, or in violation of, either International Law or the US Constitution, unless they are working directly for the persons being detained or for an independent third party working to protect human rights.
The resolution will take effect by the APA's next annual meeting, in August 2009. AP has more. The New York Sun has additional coverage.

Last year, APA members passed a resolution stating that the group opposed the use of torture and specifying which practices it found particularly inhumane, including mock executions, sleep deprivation and sexual humiliation. The American Medical Association [organization website] in 2006 adopted [JURIST report] ethical guidelines [text; press release] restricting physician participation in interrogations, following the approval of a similar policy [text; press release] by the American Psychiatric Association [organization website]. According to a report [PDF text] by the US Defense Department [official website], psychologists have been involved in military interrogations [JURIST news archive] since 2002. Mental health specialists were also reportedly involved in prisoner abuse scandals at Guantanamo and at Abu Ghraib prison [JURIST news archive] in Iraq.





Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


US Special Forces soldier charged with Afghanistan killing
Joe Shaulis on September 19, 2008 1:47 PM ET

[JURIST] A US Army Special Forces soldier faces court-martial proceedings [JURIST news archive] following his arraignment [press release] in connection with the killing of an Afghan man earlier this year. The Army announced Thursday that Master Sgt. Joseph D. Newell of the 3rd Special Forces Group (Airborne) [unit website] based at Fort Bragg, N.C., is charged under the Uniform Code of Military Justice with murder and related offenses [text]. He is accused of fatally shooting an unidentified Afghani near Hyderabad in March and then cutting an ear off the man's body. During an Article 32 preliminary hearing [JAG backgrounder] last month, a defense lawyer contended that the military had insufficient evidence against Newell. A court-martial is scheduled to convene on January 7. AP has more.

Last year, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) released documents [JURIST report] describing alleged crimes committed by US soldiers against civilians in Iraq and Afghanistan [JURIST news archive] but showing that troops believed they were following the law in most instances. The materials were made available in conjunction with a lawsuit the ACLU filed to compel the US military to release all documents relating to the deaths of civilians caused by US troops since January 2005. In 2006, court-martial proceedings against a group of US soldiers implicated in the abuse of detainees at Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan ended with only one conviction [JURIST report]. Three other soldiers pleaded guilty [JURIST report] to abusing prisoners at Bagram, two others pleaded guilty at the court-martial and five were acquitted. The Army dropped the charges against three others.






Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


China regulations clarify Labor Contract Law
Leslie Schulman on September 19, 2008 11:29 AM ET

[JURIST] The State Council of China [official website, in English] on Thursday issued regulations implementing ambiguous provisions of the Labor Contract Law [backgrounder] that took effect [JURIST report] at the beginning of this year. Among other clarifications, the regulations provide that contracts without a termination date do not have a lifetime term, instead specifying the circumstances in which employers or employees may unilaterally terminate. Although the law is viewed as a major advancement [IHT report] for employee rights, employers have complained that it has increased operational costs. The law requires workers to have written employment contracts, establishes a right to severance pay, sets a minimum wage and limits the amount of overtime that companies may ask employees to perform. Draft regulations were released [China Law & Practice report] in May. Following public comment, the final regulations were approved September 3 by the State Council, which is China's Cabinet. Xinhua has more.

The law was adopted [JURIST report] last June by the Standing Committee of China's National People's Congress [official website] amid revelations that labor officials had failed to report [JURIST report] the enslavement of hundreds of people at brick kilns in Shanxi and Henan provinces. Criminal charges were brought against government officials, and a State Council conference chaired by Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao [BBC profile] said that those who had enslaved workers or illegally employed children would be severely punished.






Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


US indicts 16 over dual-use electronics exports to Iran
Andrew Gilmore on September 19, 2008 11:15 AM ET

[JURIST] In an indictment unsealed on Wednesday, the US Department of Justice (DOJ) charged [indictment, PDF; DOJ press release] sixteen individuals and companies from Iran [JURIST news archive] and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) on thirteen counts related to alleged conspiracies to illegally export electronic components to Iran, in violation of US law and the US economic embargo against Iran. According to the indictment, many of the components were eventually found in improvised explosive devices (IEDs) used against coalition forces in Iraq. Specifically, the indictment alleges that the sixteen individuals and businesses engaged in conspiracies that entailed the ordering of electronic components, including microwave isolators, global positioning system (GPS) units, and microchips from US manufacturers through offices in Egypt, Malaysia, the Netherlands, and the UAE, then transporting them to Iran and eventually Iraq. None of the charged individuals is presently in US custody. The Washington Post has more.

The electronic components named in the indictment are considered "dual-use" technologies by the US, indicating that they have both civilian and military uses. The export of such technologies from the US is regulated by the US Department of Commerce Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) [official website].






Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


South African prosecutors to appeal invalidation of Zuma charges
Andrew Gilmore on September 19, 2008 8:43 AM ET

[JURIST] The South African National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) [official website] announced Thursday it would appeal [press release, PDF] a Pietermaritzburg High Court judgment invalidating corruption charges [JURIST report] against politician Jacob Zuma [BBC profile; JURIST news archive]. The NPA stated that the appeal will argue that the "court's interpretation of the Constitution and the NPA Act regarding the obligation to solicit representations before recharging was incorrect." The NPA's appeal will also be based on the impact the judgment has on the "operational process of the NPA." The corruption charges against Zuma were invalidated last Friday on procedural grounds [ruling, PDF text] because Zuma was not given the chance to respond to the allegations against him. Zuma was indicted [JURIST report] in December 2007 on charges of corruption, fraud, money laundering, and racketeering. Zuma has said that the charges were part of a politically-motivated effort by outgoing President Thabo Mbeki [official profile] to upset Zuma's plans to run in the 2009 presidential election. Zuma is seen as Mbeki's inevitable successor due to his position as president of the African National Congress (ANC) [party website], the South African ruling party. The New York Times has more. AP has additional coverage.

In late July, the South African Constitutional Court [official website] rejected a motion [opinion, PDF; JURIST report] by Zuma to exclude evidence from the corruption trial. Zuma had argued [JURIST report] that evidence seized in 2005 raids by the Directorate of Special Investigations [official backgrounder; BBC report] should be thrown out because the raids violated his rights to privacy and a fair trial. The court upheld the validity of the warrants used in the raids, confirming a November 2007 decision [JURIST report] by the South African Supreme Court of Appeal. The court also held [opinion, PDF; summary] that papers obtained by the Mauritius government [JURIST report] believed to document meetings between Zuma and arms manufacturer Thint were also admissible. Zuma has been facing corruption allegations [BBC timeline] and other charges for several years. He was first charged with corruption in 2005, but those charges were later dismissed [JURIST report] because prosecutors failed to follow proper procedures.






Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


US House passes Second Amendment Enforcement Act
Kiely Lewandowski on September 19, 2008 8:20 AM ET

[JURIST] The US House of Representatives [official website] on Thursday passed the Second Amendment Enforcement Act (H.R. 6842) [bill text], which would repeal multiple parts of the District of Columbia's Firearms Control Regulations Act of 1975, including its semiautomatic handgun ban, its registration requirements, and its mandate that any guns in the home be locked up and inoperable. The National Rifle Association-supported bill was passed despite protests from Congresswoman Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-DC) [official website] who introduced alternative legislation and argued [press release]:

The needless consideration of this issue, when the District was well on its way to substantially altering its gun own legislation, was all the more egregious because the city's representative could not vote on final passage.
Norton, the sole representative for the District of Columbia in the US Congress, cannot cast a final passage vote. Congressman Mark Souder (R-IN) [official website], one of the sponsors of the bill, responded [Fort Wayne Journal Gazette local coverage], "This Congress has lost faith in the willingness of the District of Columbia to defend the Second Amendment." The Senate must vote on the bill before it can take effect. AP has more.

Earlier this week, the District of Columbia City Council [official website] introduced new temporary measures [press release] to further tailor gun laws to July's Supreme Court decision in District of Columbia v. Heller [JURIST report; Duke Law backgrounder], in which the Court affirmed a decision invalidating the DC handgun ban [JURIST report]. Heller marked the first occasion that the Supreme Court directly addressed the Second Amendment since 1939's US v. Miller [case materials]. In July, the DC City Council had passed emergency legislation [JURIST report] to amend the city's long-standing ban on handguns immediately following Heller.





Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page


Ontario leaders renew call for Canada handgun ban
Kiely Lewandowski on September 19, 2008 7:55 AM ET

[JURIST] Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty [official website] on Thursday urged Canadian officials to embrace his call for an outright ban on handguns. Acknowledging that all federal leaders should use the upcoming October election to discuss the issue, McGuinty commented [The Globe and Mail local coverage]:

We have an opportunity as a distinct Canadian society to say, 'We are not going to do what other countries have. We're going to do everything we can to eliminate handguns.'
To combat increased gun violence in Canada's biggest city, Toronto Mayor David Miller [official website] launched a similar campaign for a country-wide handgun ban [official campaign website] last spring, stating [press release]:
Toronto continues to face unacceptable incidents of gun violence. These cannot be fully addressed without a total ban on handguns. Handguns are designed for one purpose and that is to kill people and have no place in our society. Statistics show that in jurisdictions with gun bans, supply is limited and shootings are less common.
The Toronto Star has more.

Last summer, Miller and several regional and city leaders, including Montreal Mayor Gerald Tremblay [official website], wrote to Prime Minister Stephen Harper [official website] urging [letter text, PDF] the federal government to support the domestic handgun ban and "do everything possible" to stop the flow of foreign handguns into the country. Prime Minister Harper has yet to support an outright prohibition on handguns, but maintains [Canwest News Service local coverage] that his government "needs to do more to deal with offenders who use guns to commit crimes."





Link | | subscribe | RSS feeds | latest newscast | archive | Facebook page

For more legal news check the Paper Chase Archive...


LATEST OP-ED

The War on Terror and the Need for Muslim Support
DOMESTIC
Faisal Kutty
Valparaiso University Law School

Get JURIST legal news delivered daily to your e-mail!

SYNDICATION

Add Paper Chase legal news to your RSS reader or personalized portal:
  • Add to Google
  • Add to My Yahoo!
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Add to My AOL

E-MAIL

Subscribe to Paper Chase by e-mail. JURIST offers a free once-a-day digest [sample]. Enter your e-mail address below. After subscribing and being returned to this page, please check your e-mail for a confirmation message.


R|mail e-mails individual Paper Chase posts through the day. Enter your e-mail address below. After subscribing and being returned to this page, please check your e-mail for a confirmation message.

PUBLICATION

Join top US law schools, federal appeals courts, law firms and legal organizations by publishing Paper Chase legal news on your public website or intranet.

JURIST offers a news ticker and preformatted headline boxes updated in real time. Get the code.

Feedroll provides free Paper Chase news boxes with headlines or digests precisely tailored to your website's look and feel, with content updated every 15 minutes. Customize and get the code.

ABOUT

Paper Chase is JURIST's real-time legal news service, powered by a team of 30 law student reporters and editors led by law professor Bernard Hibbitts at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law. As an educational service, Paper Chase is dedicated to presenting important legal news and materials rapidly, objectively and intelligibly in an accessible, ad-free format.

CONTACT

Paper Chase welcomes comments, tips and URLs from readers. E-mail us at JURIST@jurist.org